MGTOW Sandman Quotes

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Dennis and this is what what he has to say: "Hey Sandman, this is "Dennis." There is another topic I would like to see covered. I am interested in how you would compare and contrast MGTOW and the MRM with the "white nationalists" and the "race realists." While the two philosophies are in many ways diametrically opposed, I have noticed some striking parallels which I think deserve some attention. Many of the complaints that MGTOW and MRAs have against women and feminism parallel the complaints that White nationalists and "race realists" have against minorities, against immigration, and against multiculturalism. MGTOW will point to the fact that the majority of welfare recipients are women; White Nationalists will point to the fact that the majority of welfare recipents are non-White. Both groups also have complaints about reverse discrimination ("affirmative action"), unfair media representation (just as the public is more horrified when a man hits a women than if a woman hits a man, similarly, the public is more horrified if a white person attacks a non-white person (because it constitutes a "hate crime") than when it happens the other way around.) While MGTOW / MRAs complain that men are becoming more and more disposable, White Nationalists worry about Whites becoming minorities in their own countries due to low birthrates among Whites, immigration, and high birth rates among non-Whites. While most MGTOW / MRAs deny being misogynists, white nationalists and race realists deny being racists or White supremacists. Again, my observation is that while the two philosophies are diametrically opposed, some of the parallels are striking. It is also worth noting that it is politically correct to advocate for women and minorities, who are supposedly both victims of the evil White male. For better or for worse, race politics and gender politics often overlap. Here in the United States, the movement to grant Blacks full citizenship and voting rights coincided with first wave feminism. The civil rights movements of the 1950s and 1960s coincided with second wave feminism. Today, third wave feminism coincides with the increasing diversity and multiculturalism of the United States. Like it or not, MGTOW and MRAs are often classified as "right-wing extremists," along side White Nationalists. Now, I would note that one of the most noticeable differences would be this: White Nationalists have a strong "us vs. them" mentality, pledge loyalty to "their own people," focus on the future, and lean toward fascism to some extent. However, MGTOW and MRAs are rugged individualists, are more present orientated, and lean toward libertarianism. Thanks, Dennis." That's what Dennis has to say and it's a heavy topic. And I can see that he's spent a lot of time looking at it. Hopefully I can do it some justice.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

About a week ago I was talking about a date I went on with a woman I met on Tinder. After I shared my experiences a few people mentioned that there's nothing special about Tinder and that it's kind of like another online chatting service called hot or not. So I decided to compare the two services and see how they stack up against each other. During the process I started chatting with a woman and everything seemed normal and nothing was out of the ordinary. The only thing I noticed is she would take a very long time answering me back. Sometimes it would be a day. Every other interaction seemed to be normal. All I had was her first name and the city she lives in. So I did a search on facebook to see if I could find her. And not only did I find her but I found her three young children and her husband or lover. She doesn't know that I know at this point and I feel violated just talking to her. But more importantly I feel bad for her children and the man in her life. She comes across as sexually frustrated and I'm not sure if she's looking for another man so that she can dump him and swing over to another guy that will make a better provider for her and her three kids while she continues to collect a cheque from the guy she's with currently. At this point I'm at a point where I can really fuck up her life. I'm guessing she got onto hot or not because she thought that the power of anonymity would allow her to meet strange men for booty calls and get away with it. I asked her what she does for a living and she said that she works with children with special needs but on her facebook page it says she works at Tim Horton's which is a coffee shot chain mostly here in Canada with additional locations in the United States. And it pays minimum wage. I'm assuming the kids with special needs she's referring to are her own children. Of course they are special, they're her fucking kids. One of them is barely nine months old and she's thinking about galloping around like some horse in heat looking for strange men to talk to and fuck. And all three kids are under the age of four or five. If a man was doing this society would not tolerate this type of behavior. But society sees this differently because she's a woman. They might say the husband / father should have been giving her more attention. Maybe he should have worked harder to make her happy so she wasn't forced to run into the arms of another man. Women are infallible even if they are young cheating mothers. Her pictures on hot or not show her looking down to earth, wearing little to no makeup. She looks plain and innocent but the reason she can't dress up and look presentable is because she probably has at least two kids puking all over her during their daily feedings. Question: "I'm a Single Mom. Will Men See Me As 'Used Goods?'"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hhk7-...George Freeman - Youngest MGTOW I know.https://www.youtube.com/user/GeorgeTh...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Before I start my talk today I just want to make it clear that I don't think that anyone should kidnap anyone else and use them for any reason. My intention with this video is to get into the minds of men that kidnap women and keep them in their basements and homes as slaves and servants. Why would a man abduct a defenseless woman and keep her in his house and destroy her life to get his sexual and psychological needs met? I think deep down inside a man like that he is deeply wounded and unable to trust women and that's why he's doing it. In 2006 in Austria a woman named Natascha Kampusch escaped from a man that abducted her and kept her in a cellar he built under his house. So what drives a man to do such things? Usually I talk about the dark side of female nature and avoid talking about men raping women and being bad to them. But I believe that the reason men do such cruel things to women might have to do with emotional cruelty that and neglect they themselves experienced from women in the past. And through the kidnapping and use of women do they start to become more empathetic and start the healing process. I know you probably think I'm crazy at this point but please bear with with me. I'm sure most of you have have heard of Ariel Castro the man that kidnapped, locked up and had sex with three girls in his house in Cleveland. He held those three women in his house for about ten years before they were finally found. He even had a daughter with one of those women. Ariel Castro started getting sloppy a year before he was caught. He was feeling sorry for the daughter that he had with Amanda Berry. He was starting to worry about sending her to school so that she could get proper social interaction with kids her own age and friends. He was a kidnapper and rapist with a kind heart for his own child. Yet he was still an unfeeling and cruel monster to the women that he had abducted. It's almost like he wanted to get caught because he didn't seemingly have the courage to go to the police and turn himself in. It's almost like he made peace with his own issues or he felt sorry for his daughter and that made him empathetic. Like he was willing to sacrifice his own freedom for the love he had for his daughter because subconsciously he was sabotaging himself. I'm just saying that there are more complicated issues at play that drive a man to kidnap, rape, confine and possibly kill a woman. Part of it might be related to the way that women have treated such a man during his life. I couldn't really find any information about how Castro's mother treated him. But I did find out that he had anger issues and other men caught him beating his wife. Castro was a man with no remorse and hurt his own wife but seemed to love his own daughter. It's almost like the only sympathy he felt for women was sympathy for his own daughter, daughters or children. I believe he was a man that cared deeply for the love he had for his own children but not the mothers of his children.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

After I put out my video about what it would take to make women obsolete someone sent me a message saying that Feminists in Canada were supposedly trying to pass legislation to stop men from having private ownership and access to sexbots because apparently sexbots objectify women. After hearing this story I got pissed off and starting thinking about all the technologies that would have to converge together for a sexbot to become reality. And I made a list. So what you ask are the steps to reaching a fully functioning sex robot that will be good enough for men to replace women completely. Number one the robot needs a realistic voice that's passable as human. If any of you have watched or listened to Razor Blade Kandies youtube channel then you know he uses a synthesized voice to read the text in his videos. If we could perfect that technology and synthesized voice software could do the work of a human then that would be the first step. Not to mention that I would also have the side effect of getting rid of the small number of telephone receptionists that still work out there. Once you create the perfect voice then you need to give that voice a proper brain. The best computer I've seen that can think for itself to some extent is Watson that was on Jeopardy a few years ago. Watson was created by a team of mostly men at IBM for the sole purpose of winning at the game show jeopardy. But an Artificial intelligence computer coupled with a real voice would more then likely be able to hold a real life conversation for longer then a few sentences. At that point we would experience things like the main character from the film Her that has his own female AI and has a relationship with her. At that point you could put the AI and voice modulator into a real doll with censors and have sex with the doll and she would respond to your thrusts and physical touch. The main problem with Real Dolls is they don't look very human unless they have proper faces and skin. And if they did speak I'm pretty sure the voice would not match the lips like in some really corny Bruce Lee Film. So what I would do is get 3d Printers to print the faces for the sex robots. I've added a link in the description below to a webpage called 3D Printing in Movies. And even in the Ironman movies you can see a 3D printer in the back of Tony Starks laboratory used to print pieces of his ironman suit. In films stuntmen are using 3D printed masks that look identical to actors so they look perfect on camera and pass for the real thing. I have no idea how to solve the issue of making sure that the sex robots lips move properly. But the eyes are an easy fix. Most cameras these days have censors in them that can recognize eyes in front of the camera and that can follow those eyes. So putting two cameras into the eyes of the sex robot would allow the programming to follow the eyes of other3D Printing in Movieshttp://www.find3dprinter.com/3d-print...Clone Factory Faces - Japanese 3D printing company lets you put your own face on dollshttp://japandailypress.com/japanese-3...The REALFACEhttp://real-f.jp/en_the-realface.htmlAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I was sitting around in the backyard shooting the shit with my friend Peter and we were discussing the idea of men and women. He has now been completely converted over to the MGTOW dark side after our conversation. The most interesting thing we spoke about were the dynamics between male and female sexual marketplace value. Why do some men value certain women over others as long term and short term partners and why do women value some men over others for their short term and long term attachments. We also discussed the idea of why there are a lot men out there that would be considered a seven or an eight on the attractiveness scale but they are with women that are overweight and unattractive and stack up being fours and fives. And the consensus we reached is that sometimes an attractive man will date a less attractive woman because the expectation is there that she will be grateful for him being in a relationship with her. And because of her gratefulness to meet a better looking partner above her class level that will mean she will be faithful to him and not rock the boat for fear that he will leave the relationship. I've been guilty of doing this in my past relationships. I would date women that were lower maintenance where I was the catch and they were in need of rescue. The reason I did this was because I thought I had power in those relationships. I was better off physically, financially and had higher social status. I guess to some extent I was doing this consciously but there were also elements of it that were unconscious. I thought it was a great idea because I would often see very attractive women that would date and marry men that were beneath their level of attractiveness. In such situations the situations would often work out because the women were able to control their men and make sure they never went anywhere and remained faithful while they themselves went out and had sex with far more attractive men on the side. I thought to myself what a great strategy, minus the cheating part. I thought I could get together with a woman that was worth less then me with regards to her sexual marketplace value and I wouldn't have to stress out about her running off with another man because she had effectively already lucked out on me. And most importantly, not to toot my own horn or anything she would stay with me and be grateful for being with someone she perceived better then herself. How wrong I was. If a woman dates a less attractive man then herself he's usually grateful to her. But if a more attractive man dates a less attractive woman then she doesn't feel grateful. Instead she eventually gets comfortable and then eventually sees her own sexual market value rise. Although her looks are the same or have gone downhill she sees herself as better looking and tries to take over the relationship like a more attractive woman would. Her perceived sexual marketplace value rises. And she perceives that his marketplace value has fallen, even if it's actually gone up. But men that are in relationship with more attractive women don't seem to see themselves as higher class simply because they are manginas doing the bidding of a woman that perceives herself as a princess or goddess. They remain humble. Both sexes perceive their value differently even though they are in the exact same social or relationship situation. It's all about personal perception.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by Craig and he has many comments and questions and this what he has to say: "Hey Sandman, Are you familiar with phonesex sites like Niteflirt? If you peruse through some of the listings there, you'll probably recognize a lot of themes that MGTOWs discuss (not specifics, mind you, but broader themes). What most women offer there aren't vanilla phonesex services, but rather to play their part in fetishes that typically fall into the category of female domination. Some of these are about humiliating men sometimes verbally (e.g. mocking on their social status, financial status, penis size) and/or coercing guys to do humiliating things (e.g. wearing women's clothing, to eating their cum, or fuck themselves with a dildo, etc). Or sometimes it's about fantasies of something humiliating being done to them (e.g. role playing being cuckolded, raped with a strapon, raped by another man, or having their penis locked in a chastity device not allowing them to get an erection). Other ones are about blackmail and financial domination. A lot of women on Niteflirt offer "consensual blackmail" where they coerce men in to giving them personal information or even access to their personal computers using remote desktop software to access their personal data. They then tell men to do things for them, or they threaten to do something embarrassing with their personal data. Sometimes this is done during "forced intoxication" calls were men drink as much as the woman on the other end tells them, until they're so drunk they won't remember what they're doing. A lot of women who offer this say they want men to do it so they'll spill all of their secrets and and they can "get inside their head." Some women also claim to be able to hypnotize men over the phone and do the same kind of thing. ... I'm more or less okay with people doing whatever gets them off. I'd imagine most of these interactions basically amount to elaborate and expensive fetishes, although I know there have been cases of unquestionable abuse and blackmail. But I'm not trying to make a case for or against Niteflirt or sites like it. What's interesting to me, and what I'd like to hear your thoughts on, is what the existence of a large number of men with these kinds of fetishes means for MGTOW and for fighting gynocentrism. It seems that a lot of men are turned on at some level by the thought of women exploiting them (enough to blow hundreds or thousands of dollars on sites like Niteflirt). These fetishes make explicit what's implicit in a gynocentric world view; men are only good for being controlled sexually or financially by women. Is it possible that some parts of men's brains evolved to accept their role in gynocentrism, and that these fetishes "hijack" that part in the same way that drugs are said to hijack the reward centers of the brain? If so, do you think it's possible part of the reason there's male resistance to men's rights and MGTOW is because many men are essentially turned on by feminists who want to manipulate them and that treat them like they're disposable? I know that's a long circuitous topic for a video, but I would be very interested in what you think. Thank You!" Well that's what Craig has to say and I'm completely in agreement with his reasoning. I used to get pleasure taking care of my ex girlfriend. Cooking for her, cleaning for her, giving her attention. Essentially being a slave brought me pleasure. I've spent fifteen years of my life conditioning my brain to accept reality in that way. Now I'm working very hard to rewire my neural pathways to no longer be a simping man servant. Men are naturally slaves to women. We want the dopa-mine from our sexual partners and experiences. We want to feel pleasure. But like you said there is a part of our brain that has evolved to accept gynocentric behavior and control from women.Can Oxytocin Get Me A Boyfriendhttp://www.popsci.com/science/article...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This video is brought to you by a donation from Christopher. He didn't have a particular subject he wanted me to cover so I thought I'd talk about something that's been on my mind for a while now and it's women and pets. Last time I checked there are no crazy cat men that I've heard of. It seems that women are the ones that are collecting animals and hoarding them in their apartments. They find them cute and cuddly and enjoy coming home to animals instead of human beings. In fact most of the women that I've dated except for one preferred animals to human company. I'm guessing that men are utilities to most women, other women are potential competition and children are a possession. My ex used to say to me all the time that her prized cat was like her child and she would keep that cat alive as long as possible. The last two years of that's cat were filled with suffering and trauma. I wished she could have put the cat down before the situation got bad but she couldn't accept the reality that her cat was going to die until she was holding it dead in her arms. My Ex girlfriend also had a dream to own a cat ranch. She wanted to build a miniature city in some country backwater town where she could bring rescued cats to a new home. She would have them fixed so they couldn't have any more kittens and then have hundreds of cats wandering around in a park like setting in nature. And of course I would probably have to spend the rest of my days surround by cats and my crazy cat lady girlfriend. I told her it was a bad idea because the cats would attract foxes, and other wild animals. Those Wild animals would come and eat the cats and she said that wouldn't happen. I just rolled my eyes knowing full well that those cats were going to attract all kinds of wild animals. I couldn't believe how much rational thought went out the window out of her mind when she saw a stray cat in the alleyway or when she went over to friends house and saw their animals. And she's not the only one. I know dozens of women that keep animals around and pretend that they are her children. They buy them toys, feed them treats and make the men they supposedly love suffer with those animals around. So why are women obsessed with pets? How feeding and caring for 800 million pets hurts Mother Naturehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/h...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Abdellah and this is the question he wanted me to ask: Hi Sandman, I would like to know your thoughts on where society is heading in the future, and what will be the influence of MGTOW in the future society? It would be great if you could look at some of these factors that might be of influence in that future. Well that's what Abdellah has to say. His question is very broad and I'll try to narrow it down to socioeconomic ramifications. Right now the MGTOW movement is still in its incubator stage. It's numbers have grown in the last few years but by the number of video views and repeat subscribers to my channel as well as many others I feel that it has reached a temporary plateau. From the middle of two thousand and ten until January of twenty fourteen it has grown exponentially in a hockey stick pattern. And since then interest in the movement has been on a bumpy plateau. My data comes from a simple google trends search and I'm adding a link in the description below to the search results I found. I've also noticed a steady increase in searches for men's rights. So I'm not sure if the MRAs are holding people's attention more lately. Or men are getting involved in the MRA movement and not going mgtow because they find Men's Rights enough for them right now? But both MRA and MGTOW are growing their numbers. Two thousand and thirteen was the year of the MGTOW and two thousand and fourteen is shaping up to be the year of the MRA. But getting back to MGTOW I see the movement gaining real power if we face another recession and more men get divorced and see the true nature of women as they get kicked the curb because they aren't employed providers. I don't think the rise in MGTOW back in 2009 was a fluke. I think it was directly tied to the economic situation back then. After all it was a touted as many people as a man-cession because more men lost their job then women. More men were plumbers, electricians, carpenters and bankers in 2008. Once the housing market blew up and their unemployment insurance ran out they faced the full wrath of unsatisfied females in many cases and this led to greater numbers of divorces. But it also reduced the number of people getting married in general. After-all unemployed men can't afford to purchase for diamond rings for women. I'm adding a link to an article called "Is the Great Recession Linked to a Decline in Marriage?" in the description below. This article speaks about the idea that when the economy gets bad couples tend to cohabit-ate and delay getting married and delay having children. So recessions slow men down from proposing to a woman. So in the future as our society faces greater economic turmoil, especially after the shale oil and gas boom then the marriage rate will plummet. This in turn has the effect where people that co-habitate get into and out of relationships far easier then those that are married. And they tend to be more childless as well. So a bad economy will mean more men going their own way. Two thousand and fourteen has been a good year economically in the United States so maybe that's why we are seeing a plateau in the interest in MGTOW. When the economy goes bad again at some point women blame men for it and blame men for being poor providers. Men in turn have their self esteem destroyed and look for a rational reason why women are dumping them or angry with them. So men explore the internet and find out about the men going their own way movement and our numbers continue to grow. It's unfortunate but it seems that things have to get worse before they get better. Energy scarcity and other resource scarcity in the future will mean that more men will question what women want from life. And more men will go their own way because they will either be unable or unwilling provide women with the lifestyle they are accustomed to or because they will not want to work themselves to death doing it. Going their own way will be a more of an option because men will have far fewer assets to risk losing to women. Men don't have a social safety net to fall back on.Google Trends MGTOW and Men's Rightshttp://www.google.com/trends/explore#...Is the Great Recession Linked to a Decline in Marriage?http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/1...GirlWritesWhat+Stardusk: Evo-Psych, MRM, Autopilot,"Love" and morehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enqor...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A big thank you to Jacob for his donation and for making this video possible. Originally he wanted me to cover the topic of men being able to control their sex drives. But I've already spoken about that in my video called carnal pleasures which I'm adding a link to in the description below. So instead I'm covering the topic of women and government or social assistance. Also known as welfare. I'm sure most of you remember sailor spoon the girl the girl I spoke about in earlier videos. But there were some things I never told you guys about her. The most important fact is that she was collecting welfare or social assistance as she likes to call it. But the truth is she doesn't need it to survive. Last I heard she was volunteering to teach foreign languages at a local school. And back then she was worried that her welfare checks would be cutoff. She was also subletting a room in the basement apartment she was renting. So she took in a roommate and collected $600 cash from that roommate while getting about six hundred dollars in social assistance. She preferred to use the term social assistance instead of welfare because it sounds nicer and doesn't have the stigma associated with welfare. So there she was collecting "welfare" of six hundred dollars, six hundred from her roommate and doing odd babysitting and tutoring jobs on the side. And she was also getting her parents to probably give her three to four hundred dollars a month. On all sides she was getting money probably about fifteen hundred each month after tax and she didn't have to work for. Not bad for a Welfare Queen. The government is supporting her, her roommate is supporting her and her parents are supporting her. This woman was type of woman that mgtow have come to hate. She is a moocher, she uses men to fix her apartment, buy her things and if you looked up parasite in thedictionary there she'd be with her spoon shaped nose. The last time I spoke to her about a month and a half ago she was in the process of getting a part time waitress job and a part time call center job. She hated both jobs and together they paid her less then the welfare and roommate schemes she had going. Her rent was also eight hundred so with the Roommate's money the rent really cost her two hundred dollars. So for her it was easier to quit her call center job and continue to collect social assistance or welfare the to work. She claims to have worked her entire life but I was impressed by her ability to find as many opportunities to take from others ass possible. And she seemingly did this without a care in the world.Carnal Pleasureshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oOyc...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Back in February Karen Straughan did a talk at Ryerson University on a topic called: "Are Men Obsolete?" And I'm including a link to that video in the description below. The idea that men are obsolete is ridiculous. Very little would get built, repaired or invented if men weren't busy doing the work of building and maintaining civilization. But the topic of male obsolescence got me thinking about female obsolescence. What would need to happen in society to make women obsolete? Yesterday I briefly touched upon this idea and how virtual worlds that interface with the male mind directly can create a scenario where women would be obsolete. Male obsolescence is predicated on machines replacing male muscle to do the work. Oil and other fossil fuels have replaced most of the male muscle power as well as animal power that we used primarily up until the industrial revolution. Female obsolescence on the other hand is based on developing other types of machines to do the sexual and reproductive labor for men. So, speaking hypothetically here, how would society go about the business of making women obsolete? What would have to happen for it to become a reality? I think it would take a combination of male sexual satisfaction and the artificial womb. And I'm going to look at sexual gratification first. To a large extent internet pornography is allowing men to free themselves from women. Many men are using porn as a way to fulfill some of their needs with regards to having their sexuality. The visual part of sexual stimulation. Porn is a good way to release sexual tension but it still falls short with regards to the physical closeness of sex but it also means no unwanted pregnancy and disease. I think the reason women take offense to pornography is because it represents the first step in making women obsolete. Why do you think women are working as hard as they can to get plastic surgery, perfect makeup, tons of clothing. They are competing for male eyeball attention with other women, pornography, video games and all types of other distractions. Free internet pornography is certainly having an effect on younger men in their teens and twenties. Young guys are increasingly saying they don't want to date or give spoiled girls and women any attention. An entire generation of men is starting to think with their big heads because pornography is providing a relatively viable substitute for ordinary human sexuality. Men in their early thirties and older didn't have the same access to porn until about teen to fifteen years ago. I probably wouldn't have spent as muchtime dating in my teens if I had access to a multiverse full of pornography. Are Men Obsolete?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e92u5...The most realistic female android ever!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy7xG...ROBOT ACTRESS STEALS THE SHOWhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSa3D...3D projector creates life like hologramshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlanG...Customized Mind Doll Programhttp://www.shop.talmadgeharper.com/Cu...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy