

Normal Curves: Sexy Science, Serious Statistics
Regina Nuzzo and Kristin Sainani
Normal Curves is a podcast about sexy science & serious statistics. Ever try to make sense of a scientific study and the numbers behind it? Listen in to a lively conversation between two stats-savvy friends who break it all down with humor and clarity. Professors Regina Nuzzo of Gallaudet University and Kristin Sainani of Stanford University discuss academic papers journal club-style — except with more fun, less jargon, and some irreverent, PG-13 content sprinkled in. Join Kristin and Regina as they dissect the data, challenge the claims, and arm you with tools to assess scientific studies on your own.
Episodes
Mentioned books

Mar 23, 2026 • 1h 11min
Epidurals: Are labor epidurals really linked to autism?
Epidurals are widely used and widely trusted for pain relief during labor. So when a 2020 study reported that they might be linked to autism, it raised a troubling question: could a routine medical decision have long-term consequences? We follow that claim from headline to evidence—and watch what happens when other scientists take a closer look. We dig into the original study, a wave of replication studies from around the world, and a meta-analysis that tries to make sense of it all. Along the way, we unpack hazard ratios, Cox regression, inverse probability weighting, and sibling analyses—and why even sophisticated statistical adjustment can’t eliminate confounding. Plus: why bigger datasets don’t solve everything, what happens when results shrink after adjustment, and how a controversial study turned into a case study in science working as it should. Bonus: our first guest journalist interview!Statistical topicsConfoundingCox regressionHazard ratiosInverse probability weighting (IPTW)Multivariable adjustmentObservational studiesResidual confoundingRetrospective cohort studiesSibling analysisStatistical adjustmentStatistical significance vs practical significanceSurvival analysisMethodological morals“Every time you adjust the model and the effect gets smaller, that's the universe whispering, maybe don't build a causal story out of this.”“Consistency across studies is gold.”“There's more to the story than the statistics.”ReferencesDattaro, Laura. A questionable study linked autism to epidurals. Then what? Spectrum. April 18, 2023. Dattaro, Laura. How to find baby sharks. Nautilus. September 9. 2024.Laura Dattaro’s home page.Phil Kearney’s blog post about the SMART framework.Qiu C, Lin JC, Shi JM, et al. Association Between Epidural Analgesia During Labor and Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Offspring. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:1168-1175. Joint Statement. Labor Epidurals Do Not Cause Autism; Safe for Mothers and Infants, say Anesthesiology, Obstetrics, and Pediatric Medical Societies. American Society of Anesthesiologists. October 12, 2020.Wall-Wieler E, Bateman BT, Hanlon-Dearman A, Roos LL, Butwick AJ. Association of Epidural Labor Analgesia With Offspring Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorders. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175:698-705. Christakis DA. More on epidurals and autism. JAMA Pediatrics. 2021; 175: 705.Mikkelsen AP, Greiber IK, Scheller NM, Lidegaard Ø. Association of Labor Epidural Analgesia With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children. JAMA. 2021;326:1170–1177. Hanley GE, Bickford C, Ip A, et al. Association of Epidural Analgesia During Labor and Delivery With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Offspring. JAMA. 2021;326:1178-1185. Hegvik TA, Klungsøyr K, Kuja-Halkola R, et al. Labor epidural analgesia and subsequent risk of offspring autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-national cohort study of 4.5 million individuals and their siblings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228:233.e1-233.e12. Epub 2022 Aug 13. Hu X, Wang B, Chen J, Han D, Wu J. Association Between Epidural Labor Analgesia and Autism Spectrum Disorder in Offspring: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain Res;17:227-240. Kristin and Regina’s online courses: Demystifying Data: A Modern Approach to Statistical Understanding Clinical Trials: Design, Strategy, and Analysis Medical Statistics Certificate Program Writing in the Sciences Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program Programs that we teach in:Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program Find us on:Kristin - LinkedIn & Twitter/XRegina - LinkedIn & ReginaNuzzo.com(00:00) - Intro
(01:40) - Why autism is hard to study
(05:18) - The original 2020 study
(11:38) - Results & hazard ratios
(15:24) - Confounding & adjustment
(27:29) - Criticism & plausibility
(35:08) - Replications begin
(45:57) - Converging evidence & meta-analysis
(52:07) - What does it mean?
(54:57) - Guest & wrap-up

5 snips
Mar 9, 2026 • 1h 5min
Daylight Saving Time: Does springing forward cause heart attacks?
They dig into headlines claiming daylight saving causes a 24% spike in heart attacks and trace that number back to the studies behind it. The hosts compare registry studies, a large meta-analysis, and a modern U.S. registry to show how methods shape results. They explain incidence ratios, relative versus absolute risk, negative controls, harvesting, and why dramatic numbers make better headlines than careful statistics.

Feb 23, 2026 • 1h 7min
Marathon Performance: Does high-carb fueling work?
How many carbs do you need to run your best marathon? Recent headlines suggest that 120 grams per hour is the magic number. But what’s the science behind that claim? To find out, we dug into the study fueling the hype — and were surprised by what we found. In this episode, we uncover numbers that mysteriously shift after peer review, figures that don’t match the text, and p-values that refuse to line up with their confidence intervals. Along the way, we swap bonking stories, revisit repeated-measures ANOVA, renew our antipathy for spreadsheets, and follow a trail of statistical termites to a surprisingly happy scientific ending.Statistical topicsArticle in press vs final publicationData management and workflowMultiple testingP-values and confidence intervalsRepeated Measures ANOVAStatistical sleuthingVersion control in researchWithin-person study designMethodological morals“Everyone makes statistical mistakes, not everyone fixes them.”“If the numbers aren't consistent, Excel is often part of the story.”“If a p-value doesn't survive the trip from text to figure, there's a problem.”Statistical Sleuthing Extended NotesReferencesRavikanti S, Silang KG, Martyn HJ, et al. 13C-labelled glucose–fructose show greater exogenous and whole-body CHO oxidation and lower O2 cost of running at 120 versus 60 and 90 g·h−1 in elite male marathoners. J Appl Physiol. 2025;139:1581–95. (final version)Article in Press of J Appl Physiol. 2025;139:1581–95. graph2table AI data extraction from figures. Use the discount code normalcurves20 for 20% off!Bob Kempainen gutting out the win at the 1996 U.S. Olympic Marathon Trials.N=7 is a Dinner Party LinkedIn PostWebPlotDigitizerHolmer B. The new high-carb study that’s rocking the running world. Marathon Handbook. Dec 5, 2025.Ivy JL, Miller W, Dover V, et al. Endurance improved by ingestion of a glucose polymer supplement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983; 15:466–471.Coyle EF, Coggan AR, Hemmert MK, et al. Muscle glycogen utilization during prolonged strenuous exercise when fed carbohydrate. J Appl Physiol. 1986; 61:165–172.Coggan AR, Coyle EF. Reversal of fatigue during prolonged exercise by carbohydrate infusion or ingestion. J Appl Physiol. 1987; 63:2388–2395.Below PR, Mora-Rodríguez R, González-Alonso J, et al. Fluid and carbohydrate ingestion independently improve performance during 1 h of intense exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995; 27:200–210.American College of Sports Medicine. Position stand: Nutrition and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996.Jeukendrup AE, Jentjens R. Oxidation of carbohydrate feedings during prolonged exercise: current thoughts, guidelines and directions for future research. Sports Med. 2000; 29:407–424.Currell K, Jeukendrup AE. Superior endurance performance with ingestion of multiple transportable carbohydrates. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40:275–281.American Dietetic Association, Dietitians of Canada, American College of Sports Medicine, et al. Nutrition and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41:709–731.Triplett D, Doyle JA, Rupp JC, et al. An isocaloric glucose–fructose beverage's effect on simulated 100-km cycling performance compared with a glucose-only beverage. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2010; 20:122–131.Stellingwerff T, Cox GR. Systematic review: carbohydrate supplementation on exercise performance or capacity of varying durations. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2014; 39:998–1011.Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: Nutrition and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016.King AJ, O’Hara JP, Morrison DJ, et al. Carbohydrate dose influences liver and muscle glycogen oxidation and performance during prolonged exercise. Physiol Rep. 2018; 6:e13555.Urdampilleta A, Mielgo-Ayuso J, Martínez-Sanz JM, et al. Effects of 120 vs 90 g·h⁻¹ carbohydrate intake during a mountain marathon on neuromuscular function and high-intensity run capacity recovery. Nutrients. 2020; 12:2099.Podlogar T, Bescós R, Wallis GA, et al. Increased exogenous but unaltered endogenous carbohydrate oxidation with 120 vs 90 g·h⁻¹ carbohydrate ingestion during prolonged endurance exercise. Front Nutr. 2022; 9:936691.Smith JW, Pascoe DD, Passe DH, et al. Curvilinear dose-response relationship of carbohydrate (0–120 g·h⁻¹) and performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45:336–341.Lukasiewicz C, Vandiver KJ, Albert ED, et al. Assessing exogenous carbohydrate intake needed to optimize human endurance performance across sex: insights from modeling runners pursuing a sub-2-hour marathon. J Appl Physiol. 2024.Kristin and Regina’s online courses: Demystifying Data: A Modern Approach to Statistical Understanding Clinical Trials: Design, Strategy, and Analysis Medical Statistics Certificate Program Writing in the Sciences ...

Feb 9, 2026 • 1h 2min
Falling in Love: Do the 36 Questions Actually Work?
Can a list of questions really make two strangers fall in love? In 2015, a viral New York Times Modern Love column claimed psychologists had discovered a formula for love: 36 increasingly personal questions, plus four minutes of eye contact. Millions of people tried it. There was even an app. But when we followed the citation trail back to the science, the story started to unravel. In this episode, we crack open the 1997 study behind the “36 Questions,” unearth a forgotten pilot study with a different (and sexier) protocol, and track down the real origin of the eye-gazing task. Along the way, we break down why control groups matter, why scale midpoints mislead, and why group averages aren’t people. We also try the questions on each other—purely for science, of course—and ask the nerdiest Valentine’s Day question of all: can a list of questions really make anyone fall in love?Statistical topicsControl groupsCorrelated observationsGroup averages vs individual inferencePilot studiesReference distributionsScale interpretationUnits of observationMethodological morals“Before you repeat a scientific claim, follow it back to the original study and read it carefully.”“You can slice the data into subgroups all you want, but that doesn't magically give you a control group. It gives you meaningless results.”Our version of the “40 Questions” app!ReferencesAron, A., Aron, E.N., Melinat, E. and Vallone, R., 1991. Experimentally induced closeness, ego identity, and the opportunity to say no. In Conference of the International Network on Personal Relationships, Normal, IL.Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E.N., Vallone, R.D. and Bator, R.J., 1997. The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 23(4), pp.363-377.Catron, Mandy L. To fall in love with anyone, do this. New York Times. January 11, 2015. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/style/modern-love-to-fall-in-love-with-anyone-do-this.htmlCatron, M.L., 2017. How to fall in love with anyone: a memoir in essays. Simon and Schuster.Jones, Daniel. The 36 Questions That Lead to Love. New York Times. January 9, 2015. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/09/style/no-37-big-wedding-or-small.htmlKashdan, T.B. and Wenzel, A., 2005. A transactional approach to social anxiety and the genesis of interpersonal closeness: Self, partner, and social context. Behavior Therapy, 36(4), pp.335-346.Lee, Anna G. Long After ‘36 Questions,’ Finally Asking a Bigger One. New York Times. May 16, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/09/style/no-37-big-wedding-or-small.htmlSprecher, S., 2021. Closeness and other affiliative outcomes generated from the Fast Friends procedure: A comparison with a small-talk task and unstructured self-disclosure and the moderating role of mode of communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(5), pp.1452-1471.Vacharkulksemsuk T, Fredrickson BL. Strangers in sync: Achieving embodied rapport through shared movements. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012;48(1):399-402. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.015Mandy Len Catron’s TEDx talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8Yo-PXN7UAIvan Vendrov’s Twitter/X post about his exchange with Arthur Aron: https://x.com/IvanVendrov/status/1611809736823013377/photo/1https://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/love-and-the-brain-part-1-the-36-questions-revisited/Our version of the “40 Questions” app: https://www.normalcurves.com/questions-to-fall-in-love/Kristin and Regina’s online courses: Demystifying Data: A Modern Approach to Statistical Understanding Clinical Trials: Design, Strategy, and Analysis Medical Statistics Certificate Program Writing in the Sciences Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program Programs that we teach in:Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program Find us on:Kristin - LinkedIn & Twitter/XRegina - LinkedIn & ReginaNuzzo.com(00:00) - Intro
(04:42) - Viral NYT Modern Love essay’s cultural influence
(09:32) - Science behind the 36 questions
(15:07) - The 1997 paper myth busting
(19:49) - Sleuthing the pilot study
(30:41) - What did the 1997 paper actually show
(42:21) - Discussion section
(51:55) - Did it replicate
(58:44) - Wrap up

Jan 26, 2026 • 1h 4min
Bonus: Pheromones with commentary
They revisit the sweaty T-shirt study that spawned pheromone parties and DNA-based dating fads. They unpack HLA/MHC genes and how scent was used to suggest mate choice. Statistical curiosities pop up: bar chart misuse, correlated observations, within-person designs, and post-hoc subgrouping. They trace failed replications, lost data, and a meta-analysis that questions the original claims.

Jan 12, 2026 • 1h 14min
Bonus: Sugar Sag with Commentary
While we’re on a short break between seasons, we’re revisiting some of our favorite episodes from Season 1. This week, we’re re-releasing our exploration of how your diet can affect your skin – now with added commentary!Wrinkles and sagging skin—just normal aging, or can you blame your sweet tooth? We dive into “sugar sag,” exploring how sugar, processed foods, and even your crispy breakfast toast might be making you look older than if you’d said no to chocolate cake and yes to broccoli. Along the way, we encounter statistical adjustment, training and test data sets, what we call “references to nowhere,” plus some cadavers and collagen. Ever heard of an AGE reader? Find out how this tool might offer a sneak peek at your date’s age—and maybe even a clue about his… um… “performance.”Statistical topics ConfoundingCorrelation vs causationMeasurement error / proxy variablesOverfitting PlagiarismProper citing practicesReferences to nowhereStatistical adjustmentTraining and test setsMethodologic morals“When you plagiarize, you steal the errors too.”“Overdone statistical adjustment is like overdone photo filters–at a certain point it’s just laughable.”CitationsCollagen turnover: Verzijl N, DeGroot J, Thorpe SR, et al.Effect of Collagen Turnover on the Accumulation of Advanced Glycation End Products. JBC. 2000;275:39027-31.Cadaver study:Hamlin CR, Kohn RR, Luschin JH. Apparent Accelerated Aging of Human Collagen in Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes. 1975; 24: 902–904.AGE ReaderStudies of AGEs and diabetes and health:Monnier VM, Cerami A. Nonenzymatic browning in vivo: possible process for aging of long-lived proteins. Science. 1981;211:491-3. Brownlee M, Vlassara H, Cerami A. Nonenzymatic glycosylation and the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:527-37. Monnier VM, Vishwanath V, Frank KE, et al. Relation between Complications of Type I Diabetes Mellitus and Collagen-Linked Fluorescence. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:403-408.Monnier VM, Sell DR, Abdul-Karim FW, et al. Collagen browning and cross-linking are increased in chronic experimental hyperglycemia. Relevance to diabetes and aging. Diabetes. 1988;37:867-72. Monnier VM, Bautista O, Kenny D, et al. Skin collagen glycation, glycoxidation, and crosslinking are lower in subjects with long-term intensive versus conventional therapy of type 1 diabetes: relevance of glycated collagen products versus HbA1c as markers of diabetic complications. Diabetes 1999; 48: 870–80.Genuth S, Sun W, Cleary P, et al. Glycation and carboxymethyllysine levels in skin collagen predict the risk of future 10-year progression of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy in the diabetes control and complications trial and epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications participants with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54:3103-11. van Waateringe RP, Slagter SN, van Beek AP, et al. Skin autofluorescence, a non-invasive biomarker for advanced glycation end products, is associated with the metabolic syndrome and its individual components. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2017;9:42. Kouidrat Y, Zaitouni A, Amad A, et al. Skin autofluorescence (a marker for advanced glycation end products) and erectile dysfunction in diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2017;3:108-113. Fujita N, Ishida M, Iwane T, et al. Association between Advanced Glycation End-Products, Carotenoids, and Severe Erectile Dysfunction. World J Mens Health. 2023;41:701-11. Uruska A, Gandecka A, Araszkiewicz A, et al. Accumulation of advanced glycation end products in the skin is accelerated in relation to insulin resistance in people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2019;36:620-625. Boersma HE, Smit AJ, Paterson AD, et al. Skin autofluorescence and cause-specific mortality in a population-based cohort. Sci Rep 2024;14:19967.Review article with conflicts of interest: Draelos ZD. Sugar Sag: What Is Skin Glycation and How Do You Combat It? J Drugs Dermatol. 2024; 23:s5-10.Clinical study on AGE interrupter cream:Draelos ZD, Yatskayer M, Raab S, Oresajo C. An evaluation of the effect of a topical product containing C-xyloside and blueberry extract on the appearance of type II diabetic skin. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2009;8:147-51. Our citation trail:2023 review article: Zgutka K, Tkacz M, Tomasiak, et al. A Role for Advanced Glycation End Products in Molecular Ageing. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24: 9881. Sentence: “Interestingly, strict control of blood sugar for 4 months reduced the production of glycosylated collagen by 25%, and low-sugar food prepared by boiling could also reduce the production of AGEs [152].”Reference 152 is a review article: Cao C, Xiao Z, Wu Y, et al. Diet and Skin Aging-From the Perspective of Food Nutrition. Nutrients. 2020;12:870. Sentence: “However, strict control of blood sugar for four months can reduce the production of glycosylated collagen by 25%, and low-sugar food prepared by boiling can also reduce the production of AGEs [93–95].”Reference 93 is a review article: Nguyen HP, Katta R. Sugar sag: Glycation and the role of diet in aging skin. Skin Ther Lett. 2015; 20: 1–5. Sentence: “Tight glycemic control over a 4-month period can result in a reduction of glycated collagen formation by 25%.37,38”Reference 94 and 38 is a review article: Draelos ZD. Aging skin: the role of diet: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2013;31:701-6. Sentence: “Tighter glycemic control can reduce glycated collagen by 25% in 4 months.” No citation given....

16 snips
Dec 29, 2025 • 1h 29min
Bonus: Vitamin D Part 1 with commentary
Dive into the vitamin D conundrum as the hosts unravel the claims of a deficiency epidemic. Discover the surprising surfer study from Hawaii that challenges assumptions about sun exposure and vitamin D levels. Explore the clash between differing medical guidelines and how arbitrary thresholds can warp our understanding of health. With a touch of statistical sleuthing, they highlight biases, conflicts of interest, and the nuances behind dietary recommendations. Get ready for a captivating discussion that questions the very data behind vitamin D health claims.

7 snips
Dec 15, 2025 • 47min
The Batman Effect: Do weird surprises make people nicer?
DescriptionNobody expects Batman—but when he shows up in a crowded subway car, are people suddenly more likely to help a passenger in need? This week on Normal Curves, we unpack a recent quasi-experimental field study involving a caped superhero costume, a prosthetic pregnancy belly, and some puzzled Italian commuters. Along the way, we demystify three common ways of describing effects for binary outcomes—risk differences, risk ratios, and odds ratios—and explain what they actually mean in plain language. We also do some statistical sleuthing, uncover a major problem hiding in the paper’s numbers, and debate what really counts as an effective Batman outfit.Statistical topicsabsolute vs relative effectsbinary outcomescoding errorsdata errors and quality controleffect size interpretationfield experimentsoddsodds ratiospercentage differencesquasi-experimental studiesrisk differencesrisk ratiosstatistical sleuthingMethodological morals“We love an uncluttered paper, but when it's missing the basics, it's like an empty fridge. Clean, yes, but dinner is not happening.”“Before you make a fancy model, make sure the numbers in the table in the text match.”ReferencesPagnini F, Grosso F, Cavalera C, et al. Unexpected events and prosocial behavior: the Batman effect. Npj Ment Health Res. 2025;4(1):57. Published 2025 Nov 3. doi:10.1038/s44184-025-00171-5PubPeer. Comments on “Unexpected events and prosocial behavior: the Batman effect.” Accessed December 2025.Sainani KL. Understanding odds ratios. PM R. 2011;3(3):263-267. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.01.009Nuzzo RL. Communicating measures of relative risk in plain English. PM R. 2022;14(2):283-287. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12761Sainani KL. How statistics can mislead. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:e3-4.Kristin and Regina’s online courses: Demystifying Data: A Modern Approach to Statistical Understanding Clinical Trials: Design, Strategy, and Analysis Medical Statistics Certificate Program Writing in the Sciences Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program Programs that we teach in:Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program Find us on:Kristin - LinkedIn & Twitter/XRegina - LinkedIn & ReginaNuzzo.com(00:00) - Intro
(03:42) - Why would Batman make people nicer?
(07:33) - How they ran the experiment
(17:50) - Did Batman save the day? Different ways to answer that
(23:00) - What are odds and odds ratios?
(30:00) - Where people get it wrong
(34:52) - The plot twist: big numerical errors
(41:20) - Did men or women give up their seat more often?
(43:49) - Wrap-up and methodological morals

Dec 1, 2025 • 1h 4min
Holiday Survival Guide Part 2: The survey study edition
Does the temperature of your coffee six months ago really predict whether you feel gassy today? This week we dissect a new nutrition survey study on hot and cold beverage habits that claims to connect drink temperature with gut symptoms, anxiety, and more—despite relying on year-old memories and a blizzard of statistical tests. It’s the perfect case study for our Holiday Survival Guide Part 2, where we teach you how to talk with Uncle Joe at the dinner table about one of the most common—and most fraught—study designs in science: cross-sectional surveys. We walk through our easy checklist for making sense of results, show how recall bias and measurement error can skew the story, and reacquaint you with nonmonogamous Multiple-Testing Dude, who’s been very busy in this dataset. A friendly, practical guide to spotting when researchers are just torturing the data until it confesses.Statistical topicsConfoundingCross-sectional studiesFalse positivesMeasurement errorMultiple testingPICOT / PIVOT frameworkRecall biasResearch hypothesesSample size and powerSignal vs. noiseSMART frameworkStatistical significanceSubgroup analysesSurvey designTransparency and trustworthinessMethodological morals“When your measurement starts with ‘think back to last winter’ you might as well use a random number generator.”“If the effect is only significant in certain subgroups in certain seasons for certain outcomes, it might just be a bad case of gas.”ReferencesWu T, Doyle C, Ito J, et al. Cold Exposures in Relation to Dysmenorrhea among Asian and White Women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;21(1):56. Published 2023 Dec 30. doi:10.3390/ijerph21010056Wu T, Ramesh N, Doyle C, Hsu FC. Cold and hot consumption and health outcomes among US Asian and White populations. Br J Nutr. Published online September 18, 2025. doi:10.1017/S000711452510514XKristin and Regina’s online courses: Demystifying Data: A Modern Approach to Statistical Understanding Clinical Trials: Design, Strategy, and Analysis Medical Statistics Certificate Program Writing in the Sciences Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program Programs that we teach in:Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program Find us on:Kristin - LinkedIn & Twitter/XRegina - LinkedIn & ReginaNuzzo.com(00:00) - Intro
(04:36) - Did they have real research hypotheses?
(10:29) - Observational or randomized experiment?
(20:09) - PICOT and PIVOT
(26:20) - Memory problems
(32:03) - Five outcomes and measurement problems therein
(36:56) - SMART
(41:50) - Multiple Testing Dude is having a great time
(52:36) - How big is the effect?
(59:06) - Wrap-up and Irish Coffee rating scale

Nov 17, 2025 • 1h 2min
Holiday Survival Guide: How to talk about scientific studies around the dinner table
Does a little alcohol really make you speak a foreign language better? This week we unpack a quirky randomized trial that tested Dutch pronunciation after a modest buzz—and came to the opposite conclusion the researchers expected. We use it as the perfect holiday case study: instead of arguing with Uncle Joe at the dinner table, we’ll show you how to pull apart a scientific headline using a friendly, practical checklist anyone can learn. Along the way we stress-test the study’s claims, take a quick detour into what a .04% buzz actually looks like, and run our own before-and-after experiment with two brave science journalists at the ScienceWriters2025 conference in Chicago. A holiday survival guide with vodka tonics, statistical sleuthing, and a few surprisingly smooth French phrases.Statistical topicsAlternative explanationsArithmetic consistency / GRIM testBlindingEffect size / magnitudeGeneralizability / external validityObservational studies vs. experimentsOutcome measurementPICOT frameworkPlacebo and expectancy effectsPrimary outcomes / pre-specificationRandomized controlled trialsResearch hypothesesSample size SMART frameworkStatistical significance (signal vs. noise)Transparency and trustworthinessMethodological morals“You don't need a PhD to read a study. Just remember, PICOT and SMART.”“A decimal point can mean the difference between life and death. Details matter.”ReferencesRenner F, Kersbergen I, Field M, Werthmann J. Dutch courage? Effects of acute alcohol consumption on self-ratings and observer ratings of foreign language skills. J Psychopharmacol. 2018;32(1):116-122. doi:10.1177/0269881117735687Kristin and Regina’s online courses: Demystifying Data: A Modern Approach to Statistical Understanding Clinical Trials: Design, Strategy, and Analysis Medical Statistics Certificate Program Writing in the Sciences Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program Programs that we teach in:Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program Find us on:Kristin - LinkedIn & Twitter/XRegina - LinkedIn & ReginaNuzzo.com
(00:00) - Intro
(03:30) - Uncle Joe and the question of alcohol
(07:20) - Randomized controlled trial
(10:10) - PICOT mnemonic
(15:43) - Just how drunk?
(22:25) - Boring non-placeb
(33:13) - Kristin’s SMART mnemonic
(39:32) - How big of an effect?
(50:46) - Two science journalists walk into a bar
(57:00) - Martini scale and wrap-up


