Bloomberg Law

John Meiser, a professor at Notre Dame Law School and director of the Religious Liberty Clinic, delves into a Supreme Court case surrounding a Rastafarian inmate's claim of religious rights violations by prison guards. He unpacks the complexities of RELUPA and discusses the implications for monetary damages. Meanwhile, Harold Krent, a constitutional law expert, examines the government's attempt to deploy National Guard forces in Chicago, highlighting the legal challenges and limits of executive authority in domestic troop movements.

Columbia Law School Professor Suzanne Goldberg, a leading expert on sexuality and gender law, discusses the Supreme Court's refusal to hear a same-sex marriage challenge, emphasizing the need for vigilance despite current protections. Bloomberg Law reporter Suzanne Monyak then delves into the Deputy Attorney General's controversial call for a 'war' on judges, touching on the implications of politicizing the judiciary and the increasing threats faced by judges. Both guests highlight significant developments that shape the landscape of legal rights and government accountability.

Timothy Brightbill, co-chair of the international trade practice at Wiley Rein, dives into the Supreme Court's hearing on global tariffs and the implications of the Trump administration's actions. Robert Mintz, a former federal prosecutor, explores the complex defense strategies in the criminal case against James Comey, including challenges over alleged false statements and prosecutorial methods. Finally, Harry First, an NYU Law professor, analyzes Michael Jordan's antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR, focusing on market control and competition dynamics in racing.

Former federal prosecutor Robert Mintz shares insights on James Comey's legal battle, discussing the implications of grand jury irregularities and prosecutorial scrutiny. Antitrust expert Harry First dives into Michael Jordan's fight against NASCAR, revealing the court's ruling that recognizes premier stock car racing as a distinct market. He explains NASCAR's monopsony power and the challenges plaintiffs face in proving damages. The conversation also touches on how these developments might pressure a settlement and the unique dynamics of a jury trial involving a sports icon.

Michael Dorf, a constitutional law professor at Cornell, and Timothy Brightbill, a partner at Wiley Rein specializing in international trade, dive into the Supreme Court's oral arguments regarding Trump's tariffs. They discuss the potential overreach of executive power and the implications of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Key concerns include whether tariffs fall within the statute's language and how rulings on this case might affect trade policy and constitutional authority. The uncertainty of justices' votes adds to the tension regarding future tariff practices.

Eric Talley, a corporate governance expert from Columbia Law School, discusses the Delaware Supreme Court's review of a controversial law linking to Elon Musk's pay package. He offers insights on the law's implications for corporate oversight and potential constitutionality issues. Meanwhile, Bloomberg Law reporter Suzanne Monyak sheds light on the federal judiciary's funding crisis, detailing operational disruptions caused by the shutdown and how it affects criminal defense. The conversation explores legal challenges and the implications for court operations.

In this lively discussion, Pat Parenteau, an environmental law professor at Vermont Law, explores the complexities of the Antiquities Act and the ongoing Bears Ears legal challenge. He sheds light on potential Supreme Court scrutiny and the vagueness of monument protections. Meanwhile, Harold Krent, a constitutional law expert from Chicago-Kent College, tackles the intricacies of SNAP funding, detailing federal judges' rulings and the challenges states face with partial payments. Together, they navigate the intersection of environmental and constitutional law.

Join former federal prosecutor Joshua Neftalis as he dives into the NBA gambling scandal, unraveling the complexities of fixed poker games and insider information. Constitutional law expert David Super discusses President Trump's potential third term, exploring the legal barriers of the 22nd Amendment and historical precedents. Finally, Jeffrey Weiss sheds light on a significant lawsuit challenging New York City's congressional districting, raising crucial questions about voter representation and state versus federal law. It's a captivating mix of law and current events!

Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland & Knight and former head of the Office of Immigration Litigation during the Obama administration, delves into the legal battles surrounding Trump’s National Guard deployments to Democratic cities. He analyzes appellate rulings, the Supreme Court’s request for insights on federal forces, and the intricate dynamics of law enforcement agencies like ICE and Border Patrol. Fresco also discusses transparency requirements for federal agents, the challenges of aggressive immigration tactics, and the implications of family-based immigration policies.

Jeffrey Weiss, a professor at New York Law School and a redistricting expert, discusses a lawsuit challenging New York City’s only Republican congressional seat, highlighting the push to enhance minority voting power by incorporating lower Manhattan. Erik Larson, a Bloomberg legal reporter, explains President Trump's appeal of his New York hush-money conviction, detailing claims of flawed trial processes and potential presidential immunity. Together, they explore the intricate relationship between law and politics in these high-stakes matters.