Bloomberg Law

David Super, a constitutional law professor at Georgetown, dissects the complex theories surrounding Trump’s potential third term, touching on the limitations of the 22nd Amendment and potential constitutional crises. Meanwhile, Harry Nelson, a health care attorney, delves into the wrongful death trial of Tyler Skaggs, examining the Angels' alleged duty to protect their players and the implications of concealed drug use. Both guests provide compelling insights into their respective legal battles, sparking important discussions about presidential powers and player safety.

Former federal judge Paul Grimm, now at Duke Law School, discusses alarming AI errors in court orders, emphasizing judges' ethical responsibility to oversee AI work. Derrick Hogan, a partner at Tully Rincke, delves into the NBA gambling scandal, explaining allegations against players like Chauncey Billups and Terry Rozier involving rigged games and insider information. They explore the potential impact of these schemes on game integrity and the legal ramifications for those involved.

Andrew Willinger, a Second Amendment expert, discusses critical federal gun-possession laws and the evolving landscape of state restrictions after recent court rulings. Robert Mintz, a former federal prosecutor, highlights the complexities of the emergency-aid exception to warrant requirements, shedding light on ongoing Supreme Court deliberations. Tom Schoenberg reveals the surprising impact of presidential pardons on banking access, detailing how criminal histories complicate financial relationships.

Tom Schoenberg, a senior reporter at Bloomberg, delves into the complex relationship between presidential pardons and banking access, revealing that banks can still deny services despite pardons. He highlights cases like Elliot Broidy and Mahmoud Reza Banki, showcasing the challenges pardoned individuals face. Meanwhile, Joshua Kastenberg, a law professor and former military judge, analyzes the legality of using the military for domestic protests, discussing the risks outlined by the Posse Comitatus Act and the peril of treating protests as insurgencies.

Harold Krent, a constitutional law professor at Chicago-Kent, dives into Trump's ambitious $230 million claim against the Justice Department, discussing the constitutional intricacies of U.S. attorney appointments. Meanwhile, Abbe Smith, director of the Criminal Defense Clinic at Georgetown Law, examines James Comey's motions, addressing the complexities of vindictive prosecution and the high evidence bar needed for selective claims. Together, they unpack the legal implications and challenges surrounding both cases, revealing a tangled web of justice and accountability.

James Park, a securities law professor at UCLA, talks about the SEC's evolving enforcement landscape under Gary Gensler, highlighting shifts in priorities and compliance challenges. Andrew Willinger, Executive Director of the Duke Center for Firearms Law, delves into crucial Supreme Court gun cases, discussing the historical context of firearm regulations. They also explore the implications of state laws after landmark decisions and the complexities surrounding the interaction of drug use and gun possession, offering a captivating dive into law's intersection with current events.

Leon Fresco, an immigration law expert, shares insights on the complex legal battles surrounding federal troop deployments in Portland and Chicago. He discusses conflicting court decisions and the implications for immigration enforcement. Meanwhile, Robert Mintz, a former federal prosecutor, delves into the Supreme Court's examination of warrantless police entries for emergency aid, debating the standards of probable cause and objective reasonableness. The discussion highlights pressing civil rights concerns and the potential impact on law enforcement practices.

Mark Zaid, a national security attorney, delves into John Bolton's indictment under the Espionage Act, highlighting key legal challenges and implications. Richard Briffault, an elections law expert, discusses the Supreme Court’s upcoming decisions on the Voting Rights Act, predicting significant shifts in redistricting policies. Jacqueline Thomsen, a reporter focused on the judiciary, reveals how Reagan-appointed judges are increasingly critical of the Trump administration, showcasing a fascinating evolution in conservative judicial philosophy.

Elections law expert Richard Briffault from Columbia Law School discusses the Supreme Court's inclination to limit race-based electoral districts, emphasizing the complexities of the Voting Rights Act and its implications for redistricting. He outlines the potential impacts on midterm elections and the broader consequences for voting rights. Meanwhile, Bloomberg Law reporter Jacqueline Thomsen highlights Reagan-era judges who are pushing back against the Trump administration, revealing their commitment to the rule of law amid escalating executive power challenges.

Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr shares insights on the potential limitations the Court's conservative justices may impose on race-based electoral districts, raising fears over the future of the Voting Rights Act. Meanwhile, Columbia Law School professor Eric Talley analyzes the complexities of Elon Musk's controversial $55 billion pay package litigation, considering fiduciary duties and the impact of shareholder votes. The discussion highlights the intertwining of legal decisions with political consequences, particularly as they relate to upcoming elections.