Recsperts - Recommender Systems Experts

Martijn Willemsen, expert in interactive recommender systems, discusses empowering users with control over recommendations, understanding user goals for better satisfaction, and the psychology of decision-making in recommendation systems. They explore music recommender systems, nudging users towards new genres, and the value of user feedback for improved recommendations.

In episode 20 of Recsperts, we welcome Bram van den Akker, Senior Machine Learning Scientist at Booking.com. Bram's work focuses on bandit algorithms and counterfactual learning. He was one of the creators of the Practical Bandits tutorial at the World Wide Web conference. We talk about the role of bandit feedback in decision making systems and in specific for recommendations in the travel industry.In our interview, Bram elaborates on bandit feedback and how it is used in practice. We discuss off-policy- and on-policy-bandits, and we learn that counterfactual evaluation is right for selecting the best model candidates for downstream A/B-testing, but not a replacement. We hear more about the practical challenges of bandit feedback, for example the difference between model scores and propensities, the role of stochasticity or the nitty-gritty details of reward signals. Bram also shares with us the challenges of recommendations in the travel domain, where he points out the sparsity of signals or the feedback delay.At the end of the episode, we can both agree on a good example for a clickbait-heavy news service in our phones. Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS - Recommender Systems Experts.Don't forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review(00:00) - Introduction (02:58) - About Bram van den Akker (09:16) - Motivation for Practical Bandits Tutorial (16:53) - Specifics and Challenges of Travel Recommendations (26:19) - Role of Bandit Feedback in Practice (49:13) - Motivation for Bandit Feedback (01:00:54) - Practical Start for Counterfactual Evaluation (01:06:33) - Role of Business Rules (01:11:26) - better cut this section coherently (01:17:48) - Rewards and More (01:32:45) - Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Bram van den Akker on LinkedInPractical Bandits: An Industry Perspective (Website)Practical Bandits: An Industry Perspective (Recording)Tutorial at The Web Conference 2020: Unbiased Learning to Rank: Counterfactual and Online ApproachesTutorial at RecSys 2021: Counterfactual Learning and Evaluation for Recommender Systems: Foundations, Implementations, and Recent AdvancesGitHub: Open Bandit PipelinePapers:van den Akker et al. (2023): Practical Bandits: An Industry Perspectivevan den Akker et al. (2022): Extending Open Bandit Pipeline to Simulate Industry Challengesvan den Akker et al. (2019): ViTOR: Learning to Rank Webpages Based on Visual FeaturesGeneral Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on XSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel.kurovski@gmail.comRecsperts Website

Himan Abdollahpouri, Applied Research Scientist at Spotify, delves into popularity bias in recommender systems. Topics include unfair recommendations for stakeholders, challenges in music and podcast streaming personalization, and strategies to counteract popularity bias. Learn about debiasing data, models, and outputs, as well as the relationship between multi-objective and multi-stakeholder recommender systems.

In episode 18 of Recsperts, we hear from Professor Sole Pera from Delft University of Technology. We discuss the use of recommender systems for non-traditional populations, with children in particular. Sole shares the specifics, surprises, and subtleties of her research on recommendations for children.In our interview, Sole and I discuss use cases and domains which need particular attention with respect to non-traditional populations. Sole outlines some of the major challenges like lacking public datasets or multifaceted criteria for the suitability of recommendations. The highly dynamic needs and abilities of children pose proper user modeling as a crucial part in the design and development of recommender systems. We also touch on how children interact differently with recommender systems and learn that trust plays a major role here.Towards the end of the episode, we revisit the different goals and stakeholders involved in recommendations for children, especially the role of parents. We close with an overview of the current research community.Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS - Recommender Systems Experts.Don't forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review(00:00) - Introduction (04:56) - About Sole Pera (06:37) - Non-traditional Populations (09:13) - Dedicated User Modeling (25:01) - Main Application Domains (40:16) - Lack of Data about non-traditional Populations (47:53) - Data for Learning User Profiles (57:09) - Interaction between Children and Recommendations (01:00:26) - Goals and Stakeholders (01:11:35) - Role of Parents and Trust (01:17:59) - Evaluation (01:26:59) - Research Community (01:32:37) - Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Sole Pera on LinkedInSole's WebsiteChildren and RecommendersKidRec 2022People and Information Retrieval Team (PIReT)Papers:Beyhan et al. (2023): Covering Covers: Characterization Of Visual Elements Regarding SleevesMurgia et al. (2019): The Seven Layers of Complexity of Recommender Systems for Children in Educational ContextsPera et al. (2019): With a Little Help from My Friends: User of Recommendations at SchoolCharisi et al. (2022): Artificial Intelligence and the Rights of the Child: Towards an Integrated Agenda for Research and PolicyGómez et al. (2021): Evaluating recommender systems with and for children: towards a multi-perspective frameworkNg et al. (2018): Recommending social-interactive games for adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)General Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on TwitterSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel@recsperts.comRecsperts Website

Miguel Fierro, a Principal Data Science Manager at Microsoft with a PhD in robotics, dives deep into Microsoft's open-source recommenders repository, which boasts over 15k stars. He reveals how he transitioned from robotics to personalization, explaining the critical components of the system: examples, library, and tests. The conversation also explores the transformative impact of LLMs on recommender systems and emphasizes the ethical challenges and biases that must be addressed. Fierro concludes with insights on being a T-shaped data professional to thrive in a competitive landscape.

In episode 16 of Recsperts, we hear from Michael D. Ekstrand, Associate Professor at Boise State University, about fairness in recommender systems. We discuss why fairness matters and provide an overview of the multidimensional fairness-aware RecSys landscape. Furthermore, we talk about tradeoffs, methods and receive practical advice on how to get started with tackling unfairness.In our discussion, Michael outlines the difference and similarity between fairness and bias. We discuss several stages at which biases can enter the system as well as how bias can indeed support mitigating unfairness. We also cover the perspectives of different stakeholders with respect to fairness. We also learn that measuring fairness depends on the specific fairness concern one is interested in and that solving fairness universally is highly unlikely.Towards the end of the episode, we take a look at further challenges as well as how and where the upcoming RecSys 2023 provides a forum for those interested in fairness-aware recommender systems.Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS - Recommender Systems Experts.(00:00) - Episode Overview (02:57) - Introduction Michael Ekstrand (17:08) - Motivation for Fairness-Aware Recommender Systems (25:45) - Overview and Definition of Fairness in RecSys (46:51) - Distributional and Representational Harm (53:59) - Relationship between Fairness and Bias (01:04:43) - Tradeoffs (01:13:36) - Methods and Metrics for Fairness (01:28:06) - Practical Advice for Tackling Unfairness (01:32:24) - Further Challenges (01:35:24) - RecSys 2023 (01:38:29) - Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Michael Ekstrand on LinkedInMichael Ekstrand on MastodonMichael's WebsiteGroupLens Lab at University of MinnesotaPeople and Information Research Team (PIReT)6th FAccTRec Workshop: Responsible RecommendationNORMalize: The First Workshop on Normative Design and Evaluation of Recommender SystemsACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT)Coursera: Recommender Systems SpecializationLensKit: Python Tools for Recommender SystemsChris Anderson - The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of MoreFairness in Recommender Systems (in Recommender Systems Handbook)Ekstrand et al. (2022): Fairness in Information Access SystemsKeynote at EvalRS (CIKM 2022): Do You Want To Hunt A Kraken? Mapping and Expanding Recommendation FairnessFriedler et al. (2021): The (Im)possibility of Fairness: Different Value Systems Require Different Mechanisms For Fair Decision MakingSafiya Umoja Noble (2018): Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce RacismPapers:Ekstrand et al. (2018): Exploring author gender in book rating and recommendationEkstrand et al. (2014): User perception of differences in recommender algorithmsSelbst et al. (2019): Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical SystemsPinney et al. (2023): Much Ado About Gender: Current Practices and Future Recommendations for Appropriate Gender-Aware Information AccessDiaz et al. (2020): Evaluating Stochastic Rankings with Expected ExposureRaj et al. (2022): Fire Dragon and Unicorn Princess; Gender Stereotypes and Children's Products in Search Engine ResponsesMitchell et al. (2021): Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and DefinitionsMehrotra et al. (2018): Towards a Fair Marketplace: Counterfactual Evaluation of the trade-off between Relevance, Fairness & Satisfaction in Recommender SystemsRaj et al. (2022): Measuring Fairness in Ranked Results: An Analytical and Empirical ComparisonBeutel et al. (2019): Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise ComparisonsBeutel et al. (2017): Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair RepresentationsDwork et al. (2018): Fairness Under CompositionBower et al. (2022): Random Isn't Always Fair: Candidate Set Imbalance and Exposure Inequality in Recommender SystemsZehlike et al. (2022): Fairness in Ranking: A SurveyHoffmann (2019): Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourseSweeney (2013): Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery: Google ads, black names and white names, racial discrimination, and click advertisingWang et al. (2021): User Fairness, Item Fairness, and Diversity for Rankings in Two-Sided MarketsGeneral Links:Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MarcelKurovskiSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel@recsperts.comPodcast Website: https://www.recsperts.com/

A senior data scientist discusses podcast recommendations in the ARD Audiothek, exploring algorithms, mitigating bias, collaborative filtering, and content-based recommendations. He also talks about responsibility in providing diversified content suggestions and shares insights on becoming a novelist.

In this podcast, they discuss the importance of user modeling for recommendations and discovery, showcasing examples from YouTube's ad performance forecasting. They touch on real-time personalization and how Superlinked provides personalization as a service. The challenges of the RecSys community in rebranding for a better image are also highlighted.

Justin Basilico, director of research and engineering at Netflix, discusses the evolution of the Netflix recommender system from rating prediction to deep learning. They talk about the misalignment of metrics, the use of history, content, and context data, and the challenges of personalized page construction. They also touch on RecSysOps, cultural aspects at Netflix, and the importance of feedback and team collaboration.

In this episode of Recsperts we talk to Rishabh Mehrotra, the Director of Machine Learning at ShareChat, about users and creators in multi-stakeholder recommender systems. We learn more about users intents and needs, which brings us to the important matter of user satisfaction (and dissatisfaction). To draw conclusions about user satisfaction we have to perceive real-time user interaction data conditioned on user intents. We learn that relevance does not imply satisfaction as well as that diversity and discovery are two very different concepts.Rishabh takes us even further on his industry research journey where we also touch on relevance, fairness and satisfaction and how to balance them towards a fair marketplace. He introduces us into the creator economy of ShareChat. We discuss the post lifecycle of items as well as the right mixture of content and behavioral signals for generating recommendations that strike a balance between revenue and retention.In the end, we also conclude our interview with the benefits of end-to-end ownership and accountability in industrial RecSys work and how it makes people independent and effective. We receive some advice for how to grow and strive in tough job market times.Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS - Recommender Systems Experts.Chapters:(03:44) - Introduction Rishabh Mehrotra (19:09) - Ubiquity of Recommender Systems (23:32) - Moving from UCL to Spotify Research (33:17) - Moving from Research to Engineering (36:33) - Recommendations in a Marketplace (46:24) - Discovery vs. Diversity and Specialists vs. Generalists (55:24) - User Intent, Satisfaction and Relevant Recommendations (01:09:48) - Estimation of Satisfaction vs. Dissatisfaction (01:19:10) - RecSys Challenges at ShareChat (01:27:58) - Post Lifecycle and Mixing Content with Behavioral Signals (01:39:28) - Detect Fatigue and Contextual MABs for Ad Placement (01:47:24) - Unblock Yourself and Upskill (02:00:59) - RecSys Challenge 2023 by ShareChat (02:02:36) - Farewell Remarks Links from the Episode:Rishabh Mehrotra on LinkedinRishabh Mehrotra on TwitterRishabh's WebsitePapers:Mehrotra et al. (2017): Auditing Search Engines for Differential Satisfaction Across DemographicsMehrotra et al. (2018): Towards a Fair Marketplace: Counterfactual Evaluation of the trade-off between Relevance, Fairness & Satisfaction in Recommender SystemsMehrotra et al. (2019): Jointly Leveraging Intent and Interaction Signals to Predict User Satisfaction with Slate RecommendationsAnderson et al. (2020): Algorithmic Effects on the Diversity of Consumption on SpotifyMehrotra et al. (2020): Bandit based Optimization of Multiple Objectives on a Music Streaming PlatformHansen et al. (2021): Shifting Consumption towards Diverse Content on Music Streaming PlatformsMehrotra (2021): Algorithmic Balancing of Familiarity, Similarity & Discovery in Music RecommendationsJeunen et al. (2022): Disentangling Causal Effects from Sets of Interventions in the Presence of Unobserved ConfoundersGeneral Links:Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LivesInAnalogiaSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel@recsperts.comPodcast Website: https://www.recsperts.com/