MGTOW Sandman Quotes

So I decided to try tinder for a couple of weeks to see if I could go on some dates and share some stories about it. I wanted to know what the difference between more traditional online dating sites and tinder really were. And I find that ultimately it's just as bad as bad as Plenty of Fish and OK Cupid when I tried those last summer. The only advantage for men it seems to be is that women don't know a man's height from the photos they see on tinder. Most guys can still see if a woman is overweight or chubby from their pictures but women don't know the height of man. And the app doesn't force you enter that information. So the conversations I would usually encounter on tinder would usually be like this: "Hi how tall are you?" or "Have you ever been married before or do you have any kids?" Women on tinder instantly want to know if you will be a tall dark provider and want to make sure your money isn't already being shackled down to an ex wife and children. Their demands seem fairly straight forward to me. But tinder is taking female entitlement to a whole other level. Average and below average women are starting to behave and feel far above average then they really are because they are getting far more attention and this seems to be the norm. What I also found interest is the idea that women are more likely to message me on Tinder then in the past on dating sites. There is no bullshit associated with writing a witty and thought provoking profile or any other crap like that. It's all about appearances and your photos. It's pure glorification of the selfie dating culture. In the past the lower quality women would have been lucky to get a handful of dates with men they met through friends and in real life. Now they are getting far more male attention. And probably going on a couple dates a month or lets say twenty four dates per year on average. And let's say ten percent of those men are guys with money that like to show off. I do my best to hide my wealth instead of flaunt it. If someone doesn't accept the fact that I choose to drive a ten year old car then that's their problem. Or if they think I'm being cheap for keeping a two year old cel phone then that's also their problem. I don't see the need to get rid of perfectly useful and functional physical objects in my life simply because they are not in style or because I can afford to purchase new ones. Why would I get into debt to make some fat banker wealthier then he already is. But also keep in mind that this is my first real date since I was twenty one years old.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I have to thank Vention MGTOW for his donation for this video. He sent me some bit coins in a way I can actually use them and it's much appreciated. Thank you very much! If and when I finish my MGTOW book I'll have to send him a copy as a thanks. In the city I live in there are quite a few old free masons lodges and temples that are scattered around. For today's video I went around and took these pictures. Three of them are of lodges and temples and one of the buildinsg I'm going to show you has sacred Masonic geometry. More specifically the histogram. Many people think of it as the Star of David in the Jewish Religion but it's used in many cultures. According to the Encyclopedia of Freemasonry ""The interlacing triangles or deltas symbolize the union of the two principles or forces, the active and passive, male and female, pervading the universe ... The two triangles, one white and the other black, interlacing, typify the mingling of apparent opposites in nature, darkness and light, error and truth, ignorance and wisdom, evil and good, throughout human life." So essentially Freemasonry recognizes that men and women are opposite or like Ying And Yang. And the first printed constitution of free masonry apparently bans women from the practice. But there are many cases where women were admitted as well in masculine only masonic bodies. One woman Salome Anderson was put in American papers in 1892 as the only female Freemason in the world. Apparently she hid in lodge room in her uncles house and learned the masonic secrets so she was pledged into secrecy. I don't really believe this idea of a woman hiding in a Masonic Lodge and then being discovered and brought into Masonry. And that story has been used in order to excuse free-masonry as an institution for choices to include women in the practice. It's nearly impossible for a woman dressed like a woman to enter a Masonic Lodge without the obvious fact that she's a woman. There is even a tale about a French Madame that dressed up as a man to enlist in the French Army. Again this is a story and not verifiable. But the idea that she was willing to sacrifice her life by joining the army must have meant that she was seen as an equal by men and made a member of a male only secret society. Personally I think that male secret societies even if they have rules that forbid women from joining will often let women join because many men are weak when it comes to having women around. And in many cases with things such as freemasonry it's often the wives and the daughters of the men in the lodges that are selected to become members. It's a form of nepotism. If the women that were being selected were the most rational and possibly even Nawalts then I wouldn't be bringing any of this up. Instead it seemed like family choice to bring women into male only free masonry. There is also Co-Freemasonry for both men and women. And there were also exclusive female lodges. But the ironic thing is women have co-freemasonry and exclusive women's lodges and yet that's not enough. They still have to go and force their way into the male only freemasonry groups.Aaron Russo talks Rockefeller Elite (12 Minutes)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gwcQ...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I was talking to a friend of mine yesterday about the state of men in Asia and how they are raised and treated differently in Asia then they are in North America and Europe. In some Asian cultures there are child or baby grooms going back to tradition that were married when they are nine or ten years old to fourteen year old girls. Boys in Asia for the most part have been so prized through history that they get babied by their mothers. That's why my friend says that as an Asian woman she is more interested in Western men. Because according to her Asian men have a hard time doing things for themselves because they have been taken care of most of their lives and haven't learned responsibility or how to do things for themselves. They have been babied. I also brought up the question of salary men in Japan and she told me that the reason men in Japan are given strict allowances in Japan is because they were never properly raised to manage money because taking care of money is something more female dominated. Men were kept this way so they don't know how to do seemingly anything for themselves and the only thing they are pushed to do is work and provide a paycheck and work from seven am to ten pm at night. That's what she told me. And it's a perspective that many of us haven't heard before. The whole idea of baby grooms is insane. To take a man before he's a man and put him with a teenage girl that takes over the duties of his mother as well as the sexual duties once he reaches his teenage years is to stunt his development as a man. My belief is that Asian women are scared at the power found inside of independent Asian men. And it's like Asian women are trying to make sure that men never have true self respect and independence. She told me this is one of the big issues she has with Asian men. Many of them can be emotionally stunted because of that babying they receive and many of them can be very loud, obnoxious and vulgar because they have been spoiled through their formative years. Effectively they are big spoiled babies. And they have to listen to their mothers and wives and achieve at work so that the women can continue to spoil them at home. Again a lot of this is her opinion but I'd love to hear what everyone else thinks.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

After putting out yesterday's video on the magic wallet maneuver someone posted in the comments section and said that by using the magic wallet men are just as bad as women because that's our version of the shit test on them. Women put men through shit tests to see what they can get away with and how big of a push over a man really is. Men on the other hand put women through them for a different reason and it has to do with trust. Most blue pill men still believe that women can be trusted so male shit tests are all about testing that trust. He wants to know that he can trust her with secrets, money and the fact that she won't cheat on him. One guy once told me a story about how when he worked as a contractor people would always test his trust. They would clear out all the furniture from a room before it need to be painted or the floor had to be sanded. But one time he noticed that a would always notice that people would always leave a quarter or in Canada a one dollar coin on the ground clearly there as a shit test. Contractors are notorious for stealing money but this guy was honest. So one time he went to a clients house and found a one dollar coin on the ground and instead of picking it up he reached into his pocket and pulled out a one dollar coin and put it next to the other one dollar coin and finished up shop for the day. The next day he returned to painting and both one dollar coins were gone and in their place was a two dollar coin. So he bent down and put a two dollar coin next to the other two dollar coin. The next day he comes back and the two two dollar coins were gone. And in their place was a five dollar bill. So he drops a five dollar bill and adds a quarter as well to raise the bet so to speak. Later on the person who hired him said he was one of the most interesting people he had ever met. And the two of them built trust through humor and the ongoing joke that took four days to play out. The whole thing was a shit test between two men. But in some ways it was kind of a shit test based on trust. And men shit test women so they can see if they are trustworthy. And women shit test men to see the strength of their emotional resolve. Women want strong men so that don't fold like a cheap suitcase and can continue providing for themselves and their children even when the pressure is on. That seems to be the case many times.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Paul. And today's topic is about the magic wallet maneuver. In the 1814 Novella (Peter Schlemiel's Miraculous Story) the main character Peter sells his shadow to the Devil for a bottomless wallet called the gold sack of Fortunatus. But in the story both society and the woman he love reject him because he has no shadow. Are we really to believe that a woman wouldn't sell her husband's or boyfriends shadow if he had access to a bottomless wallet through him? Am I the only one that thinks the concept for such a story is ridiculous I for one think most women would sell their husbands hair, arms, legs, kidneys, liver and even his brain if they could get access to a limitless or bottomless wallet. He could be a stump with lungs and I've met women that would gladly see men suffer so they could live with unlimited access to resources. So this story is kind of unbelievable. Hell Peter Schlemiel could have just found himself a blind woman that wouldn't care about his shadow and that would love him for him. And he wouldn't have to tell her that he didn't have a shadow. But this video isn't about a fairy tale. This story is about a real life man I know also called Peter and he has a Magic Wallet maneuver of his own. He's a mgtow that still dates and he's not willing to settle for anything less then a rare nawalt or unicorn. He always says that money won't bring you happiness but it sure lets you suffer in style. And that he does. But his magic wallet is a technique he uses on women once they start shit testing him on dates or trying to blow him off. What he does is carry five to ten thousand dollars in his wallet when he goes on dates. And if a woman is no longer interested in him and put him through shit tests and starts to talk down to him he brings out the magic wallet. Here in Canada one hundred dollar bills are brown, fifties are red, twenties are green, tens are purple and fives are blue. So he stacks his wallet with a technicolor rainbow of money and makes sure to stack the hundreds and fifties as high as he can before shoving him into his wallet. And he makes the wallet just thick enough so it barely closes. When the date turns sour he puts his wallet and his key-chain which has keys to a beamer onto the table where he's taking his date and then watches as his lady friends eyes start to glaze over. Often times a woman that told him she wasn't interested five minutes earlier asks him when she can see him again. Again that number is 95% of the time based on his observations.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Eric and this is what Eric has to say: "I've sent you a donation to ask you to talk about pick-up artists and the perception feminists and yourself have of them. What is the usefulness of PUAs in the men's rights and MGTOW situation and battle? I know that feminists despise them, I think it's a good sign, don't you?" Well, thank you for your question Eric. I know you have more to say and I'll switch gears and talk about the other part of your question a bit later. Regarding Pick Up Artists of course feminists hate them because they aren't about commitment and marriage. Therefore pickup artists are men that use deception to trick women into giving away their golden vagina for literally a song and a dance in many cases. Women hate Puas the way men hate gold diggers. And the woman that falls for a pua is being played just as much as a nice guy mangina that takes a woman out to dinner and pays for dinner over and over again. Like my buddy I spoke about that was budgeting five hundred dollars a month for dates. Puas are predators of sluts and gold diggers are predators of manginas. Both groups are higher up on the sexual food chain, the puas and gold diggers. It's also kind of ironic because most people in our society hate gold diggers, manginas, sluts and pickup artists. When I see pua in action it's like a crocodile jumping out of the river and catching a water buffalo. And a gold digger is often like a lion chasing a baby zebra and taking it down. We want to root for the underdog but not when the underdog has very little self esteem which is what many sluts and manginas seem to lack. A woman that spreads her legs for the entire football team and the man that bends over backwards for a shit testing woman both have very little self esteem and it's sickening to see as well. This I believe is the root behind equality. And I think that the majority of men going their own way are guilty of being manginas for most of their lives, present company included. And most of us can't be bothered learning to become pickup artists and some of us lack the intelligence or self-confidence to walk up to women and wind them up. And that's what being a pickup artist is all about. Women are like an old Model-T automobile. They aren't like guys ready for sex and attention instantly. Instead you have to wind them up with words, flirtation and playfulness. And the first step is sending out the right body language. At that point your foot is in the door. Then you have to keep boosting her ego and flirting over and over again until she gets the hots for you. You have to whisper the right combination of words into her ear and send off the right mating cues for her to lose her marbles and drop her panties. I've done this a few times but it had to be funny yet smart, strong yet sensitive, thoughtful yet forgetful. And Puas have to be masters at deflecting shit tests and throwing them back into women's faces in a comical way. It's a lot of work and most of the time it's not worth it.Bust a move: Can hypnosis increase breast size?http://drmarkgriffiths.wordpress.com/...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A big thank you to Danmandingo for his donation for making this video possible. He donated before for a video called Red Pill Rage which I'm including a link to in the description below. He had some comments as well as questions he wants me to answer and first I'll read them to you. This is what Danmandingo has to say: "Greetings once again Sandman. Please allow me to offer a deep & very sincere "Thank You" for all of the well-thought content you steadily produce, enlightening/awakening many of us out there. Recently while at work, something interesting & possibly coincidental happened. Twice within the same week I was asked by older men "Are you married"? Both times responding "No I am not" to them, I received responses like: Why not? (or) So what are you going to do? These events brought me to the realization (If many men are NOT following that old traditional protector/provider model men are accustomed to adhering to, many have no idea what ELSE to do with their lives). Personally I believe it is very important for everyone's life, to have a sense of purpose that doesn't necessarily revolve AROUND serving others. If that is something someone willingly partakes in, of course that is their decision. But if someone chooses a different path in life, it should not be looked at as unorthodox. Thank." That's what Danmandingo had to say and he wants me to cover this idea of purpose outside of service to others and instead focus on service to self. I was sitting around with three of my friends yesterday night pondering the purpose of existence and they were discussing their dating lives and how most of them wanted a relationship. Two of them have only ever had relationships that have lasted less then six months. Both of these guys own multiple properties with many tenants and have tons of money they just don't flaunt their money. For them their purpose in life is to get married, have kids and retire. And basically do nothing else with their lives. I had all of these aspirations in my mid twenties. I lived with women. I made enough passive income not to have to work more then five to ten hours a week and go to enjoy my life. Or so I thought. Their purpose is to serve women and have tons of free time which they have not idea how they would use because they've never had that much free time in the past to do nothing but think, travel and be themselves.Red Pill Ragehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwXRi...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Isn't it funny that women always seem to complain about men in male locker room talking about women. After all male locker rooms are probably one of the last true male spaces left on the face of the earth. But men don't really raise a a stink about women talking to each other in the ladies room. This double standard proves to me that women want to control all the physical spaces in our society. And one of the places they use to control men and gossip to each other about how to control men is the ladies room. I believe that more important decisions in history have been made in women's washrooms then in palaces and government legislatures. Ladies rooms are the perfect place for women to tell secrets to each other and plan their manipulation of men and each other. All women have to do is check the stalls for feet and they can speak to each other and share all the juicy gossip they want. Men on the other hand don't talk to each other in the bathroom very much and instead use locker rooms to talk about women. And usually this is in high school when boys are talking about their usually non-existent sexual encounters with prudish teenage girls. Women are usually more concerned with emotional and social capital and men are concerned with physical and financial capital. And men often talk to each other about physical capital in public or semi-public places like board rooms and offices. Places that are often open for women to enter. But women talk often talk about social capital at the girls night out or in the ladies room. Back when I was in a relationship I can't tell you how many times my ex-girlfriend would say sorry you can't come out with me or my friends tonight. It's ladies night and there are no guys coming. Sorry! But when I said that she would belittle my friends and say, I can't believe you're still friends with those losers or why don't we all go out together. At that point I would say: "Last time I went out with my friends you called them losers and yet tonight you want us all to go out together? Of course she would say I never called them losers and pretend like what she said in the past never happened. Here's a bold statement on my part. I don't think that the long lineups into the ladies room have anything to do with using the stalls. I think it comes down to gossip. And if you're in a crowded bar or party then women are usually clawing at each other to get into the bathroom so they can strategize about the men they want in the room and they don't care if there are thirty or forty women waiting outside in the line to get in. They know that those women are don't really need to pee and are just going into the bathroom to shoot the shit with their girlfriends. There usually isn't any empathy because being empathetic is not in the nature of most gossip queens.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Here are some of Dennis's comments and questions: "Please keep my real identity secret and use the name Dennis Strickton. I took the red pill around this time last year, and my life has improved dramatically ever since then. I have rejected marriage and long-term relationships, but am still open to short-term relationships provided there is some real benefit. Unlike a lot of other men going their own way, I have not had any particularly traumatic experiences with women - nothing beyond the normal frustrations of dealing with rejection on the one hand, and entitled women on the other hand. Another difference is that, while most MGTOW are either atheist or agnostic, I am an observant, traditionalist, pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic. I will admit that during my blue pill days, the primary reason I wanted to marry was that sex outside of marriage is a moral sin. I certainly didn't want to be guilty of mortal sin, but I didn't want to live without sex either. So I saw marriage as my only choice. Within Roman Catholicism, there is a strong emphasis on the idea of vocations. You are either married (with 12 children), a priest, a monk / nun / member of a religious order, or otherwise you simply have not found your true vocation. My devout friends are telling me that secular celibacy is NOT a valid option and that I need to choose one of the three, or at the very least enter a life of consecrated single-hood. In the eyes of the Church, MGTOW are seen as people who never found, or simply gave up on, their vocation. One of my devout Catholic friends told me that "MGTOW is selfish, hedonistic, materialistic, and demographically suicidal. It is Satanic, saying "Non serviam" to God, man, nation, and race. MGTOW and MRA are unnatural, erroneous, untenable, losing, immoral positions; the correct position is benevolent patriarchy. Even first wave feminism was a mistake." another one said "MGTOW is fundamentally selfish, turning inward on oneself, the sure sign of pride and sin. It is concerned with comfort and not Goodness, duty, charity. We Catholics should be giving our entire lives to doing God's will, not being selfish and materialistic. Sure, we should be prudent, cautious, and practice self-preservation; we should make sure that our wife obeys us, is virtuous, is Catholic, is humble and modest, etc."Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

It seems like everywhere I look these days I see overweight women calling themselves sexy and empowered even if they are fifty pounds overweight. And websites like plenty of fish and OK Cupid are providing larger ladies with male attention they never would have enjoyed ten or fifteen years ago. There are even big & beautiful dance clubs and popping up all over north America and Europe. Women are getting the message that they can become as large as they want and still find a guy that's an eight or a nine to date and marry them. They are turning their weight management problems into a huge asset, no pun intended. Women used to blame genetics twenty years ago saying things like, I'm overweight because of genetics. But they are now wearing their fat with pride, almost like a badge of pudgy honor and behaving exactly like their thinner counterparts. There are clothing stores for large ladies, night clubs and even annual conventions. The culture has shifted creating a situation where thin women accept larger women. And I think it was in an earlier video that I spoke about how thin ladies keep larger ladies around to keep make their own market valuerise. And the large ladies that hang around with the more attractive women are there to get male scraps from the hot girls. How many times have many of us been turned down in the past by a thin and attractive woman only to be thrown a bone by her. The attractive woman throws us their fat ugly friend and we are supposed to feel grateful. Sometimes that large lady is thrown at us by them as a shit test to see if have enough self esteem and determination to continue to pursue the attractive lady. The friendship between the large ladies and regular size girls is one of the unholy alliances in female own group preference. I think it was the women of ordinary weight that led to that acceptance of larger ladies by society. The fat women meant less competition for the women that were nines and tens. And now the overweight women are striking out on their own. It will be interesting to see just how far society accepts larger women in social circles. Instead of the skinny women trying to get their fat friends to lose weight and maintain some common thread in beauty and attractiveness they have used the situation to their advantage and have no sympathy for fat women. Being overweight generally lessens a woman's lifespan, makes them have more health problems, limits their ability to find gainful employment, reduces their chances of finding a man to marry, creates irregular menstrual cycles thus destroying fertility and speeds up the aging process so they hit the wall years before they naturally would. Not to mention that some fat women's vagina's haven't seen daylight in many decades. Who knows what kind of bacteria are growingin the shadow of all that fat. Yet larger ladies are trying to convince themselves and society that their value is just as high as women that are thin and trim. A rational man would see all of these negatives and refuse to date larger women. Only a man blinded by lustful sexual desire and love would see larger ladies as worthy of his affection.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy