True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

He's been the face of the Nancy Guthrie investigation since day one — standing at podiums, giving interviews, telling the nation he has it handled. But in December 2025, six weeks before Nancy Guthrie disappeared, Chris Nanos sat in a sworn deposition and told an attorney he had never been suspended in forty years of law enforcement. The documents tell a completely different story.The Arizona Republic obtained his actual El Paso Police Department employment file. Eight suspensions. Thirty-seven days without pay. Twenty-six separate internal affairs allegations over five years. A robbery suspect who ended up in the hospital's intensive care unit. A grand jury convened to examine his conduct. And a forced resignation in August 1982 that he apparently buried for four decades — including on a publicly posted résumé that contained multiple inaccuracies, all in his favor.True Crime Today breaks down the full record: the El Paso years in detail, the unexplained two-year gap in his biography, the résumé discrepancies, the deposition answer, and the Pima County history that followed — a federal investigation into his own department, AG findings on a mishandled sexual assault case, the suppression of political opponents before an election, and now a formal recall with the clock running.Forty-seven days. No arrest. No suspect. No press conference. This is who has been running this case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #NancyGuthrieCase #SheriffMisconduct #ChrisNanos #LawEnforcementAccountability #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

A formal recall proceeding is now underway against the sheriff leading the Nancy Guthrie missing persons investigation, following documented evidence that sworn deposition testimony he provided regarding his prior law enforcement career was contradicted by official agency records. Those records reportedly reflect a separation rather than voluntary resignation, with a disciplinary history including excessive force findings, insubordination, and off-duty gambling violations.The legal implications are layered. A lead investigator with a documented credibility problem — now the subject of an active recall proceeding — affects not only the evidentiary weight of his statements about the case, but potentially the chain of custody and admissibility of evidence collected under his direction. Whether any material processed through this investigation will withstand a challenge to foundational reliability is a question that hasn't been fully litigated.Separately, the forensic picture carries procedural complications independent of the recall. The crime scene was reportedly released earlier than standard investigative protocol. Biological evidence was processed through a private laboratory rather than a government facility. Chain of custody has been publicly challenged. Forensic genetic genealogy is actively in play as an investigative tool, but its courtroom viability depends on whether the underlying biological samples remain legally defensible.January 24th has been added to the investigation's dates of interest alongside January 11th — both Saturdays, approximately two weeks apart. Camera footage from additional angles at Nancy Guthrie's property was reviewed and yielded nothing. The suspect does not appear beyond a single doorbell image. FBI veterans have publicly stated the ransom motive appears increasingly unlikely, which would require a fundamental reassessment of the current investigative framework and suspect profile.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines the legal and procedural stakes in this conversation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SheriffRecall #TrueCrimeLaw #MissingPersonsCase #ForensicGenealogy #EvidenceChainOfCustody #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrimeToday #CriminalJustice #RecallProceeding

The Kelsey Fitzsimmons bench trial rests on a question of specific intent — and the answer to that question determines whether she faces up to five years in prison or walks out of court free.Fitzsimmons, a law enforcement officer on documented medical leave for postpartum depression at the time of the incident, is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon following a June 30, 2025, encounter with officers who arrived at her home to execute a restraining order and remove her infant. She sustained a gunshot wound and spent 53 days hospitalized with a collapsed lung. Her position is that she was attempting to take her own life. The responding officer's account is that the firearm was directed at him.With no neutral third-party witnesses and competing sworn accounts from the two individuals present at the moment of discharge, the evidentiary core of this case is a credibility determination. The bench trial format places that determination entirely in the hands of a single judge, removing the lay jury that is typically the finder of fact in criminal proceedings.That waiver is legally significant. The defendant's mental state at the moment of the alleged offense is central to her defense. Postpartum depression and documented psychological crisis are part of the record. Whether a single judge applies the appropriate analytical weight to those clinical factors — compared to twelve lay jurors, some of whom might have personal experience with postpartum mental health — is a strategic question with no clean answer.Also unresolved: the alleged conduct of her ex during her hospitalization, including home entry, account access, and removal of a document favorable to the defense. Prosecutors declined to pursue charges. That decision is part of the legal context examined directly in this conversation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KelseyFitzsimmons #BenchTrial #TrueCrimeLaw #AssaultWithADangerousWeapon #SpecificIntent #PostpartumDepression #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrimeToday #CriminalLaw #LegalAnalysis

This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Murdaugh case is examined from the two structural angles that explain everything that followed — the legal and institutional dynasty that produced Alex Murdaugh, and the financial and behavioral architecture he built and maintained inside it.Part 1 of The Name establishes the foundation. For eighty-six years, three generations of Murdaughs served as solicitors in South Carolina's 14th Circuit, controlling prosecutorial decisions across the lowcountry. The legal implications of that kind of multigenerational institutional power are significant: it creates a parallel system in which accountability is selectively applied, in which the family occupies a position above the law they nominally enforce. Part 1 examines what that environment produces — the psychology of entitlement that develops when consequences are genuinely optional, the toxic family system dynamics that normalize the suppression of accountability, and the specific way that upbringing shaped the man who would eventually steal millions from his own clients and murder his wife and son.Part 2 documents the financial and behavioral record that ran underneath the performance. The fraud was not a single act of desperation — it was a sustained, escalating operation involving millions stolen from clients over years, maintained alongside a serious opioid addiction that required its own concealment infrastructure. Maggie Murdaugh was consulting divorce attorneys. The Mallory Beach boat crash in 2019 — resulting in the death of a young woman and a cover-up that implicated the family directly — was the first point at which the system that had protected the Murdaugh name for generations faced a test it couldn't simply absorb. Part 2 examines covert narcissism as a behavioral and legal framework: how it performs respectability, how it manages exposure, and what the documented record of Alex Murdaugh's conduct looks like when analyzed through that lens.The crime didn't begin at the dog kennels on June 7, 2021. It began with a name.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughDynasty #MurdaughFraud #MurdaughTrial #CovertNarcissist #MalloryBeach #MaggieAndPaul #TrueCrimeToday #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime

Jennifer Coffindaffer, retired FBI special agent with investigative and forensic experience, breaks down the Guthrie investigation. She discusses the 40+ day evidence record, why cadaver dogs were stood down, the limits of mixed DNA and the glove lead, and how digital forensics and statistics reshape the search. Short, clear takes on investigative choices and what the current trail actually means.

This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Kouri Richins conviction gets examined through the two behavioral and evidentiary threads that make it most legible — the pattern of public narrative construction in the aftermath of an alleged murder, and the documented history of victims who identified their killers before they died.After Eric Richins died, Kouri Richins wrote a children's book about a father who becomes a firefly and went on morning shows to perform grief on national television. Prosecutors say she killed him. Tony Brueski examines that conduct through the case that makes the underlying compulsion most explicit. Nancy Crampton-Brophy published an essay in 2011 titled "How to Murder Your Husband" — under her real name, discussing methods, discussing freedom from imprisonment. Seven years later she shot her husband Daniel twice in the chest. The essay was ruled too old for trial. The jury convicted her anyway, on evidence that included traceable gun purchases and her own vehicle placing her at the scene. The prosecutorial and behavioral significance of a defendant who cannot resist public self-expression — even when that expression documents motive — is the thread connecting both cases.The evidentiary parallel on the victim side is equally significant. Eric Richins told friends after Valentine's Day 2022 that he believed Kouri was poisoning him following a serious illness. Prosecutors allege she administered five times the lethal dose of fentanyl approximately one month later. Bobby Curley, hospitalized on September 22, 1991, took a nurse's arm and stated explicitly: "Please help me. My wife is trying to kill me. She is not as she seems." He died the following morning. Joann Curley had been administering thallium to his iced tea for eleven months — confirmed by post-mortem hair analysis at nine hundred times the lethal dose. She collected a $1.7 million settlement two days before his death.Both victims named what was happening to them. In neither case was it enough. The legal and behavioral record this week's coverage examines explains why.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #NancyCramptonBrophy #JoannCurley #BobbyCurley #TrueCrimeToday #PerfectWife #WifePoisoner #NarcissistKiller #TrueCrime

This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the legal aftermath of the Kouri Richins conviction gets its most rigorous examination — alongside the prosecutorial framework of premeditated spousal murder that the case sits within.Tony Brueski, defense attorney Bob Motta, and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke work through the appellate record the defense constructed across three weeks of preserved rulings. The coaching video — investigators on tape directing Carmen Lauber to supply details ensuring a murder conviction — was presented to the jury, who returned guilty on all counts in three hours. Motta assesses what that outcome means for any appeal built around it. The hearsay ruling excluding testimony about Eric allegedly inquiring about obtaining fentanyl is examined — including the fact that the defense ultimately withdrew from pursuing it. The denied spoliation instruction over a missing pill bottle and the informant instruction issued for Lauber, the prosecution's sole direct link between Kouri and the fentanyl, each receive the legal weight they carry in a post-conviction proceeding. Motta is direct about which arguments have genuine appellate traction and which are preserved for the record but unlikely to move a reviewing court.The premeditation dimension of the prosecution's case is examined through Melanie McGuire — a case that provides the most documented parallel to the behavioral pattern prosecutors argued defined Kouri Richins' conduct. McGuire attended a real estate closing with her husband, signed mortgage documents alongside him, and allegedly killed and dismembered him hours later. She filed a restraining order against him two days later while allegedly still managing the disposal of his remains. Her digital search history — "undetectable poisons," "how to commit murder," "fatal insulin doses" — became the evidentiary foundation of her conviction. Prosecutors argued Kouri conducted fentanyl searches while Eric was alive, maintained a secret $250,000 HELOC, and conducted a second life that included texting a boyfriend about marriage.Premeditation in the legal record doesn't require a confession. It requires a pattern. Both cases built one.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #MelanieMcGuire #CriminalAppeal #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #PremeditatedMurder #EricRichins #UtahMurderTrial

This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Kouri Richins conviction demands two distinct legal examinations. The first is the defense strategy — zero witnesses, no affirmative case, everything built on reasonable doubt — and why it failed. The second is the financial record the prosecution used to establish motive, and why the defense narrative built around it never held up to scrutiny.Tony Brueski, defense attorney Bob Motta, and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke break down the defense's approach with the precision the verdict now requires. The jury watched video of investigators directing star witness Carmen Lauber to provide details that would ensure a murder conviction — before she changed her story. The lead detective confirmed under oath that four years of investigation found no fentanyl connected to Eric Richins' death. Lauber's credibility was damaged on cross-examination and further compromised when drug court violations surfaced mid-trial. Motta identifies the strategic decision he believes cost the defense the verdict. Dreeke examines how juries process cumulative behavioral evidence — what three weeks of silence at the defense table communicates before closing arguments begin.The financial record receives its full accounting in the second piece of this week's coverage. The defense framed Kouri Richins as a woman trapped in a controlling marriage. The documented record — forensic accountant testimony, court filings, civil records, charging documents — shows a secretly obtained HELOC draining marital accounts, falsified business documents used for fraudulent loans, $45,000 taken from a personal friend for a deal that never closed, and a home sold with alleged concealed defects. Roughly $7.5 million in business debt by the time Eric died. His legal response was a private estate restructuring specifically citing recently discovered and ongoing financial abuse. He made no public accusation. He stayed in the marriage. According to prosecutors, he was dead a year and a half later.The prosecution called it motive. The jury agreed.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #DefenseStrategy #FinancialFraud #EricRichins #MurderVerdict

This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Kouri Richins guilty verdict raises the legal question this case was always going to force: how does a prosecution without a murder weapon, a recovered drug, or a death certificate ruling of homicide still secure a conviction on all counts in three hours?Before the jury returned, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke provided the most precise pre-verdict legal and behavioral accounting of where this case stood. The defense rested without calling a single witness — Coffindaffer examined whether that reflected strategic confidence in the prosecution's weaknesses or the absence of viable witnesses to call. She addressed the recording that the state could not walk back: prosecutors' own detectives captured on audio telling star witness Carmen Lauber she needed to provide details that would ensure Kouri gets convicted of murder. The assessment of how much damage that audio could absorb is now answered by the verdict itself. Dreeke mapped the behavioral timeline — texts to a new boyfriend one month after Eric's death, memes on Kouri's phone the morning his body was found — and what that record communicates when analyzed against documented post-loss behavior patterns.Defense attorney Bob Motta then provides the post-conviction legal accounting alongside Dreeke. Eric Richins told multiple people he believed his wife was trying to poison him eighteen days before he died. The insurance policy timing. The forged signature. Three weeks of financial motive testimony. Motta examines what moved the jury and what this conviction establishes about the upper limit of circumstantial evidence prosecution when physical evidence is absent from the record entirely.Guilty on all counts. This is the legal map of how it happened.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #BobMotta #CircumstantialEvidence #EricRichins #MurderVerdict

This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Kouri Richins guilty verdict demands a complete legal accounting of the evidence that built it and the defense strategy that failed to dismantle it. No murder weapon. No confession. No eyewitness. Prosecutors argued the case as death by a thousand cuts — and the jury returned guilty on all counts in three hours.Tony Brueski lays out the prosecution's record in full: the alleged $4.5 million debt, the housekeeper's testimony that she made four fentanyl runs at Kouri's request, the Valentine's Day poisoning attempt prosecutors argued came before the fatal dose, hundreds of deleted text messages, pre-arrest phone searches for "fentanyl poisoning" and "deleting iPhone messages," a jailhouse letter prosecutors said was written to coach family testimony, and a conversation Kouri allegedly had with her boyfriend two weeks after Eric died — asking him what it feels like to kill someone. Every piece circumstantial. Together, with no counter-narrative ever entered into the record, sufficient for a jury in three hours.Defense attorney Bob Motta examines the legal architecture of the defense's approach — the credibility attack on immunity witness Carmen Lauber, the argument that no physical drug evidence links Kouri to the fentanyl, and the theory that Eric Richins' death remains legally unexplained. He addresses the decision to rest without testimony through the lens of someone who has made that call: what it communicates about a defense team's assessment of their own position heading into closing arguments.Retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke adds the dimension no legal analysis alone captures: what a jury absorbs from three weeks of watching a defendant sit silently at the defense table — and whether that silence functions as strategy or simply registers as absence. Guilty on all counts.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #CircumstantialEvidence #DefenseRests #EricRichins #MurderVerdic