True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Kouri Richins has been convicted of first-degree murder in the death of her husband Eric Richins following a Summit County trial in which the prosecution established he died from a lethal dose of fentanyl administered without his knowledge. The jury reached its verdict despite the absence of a physically recovered murder weapon and credibility challenges to the prosecution's star witness — a combination that in many cases is sufficient to support a reasonable doubt defense.The documentary record proved central. Approximately 18 months before his death, Eric Richins executed a formal estate restructuring with communications to his attorney explicitly stating his purpose was to protect his children from Kouri Richins. That prior legal act — memorialized in attorney-client correspondence by the victim himself before his death — provided the jury with a pre-mortem account of the domestic circumstances that no trial witness could have independently provided or undermined.The financial evidence amplified that foundation: undisclosed debts attributed to Kouri Richins, insurance policies Eric Richins allegedly had no knowledge of, and alleged signature forgeries. No individual element was independently dispositive. As a cumulative pattern, they constructed a motive framework the defense chose not to address through testimony.The appellate record carries material worth evaluating. A coaching video connected to the prosecution's star witness raised procedural concerns. That witness sustained public credibility damage during cross-examination. The lead detective's sworn testimony included an acknowledgment that fentanyl was not physically recovered from the crime scene. Whether those issues satisfy the threshold for reversible error requires analysis of whether they individually or cumulatively affected the verdict in a way an appellate court would deem prejudicial.Sentencing follows conviction. The position Kouri Richins takes at that proceeding — continued assertion of innocence or expression of remorse — carries both legal and strategic implications for the appeal timeline.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrimeLaw #FentanylMurder #GuiltyVerdict #AppealAnalysis #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #CriminalJustice #MurderConviction

Former 19 Kids and Counting star Joseph Garrett Duggar was arrested on March 18th, 2026 on serious charges involving a minor. According to the Bay County Sheriff's Office in Florida, Duggar allegedly harmed a young girl on multiple occasions during a 2020 family vacation in Panama City Beach. The victim, now 14, came forward during a recent forensic interview. When her father confronted Duggar, he allegedly admitted it. When a detective was placed on that same call, he allegedly admitted it again.Joseph is the younger brother of Josh Duggar, currently serving 12 and a half years in federal prison following a 2021 conviction on federal charges involving illegal content depicting minors. Before Josh's federal conviction, it was revealed he had harmed five young victims between 2002 and 2003 — four of them his own sisters. Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar knew and chose internal church counseling over reporting it to law enforcement. The statute of limitations ran out. No charges were ever filed.According to Fox 5 Atlanta, Jim Bob and Michelle reportedly told authorities they were aware of the allegations involving Joseph and reportedly handled the matter through internal church counseling rather than contacting police. That reporting has not been independently confirmed and neither has publicly commented.On Hidden Killers, host Tony Brueski goes beyond the arrest and into the machinery behind it — the IBLP fundamentalist belief system that taught that silence was a virtue and obedience to male authority was non-negotiable, the step-by-step timeline of how prior allegations were handled inside this family over more than a decade, the fact that Jim Bob publicly campaigned on the harshest possible platform for exactly these types of offenses in 2002 while his family was managing a similar situation at home, TLC's decade of profits from this family, and the Duggar children who finally walked away and what they had to say when they did.Joseph Duggar awaits extradition to Florida. The family has not issued a statement. The pattern has.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #DuggarArrested #19KidsAndCounting #JimBobDuggar #IBLP #JoshDuggar #DuggarFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #FundamentalistChristianity

He's been the face of the Nancy Guthrie investigation since day one — standing at podiums, giving interviews, telling the nation he has it handled. But in December 2025, six weeks before Nancy Guthrie disappeared, Chris Nanos sat in a sworn deposition and told an attorney he had never been suspended in forty years of law enforcement. The documents tell a completely different story.The Arizona Republic obtained his actual El Paso Police Department employment file. Eight suspensions. Thirty-seven days without pay. Twenty-six separate internal affairs allegations over five years. A robbery suspect who ended up in the hospital's intensive care unit. A grand jury convened to examine his conduct. And a forced resignation in August 1982 that he apparently buried for four decades — including on a publicly posted résumé that contained multiple inaccuracies, all in his favor.True Crime Today breaks down the full record: the El Paso years in detail, the unexplained two-year gap in his biography, the résumé discrepancies, the deposition answer, and the Pima County history that followed — a federal investigation into his own department, AG findings on a mishandled sexual assault case, the suppression of political opponents before an election, and now a formal recall with the clock running.Forty-seven days. No arrest. No suspect. No press conference. This is who has been running this case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #NancyGuthrieCase #SheriffMisconduct #ChrisNanos #LawEnforcementAccountability #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

A formal recall proceeding is now underway against the sheriff leading the Nancy Guthrie missing persons investigation, following documented evidence that sworn deposition testimony he provided regarding his prior law enforcement career was contradicted by official agency records. Those records reportedly reflect a separation rather than voluntary resignation, with a disciplinary history including excessive force findings, insubordination, and off-duty gambling violations.The legal implications are layered. A lead investigator with a documented credibility problem — now the subject of an active recall proceeding — affects not only the evidentiary weight of his statements about the case, but potentially the chain of custody and admissibility of evidence collected under his direction. Whether any material processed through this investigation will withstand a challenge to foundational reliability is a question that hasn't been fully litigated.Separately, the forensic picture carries procedural complications independent of the recall. The crime scene was reportedly released earlier than standard investigative protocol. Biological evidence was processed through a private laboratory rather than a government facility. Chain of custody has been publicly challenged. Forensic genetic genealogy is actively in play as an investigative tool, but its courtroom viability depends on whether the underlying biological samples remain legally defensible.January 24th has been added to the investigation's dates of interest alongside January 11th — both Saturdays, approximately two weeks apart. Camera footage from additional angles at Nancy Guthrie's property was reviewed and yielded nothing. The suspect does not appear beyond a single doorbell image. FBI veterans have publicly stated the ransom motive appears increasingly unlikely, which would require a fundamental reassessment of the current investigative framework and suspect profile.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines the legal and procedural stakes in this conversation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SheriffRecall #TrueCrimeLaw #MissingPersonsCase #ForensicGenealogy #EvidenceChainOfCustody #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrimeToday #CriminalJustice #RecallProceeding

The Kelsey Fitzsimmons bench trial rests on a question of specific intent — and the answer to that question determines whether she faces up to five years in prison or walks out of court free.Fitzsimmons, a law enforcement officer on documented medical leave for postpartum depression at the time of the incident, is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon following a June 30, 2025, encounter with officers who arrived at her home to execute a restraining order and remove her infant. She sustained a gunshot wound and spent 53 days hospitalized with a collapsed lung. Her position is that she was attempting to take her own life. The responding officer's account is that the firearm was directed at him.With no neutral third-party witnesses and competing sworn accounts from the two individuals present at the moment of discharge, the evidentiary core of this case is a credibility determination. The bench trial format places that determination entirely in the hands of a single judge, removing the lay jury that is typically the finder of fact in criminal proceedings.That waiver is legally significant. The defendant's mental state at the moment of the alleged offense is central to her defense. Postpartum depression and documented psychological crisis are part of the record. Whether a single judge applies the appropriate analytical weight to those clinical factors — compared to twelve lay jurors, some of whom might have personal experience with postpartum mental health — is a strategic question with no clean answer.Also unresolved: the alleged conduct of her ex during her hospitalization, including home entry, account access, and removal of a document favorable to the defense. Prosecutors declined to pursue charges. That decision is part of the legal context examined directly in this conversation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KelseyFitzsimmons #BenchTrial #TrueCrimeLaw #AssaultWithADangerousWeapon #SpecificIntent #PostpartumDepression #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrimeToday #CriminalLaw #LegalAnalysis

This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Murdaugh case is examined from the two structural angles that explain everything that followed — the legal and institutional dynasty that produced Alex Murdaugh, and the financial and behavioral architecture he built and maintained inside it.Part 1 of The Name establishes the foundation. For eighty-six years, three generations of Murdaughs served as solicitors in South Carolina's 14th Circuit, controlling prosecutorial decisions across the lowcountry. The legal implications of that kind of multigenerational institutional power are significant: it creates a parallel system in which accountability is selectively applied, in which the family occupies a position above the law they nominally enforce. Part 1 examines what that environment produces — the psychology of entitlement that develops when consequences are genuinely optional, the toxic family system dynamics that normalize the suppression of accountability, and the specific way that upbringing shaped the man who would eventually steal millions from his own clients and murder his wife and son.Part 2 documents the financial and behavioral record that ran underneath the performance. The fraud was not a single act of desperation — it was a sustained, escalating operation involving millions stolen from clients over years, maintained alongside a serious opioid addiction that required its own concealment infrastructure. Maggie Murdaugh was consulting divorce attorneys. The Mallory Beach boat crash in 2019 — resulting in the death of a young woman and a cover-up that implicated the family directly — was the first point at which the system that had protected the Murdaugh name for generations faced a test it couldn't simply absorb. Part 2 examines covert narcissism as a behavioral and legal framework: how it performs respectability, how it manages exposure, and what the documented record of Alex Murdaugh's conduct looks like when analyzed through that lens.The crime didn't begin at the dog kennels on June 7, 2021. It began with a name.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughDynasty #MurdaughFraud #MurdaughTrial #CovertNarcissist #MalloryBeach #MaggieAndPaul #TrueCrimeToday #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime

Jennifer Coffindaffer, retired FBI special agent with investigative and forensic experience, breaks down the Guthrie investigation. She discusses the 40+ day evidence record, why cadaver dogs were stood down, the limits of mixed DNA and the glove lead, and how digital forensics and statistics reshape the search. Short, clear takes on investigative choices and what the current trail actually means.

This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Kouri Richins conviction gets examined through the two behavioral and evidentiary threads that make it most legible — the pattern of public narrative construction in the aftermath of an alleged murder, and the documented history of victims who identified their killers before they died.After Eric Richins died, Kouri Richins wrote a children's book about a father who becomes a firefly and went on morning shows to perform grief on national television. Prosecutors say she killed him. Tony Brueski examines that conduct through the case that makes the underlying compulsion most explicit. Nancy Crampton-Brophy published an essay in 2011 titled "How to Murder Your Husband" — under her real name, discussing methods, discussing freedom from imprisonment. Seven years later she shot her husband Daniel twice in the chest. The essay was ruled too old for trial. The jury convicted her anyway, on evidence that included traceable gun purchases and her own vehicle placing her at the scene. The prosecutorial and behavioral significance of a defendant who cannot resist public self-expression — even when that expression documents motive — is the thread connecting both cases.The evidentiary parallel on the victim side is equally significant. Eric Richins told friends after Valentine's Day 2022 that he believed Kouri was poisoning him following a serious illness. Prosecutors allege she administered five times the lethal dose of fentanyl approximately one month later. Bobby Curley, hospitalized on September 22, 1991, took a nurse's arm and stated explicitly: "Please help me. My wife is trying to kill me. She is not as she seems." He died the following morning. Joann Curley had been administering thallium to his iced tea for eleven months — confirmed by post-mortem hair analysis at nine hundred times the lethal dose. She collected a $1.7 million settlement two days before his death.Both victims named what was happening to them. In neither case was it enough. The legal and behavioral record this week's coverage examines explains why.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #NancyCramptonBrophy #JoannCurley #BobbyCurley #TrueCrimeToday #PerfectWife #WifePoisoner #NarcissistKiller #TrueCrime

This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the legal aftermath of the Kouri Richins conviction gets its most rigorous examination — alongside the prosecutorial framework of premeditated spousal murder that the case sits within.Tony Brueski, defense attorney Bob Motta, and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke work through the appellate record the defense constructed across three weeks of preserved rulings. The coaching video — investigators on tape directing Carmen Lauber to supply details ensuring a murder conviction — was presented to the jury, who returned guilty on all counts in three hours. Motta assesses what that outcome means for any appeal built around it. The hearsay ruling excluding testimony about Eric allegedly inquiring about obtaining fentanyl is examined — including the fact that the defense ultimately withdrew from pursuing it. The denied spoliation instruction over a missing pill bottle and the informant instruction issued for Lauber, the prosecution's sole direct link between Kouri and the fentanyl, each receive the legal weight they carry in a post-conviction proceeding. Motta is direct about which arguments have genuine appellate traction and which are preserved for the record but unlikely to move a reviewing court.The premeditation dimension of the prosecution's case is examined through Melanie McGuire — a case that provides the most documented parallel to the behavioral pattern prosecutors argued defined Kouri Richins' conduct. McGuire attended a real estate closing with her husband, signed mortgage documents alongside him, and allegedly killed and dismembered him hours later. She filed a restraining order against him two days later while allegedly still managing the disposal of his remains. Her digital search history — "undetectable poisons," "how to commit murder," "fatal insulin doses" — became the evidentiary foundation of her conviction. Prosecutors argued Kouri conducted fentanyl searches while Eric was alive, maintained a secret $250,000 HELOC, and conducted a second life that included texting a boyfriend about marriage.Premeditation in the legal record doesn't require a confession. It requires a pattern. Both cases built one.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #MelanieMcGuire #CriminalAppeal #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #PremeditatedMurder #EricRichins #UtahMurderTrial

This week in True Crime Today's Week in Review, the Kouri Richins conviction demands two distinct legal examinations. The first is the defense strategy — zero witnesses, no affirmative case, everything built on reasonable doubt — and why it failed. The second is the financial record the prosecution used to establish motive, and why the defense narrative built around it never held up to scrutiny.Tony Brueski, defense attorney Bob Motta, and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke break down the defense's approach with the precision the verdict now requires. The jury watched video of investigators directing star witness Carmen Lauber to provide details that would ensure a murder conviction — before she changed her story. The lead detective confirmed under oath that four years of investigation found no fentanyl connected to Eric Richins' death. Lauber's credibility was damaged on cross-examination and further compromised when drug court violations surfaced mid-trial. Motta identifies the strategic decision he believes cost the defense the verdict. Dreeke examines how juries process cumulative behavioral evidence — what three weeks of silence at the defense table communicates before closing arguments begin.The financial record receives its full accounting in the second piece of this week's coverage. The defense framed Kouri Richins as a woman trapped in a controlling marriage. The documented record — forensic accountant testimony, court filings, civil records, charging documents — shows a secretly obtained HELOC draining marital accounts, falsified business documents used for fraudulent loans, $45,000 taken from a personal friend for a deal that never closed, and a home sold with alleged concealed defects. Roughly $7.5 million in business debt by the time Eric died. His legal response was a private estate restructuring specifically citing recently discovered and ongoing financial abuse. He made no public accusation. He stayed in the marriage. According to prosecutors, he was dead a year and a half later.The prosecution called it motive. The jury agreed.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #DefenseStrategy #FinancialFraud #EricRichins #MurderVerdict