Recsperts - Recommender Systems Experts

In episode 31 of Recsperts, I sit down with Elisabeth Lex, Full Professor of Human-Computer Interfaces and Inclusive Technologies at Graz University of Technology and a leading researcher at the intersection of recommender systems, psychology, and human–computer interaction. Together, we explore how recommender systems can become truly human-centric by integrating cognitive, emotional, and personality-aware models into their design.Elisabeth begins by addressing a common reductionism in the field: treating users primarily as data points rather than as humans with goals, emotions, memories, and cognitive boundaries. We revisit the origins of psychology-informed recommendation, including the Grundy system -the first recommender system, built nearly 50 years ago - which framed book recommendation through stereotype modeling. From there, we discuss how the community’s focus shifted toward solving recommendation mainly as an algorithmic optimization problem, often sidelining richer models of human decision-making.We then map out the three major branches of psychology-informed RecSys - cognition-inspired, affect-aware, and personality-aware - and dive into practical examples. Elisabeth walks us through her work on modeling music re-listening behavior using cognitive architectures such as ACT-R (Adaptive Control of Thought–Rational) and shows how cognitive constructs like memory decay, attention, and familiarity can meaningfully augment standard approaches like collaborative filtering. We also explore how hybrid systems that combine cognitive models with collaborative filtering can yield not just higher accuracy but also more novelty, diversity, and clearer explanations.Our conversation also turns to user-centric evaluation. Elisabeth argues that accuracy metrics alone cannot tell us whether a system is genuinely helpful. Instead, we must measure attitudes, perceptions, motivations, and emotional responses - while carefully accounting for cognitive biases, UI effects, and users’ lived experiences.Towards the end, Elisabeth discusses emerging research directions such as hybrid AI (symbolic + sub-symbolic methods), the role of LLMs and agents, the risks of replacing human studies with automated evaluations, and the responsibility our community has to understand users beyond their clicks.Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS – Recommender Systems Experts.Don’t forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review.(00:00) - Introduction (03:15) - About Elisabeth Lex (07:55) - Grundy, the first Recommender System (09:03) - Bridging the Gap between Psychology and Modern RecSys (17:21) - On how and when Elisabeth became a Researcher (21:39) - Survey on Psychology-Informed RecSys (39:29) - Personality-Aware Recommendation (49:43) - Affect- and Emotion-Aware Recommendation (01:01:37) - Cognition-Inspired Recommendation and the ACT-R Framework (01:14:39) - Combining Collaborative Filtering and ACT-R for Explainability (01:21:26) - Human-Centered Design (01:26:15) - Further Challenges and Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Elisabeth Lex on LinkedInWebsite of ElisabethAI for Society LabFirst International Workshop on Recommender Systems for Sustainability and Social Good | co-located with RecSys 2024Second International Workshop on Recommender Systems for Sustainability and Social Good | co-located with RecSys 2025HyPer Workshop: Hybrid AI for Human-Centric PersonalizationTutorial on Psychology-Informed RecSysACT-R: Adaptive Control of Thought-RationalPOPROX: Platform for OPen Recommendation and Online eXperimentationPapers:Elaine Rich (1979): User Modeling via StereotypesLex et al. (2021): Psychology-informed Recommender SystemsReiter-Haas et al. (2021): Predicting Music Relistening Behavior Using the ACT-R FrameworkMoscati et al. (2023): Integrating the ACT-R Framework with Collaborative Filtering for Explainable Sequential Music RecommendationTran et al. (2024): Transformers Meet ACT-R: Repeat-Aware and Sequential Listening Session RecommendationGeneral Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on XSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel.kurovski@gmail.comRecsperts Website

In episode 30 of Recsperts, I speak with Annelien Smets, Professor at Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Senior Researcher at imec-SMIT, about the value, perception, and practical design of serendipity in recommender systems. Annelien introduces her framework for understanding serendipity through intention, experience, and affordances, and explains the paradox of artificial serendipity - why it cannot be engineered, but only designed for.We start by unpacking the paradox of serendipity: while serendipity cannot be engineered or planned, systems and environments can be designed to increase the likelihood that serendipitous experiences occur. Annelien explains why randomness alone is not enough and why serendipity always emerges from an interplay between an unexpected encounter and a user’s ability to recognize its relevance and value.A central part of our discussion focuses on Annelien’s recent framework that distinguishes between intended, experienced, and afforded serendipity. We explore why organizations first need to clarify why they want serendipity - whether as an ideal, a common good, a mediator to achieve other goals (such as long-term retention or long-tail exposure), or even as a product feature in itself. From there, we dive into how users actually experience serendipity, drawing on qualitative interview research that identifies three core components: encounters must feel fortuitous, refreshing, and enriching. These components can manifest in different “flavors,” such as taste broadening, taste deepening, or rediscovering forgotten interests.We then move beyond algorithms to discuss affordances for serendipity - design principles that span content, user interfaces, and information access. Using examples from libraries, urban spaces, and digital platforms, Annelien shows why serendipity is a system-level property rather than a single metric or model tweak. We also discuss where serendipity can go wrong, including the Netflix “Surprise Me” feature, and why mismatched expectations can actually harm user experience.To close, we reflect on open research questions, from measuring different types of serendipity to understanding how content types, business models, and platform economics shape what is possible. Annelien also challenges a common myth: serendipity does not automatically burst filter bubbles—and should not be treated as a silver bullet.Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS – Recommender Systems Experts.Don’t forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review.(00:00) - Introduction (03:57) - About Annelien Smets (14:42) - Paradox and Definition of (Artificial) Serendipity (27:04) - Intended Serendipity (43:01) - Experienced Serendipity (01:01:18) - Afforded Serendipity (01:13:49) - Examples of Serendipity Going Wrong (01:17:40) - Framework for Serendipity (01:22:41) - Further Challenges and Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Annelien Smets on LinkedInWebsite of AnnelienLinkedIn Article by Annelien Smets (2025): Overcoming the Paradox of Artificial SerendipityThe Serendipity SocietySerendipity EnginePapers:Smets (2025): Intended, afforded, and experienced serendipity: overcoming the paradox of artificial serendipitySmets et al. (2022): Serendipity in Recommender Systems Beyond the Algorithm: A Feature Repository and Experimental DesignBinst et al. (2025): What Is Serendipity? An Interview Study to Conceptualize Experienced Serendipity in Recommender SystemsZiarani et al. (2021): Serendipity in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Literature ReviewChen et al. (2021): Values of User Exploration in Recommender SystemsSmets et al. (2025): Why Do Recommenders Recommend? Three Waves of Research Perspectives on Recommender SystemsSmets (2023): Designing for Serendipity, a Means or an End?General Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on XSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel.kurovski@gmail.comRecsperts Website

In episode 29 of Recsperts, I welcome Craig Macdonald, Professor of Information Retrieval at the University of Glasgow, and Aleksandr “Sasha” Petrov, PhD researcher and former applied scientist at Amazon. Together, we dive deep into sequential recommender systems and the growing role of transformer models such as SASRec and BERT4Rec.Our conversation begins with their influential replicability study of BERT4Rec, which revealed inconsistencies in reported results and highlighted the importance of training objectives over architecture tweaks. From there, Craig and Sasha guide us through their award-winning research on making transformers for sequential recommendation with large corpora both more effective and more efficient. We discuss how recency sampling (RSS) reduces training times dramatically, and how gSASRec overcomes the problem of overconfidence in models trained with negative sampling. By generalizing the sigmoid function (gBCE), they were able to reconcile cross-entropy–based optimization results with negative sampling, matching the effectiveness of softmax approaches while keeping training scalable for large corpora.We also explore RecJPQ, their recent work on joint product quantization for item embeddings. This approach makes transformer-based sequential recommenders substantially faster at inference and far more memory-efficient for embeddings—while sometimes even improving effectiveness thanks to regularization effects. Towards the end, Craig and Sasha share their perspective on generative approaches like GPTRec, the promises and limits of large language models in recommendation, and what challenges remain for the future of sequential recommender systems.Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS – Recommender Systems Experts.Don’t forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review.(00:00) - Introduction (04:09) - About Craig Macdonald (04:46) - About Sasha Petrov (13:48) - Tutorial on Transformers for Sequential Recommendations (19:24) - SASRec vs. BERT4Rec (21:25) - Replicability Study of BERT4Rec for Sequential Recommendation (32:52) - Training Sequential RecSys using Recency Sampling (40:01) - gSASRec for Reducing Overconfidence by Negative Sampling (01:00:51) - RecJPQ: Training Large-Catalogue Sequential Recommenders (01:21:37) - Generative Sequential Recommendation with GPTRec (01:29:12) - Further Challenges and Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Craig Macdonald on LinkedInSasha Petrov on LinkedInSasha's WebsiteTutorial: Transformers for Sequential Recommendation (ECIR 2024)Tutorial Recording from ACM European Summer School in Bari (2024)Talk: Neural Recommender Systems (European Summer School in Information Retrieval 2024)Papers:Kang et al. (2018): Self-Attentive Sequential RecommendationSun et al. (2019): BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from TransformerPetrov et al. (2022): A Systematic Review and Replicability Study of BERT4Rec for Sequential RecommendationPetrov et al. (2022): Effective and Efficient Training for Sequential Recommendation using Recency SamplingPetrov et al. (2024): RSS: Effective and Efficient Training for Sequential Recommendation Using Recency Sampling (extended version)Petrov et al. (2023): gSASRec: Reducing Overconfidence in Sequential Recommendation Trained with Negative SamplingPetrov et al. (2025): Improving Effectiveness by Reducing Overconfidence in Large Catalogue Sequential Recommendation with gBCE lossPetrov et al. (2024): RecJPQ: Training Large-Catalogue Sequential RecommendersPetrov et al. (2024): Efficient Inference of Sub-Item Id-based Sequential Recommendation Models with Millions of ItemsRajput et al. (2023): Recommender Systems with Generative RetrievalPetrov et al. (2023): Generative Sequential Recommendation with GPTRecPetrov et al. (2024): Aligning GPTRec with Beyond-Accuracy Goals with Reinforcement LearningGeneral Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on XSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel.kurovski@gmail.comRecsperts WebsiteDisclaimer:Craig holds concurrent appointments as a Professor of Information Retrieval at University of Glasgow and as an Amazon Scholar. This podcast describes work performed at the University of Glasgow and is not associated with Amazon.

In episode 28 of Recsperts, I sit down with Robin Burke, professor of information science at the University of Colorado Boulder and a leading expert with over 30 years of experience in recommender systems. Together, we explore multistakeholder recommender systems, fairness, transparency, and the role of recommender systems in the age of evolving generative AI.We begin by tracing the origins of recommender systems, traditionally built around user-centric models. However, Robin challenges this perspective, arguing that all recommender systems are inherently multistakeholder—serving not just consumers as the recipients of recommendations, but also content providers, platform operators, and other key players with partially competing interests. He explains why the common “Recommended for You” label is, at best, an oversimplification and how greater transparency is needed to show how stakeholder interests are balanced.Our conversation also delves into practical approaches for handling multiple objectives, including reranking strategies versus integrated optimization. While embedding multistakeholder concerns directly into models may be ideal, reranking offers a more flexible and efficient alternative, reducing the need for frequent retraining.Towards the end of our discussion, we explore post-userism and the impact of generative AI on recommendation systems. With AI-generated content on the rise, Robin raises a critical concern: if recommendation systems remain overly user-centric, generative content could marginalize human creators, diminishing their revenue streams. Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS - Recommender Systems Experts.Don't forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review(00:00) - Introduction (03:24) - About Robin Burke and First Recommender Systems (26:07) - From Fairness and Advertising to Multistakeholder RecSys (34:10) - Multistakeholder RecSys Terminology (40:16) - Multistakeholder vs. Multiobjective (42:43) - Reciprocal and Value-Aware RecSys (59:14) - Objective Integration vs. Reranking (01:06:31) - Social Choice for Recommendations under Fairness (01:17:40) - Post-Userist Recommender Systems (01:26:34) - Further Challenges and Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Robin Burke on LinkedInRobin's WebsiteThat Recommender Systems LabReference to Broder's Keynote on Computational Advertising and Recommender Systems from RecSys 2008Multistakeholder Recommender Systems (from Recommender Systems Handbook), chapter by Himan Abdollahpouri & Robin BurkePOPROX: The Platform for OPen Recommendation and Online eXperimentationAltRecSys 2024 (Workshop at RecSys 2024)Papers:Burke et al. (1996): Knowledge-Based Navigation of Complex Information SpacesBurke (2002): Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and ExperimentsResnick et al. (1997): Recommender SystemsGoldberg et al. (1992): Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestryLinden et al. (2003): Amazon.com Recommendations - Item-to-Item Collaborative FilteringAird et al. (2024): Social Choice for Heterogeneous Fairness in RecommendationAird et al. (2024): Dynamic Fairness-aware Recommendation Through Multi-agent Social ChoiceBurke et al. (2024): Post-Userist Recommender Systems : A ManifestoBaumer et al. (2017): Post-userismBurke et al. (2024): Conducting Recommender Systems User Studies Using POPROXGeneral Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on XSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel.kurovski@gmail.comRecsperts Website

In episode 27 of Recsperts, we meet Alessandro Piscopo, Lead Data Scientist in Personalization and Search, and Duncan Walker, Principal Data Scientist in the iPlayer Recommendations Team, both from the BBC. We discuss how the BBC personalizes recommendations across different offerings like news or video and audio content recommendations. We learn about the core values for the oldest public service media organization and the collaboration with editors in that process.The BBC once started with short video recommendations for BBC+ and nowadays has to consider recommendations across multiple domains: news, the iPlayer, BBC Sounds, BBC Bytesize, and more. With a reach of about 500M+ users who access services every week there is a huge potential. My guests discuss the challenges of aligning recommendations with public service values and the role of editors and constant exchange, alignment, and learning between the algorithmic and editorial lines of recommender systems.We also discuss the potential of cross-domain recommendations to leverage the content across different products as well as the organizational setup of teams working on recommender systems at the BBC. We learn about skews in the data due to the nature of an online service that also has a linear offering with TV and radio services.Towards the end, we also touch a bit on QUARE @ RecSys, which is the Workshop on Measuring the Quality of Explanations in Recommender Systems.Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS - Recommender Systems Experts.Don't forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review(00:00) - Introduction (03:10) - About Alessandro Piscopo and Duncan Walker (14:53) - RecSys Applications at the BBC (20:22) - Journey of Building Public Service Recommendations (28:02) - Role and Implementation of Public Service Values (36:52) - Algorithmic and Editorial Recommendation (01:01:54) - Further RecSys Challenges at the BBC (01:15:53) - Quare Workshop (01:23:27) - Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Alessandro Piscopo on LinkedInDuncan Walker on LinkedInBBCQUARE @ RecSys 2023 (2nd Workshop on Measuring the Quality of Explanations in Recommender Systems)Papers:Clarke et al. (2023): Personalised Recommendations for the BBC iPlayer: Initial approach and current challengesBoididou et al. (2021): Building Public Service Recommenders: Logbook of a JourneyPiscopo et al. (2019): Data-Driven Recommendations in a Public Service OrganisationGeneral Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on XSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel.kurovski@gmail.comRecsperts Website

In episode 26 of Recsperts, I speak with Sanne Vrijenhoek, a PhD candidate at the University of Amsterdam’s Institute for Information Law and the AI, Media & Democracy Lab. Sanne’s research explores diversity in recommender systems, particularly in the news domain, and its connection to democratic values and goals.We dive into four of her papers, which focus on how diversity is conceptualized in news recommender systems. Sanne introduces us to five rank-aware divergence metrics for measuring normative diversity and explains why diversity evaluation shouldn’t be approached blindly—first, we need to clarify the underlying values. She also presents a normative framework for these metrics, linking them to different democratic theory perspectives. Beyond evaluation, we discuss how to optimize diversity in recommender systems and reflect on missed opportunities—such as the RecSys Challenge 2024, which could have gone beyond accuracy-chasing. Sanne also shares her recommendations for improving the challenge by incorporating objectives such as diversity.During our conversation, Sanne shares insights on effectively communicating recommender systems research to non-technical audiences. To wrap up, we explore ideas for fostering a more diverse RecSys research community, integrating perspectives from multiple disciplines.Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS - Recommender Systems Experts.Don't forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review(00:00) - Introduction (03:24) - About Sanne Vrijenhoek (14:49) - What Does Diversity in RecSys Mean? (26:32) - Assessing Diversity in News Recommendations (34:54) - Rank-Aware Divergence Metrics to Measure Normative Diversity (01:01:37) - RecSys Challenge 2024 - Recommendations for the Recommenders (01:11:23) - RecSys Workshops - NORMalize and AltRecSys (01:15:39) - On the Different Conceptualizations of Diversity in RecSys (01:28:38) - Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Sanne Vrijenhoek on LinkedInInformfullyMIND: MIcrosoft News DatasetRecSys Challenge 2024NORMalize 2023: The First Workshop on the Normative Design and Evaluation of Recommender SystemsNORMalize 2024: The Second Workshop on the Normative Design and Evaluation of Recommender SystemsAltRecSys 2024: The AltRecSys Workshop on Alternative, Unexpected, and Critical Ideas in RecommendationPapers:Vrijenhoek et al. (2021): Recommenders with a Mission: Assessing Diversity in News RecommendationsVrijenhoek et al. (2022): RADio – Rank-Aware Divergence Metrics to Measure Normative Diversity in News RecommendationsHeitz et al. (2024): Recommendations for the Recommenders: Reflections on Prioritizing Diversity in the RecSys ChallengeVrijenhoek et al. (2024): Diversity of What? On the Different Conceptualizations of Diversity in Recommender SystemsHelberger (2019): On the Democratic Role of News RecommendersSteck (2018): Calibrated RecommendationsGeneral Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on XSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel.kurovski@gmail.comRecsperts Website

In episode 25, we talk about the upcoming ACM Conference on Recommender Systems 2024 (RecSys) and welcome a former guest to geek about the conference. Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS - Recommender Systems Experts.Don't forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review(00:00) - Introduction (01:56) - Overview RecSys 2024 (07:01) - Contribution Stats (09:37) - Interview Links from the Episode:RecSys 2024 Conference WebsitePapers:RecSys '24: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender SystemsGeneral Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on XSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel.kurovski@gmail.comRecsperts Website

Amey Dharwadker, a Machine Learning Engineering Manager at Facebook and leader of the Video Recommendations Quality Ranking team, discusses the complexities of personalizing video feeds for millions of users. He highlights the challenges of real-time personalization in fast-paced content environments and the cold start problem with billions of videos. Amey also delves into the significance of user engagement metrics and cross-domain data in refining recommendations, aiming to create diverse and meaningful viewing experiences.

In episode 23 of Recsperts, we welcome Yashar Deldjoo, Assistant Professor at the Polytechnic University of Bari, Italy. Yashar's research on recommender systems includes multimodal approaches, multimedia recommender systems as well as trustworthiness and adversarial robustness, where he has published a lot of work. We discuss the evolution of generative models for recommender systems, modeling paradigms, scenarios as well as their evaluation, risks and harms.We begin our interview with a reflection of Yashar's areas of recommender systems research so far. Starting with multimedia recsys, particularly video recommendations, Yashar covers his work around adversarial robustness and trustworthiness leading to the main topic for this episode: generative models for recommender systems. We learn about their aspects for improving beyond the (partially saturated) state of traditional recommender systems: improve effectiveness and efficiency for top-n recommendations, introduce interactivity beyond classical conversational recsys, provide personalized zero- or few-shot recommendations.We learn about the modeling paradigms and as well about the scenarios for generative models which mainly differ by input and modelling approach: ID-based, text-based, and multimodal generative models. This is how we navigate the large field of acronyms leading us from VAEs and GANs to LLMs.Towards the end of the episode, we also touch on the evaluation, opportunities, risks and harms of generative models for recommender systems. Yashar also provides us with an ample amount of references and upcoming events where people get the chance to know more about GenRecSys.Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS - Recommender Systems Experts.Don't forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review(00:00) - Introduction (03:58) - About Yashar Deldjoo (09:34) - Motivation for RecSys (13:05) - Intro to Generative Models for Recommender Systems (44:27) - Modeling Paradigms for Generative Models (51:33) - Scenario 1: Interaction-Driven Recommendation (57:59) - Scenario 2: Text-based Recommendation (01:10:39) - Scenario 3: Multimodal Recommendation (01:24:59) - Evaluation of Impact and Harm (01:38:07) - Further Research Challenges (01:45:03) - References and Research Advice (01:49:39) - Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Yashar Deldjoo on LinkedInYashar's WebsiteKDD 2024 Tutorial: Modern Recommender Systems Leveraging Generative AI: Fundamentals, Challenges and OpportunitiesRecSys 2024 Workshop: The 1st Workshop on Risks, Opportunities, and Evaluation of Generative Models in Recommender Systems (ROEGEN@RECSYS'24)Papers:Deldjoo et al. (2024): A Review of Modern Recommender Systems Using Generative Models (Gen-RecSys)Deldjoo et al. (2020): Recommender Systems Leveraging Multimedia ContentDeldjoo et al. (2021): A Survey on Adversarial Recommender Systems: From Attack/Defense Strategies to Generative Adversarial NetworksDeldjoo et al. (2020): How Dataset Characteristics Affect the Robustness of Collaborative Recommendation ModelsLiang et al. (2018): Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative FilteringHe et al. (2016): Visual Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit FeedbackGeneral Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on XSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel.kurovski@gmail.comRecsperts Website

In episode 22 of Recsperts, we welcome Prabhat Agarwal, Senior ML Engineer, and Aayush Mudgal, Staff ML Engineer, both from Pinterest, to the show. Prabhat works on recommendations and search systems at Pinterest, leading representation learning efforts. Aayush is responsible for ads ranking and privacy-aware conversion modeling. We discuss user and content modeling, short- vs. long-term objectives, evaluation as well as multi-task learning and touch on counterfactual evaluation as well.In our interview, Prabhat guides us through the journey of continuous improvements of Pinterest's Homefeed personalization starting with techniques such as gradient boosting over two-tower models to DCN and transformers. We discuss how to capture users' short- and long-term preferences through multiple embeddings and the role of candidate generators for content diversification. Prabhat shares some details about position debiasing and the challenges to facilitate exploration.With Aayush we get the chance to dive into the specifics of ads ranking at Pinterest and he helps us to better understand how multifaceted ads can be. We learn more about the pain of having too many models and the Pinterest's efforts to consolidate the model landscape to improve infrastructural costs, maintainability, and efficiency. Aayush also shares some insights about exploration and corresponding randomization in the context of ads and how user behavior is very different between different kinds of ads.Both guests highlight the role of counterfactual evaluation and its impact for faster experimentation.Towards the end of the episode, we also touch a bit on learnings from last year's RecSys challenge.Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS - Recommender Systems Experts.Don't forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review(00:00) - Introduction (03:51) - Guest Introductions (09:57) - Pinterest Introduction (21:57) - Homefeed Personalization (47:27) - Ads Ranking (01:14:58) - RecSys Challenge 2023 (01:20:26) - Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Prabhat Agarwal on LinkedInAayush Mudgal on LinkedInRecSys Challenge 2023Pinterest Engineering BlogPinterest LabsPrabhat's Talk at GTC 2022: Evolution of web-scale engagement modeling at PinterestBlogpost: How we use AutoML, Multi-task learning and Multi-tower models for Pinterest AdsBlogpost: Pinterest Home Feed Unified Lightweight Scoring: A Two-tower ApproachBlogpost: Experiment without the wait: Speeding up the iteration cycle with Offline Replay ExperimentationBlogpost: MLEnv: Standardizing ML at Pinterest Under One ML Engine to Accelerate InnovationBlogpost: Handling Online-Offline Discrepancy in Pinterest Ads Ranking SystemPapers:Eksombatchai et al. (2018): Pixie: A System for Recommending 3+ Billion Items to 200+ Million Users in Real-TimeYing et al. (2018): Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender SystemsPal et al. (2020): PinnerSage: Multi-Modal User Embedding Framework for Recommendations at PinterestPancha et al. (2022): PinnerFormer: Sequence Modeling for User Representation at PinterestZhao et al. (2019): Recommending what video to watch next: a multitask ranking systemGeneral Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on XSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel.kurovski@gmail.comRecsperts Website