MGTOW Sandman Quotes

Most of us already know the story behind the herbivore man not wanting sex or relationships with women in Japan. But we also know that human beings have sexual needs that we can't simply walk away from. So pornography in Japan caters to almost any and all sexual fantasies from normal to depraved. And I was shocked to hear that only yesterday Japan banned the possession of photographic images of child pornography. And this was due to international pressure to do something about that problem. And I'm putting a link in the description below for you to read on the subject. But in this video I want to explain how sex crimes and pornography are related to each other because in Japan the availability of pornography from the nineteen sixties and nineteen seventies on-wards might have actually reduced the amount of sex crimes in that society. Critics will say women are reporting sex crimes less because it reduces their chances of finding a husband. But as marriage rates have continued to fall the idea that women in Japan are hiding their abuse because it can effect their future prospects is kind of silly. With the rise in industrialization in Japan in the late nineteenth century Japan started imposing Western ideals governing the pornography. The government of the Meiji era started the Meiji Restoration in 1868 and started imposing restrictions on human sexuality. As a result communal male and female nude bathing were forbidden in the Japanese bath houses. The Japanese went Victorian with their attitude towards sexuality. Sexuality and the human body became something to be ashamed of instead of enjoyed. As the body became taboo the birth rate in Japan began to rise. If you make the body and sexuality forbidden people will crave it more then ever and the way I see it they will start having more sex and not less. As a result people will start getting married more because they need an outlet for their pent up sexual desires. With the birth rate rapidly declining in Japan it was only a time before they started taking more radical actions against pornography or any other personal liberty that threatens the state. Pornography is a liberty that deprives the government of future citizens because current citizens choose not to have children. It takes about twenty to thirty years for the consequences to become apparent. In Japan print pornography started expanding rapidly in the nineteen seventies and nineteen eighties. Anime porn was everywhere as a result. Women getting penetrated by giant squid like monsters without their permission. Japan Finally Bans Child Pornographyhttp://time.com/2892728/japan-finally...Why Japan Has Low Rape Rate Recordshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUD4s...Pornography, Rape and Sex Crimes in Japanhttp://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/art...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today I'd like to talk about the idea that if a man doesn't pay his alimony then he goes to debtors prison. So, not paying ones alimony is considered a debt worthy of getting a man thrown into prison. I got the idea for this video while I was shooting video for the Toronto Domestic Violence Symposium about a week and a half ago. A few of the people in the audience at that event brought up the idea that not paying alimony gets a man thrown into the slammer which is like a form of debtors prison and that debt prisons were barbaric and that we increasingly use this strategy on on men these days with regards to paying spousal support. The state is willing to incarcerate a man if he's either unwilling or unable to pay his alimony. That's one thing I won't have to worry about with regards to being a MGTOW. I don't have to worry about being thrown in jail for refusing to pay or being unable to pay a woman that I was with in the past. If the day came when I was bankrupt for a different reason I would declare insolvency and restart my financial life. But for formerly married guys without that option they don't get to pass go and collect two hundred dollars. Instead they go directly to jail. Another interesting part of that discussion at the domestic violence symposium centered around the idea that the debtors prison was a barbaric practice written about by Charles Dickens in his novels. Over 150 years ago people were locked up for being unable to pay their public and private debts. The irony today is that governments spend tax payer dollars to lock men up for not paying their alimony. So the corporations involved in the prison system and the lawyers and judges are making the money. The system is corrupt. Also during that discussion I overheard people say that men thrown in jail for not paying alimony would meet with other men in the same boat. And they would discuss how their wives hurt them, divorced them and then took their children away in many cases. So those men meet like minded men and then they fuel each others anger and hostility towards women. Thus feeding into feminist ideas. Feminism is interested in creating misogyny and what better way then incarcerating a man and taking away his liberties. If you treat men like criminals and put them into institutions with criminals then when they come out they are more then likely to become actual criminals. It reminds me of that film blow with Johnny Depp where he says he went into prison with a bachelor of a Marijuana and came out with a PHD in Cocaine. The political system is about three steps. Problem, Reaction and Solutions. People in power often create a problem then react to it as a tool to maintain ortake political power and then offer up a solution to a problem they created in the first place. The court system created the alimony payment structure. Then when men don't pay the money the courts ordered them to pay the courts react and thus find a solution to the alimony payments imposed on people in the first place. And in this case the courts drag people off to prison.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This video is not about men beating women. I'm only referring to the shirt that's often nick named "A wife beater shirt." And I'll explain the reason I selected that title for this video in a few minutes. Firstly, does anyone ever wonder why the majority of men plan for the future and why many women never seem to do. I'm not saying that all men plan for the future and that all women don't but I get the general sense that more women then not live for the moment while many men I know including myself live for some future that may never happen. My friend Steve's fathers died from heart disease at the age of sixty five. He was an extremely frugal guy. Visiting their home I would still see only furniture from the late nineteen seventies from when they first purchased their house. His father even kept an old disco ball and the house wasn't painted for years. The place looked like it was out of a time warp from the twilight zone. There was even a mid eighties Oldsmobile in the driveway. For people looking in from the outside my friends family was dirt poor except for the fact that they owned a relatively large middle class home. All the homes around them had been renovated with new cars in the driveway. It seemed like they were the laughing stock of the neighborhood. After my friends father passed away it was revealed to him by his mother that his father had over one million dollars in liquid assets. Mostly cash and cash deposits. His father, the man that wore twenty year old wife beater shirts around the house was one of the four hundred thousand millionaires in Canada or one of the twelve million millionaires around the world. And now my friend, Steve was set to inherit a million dollars. Steve went to the protests in Toronto for Occupy Wall Street. Or occupy Bay Street protests here in Toronto. There he was chanting that he was one of the 99% all the while he was part of the 1% and didn't even know it. And now he's set to retire sometime in his early to mid forties as a millionaire and he claims he's ready to travel the world and live off the interest that he makes off his money. And he deserves it and is a nice guy and it hasn't gotten into his head. Money for him represents safety and security. The money hasn't changed him at all. He's just as careful with his money as he's always been. He rarely treats himself. Still wears ten to twenty year old dress shirts that he got after high school although he still buys a few new articles of clothing each and every year. With no family or kids he will probably retire with one point five million dollars and be financially set for the rest of his life. But this video isn't only about Steve. It's about all of the other men like him that save large amounts of money throughout their life and never do anything with it. They are saving money for security yes but some of them are saving it for some future they plan out but will never live out. And did I mention that my friend is also a MGTOW? The only way he will settle for marriage is if finds a woman worthy of marrying.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Senator Anne Cools at the Toronto Domestic Violence Symposium. Event hosted by Attila Vinczer. Event put on by The Canadian Maltese Charitable Services Trust.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Stefan Molyneux at the Toronto Domestic Violence Symposium. Event hosted by Attila Vinczer. Event put on by The Canadian Maltese Charitable Services Trust.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This is what Kelvin has to say: "Hello Sandman, I am a big fan of your videos and I was wondering if it possible that you could please do a video about male alienation that briefly talked about in your "MGTOWs Anonymous" video? When in high school I was the typical shy, introverted kid that kept my head down with zero success with women. After high school I vowed to improve myself however that has caused me to alienate most of male friends in my life which has caused me to be by myself for the last couple of years. The bitter reality I soon realized with my past male friendships was that most of my "friends" kept me around not because they enjoyed my company but because I was seen as a resource to them or they had access to someone they could make put down to make themselves feel better. I have also found that because of non-competitive nature and that I often just "walk away" from things men my age get very upset because I refused to get involved in their bullshit and their emotions. I find nowadays the only males I can really connect to are men who have gained empathy from being harmed in the past or older men. If you could provide some insight on this male alienation it would really make my day. Thanks, Kelvin. Well, thanks for your very interesting observations and experiences Kelvin. I'm going to elaborate with many personal stories during my childhood.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I've been watching the drama over the last few days with regards to the Manhood Academy. Their leader known either as aca demy or "the professor" modifies his voice to sound like a Chipmunk. So I'm gonna start calling him Professor Chip 'n' Dale. That's also the reason why the title of this video is called The Chipmunk Academy. Professor Chip 'n' Dale recently held an online a debate with Psychological Cynic. And today he released a second debate between himself and Josh. And Chip 'n' Dale is also constantly using the derogatory "F" word when referring to everyone. And he's clearly a blatant Misogynist because at the top of his youtube page he has a sketch of a dog with the words Bitch Management next to it. But I'll get into that a little bit later. Josh wanted me to do a analysis of his debate with professor Chip 'n' Dale so I'm adding that video link into the description below. Here's what Josh had to say: Hello Sandman, A couple days ago I found a video channel on Youtube titled Aca Demy. Which is hosted by a troll who calls himself "The Professor". This person who also runs a website by the name of "Manhood Academy" decided to post a video on his channel titled "MGTOW Cowards Exposed! Standing up to the Men going their own way Movement". While listening to the chipmunk modified voice, I began reading the comments and eventually came across your name. In the comment you invited Aca Demy to a live debate in person stating "SURE I'M A COWARD. I GO TO CAFE EVENTS, MRA EVENTS AND WILL BE AT THE UP AND COMING CONVENTION. I'LL DEBATE YOU IN PERSON AT THE MEN'S RIGHTS CONVENTION IN DETROIT. COME ON DOWN!". However Mr Demy never replied back to you, which honestly should not be much of a surprise. I however did respond to you saying "YOU SHOULD NOT FEED INTO HIS BULLSHIT. JUST MAKE ANOTHER ANALYSIS VIDEO ON YOUR CHANNEL BREAKING DOWN THIS IDIOT BECAUSE IT'S CLEAR THAT HE IS USING THESE DEBATES ON HIS WEBSITE TO ATTRACT TRAFFIC. PLEASE MESS UP THIS FOOL AND HIS WORTHLESS ACADEMY. ACA DEMY YOU HEARD THE MAN DETROIT OR NOTHING." I will like to thank PsychologicalCynic for taking the time out to engage the first debate and share his perspective on what it is to be a MGTOW. Despite the fact I was fully aware that Aca Demy was a troll and the best response for MGTOW's was to ignore him I decided to engage the fool. Now I must say Stardusk made a very good point about the fact that MGTOW should remain indifferent to opposition and let the message speak for itself. What do you think is the best response for MGTOW's to make when confronted by individuals such as Aca Demy? Thank You.Debating A MGTOW Mental Patienthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCsOo...Manhood Academy, selling social incompetencehttps://www.avoiceformen.com/men/manh...Sexually Harassing The Cult Leaderhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaDzB...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This video shows a seventeen year old guy getting assaulted by a woman at Hammonasset Beach in Madison, Connecticut by Andrea Mears. And I've also included a link to her facebook page in the description below. But it looks like she's taken down pictures of herself so that no one will recognize her face and contact her. I spoke with the guy also known as hogwit on youtube and received permission to show you his video clip. I asked the seventeen year old quad-copter pilot why he didn't take it to criminal court and he says that it has to be done through civil court. I'm also putting link to the indie gogo crowd sourcing campaign in the description below as well. So far he's managed to raise over a thousand dollars but he's planning on using the money for another issue now. And I'm not sure why that's happened. This is what Hogwit said with regards to taking this is what he told me: "Civil is the only type of lawsuit. There are civil lawsuits and criminal prosecutions, one is for crimes only and the other is for loss or damages regardless of the incident being a crime or not. Example: You are at fault in a car accident while driving within the law. You will not be prosecuted for a crime because no crime was committed, however the victim may sue you for damage to their car and injuries (both mental and physical)." This is Hogwit's official statement I found on Photography is not a crime dot com: I went to a nearby beach that is a whopping 2 miles long, setup, talked to some people that were curious what my "thing" was, demonstrated the loiter feature (pulling the quad to one direction or another), demonstrated rtl (flying it away then having it return), and make a lot of people think the quad was just awesome. I never went below 50 feet save for take off/landing, then after the end of my last flight, some crazy lady came over and started taking pictures of me...and dialed 911 for the 3rd time in 15 minutes...she said something to the effect of, "There's a guy here taking pictures at the beach with a helicopter plane." (I distinctly remember her saying, "with a helicopter plane," because that just sounds hilarious.) They basically said that they'd send someone when one gets free during each of the 3 calls she made, she decided they didn't care enough about someone obeying the law so when no one was around she assaulted me and she decided to stop when she got a phone call. I called the police to report the assault, and boy was the response big...10 or more vehicles arrived (cops, DEEP, and an ambulance)...They first listened to her story of lies (she claimed I was taking close ups of people in bikinis, and that she had asked me to stop flying before calling the police, and that I was the one that assaulted her, and and and). The police approached me very aggressively, believing her full story, and before anything else was said I brought up something that she missed... The fact that the cell phone in my hand has a camera...that was recording. I had video evidence that she went nuts completely unprovoked, and was the one that assaulted me. She was then charged with assault, and breach of peace and I gave the cops a copy of the video for their prosecution.Quadcopter Pilot Assaulted at Hammonasset Beachhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elnEN...Andrea Mears Facebook Pagehttps://www.facebook.com/ndrmearsIndie Gogo - Crowdsourcinghttps://www.indiegogo.com/projects/no...Photography is not a Crime Dot Comhttp://photographyisnotacrime.com/201...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I think your observation that feminism is the new religion is a valid one. Feminism is certainly dogmatic and preachy and it promises heaven on Earth for women while promoting the idea that white males are the great white Satan. They say that all men are rapists or potential rapists and that we are going to feminist hell because we objectify women and oppress women. Satan is or was supposedly fighting with god for the souls of human beings. Feminists say that men are fighting for control over women's bodies. The parallels are striking. And they say that men are always out to objectify. The objectification of women can be seen as the worship of false idols. Feminists want to say that men are not respecting the real woman, the person inside the body but are instead worshiping the female body itself. And that in a way it's sinful for men to give in to human nature. They are confusing objectification with biological imperatives. They don't see that when a man admires the female form it's usually his subconscious desire to procreate that's doing it. It's coded in his DNA to seek out physically attractive females and want to impregnate them. The last time a woman said all men are pigs I jumped up and said "If all men are pigs and they come from women, then women are just pigs with lipstick." After saying that I was no longer popular at that dinner party. Anyways, feminism is a belief system based on faith. It's based on the faith that all men are pigs and rapists. And that male behavior is evil and that men should be thrown under the bus for women's sake. Feminism and consumerism go hand in hand. Women got the right to vote in the early twentieth century as the rise of the consumer economy was happening. That's no coincidence and the two go hand in hand. Women became liberated and what they did was go on a shopping spree in the nineteen twenties. I don't blame women for wanting washing machines, stoves, fridges, Irons and other time saving devices early in the twentieth century. Early feminism was most likely promoted by people wanting women to have purchasing control in the household so they could then go out and purchase the surplus goods in society using debt. The feminist religion doesn't question debt and consumerism. If anything it seems to support the banking system which they don't seem to question as part of patriarchy. Yet I rarely hear them talk about how the banking system is raping the financial future of both males and females. Why don't the feminists talk about the amount of debt swirling around or that women are becoming debt serfs by taking on debt to get into university for degrees like art therapy or women's studies. My belief is that because of the prevalence of feminists in education they want women to pay money at the sacrificial alter of feminism in the form of tuition expenses. Why else would they create courses like women's studies to justify themselves a nice salary perhaps? In some cases women are getting into debt to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars for women's studies. Feminism much like the church before it has become institutionalized and corrupt. And I predict that much like the church it will be increasingly abandoned in the future.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Vernon Beck at the Toronto Domestic Violence Symposium. Event put on by The Canadian Maltese Charitable Services Trust.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy