

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
Real Story Media
π Daily True Crime Stories | Unsolved Mysteries | Criminal Investigations | Cold Cases
True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether itβs breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates.
ποΈ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom dramaβgiving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why.
If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! π§ New episodes daily.
True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether itβs breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates.
ποΈ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom dramaβgiving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why.
If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! π§ New episodes daily.
Episodes
Mentioned books

Mar 22, 2026 β’ 48min
Kouri Richins: How a Circumstantial Case Without a Murder Weapon Ended in Conviction
This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Kouri Richins guilty verdict raises the legal question this case was always going to force: how does a prosecution without a murder weapon, a recovered drug, or a death certificate ruling of homicide still secure a conviction on all counts in three hours?Before the jury returned, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke provided the most precise pre-verdict legal and behavioral accounting of where this case stood. The defense rested without calling a single witness β Coffindaffer examined whether that reflected strategic confidence in the prosecution's weaknesses or the absence of viable witnesses to call. She addressed the recording that the state could not walk back: prosecutors' own detectives captured on audio telling star witness Carmen Lauber she needed to provide details that would ensure Kouri gets convicted of murder. The assessment of how much damage that audio could absorb is now answered by the verdict itself. Dreeke mapped the behavioral timeline β texts to a new boyfriend one month after Eric's death, memes on Kouri's phone the morning his body was found β and what that record communicates when analyzed against documented post-loss behavior patterns.Defense attorney Bob Motta then provides the post-conviction legal accounting alongside Dreeke. Eric Richins told multiple people he believed his wife was trying to poison him eighteen days before he died. The insurance policy timing. The forged signature. Three weeks of financial motive testimony. Motta examines what moved the jury and what this conviction establishes about the upper limit of circumstantial evidence prosecution when physical evidence is absent from the record entirely.Guilty on all counts. This is the legal map of how it happened.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #BobMotta #CircumstantialEvidence #EricRichins #MurderVerdict

Mar 21, 2026 β’ 1h 8min
Kouri Richins: The Circumstantial Case That Held β A Legal Breakdown of the Verdict
This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Kouri Richins guilty verdict demands a complete legal accounting of the evidence that built it and the defense strategy that failed to dismantle it. No murder weapon. No confession. No eyewitness. Prosecutors argued the case as death by a thousand cuts β and the jury returned guilty on all counts in three hours.Tony Brueski lays out the prosecution's record in full: the alleged $4.5 million debt, the housekeeper's testimony that she made four fentanyl runs at Kouri's request, the Valentine's Day poisoning attempt prosecutors argued came before the fatal dose, hundreds of deleted text messages, pre-arrest phone searches for "fentanyl poisoning" and "deleting iPhone messages," a jailhouse letter prosecutors said was written to coach family testimony, and a conversation Kouri allegedly had with her boyfriend two weeks after Eric died β asking him what it feels like to kill someone. Every piece circumstantial. Together, with no counter-narrative ever entered into the record, sufficient for a jury in three hours.Defense attorney Bob Motta examines the legal architecture of the defense's approach β the credibility attack on immunity witness Carmen Lauber, the argument that no physical drug evidence links Kouri to the fentanyl, and the theory that Eric Richins' death remains legally unexplained. He addresses the decision to rest without testimony through the lens of someone who has made that call: what it communicates about a defense team's assessment of their own position heading into closing arguments.Retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke adds the dimension no legal analysis alone captures: what a jury absorbs from three weeks of watching a defendant sit silently at the defense table β and whether that silence functions as strategy or simply registers as absence. Guilty on all counts.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #CircumstantialEvidence #DefenseRests #EricRichins #MurderVerdic

Mar 21, 2026 β’ 42min
Laken Snelling: The Manslaughter Charge, the Phone Record, and Whether the Evidence Holds
This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Laken Snelling case receives the legal and evidentiary examination it requires. University of Kentucky cheerleader Laken Snelling has been indicted on first-degree manslaughter following the death of her newborn son, who was found by her roommates on August 27, 2025 β wrapped in a towel inside a black trash bag in her closet. The Kentucky Medical Examiner confirmed the infant was born alive. Cause of death: asphyxia by undetermined means. Snelling is currently held at the Fayette County Detention Center facing up to 31 years.Tony Brueski lays out the evidentiary record in full: the deleted labor photos, the private week-by-week pregnancy tracking, and months of documented concealment that ran parallel to a public life including the April 2025 national cheerleading championship and social media posts about wanting to be a mother. The 4 a.m. timeline. The roommates' account. The word "guessed." The whimper she admitted hearing. The trash bag. All of it on the record before the legal analysis begins.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer assesses the prosecution's position with precision β whether the physical and digital evidence is sufficient to sustain a first-degree manslaughter charge through trial, what "guessed" is going to require the state to prove, and how the roommates' acceptance of the "I fainted" explanation factors into the evidentiary picture at trial. Behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke examines the phone record as documentation of intent β distinguishing active months-long parallel concealment from reactive denial and explaining why that distinction sits at the center of a conscious disregard argument.The broader legal question this case raises is one Coffindaffer and Dreeke address directly: what does prosecution look like when the defendant is 22, has no prior record, and doesn't match jury expectations β and the only witness who mattered had no voice? Laken Snelling has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LakenSnelling #LakenSnellingCase #TrueCrimeToday #FirstDegreeManslaughter #NeonaticideKentucky #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #PregnancyConcealment #LexingtonKentucky #KentuckyTrueCrime

Mar 21, 2026 β’ 1h 11min
Kouri Richins: How the Defense Strategy Collapsed β A Legal Breakdown of the Road to Guilty
This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, with the guilty verdict now on record, the legal decisions made during the final stretch of the Kouri Richins murder trial deserve a complete accounting. On Day 13, following the denial of a directed verdict motion and the final cross-examination of lead investigator Detective Jeff O'Driscoll, the defense rested without calling a single witness. Three were reportedly prepared. One hour behind closed doors. Then silence.Tony Brueski examines the legal architecture of that decision β the directed verdict standard, why it failed, and the procedural position the defense was in when that recess ended. Viewed against a guilty verdict on all counts returned in three hours, the choice to rest without testimony takes on added weight.Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, provides the most rigorous pre-verdict legal accounting of where this case was vulnerable and where it wasn't. The drug use theory had been challenged on three fronts: a judicial ruling, witness testimony from Eric's personal circle, and forensic toxicology. Both key prosecution witnesses held immunity agreements and altered their accounts. A detective's recorded statements were used against the state mid-trial. Faddis assessed each of these defense arguments with full credibility β and then turned to the deception record the jury ultimately had to weigh. A forged insurance signature. A jailhouse letter written as a destruction instruction. Phone searches. Text messages requesting fentanyl three days after Eric Richins died.The jury deliberated for three hours. This is the legal map of how the verdict got there.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #DefenseRests #DirectedVerdict #EricRichins #MurderVerdict #LegalStrategy

Mar 21, 2026 β’ 48min
Kouri Richins' Letter as Legal Evidence β What the Document Actually Tells Prosecutors
This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Walk the Dog letter is not treated as a news story. It is treated as an exhibit. Tony Brueski examines the six-page jailhouse letter attributed to Kouri Richins with the specificity the legal record demands β each section analyzed not for shock value but for evidentiary function. The Ronney witness narrative and what it establishes about alleged tampering intent. The airport drug story as a constructed defense mechanism rather than authentic recollection. The GMA media coordination and what it implies about narrative management. The Lotto suppression request. The Katie ask. The Crest whitening strips passage, which read carefully speaks directly to state of mind.That legal analysis extends into psychological territory with direct implications for how juries evaluate defendants. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott and former FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke examine the documented background of Kouri Richins and what behavioral research tells us about the development of deceptive conduct over time. Whether a pattern of behavior predates the alleged crime is not an academic question β it is often precisely what the government uses to build a consciousness of guilt argument.This is the legal and analytical work this case requires. Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #JailhouseLetter #WitnessTampering #ConsciousnessOfGuilt #EricRichins #MurderTrial #LegalAnalysis #WalkTheDog

Mar 21, 2026 β’ 14min
Kouri Richins: The Friend Said "Better If He Were Dead" β Why Every Perfect Crime Ends With Someone Talking
Kouri Richins is watching her story collapse in Utah. The friend who testified. The boyfriend. The housekeeper. The financial records.One by one, people are talking.This is Part 5 of The Perfect Wife β examining why the long con always ends.Denise Williams held hers together for seventeen years.Mike Williams disappeared December 2000. Duck hunting. Drowned, eaten by alligators.Denise collected $1.75 million in insurance. Five years later, she married Brian Winchester β Mike's best friend. The man who shot him.They raised Mike's daughter together. Built a life on top of what they'd done.Mike's mother Cheryl spent seventeen years fighting. Being called paranoid. Refusing to stop.She was right.Brian cracked in 2016. Divorce made the math simple: his survival mattered more than their secret. He confessed. Led investigators to Mike's body.Every perfect crime has witnesses. And witnesses talk when their survival is on the line.Kouri's foundation is cracking. The texts. The testimony. The financial records.The long con always ends. Not through brilliant detective work. Through human nature.People talk.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #DeniseWilliams #MikeWilliams #TrueCrimeToday #LongCon #BrianWinchester #PerfectWife #TrueCrime2026 #TheUnraveling #AccompliceTalks

Mar 20, 2026 β’ 59min
Three Women: Kouri, Nancy, and Kelsey. Three Crimes and Many Unanswered Questions
A murder conviction that shut the courtroom doors but opened a flood of new questions about whatβs next β thatβs Kouri Richins. A disappearance now stretching into its seventh week, packed with leads but still no arrest β Nancy Guthrie. And a cop-on-cop shooting where the officer who was shot now faces trial in front of a judge alone β Kelsey Fitzsimmons.Tony Brueski and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke dig into what no one else will: the holes in the stories, the decisions that donβt make sense, and the people left waiting for real answers. No summaries, no soft takes β just the hard questions these three stories demand.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #KelseyFitzsimmons #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #MurderVerdict #TucsonKidnapping #PoliceShootingTrial

Mar 20, 2026 β’ 13min
Murdaugh Legacy: The Dynasty Is Over β But Can Buster Escape What the Name Now Means?
The Murdaugh name meant power for a hundred years. Now it means murder.Part 5 of "The Name" explores what remains after the collapse. The victims still suffering β Gloria Satterfield's sons, Mallory Beach's family, every client Alex robbed. The survivors trying to rebuild.And Buster Murdaugh, the surviving son, carrying a name that will never mean what it used to mean.This episode asks the question anyone who's escaped a toxic family knows: How do you separate yourself from a legacy you didn't choose?The dynasty is over. The wreckage keeps spreading. And the people holding it didn't all choose to be there.You can't choose your family. But you can choose what you carry forward.Join Our Substack for AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter: https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BusterMurdaugh #MurdaughAftermath #MurdaughLegacy #AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughVictims #TrueCrime #GenerationalTrauma #MurdaughDynasty #BreakingFamilyPatterns

Mar 20, 2026 β’ 17min
Cop Shoots Cop β And the Officer Who Was Shot Is the One on Trial
Kelsey Fitzsimmons is a North Andover, Massachusetts police officer who was shot in the chest by a fellow officer at her own home in June 2025 β and she's the one facing criminal charges. Her trial on assault with a dangerous weapon begins March 23, and today she waived her right to a jury trial, placing her fate entirely in a judge's hands. The circumstances of the case are genuinely contested. Officers say Fitzsimmons pointed her service weapon at them when they arrived to serve a restraining order obtained by her fiancΓ© and remove her infant son. Fitzsimmons says she pointed the gun at herself β that she was in the grip of a postpartum mental health crisis and was trying to take her own life. There is no footage of the moment the gun was raised. Her legal team alleges her ex-fiancΓ© subsequently broke into her home while she was hospitalized and allegedly stole money and personal records β and that prosecutors have declined to charge him. In this listener Q&A, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke walk a new audience through every layer of this case and take on the questions that get to the heart of it: about mental health, about the system, about accountability, and about what justice looks like when the facts are this disputed.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KelseyFitzsimmons #TrueCrimeToday #RobinDreeke #NorthAndoverPolice #TrueCrime #PostpartumDepression #PoliceShootingTrial #CriminalTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #AssaultCharge

Mar 20, 2026 β’ 25min
Fitzsimmons Trial: Texts Unsealed, Jury Waived β The Double Standard This Case Exposes
The Kelsey Fitzsimmons assault trial opens Monday in Massachusetts β and two developments this week changed the entire shape of what happens next.Fitzsimmons waived her right to a jury trial. Judge Jeffrey Karp alone will decide whether the former North Andover police officer is guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon for allegedly pointing her service weapon at a colleague who came to serve a restraining order. She says she was pointing it at herself. He says she pointed it at him. There is no body camera footage. One judge picks.And the June 30th text exchange between Fitzsimmons and former fiancΓ© Justin Aylaian β the messages sent on the day of the shooting β was unsealed and admitted as evidence.Those texts are the story. And the story they tell is one that true crime coverage has been largely unwilling to say plainly.Read the patterns in that exchange. The dismissal of Aylaian's physical abuse allegation in four words. The child deployed as emotional leverage every time he tries to state a boundary. The financial threats pulled in rapid succession. His debit card and ID in her possession leaving him unable to move. His entire support network dismissed as liars. His tone β measured, factual, calm β against an escalation that never stops.Now ask the question True Crime Today is asking: if those messages had come from him, what would we call it?There would be no conversation about mental health softening the read. There would be a victim and a restraining order we would call necessary. The behavior in those messages has a name when a man sends it. It does not always get that name when a woman does.This episode examines the texts pattern by pattern, breaks down the bench trial decision from both strategic directions, and addresses the system failure that sent officers to that door with no crisis plan for a situation already flagged as dangerous. Both sides. Full context. The question the verdict won't answer.Trial starts Monday. This is the coverage it deserves.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KelseyFitzsimmons #NorthAndoverPolice #TrueCrime2026 #PostpartumDepression #HiddenKillers #JustinAylaian #BenchTrial #MaleAbuse #CoerciveControl #TrueCrimePodcast


