Varn Vlog

Ru Marshall, writer and visual artist and author of American Trickster, unravels Carlos Castaneda’s life and reinventions. They explore his academic seductions, the Arana family secret he fled, the rise of tensegrity and cult practices, and the mysterious Death Valley disappearances. The conversation traces charisma, gendered manipulation, and how a literary con became a long-lasting cultural force.

Nurse John, a longtime workplace organizer and friend of the show, brings hard-earned union experience. He unpacks why left‑leaning talk often stops short of action. Short, punchy conversations cover one‑on‑ones, leader development, disruptive members, rank‑and‑file strategy vs staff models, sector differences, and when militancy helps or burns people out.

Matt Borka, Hungarian-born creator and entrepreneur who studies labor data and AI’s effects on work, walks through a K-shaped economy. He discusses wage stagnation, how AI automates entry-level roles first, platform monopolies and rising ad costs, and the migration and brain-drain reshaping life choices. Short, sharp takes on institutional decay, hedging behaviors, and why everyday life feels riskier for most people.

In Part 6 of our series "From Dawn to Decadence," we examine the intellectual trajectory and eventual "decay" of the Aufheben collective. This episode explores the group's early contributions to Marxist theory, their critique of the state, and the internal contradictions that led to their decline.We dive deep into the specific criticisms leveled by the Aufhebung Collective against previous thinkers, including their critiques of Rosa Luxemburg's "objectivism" and the perceived "automaticity" of capitalist collapse. We also discuss how their work interacts with broader Marxist debates on over-accumulation, under-consumption, and the role of the state in managing the "common ruin" of society.Key Topics Discussed:The Roots of Aufheben: How the collective emerged within the landscape of radical Marxist theory.Critique of Luxemburgism: Why Aufheben rejected theories of automatic economic collapse in favor of a more nuanced understanding of class struggle.The Decay of Theory: Analyzing the shifts in the collective’s perspective that signaled a move away from their original radical foundations.Theoretical Implications: How these debates on the "highest stage" of capitalism and the "rentier state" remain relevant in today's shifting global landscape.Link:  https://files.libcom.org/files/Aufheben-%20Decadence.pdfSend us Fan Mail Musis by Bitterlake, Used with Permission, all rights to BitterlakeSupport the showCrew:Host: C. Derick VarnIntro and Outro Music by Bitter Lake.Intro Video Design: Jason MylesArt Design: Corn and C. Derick VarnLinks and Social Media:twitter: @varnvlogblue sky: @varnvlog.bsky.socialYou can find the additional streams on YoutubeCurrent Patreon at the Sponsor Tier: Jordan Sheldon, Mark J. Matthews, Lindsay Kimbrough, RedWolf, DRV, Kenneth McKee, JY Chan, Matthew Monahan, Parzival, Adriel Mixon, Buddy Roark, Daniel Petrovic,Julian

Romanticism gets treated like a synonym for nostalgia, and German Idealism gets shrunk to a few brand-name thinkers. We push back on both habits by talking with Christopher Satoor, a York University doctoral candidate and founder of the Young Idealist series, about what really happens when philosophy, poetry, art, and science collide in Jena.Schelling sits at the center of that collision. We dig into why his Naturphilosophie is neither “woo” nor a quaint premodern science lesson, but a serious attempt to rebuild our concept of nature after Cartesian mechanism. That means thinking in terms of living processes, hidden forces, and organic organization, and then asking what it does to our view of mind, creativity, and embodiment when “nature is visible spirit and spirit is invisible nature.” Along the way, we unpack the rift with Fichte, the shadow cast by Hegel, and how later caricatures and missing translations shaped Schelling’s reputation in English-language philosophy.We also take the political and ethical questions seriously: what the Freedom Essay contributes to debates about evil, freedom, and the limits of purely dialectical stories of progress, and why Schelling’s later “positive philosophy” focuses on existence, facticity, and the question of why there is something rather than nothing. Finally, we connect the stakes to the present, where climate change and environmental catastrophe demand a less mechanized picture of the world and a more holistic way of thinking across disciplines.If you enjoy deep dives into German Romanticism, German Idealism, Schelling, Kant, Fichte, Hegel, philosophy of nature, and freedom, subscribe, share this with a friend who argues about materialism, and leave a review with the biggest idea you’re still wrestling with.Send us Fan Mail Musis by Bitterlake, Used with Permission, all rights to BitterlakeSupport the showCrew:Host: C. Derick VarnIntro and Outro Music by Bitter Lake.Intro Video Design: Jason MylesArt Design: Corn and C. Derick VarnLinks and Social Media:twitter: @varnvlogblue sky: @varnvlog.bsky.socialYou can find the additional streams on YoutubeCurrent Patreon at the Sponsor Tier: Jordan Sheldon, Mark J. Matthews, Lindsay Kimbrough, RedWolf, DRV, Kenneth McKee, JY Chan, Matthew Monahan, Parzival, Adriel Mixon, Buddy Roark, Daniel Petrovic,Julian

Join hosts as they dive deep into the complexities of modern French politics with guest Henry Wallace. This episode explores the concept of the "new municipalism" and the strategic efforts of the La France Insoumise (France Unbowed) movement to reclaim local governance. From the legacy of the Yellow Vests protests to the innovative use of digital organizing tools, the discussion provides a comprehensive look at how grassroots activism is challenging neoliberal structures in France.Key Topics Covered:The New Municipalism: Understanding the shift toward empowering local communes and city councils as hubs for democratic participation.France Unbowed (LFI) Strategy: An inside look at how the movement integrates intellectual production with popular education and local action.Lessons from the Yellow Vests: Analyzing the impact of past social movements on current political strategies and the demand for a "referendum of citizen initiative".Digital Organizing: How LFI utilizes custom-built applications to facilitate local action groups and bypass traditional bureaucratic hurdles.The Future of French Politics: Predicting the implications of local electoral successes on the upcoming presidential and legislative races.Send us Fan Mail Musis by Bitterlake, Used with Permission, all rights to BitterlakeSupport the showCrew:Host: C. Derick VarnIntro and Outro Music by Bitter Lake.Intro Video Design: Jason MylesArt Design: Corn and C. Derick VarnLinks and Social Media:twitter: @varnvlogblue sky: @varnvlog.bsky.socialYou can find the additional streams on YoutubeCurrent Patreon at the Sponsor Tier: Jordan Sheldon, Mark J. Matthews, Lindsay Kimbrough, RedWolf, DRV, Kenneth McKee, JY Chan, Matthew Monahan, Parzival, Adriel Mixon, Buddy Roark, Daniel Petrovic,Julian

Brandon Lightly, an independent researcher and socialist history enthusiast, walks through the tangled history of united and popular fronts. He maps debates from Marx and the Internationals to Trotsky, the Comintern pivots, and case studies in Austria, Germany, France, Spain, China, and the U.S. Short takes cover tactical mechanics: organizational independence, timing, and when unity strengthens or dissolves power.

David I. Backer, an education policy scholar and author who studies school finance and municipal bonds. He follows how local property taxes and Wall Street shape who gets safe buildings and learning resources. He unpacks crumbling facilities, the municipal bond market’s power, rising noninstruction costs, and bold fixes like shared tax bases and public lending for school infrastructure.

What if the real engine of socialist history wasn’t just theory, but teaching? We sit down with historian Edward Baring to trace a vivid, often-misread story: Marxism as a mass educational project designed to turn scattered grievances into class consciousness. From best-selling primers that outsold Capital to study circles in factories and party schools, we unpack how organizers taught at scale—and why the word “vulgar” once critiqued bad teaching, not bad thinking.We map the fault line between Kautsky’s “teach the conclusions” approach and Lukács’s insistence on method and totality, and we ask the hard question: how do you teach complexity without losing people who work ten-hour days? Lenin’s What Is To Be Done and State and Revolution reveal the same tension, combining textual trench warfare with tactical clarity for a revolutionary moment. Hendrik de Man’s psychological critique raises a chilling possibility: if capitalism deforms worker experience, will the versions of Marxism that spread most easily become the most mechanical?Gramsci offers a different path. His organic intellectuals don’t deliver doctrine; they nurture a counter-hegemony by working inside communities’ common sense and everyday practice. Education becomes a two-way process that builds agency, not dependency. We follow this thread beyond Europe with Mariátegui, where translating Marxism for peasant contexts demanded creativity over orthodoxy—and exposed the classist edge to accusations of “vulgarity.”If you care about political education, labor organizing, or the history of socialist strategy, this conversation brings fresh clarity to how ideas travel, who carries them, and what actually changes minds. Subscribe, share with a comrade, and leave a review telling us: what’s the one teaching practice you think movements should revive today?Edward Baring is a Professor of History and Human Values at Princeton University. An expert in modern European intellectual history, he is the author of several award-winning books, including The Young Derrida and French Philosophy and Converts to the Real. Today, we focus on his book, Vulgar Marxism His latest research focuses on the intersection of revolutionary politics and pedagogy.Send us Fan Mail Musis by Bitterlake, Used with Permission, all rights to BitterlakeSupport the showCrew:Host: C. Derick VarnIntro and Outro Music by Bitter Lake.Intro Video Design: Jason MylesArt Design: Corn and C. Derick VarnLinks and Social Media:twitter: @varnvlogblue sky: @varnvlog.bsky.socialYou can find the additional streams on YoutubeCurrent Patreon at the Sponsor Tier: Jordan Sheldon, Mark J. Matthews, Lindsay Kimbrough, RedWolf, DRV, Kenneth McKee, JY Chan, Matthew Monahan, Parzival, Adriel Mixon, Buddy Roark, Daniel Petrovic,Julian

A century ago, philosophy split its seams. Cambridge’s revolt against British Hegelianism promised “clarity,” Vienna’s scientific modernism tried to rebuild from scratch, and postwar America professionalized it all while quietly erasing the politics that once burned at the core. We invited Christoph Schuringa, editor of Hegel Bulletin and author of A Social History of Analytic Philosophy and Karl Marx and the Actualization of Philosophy, to map the break—and to argue why Marx didn’t abandon philosophy so much as put it back to work.We start with Russell and Moore’s rebellion and the Bloomsbury circle that treated linguistic precision as a moral breakthrough. Then we step into Red Vienna, where the Unity of Science lived alongside adult education, social housing, and austro‑Marxist reform. Wittgenstein links both worlds: sanctified by the Vienna Circle, wary of their empiricism, mystical yet method-obsessed, and ultimately a catalyst for the linguistic turn that reshaped Anglo‑American departments. The Cold War’s shadow looms large here; McCarthyism and professional incentives sanded down the political edge of philosophy of science, leaving behind procedures without projects.From there, we pivot to Marx. Schuringa makes a provocative case: Capital is philosophical not because it states doctrines, but because it enacts dialectical thinking adequate to its object. Rather than a self‑contained logic applied to reality, Marx tracks how concrete oppositions ripen into contradictions—how specialization collides with labor mobility, how accumulation breeds crisis. Ethics reenters the frame too. Instead of rulebooks, we get the hard work of situated judgment and character, closer to Aristotle than to textbook deontology. Species‑being names our capacity for freedom and mutual recognition within social life; its glimpses are already here in imperfect forms, like care untethered from payment.If you’ve ever wondered why analytic philosophy persists, why Wittgenstein feels both central and strange, or how Marx can guide action without sanctifying dogma, this conversation connects the dots. Join us for a tour from Cambridge to Vienna to London and back to the workshop of history—and stay for a clear, practical case for philosophy that helps us think and act together. If this resonates, share it with a friend, leave a review, and tell us: what should philosophy dare to do next?Send us Fan Mail Musis by Bitterlake, Used with Permission, all rights to BitterlakeSupport the showCrew:Host: C. Derick VarnIntro and Outro Music by Bitter Lake.Intro Video Design: Jason MylesArt Design: Corn and C. Derick VarnLinks and Social Media:twitter: @varnvlogblue sky: @varnvlog.bsky.socialYou can find the additional streams on YoutubeCurrent Patreon at the Sponsor Tier: Jordan Sheldon, Mark J. Matthews, Lindsay Kimbrough, RedWolf, DRV, Kenneth McKee, JY Chan, Matthew Monahan, Parzival, Adriel Mixon, Buddy Roark, Daniel Petrovic,Julian