MGTOW Sandman Quotes

I'd like to dedicated this video to Jacob. He sent me a donation and I want to thank him for his support. Anyways the topic for this video is a response to Stardusk's video which I'm adding in the description. I don't want to cut him up or attack him. Instead I want to thank him for bringing up the subject of marketing freedom and marketing mgtow. What I want to do is make the case or argument in favor of marketing freedom for mgtow. The very line "marketing freedom" got me thinking about the creation of the United States. Everyone knows that Stardusk and myself have had our disagreements in the past but if you know you're American history then you know that in the early formation of the United States there were many misunderstandings and divisions between the founding fathers. Stardusk himself mentions that men by their very nature dissent against each other. And it is through conflict that we men resolve our differences and move forward. But I believe that Stardusk sees the great value in marketing even if he says he doesn't. The United States were formed on the back of a marketing campaign. The taxes that the British were putting on the American Colonies for Tea were insignificant if we compare them to the tax rates people pay today. The story about the Boston Tea party was told throughout the colonies to rally support for independence. When the founding fathers decided to go their own way they also decided to write the declaration of independence. It was a document of self ownership but they spread it throughout the colonies so that people would hear those three magical words, we the people. In addition to that declaration early Americans created other symbols they could get behind as well as use to promote their fledgling rebellion. The constitution and architecture in Washington DC are such symbols. Men are visual beings and we respond to what we see around us. If marketing wasn't important then why does Stardusk the thinking-ape put so much effort into presenting his viewers with fancy 3D animated graphics at the beginning of his videos? Why does The thinking ape select images of apes to peak our interest and curiosity. The phrase: "The only way to win the game is to not play" that too is marketing. Everything is marketing. The way we speak, the way present our youtube channels to our viewers. All of this is marketing. Yesterday I showed people pictures of Washington DC and just to make it clear to everyone I'm not American but I understand that some extent America exists today because of marketing. We also have the Gadsden flag with Snake that says "Don't Tread On Me." This too was a form of promotion.Why MGTOW is the Way Forward...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCojV...Cancel the Men's Rights Conferencehttp://www.change.org/petitions/doubl...Google's new driverless car has no brakes or steering wheelhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mo...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A couple of days ago I spoke about Elliot Rodger and I casually mentioned that feminists were going to take the story and the anti-feminist shooting in Montreal in 1989 and use that material to attack the men's rights movement and MGTOW. Well a couple of hours after I posted that video a few people sent me messages saying that feminists have already taken this information and created a petition on the White House Websites. This petition which I'm linking to in the description below is called: "Classify the Men's Rights Movement as a terrorist group." And this is what the petition has to say: "The Men's Rights Movement (MRM) is a misogynistic movement that advocates violence against women and girls. Multiple members of the MRM--self identified Men's Rights Activists (MRAs)--have committed atrocities and mass murders. Marc Lepine killed 17 women on a university campus in the "Montreal Massacre". Tom Ball firebombed a courthouse and wrote a manifesto encouraging others to bomb government buildings that is posted on major MRM websites like avoiceformen.com. Elliot Rodger, an active MRA, shot and killed at least 7 young women and injured many other people at random. Rodger is being celebrated as a martyr and hero by the movement, which will likely cause other MRAs to emulate his crimes. This is what the MRM does and action must be taken against them to protect women and girls." This statement is factually wrong in so many ways. First of all Marc Lepine killed fourteen women and not 17. And Elliot Rodger did not shoot and kill seven women. He killed two women and four men. And this idea that Elliot Rodger is being celebrated as a martyr and a hero by the men's rights movement is insane. Who in the men's rights movement is glorifying him? This entire thing is an attack on the men's rights movement and A voice For Men. The fact that this factually wrong petition hasn't been taken down by the white house is an insult. As of right now the petition has twenty three hundred signatures. Yesterday when I discovered this petition around eleven pm eastern standard time and the number of signatures was fifteen hundred. So right now if it continues at its current rate this petition will get forty to fifty thousand signatures in the one month that is has to reach the magical number of one hundred thousand. If the petition reaches that number then it will be handed over by the white house to policy makers to analyze and respond to. Classify the Men's Rights Movement as a terrorist grouphttps://petitions.whitehouse.gov/peti...Please sign this White House petition to declare A Voice for Men a terrorist grouphttp://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Someone suggested that I cover Esther Vilar the author of the Manipulated Man and do a video on her for my god among mgtow series. I look at this as part one of two part series. The second part will be a book review of her seminal work. But in this part I'm going to talk about her personal life, struggles with her famous book that many of us MGTOWs have already read, called the manipulated man. Why did she choose to write this book? Why did she try to reveal to men the controlling nature of women? Her book The Manipulated Man was so popular when it was released in the nineteen seventies that she was invited to go on the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson. Her book also came out at a time when feminism was rising in Western nations and she was part of the small minority of people standing up to it at that time. She argues that contrary to what is socially acceptable and says that women oppress and exploit men for their own benefits and instead tried to paint women as accountable. She was saying this at a time when women were trying to blame men instead of taking responsibility for their views. Anyways, getting back on topic Esther was a doctor in Bavaria, Germany and she studied psychology and sociology. So she had the credentials to talk about male female relations because she spent her days interacting with men and women in a professional medical practice trying to analyze their behavior. The main theme or thesis that permeates all of her work male female relations is the idea that in advanced industrial economies women are not victims but instead manipulate men for their own ends. For some reason Esther is also considered by many people fascist because of her work. The irony is that Fascism is also known as national socialism. So fascism more closely resembles communism then people believe. One of the main reasons people think that she is a fascist is because she wrote the play Speer about the famous German architect under Hitler, Albert Speer. But her background is German-Jewish so I highly doubt that she would be support the Nazis. Simply because she is against feminism does not automatically make her a fascist. And by many accounts Albert Speer, was sucked up into the Third Reich like many other people because he was afraid of upsetting Hitler and if he did that then there was a chance Hitler would kill him or his family. And Albert Speer went to prison after the war. A war crimes tribunal found him guilty and sentenced him. Justice was done.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

In case you missed it Elliot Rodger a 22 year old man from Santa Barbara decided to go on a killing rampage because not a single woman has given him attention in his entire life. The victims of the Elliot Rodger shooting include 4 men and 2 women. First he killed his three male roommates and then he went to a sorority house where he was planning on going inside and killing all of the women. Luckily when he knocked on the door they didn't let him in so he killed Katherine Cooper, Veronika Weiss and Christopher Martinez, all young people in their late teens and early twenties. Then he went off and randomly shot and wounded people on the street until his car crashed and the police found him dead inside from a self inflicted gunshot wound. And one more thing, Elliot Rodger was a feminist. You heard me I said the word "feminist." Do I need to prove to you he was a feminist? Of course not. All I have to say is that he was a feminist and people will believe me right? Feminists are claiming that Mr. Rodger was an MRA. Did they have to prove it? Of course not. As soon as this story broke Feminists started saying that Elliot Rodger was an MRA. And they claim that Elliot is an MRA because he was a member of the website PUAHate.com. But Elliot Rodger was not a PUA he was against pickup artists. And since pickup artists have often been associated with MRA's and MGTOWS does that mean he was against them as well? The PUAHate.com website is a place that describes itself as the 'Anti-Pickup-Artist Movement' because it believes that many so called dating gurus and seduction artists are scammers. And that all they care about is making money. But that doesn't seem to matter to the mainstream media and feminists. They want to take this story and twist the facts to target the Men's Rights Movement. This is telling me that the Men's Rights Movement is now on the feminists radar as a threat. First they ignored the men's rights movement. Then they started to ridicule it like in the video from Saturday Night Live. I'm including a link to that sketch so you can watch it and let me know. And now they are attacking Men's Rights head on and trying to say that it's directly related to mass murder. They are stretching the connection between PUA and MRA in a rediculous way and they are completely ignoring the fact that Rodger was against the PUA movement. That's like saying if someone joined a website that was against sexual abuse simply because that particular website had the word abuse in the title that would mean that person would be for abuse. By that same logic if I joined a website called ViolenceAgainstWomen.com then I would be in favor of being violent to women because the word violence is found in the title. Feminists are trying to paint MRA, PUA, MGTOW and any other term that means equality and fair treatment for men and trying to tarnish it by saying that the very use of such words is evil. Most people in society don't understand the meaning of terms like MRA or MGTOw. And many of us know that feminists are incapable of winning a rational argument so they are using guilt by word association here. They are not attacking men's rights directly but they are trying to define it as evil before society in large can understand what it means? They are scared and their behavior proves it.Elliot Rodger - Facebook Pagehttps://www.facebook.com/elliot.rodge...SNL Skit Savagely Attacks Pro-Life Activism and Conservativeshttp://madworldnews.com/watch-snl-ski...My Twisted World - The Story of Elliothttp://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/24...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This is what Jeff has to say: "Hi Sandman, I recently discovered your videos after doing a Youtube search for "marriage not worth it." I went to a few videos before finding your "The Misandry Treadmill." I proceeded to watch your videos from the very first one forward. I instantly became a lifetime fan when I found your "My Journey into Mgtow" video. While watching that video, I kept thinking, "is this guy talking about my life?" A quick background about myself. I am a 29 year old in his final year of medical school. I had confidence issues in my first two years of medical school. It was likely due to my constant struggling for the first time in academics. Med school has a way of taking the highest-achieving science majors in college and then stratifying them. "Someone must fail," my school would tell me. I worked hard to stay afloat and had to retake exams. Anyway, during my second year, I decided to join a dating site. Like you, I wasn't too serious about it. I sent a few messages here and there and received a decent amount of replies. I think it had something to do with the part about my wanting to become a Cardiothoracic Surgeon. I ended up meeting "Jane" online, who was a 22 year old Junior at the undergrad college near my med school. She was studying biology, so we had some stuff to talk about. She told me she had dreams of become a Vet, which drew me to her as I thought she was more ambitious than the majority of the women I came across online. We met a few times. One day, she told me we should be in a relationship. I agreed. And then commenced my 2 years of hell. In the summer between my second and third year of med school, I allowed Jane to move in with me. Her rent had run out, and she said she'd pay me half the rent. Like an idiot blinded by love, I agreed. My third year of med school was as tough as the TV shows would have you believe. 12 to 15 hour days in the hospital; 6 to 7 days a week. Things started going downhill quickly. Jane didn't do housework, so I had to spend time cleaning the house (everything from cleaning the floors to washing the dishes). Jane became lazy. She had sporadic work (spotty hours), but she was able to pay the rent (though never on time). She bought animals that she couldn't afford and expected me to pay for their care.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A couple of days ago I got an email from Winston Wu. He didn't send me any money yet he wants me to cover his website HappierAbroad.com. So, sure I'll do a video about the happier abroad movement. But I'm not sure Mr. We is going to like everything I have to say. But then again you know what they say, all publicity is good publicity. Well I guess you're about to find out. In the description below I'm adding a link to HappierAbroad.com as well as a video I've done in the past about dating and marrying foreign women in case anyone missed it. I got a good chuckle when I visited Happier Abroad and read this paragraph on the website regarding foreign women versus American ones. This is what the website has to say: "Dating women comes easily and naturally. Women are sweet, friendly, feminine and down-to-earth. They are approachable, open, sociable, engaging, curious, and exude genuine warmth. Thus they are easier to meet and connect with. Females are generally thin and look wholesome. They cherish their femininity and have values. Women appreciate good men and seek a partner, not a competitor. Niceness counts. Flirtation with women creates energy and excitement. They are flattered by compliments and like being pursued. Men get dates easily just by asking. Not surprisingly, American men who date overseas usually report that they NEVER want to go back to dating American women again! So many of them have told me this, that it's almost become a cliché." Those are just some of the tasty words I found on the Happier Abroad website with regards to dating foreign women. And Winston Wu makes foreign women seem like they belong to a completely different species. He obviously just wants me to give him a plug and get free publicity for his service. But I'm here to warn you guys once again about the dangers of listening to a false bill of goods sold by guys guys like Winston Wu. He is selling men on the idea that not all foreign women are like that. Winston Wu also reminds of Tom Vu. Tom Vu guy that used to have infomercials on in the late eighties and early nineties with boat loads of women in Miami. He was selling people on the idea that they could get rich quick by coming out to his seminar. And Winston Wu is selling overseas tours to desperate American men looking for real women. The tours include Ukraine, Latin America, Asia and Russia. Winston Wu says that marriage is bad and I'm in total agreement with him but it seems like he is targeting desperate and disenfranchised American men with money to take overseas tours that promise love. Again there's nothing wrong if you're a man going overseas to meet women for fun. The trouble starts when you assume you can marry them or bring them home to North America or Europe. And that's what many of these women in poorer countries want. They want to trade their youth and bodies for a ticket over to the so called first world where they will more then likely leave your ass.HappierAbroadhttp://www.happierabroad.comForeign Women - MGTOWhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDjxb...HappierAbroad Star Wars Videoshttp://www.happierabroad.com/film.phpVladimir Zhirinovsky reveals the truth about womenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6Lx4...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today I want to talk about self actualized people. More specifically self actualized men. Being this way allows us to enjoy our lives free of guilt and shame. We see the world more rationally and logically then then others. And many men going their own way are self-actualized. So what does it being self actualized mean? The most important thing is that such individuals have an efficient perception of reality. We see it for what it is in as much of an unbiased way as possible and not fixated on what others think of him and yet he is strongly focused on problems outside of himself. According to Abraham Maslow the creator of Maslow's hierarchy of needs once self actualized men attain this status they start to seek out peak experiences. This can Explain why Nikola Tesla, Arthur Schopenhauer and Isaac Newton would seek out knowledge but not women. They were seeking out new peak experiences and I finally think I understand why they were motivated to work and succeed outside the need to impress females. Once you have one relationship you understand that they are predominantly the same. So instead of falling into that trap over and over again you seek out new and life altering experiences over and over again. According to Maslow a peak experience is "Feelings of limitless horizons opening up to the vision, the feeling of being simultaneously more powerful and also more helpless than one ever was before, the feeling of ecstasy and wonder and awe, the loss of placement in time and space with, finally, the conviction that something extremely important and valuable had happened, so that the subject was to some extent transformed and strengthened even in his daily life by such experiences." More interesting things about self actualized people is that their motivation comes from within and they can be both introverted and extroverted. This is something that I can related to. When I was younger and co-dependent on women I couldn't stand to spend too much time by myself. I enjoyed my own company but after a few days I would feel like a indoor house-cat and almost literally start scratching the walls. But today I feel like I can function well in both modes. I can spend weeks working alone on my videos with limited human interaction or I can go out and spend day after day working with different people. My emotion state no longer depends on the external validation or rejection of other people. I find fulfillment from within.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I've spent the last few days getting my hands on various articles trying to figure out why our society is giving rise to increasing numbers of female narcissists. I now suspect that all of the relationships I've had in my life except one were with women that were narcissists. The relationships started off being about "us" and then quickly shifted towards their happiness and desires in life. What I wanted was left in the dust. This is another big reason I go my own way. If a woman makes like about Me instead of We then there is no life for man. Maybe I'm naive and maybe it's always been like this. Maybe women in their twenties and thirties have been self-centered since the beginning of time. This all got started when I sent that girl Sailor Spoon a copy of the film American Psycho. I asked her if she had seen it before and she said she had. So I asked her what she thought about Christian Bale's Character, Patrick Bateman? She said she didn't like the stabbing scene in the shower. I quickly realized she was confusing the Alfred Hitchhock film Psycho with American Psycho. I proceeded to explain to her that they were two different films. At that point she couldn't accept the idea that she was wrong and that she had confused the two films. This is one of the first signs of a narcissist. They have to be right even when they are wrong and they are sensitive to criticism and praising them makes them happy. So she watched the film and I spoke with her later. She said she found the film interesting because Patrick Bateman had many similar qualities to her and she really appreciated how he would take care of his body and do facial treatments and how she also had a daily regiment. From the outside she said he was a guy she could relate to. When a woman tells you that she can relate to a fictional serial killer you do one of two things, you run away as fast as you can, or if you're like me you try to figure out what the fuck is happening here? And you try to understand her behavior. So I began looking at the Patrick Bateman character and quickly found out he has NPD or Narcissistic Personality Disorder combined with Psychopathic tendencies. He hates everyone and feels nothing except disgust with himself and rest of humanity. And he wants to inflict the same type of pain he feels onto others. I saw these qualities in her. She hates everyone. Is always in a bad mood unless being praised and wants to inflict pain onto others. When they inflict it back on her she cowers away. And I've noticed that many single women in their twenties, thirties and four-ties are increasingly exhibiting this type of behavior on me because when I work I don't show any interest in them. And only care about doing a good job.Is Female Narcissism on the Rise?http://www.psychforums.com/narcissist...#SELFIE (Official Music Video) - The Chainsmokershttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdemF...What, Me Care? Young Are Less Empathetichttp://www.scientificamerican.com/art...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This is what Jeff has to say: "Hi Sandman, I'm attaching a question from a female friend who has the ability to think rationally. When she overheard a male friend and I talk about Feminism last night (specifically about how a man will have his life ruined the moment he is accused of rape and if the woman is found to have lied, she is punished at most with a slap on the wrist). Our female friend told us that she agreed with the hypocrisy that is Feminism. When we began talking about MGTOW and your channel, she added to our conversation by asking, "what can women do differently?" I feel that you may be the best person to answer this. Thanks" Well, thanks for your question Jeff. The first thing I would think about is why is this woman taking an interest in male/female relations. Can you see any possible selfish interest in her part? Is she interested in dating either you or your friend? What is her dating history and what is her experience with men? If she's pointing out the hypocrisy of Feminism why is she doing it? I really need to know more about this woman before I can figure out her motives and drives. But regardless of her opinions and personality I want to talk about what women should do in our society. This is just my opinion and it's based on what I'd like to see happen. It's not going to happen so my opinions are just a thought experiment. And I have no illusions of changing female nature. So the first thing I want to identify the woman that is the model for my understandingand as a measuring stick for women. We all see our mothers as the example of what women should be like. Even if we hate or don't get along with our mothers. My mother is a hard worker. Before she retired she put one hundred and twenty percent effort in her job, one hundred and twenty percent effort as a homemaker. She got into medical school when she was younger and although she didn't finish because her family was poor and she couldn't get money to finish school she is my model for what a woman should be. She is also a gifted artist. And she puts effort into keeping herself as attractive as possible for her age. But even with all the good qualities she is still a hormonal woman. She has frequent emotional outbursts directed at my father and shaming language directed at me. She still wastes resources on things that many of us men see as irrational. She has many of the bad and stereotypical traits that we have spoken about on MGTOW. But with my mother she is like Miss Jackal and Mrs. Hyde. One moment she is just as rational as a man and I can talk to her like any other man and a few seconds later an emotional switch goes off in her head and she becomes like a vicious caged animal. She was born in the nineteen fifties in Eastern Europe. Women coming of age in Eastern Europe in the late nineteen sixties and nineteen seventies seemed to have had many of the qualities that men today would want. They were born in a time and place where they learned traditional home-making skills and knew how to cook, clean and sew and just saw it as something that women did for the household. They were taught by their fathers to be soft spoken and not brought up to raise their voices to men. And at the same they went out into the working world and made money and were also mothers.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today I'm releasing my next installment in my God Among MGTOW Series. This one is about the famous petroleum geologist M. King Hubbert who went his own way and stood up to the Shell Oil Company in 1956. I usually don't feature men that are married and have families in this series. But the reason I'm featuring him is because this man had the strength to stand up for the research, regardless of what the company paying him told him to do. So let me take you back to 1956. In that year Marion King Hubbert or M. King Hubbert as he is sometimes referred to was working as a geoscientist for the Shell oil company in one of their laboratory in Houston, Texas. On March 8th, 1956 he made a speech to the Southern Section of the American Petroleum Institute in San Antonio Texas. He was about to go up on stage and present his speech that day but was signaled to leave the stage. In what was a last minute phone call the public relations staff at the Shell Oil company begged him to tone down the parts of his speech that they considered to be sensational. However he didn't do this and instead decided to go his own way instead. He didn't do what people in his own company told him to do. We went on stage and told his audience that oil production in the United States was going to reach a peak or maximum rate of production for conventional oil in 1970. Many of the people in the audience thought he was a crackpot. In some weird way he was like Galileo telling men that the world was flat. He told everyone that United States conventional oil production would peak in 1970 at 3 billion barrels of oil production per year. In reality it peaked in 1970 at 3.4 billion barrels and has never recovered to those levels. Even with Alaska in the nineteen seventies and nineteen eighties and today's Oil Fracking boom it never rose above that point and if oil production from fracking goes into decline within the next 5 years as is predicted by many of today's petroleum geologists then that will mean oil production will continues to decline. I know many of you are skeptics and will say if only the US government would allow for more offshore drilling then everything will be alright. And that the US government is holding back US oil production. On the contrary the US government is doing whatever it can to bend over backwards to the oil companies. They are giving them permits to frack most of America's oil shale. We are in the midst of giant oil boom in North America. But it's not going to last as production starts to peak out and go into decline. Marion King Hubbert is guy most of you haven't heard of before but in the coming decades as global oil production goes into terminal decline you will most likely be hearing his name.People mocked Hubbert and criticized him because up to that point in history more and more oil was being found all of the time back then. It was being found faster then humanity could burn it up. Today for every new barrel of conventional oil we find we burn three. And most of the non-conventional oil is uneconomical at current prices and requires one hundred and fifty to two hundred barrels to be produced for a profit. President Jimmy Carter - Address to the Nation on Energyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tPeP...The End of Suburbiahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3uvz...Updated Natural Gas Production UKhttp://www.eia.gov/countries/country-...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy