MGTOW Sandman Quotes

Today I decided to go my own way and attend the Toronto Slut Walk. So there I was standing in the middle of crowd of about three hundred, feminists, lesbians, transgender people and even male feminists. Yes you heard me right, male feminists. This was the first time I had seen a male feminist in action speaking to a crowd. The man I'm referring to Jeff Perera and I'm going to show everyone of clip of him in just a moment. But first I want to give you a bit of background on him. He's a Community Engagement Manager for White Ribbon an organization created to end sexual violence on Universities in the Canadian province of Ontario. It sounds good on the surface but spending a few minutes going through the website I came across some postcards that were promoting the idea of rape culture but using a different angle. I'm adding a link in the description below so you can see it for yourself. Now I'll read to you what some of the cards say on them. The first one has a men's sports jacket and on the back it says "No Means Try Harder." And the words Frosh Culture are posted above it. Then the second one is titled Sports Culture and below that it says "A Teammate on your school sports team is accused of sexual misconduct, Do you still cheer him on? And on the back of the postcard it says tell your teammate he is not welcomed. So based on this advice on these cards I take it that simply being accused means that if your teammate has an accusation either real or fake laid upon his reputation you're supposed to turn your back on him. What about a trial, evidence, due process? I would turn my back on a friend if he was a rapist. But if one of my friends was accused of rape I'm sure they would tell me the truth if I asked and if they were proven wrong legally then I would never forgive them. And it's not hard to see how the phrases Frosh Culture and Sports Culture could be turned into rap culture easily. There is even a series of videos on white ribbons website called consent man. And no I'm not making this stuff up. This page looks like it's recruiting men to become feminists. So now that I've given you a bit of background on the organization here is the video with Jeff Perera so you can make up your own mind. And he even mentions the men's rights movement in it. Enjoy!Consent Man Video Serieshttp://www.whiteribbon.ca/draw-the-line/What We Dohttp://www.whiteribbon.ca/what-we-do/Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Along with the book Bachelor Pad Economics Aaron Clarey sent me his book Worthless, The Young Person's Indispensable Guide To Choosing the Right Major. And I wasn't going to review it or talk about it originally but over the course of going to the men's rights conference I met someone that should have read this book. She was just in the process of finishing her degree in poetry. And during the winter she's involved in dog sled racing. How she's going to make a living and possibly pay back the debts she owes to get a masters in poetry I'll never know? But after she said these things to me all I could think about was Aaron Clarey's book Worthless. And I too am guilty of taking a college or university major that didn't really pan out the way I expected at first. Originally I was going to take photography but my parents convinced me to take "New Media" instead. I thought it was going to be about computer animation, video, film, photography, web design, design, creative writing and much more. And I was right because the university I went to was a polytechnic university at that time. But there was a lot of time wasted on feminist theory, gender studies and art installations. My degree was a combination of theory and application broken up roughly fifty percent of the time for each. And I learned many skills that I'm still applying today. But the most important thing I learned about my degree was the ability to learn on my own without professors. And I attribute my success in life to that. I was taught to problem solve on my own. But getting back to Aaron Clarey's book, Worthless is a short read less then 200 pages with only about 150 words per page. So it can be read at one or two sittings. Aaron wants people to get a degree or skill in something vital in the economy and leave emotions out of making education decisions. Early in the book he makes a list of things that people usually purchase in life such as gasoline, cell phone bills, food, computer, mp3 players etc and then side by side he puts degrees that have no relation to the everyday things that most ordinary people buy or even want to buy. Thing like political science, English, Women's studies amount other things. He suggests that people go into things that are real and tangible and produce consistent income.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Years ago when I first started exploring the topic of coming scarcity of fossil fuel energy I came across the idea that the ideological battle between Communism and Capitalism is really just a fight between two "isms." And both Capitalism and Communism are dependent on yet another "ism" which we called industrialism. Without industry there can be no capitalism on the scale that we enjoy today in most of the world. And without industry there can be no Socialism or Communism either. And like I said both of these systems are built on cheap fossil fuels. So how does that relate to the idea of Industrial Feminism you ask? Well Industrial Feminism is built on all of the technologies used to liberate women from their biological functions and dependency on men. Without industrialization there could be no rise in feminism over the last fifty years in universities, governments and other public institutions. And feminism is female nature enabled by and amplified by industrialization. Feminism should be seen as a scaling up of female nature through the scaling up of government and industry. We can all agree that without big government to take money from the productive and give it to the less productive, women would still be dependent on men instead of that state sponsored wealth transfer. Women carry children and therefore have less time to devote to working and having a career. And without the cheap industrialization and mechanization of every process including transportation, education, medicine and agriculture among many other things there would be no women's liberation plain and simple. Men created the very technologies and ideas that women use to amplify their nature and subjugate men. If men want to return back to traditionalism then all we have to do is do nothing and allow the system to starve economically and die. But that's one possible future that I don't really want to see. Like I said in earlier videos this generation of men, our generation of men, can truly be the said to be the first free generation of men in the history of the world. Women are using the technology that our minds and bodies created over the generations to subjugate us. But the ironic thing is the prison that most men are in with regards to catering to what women want is a mental prison that men can rid themselves of through MGTOW. There are no four walls or a cage keeping us here. The only thing that keeps us here are our own biological imperatives. We have to find things like pornography and surrogacy to satisfy our biological desires and reduce if not eliminate our need for women if want to use them. If we get smart enough we can even use genetic engineering at some point Women have played dirty, developed feminism as their religion to attack the values of man and shame him into continuing to work as a plow horse. If it were up to me I'd take the sexual carrot many women hoist over men's heads and shove it into very ass of feminism.300 Years Of Fossil Fuels And Not One Bad Gal: Peak Oil, Women's History And Everyone's Futurehttp://www.countercurrents.org/astyk2...The Fairy Tale Of Feminism Is An Economic Anomaly And It's About To Endhttp://thoughtcatalog.com/stephanie-s...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A few days ago it dawned on me that it's possible for a man to be in a relationship with a woman where the guy has been completely rejected emotionally, physically and yet all a man has been reduced to is a utility. So effectively it's possible for a woman tocompletely reject a man for almost everything except his utility value. And at the same time if you talk to older men about rejecting wives or common law partners they no longer want to be with they often say it's cheaper to keep her. Which essentially means it's cheaper for a man to be with a woman that's not giving him sex, intimacy and emotional closeness then divorce her. So she rejects him and in many cases the man will subsequently reject a woman because she is no longer interested for anything else but his utility value. All of that is straight forward and easy to follow. But I think it's important to look into it further. We all know that the the divorce statistic is somewhere around fifty percent of the population. But What that statistic doesn't give us is how many people are miserable in their marriages and refuse to get divorced. We often see the divorce laws as a way to enrich women while at the same time impoverishing men. And as MGTOWs this is one of the big red flags that's made us this way. But what most of us don't see is that most men and women stay together in unhappy marriages because of money and status. I often wonder what the divorce statistics would look like if people were making more money and it was still possible to support a family on a single income. I suspect that the divorce rate would be approaching eighty or ninety percent. A ninety percent divorce rate would make even the most old school romantic men and women re-consider getting married and having kids. And we know that of the fifty percent of divorces seventy percent are initiated by men. If money was not an issue I would think that women would probably initiate eighty to ninety percent of divorces. Some women after all are content to stay with a husband they no longer love and respect because it's easier then going through divorce, letting down their family and friends and risking a lower lifestyle. I'm sure many of them think it's easier to reject their partner while still being in a relationships with them.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

What's more disturbing then a woman that dates bad boys. Well a woman that's into dating serial killers and deranged criminals behind bars. What makes the girl next door go for such men? There's even a Canadian serial killer called Paul Bernardo and he killed two school girls back in the early nineteen nineties and confessed to raping at least twenty women. Today Paul is fifty years old and has been behind bars for over twenty years. Yet an thirty year old woman is supposedly engaged to marry him. She says he's a good person and incapable of doing the horrible things he was sent to jail for doing. Feminists complain about imaginary rape culture yet here we have a woman that doesn't believe that Paul Bernardo could possibly rape over 20 women even after confessing to it. And there was video evidence of two murders to prove he did it she still won't believe it. And don't forget about testimony from Paul Bernardo's ex wife that he did it as well. Even with all the evidence She still thinks he's a nice guy and a good Christian man. She is acting irrationally and illogically and it was Erin Pizzey that told me that for men to understand women they have to think irrationally. So that's exactly how I'm going to look at this situation. I have a theory that when women like this say they want a nice guy what they are saying is they want an asshole but they want to pretend that he's a nice guy. Is it some form of Orwellian double speak. They pretend that bad is good and good is bad. Down is up and up is down. I have yet another theory about the term rapey. I think that some women use that ridiculous term to say that the man they are calling rapey is incapable of raping them. So is it a way to mock a weak nice guy or mangina? They are calling nice guys rapists and rapists nice guys. I think the problem is the way humans use language. From now on when I hear a woman she wants a nice guy. I'm conditioning myself to think that nice guy equals asshole and vice versa. Most women also don't take the initiative to pursue men and instead wait for men to pursue them. And in a society where more and more men are afraid to talk to women let alone ask them on a date women are trying to provoke male attention by insulting and belittling men. Shaming a man to get him to do what you want may seem irrational but it works. And many women these days are willing to take any and all attention that men are willing to give them. But for some reason they prefer the negative men give them attention.Paul Bernardo's would-be wife not alone in weird attraction: DiMannohttp://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from George and he wants me to create yet another addition to my God Among MGTOW Series. This one is about Leonardo Da Vinci. So what is it that makes Leonardo a man going his own way? Well I believe it's because he spent much of his time painting for the church. But at the same time he was interested in the science behind human anatomy, early aviation including the development of an early form of the helicopter or air screw, the tank and the glider. On one hand he was taking commissions from the Roman Catholic Church and the King of France I believe and was using the money he received to work on the very technology and science that would one day lead to the very undoing of the monarchy and extreme power of the church. By many accounts he did take on male lovers but I'm fairly certain that even if he did have sex with them I'm sure that he was so useful helping to make the church look good through visual propaganda that they probably left him alone. That kind of reminds me of Fritz Lang in 1933 the director of the film Metropolis. Fritz Lang one of the most popular film directors in Germany in 1920s and 1930s was called in to meet with Nazi propaganda minister, Goebbels after he attacked Hitler in his 1933 film The Testament of DR. Mabuse. Fritz Lang must have been sweating buckets when he was called in to see Goebbels. He probably thought he was going to prison for a very long time. Instead Goebbels offered the position of the head of the National Socialist Film Studios. Fritz Lang decided he had heard enough and left Germany that same day. Turning down Hitler was not something you wanted to do of the brown shirts would be coming after you. In more recent times you have an artist like Michael Jackson. No one knows if he was really molesting children. But I can guarantee that if anyone else less popular or wealthy as him were to behave like that it guarantee the police would be scrutinizing everything he was doing. Often times a society will recognize men of great artistic merit because no matter what taboos they may do in their lives society still respects them enough to look past those issues. Their merits outweigh their shortcomings. And that's why I believe the Catholic Church and the Monarchs allowed Leonardo to continue pursuing science and possibly sleeping with his young male apprentices. I have no proof of this but there is speculation about Leonardo Da Vinci taking part in Sodomy but those charges were dropped. What we do know for a fact is that Leonardo Da Vinci dedicated his life to his work, never married, never had any children. Back when he was accused of sodomy it was punishable by death. Yet no witnesses came forth so the Da Vinci's trial was thrown out.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

So over the last three or four months I've been playing a bit of an experiment with that girl sailor spoon. It's not something I would do on anyone but the lowest of the low type of person. I've been acting like a complete jerk to her. I've been putting her down, talking down to her and giving her little bits of attention here and there. Just enough for her to keep calling me back and wanting more. What I've learned is that a man has to be hurt really bad by women to become a jerk. Some Jerks have tons of self esteem because they don't care about women's feelings because women didn't care about theirs at some point and hurt their feelings pretty badly. Many jerks look down upon women. And the men that put women on a pedestal are the ones women don't want. It's almost like most women don't want respect. It's almost like they enjoy being belittled and talked down to. I went from being a needy guy to one that was in anger and shock after taking the red pill. Then I turned out into a rational man studying male female relationships in some kind of clinical way. Now I feel like a tinkering social scientist and to be honest a bit of a jerk to people I have no respect for. Women always complain when a guy doesn't call. And I don't call Sailor Spoon, she calls me. And now I think the reason women hate it when guys they want something from don't call them is because firstly it lowers their self esteem and it also makes them feel inadequate in some way as well as needy. Needless to say she's calling me three to four times a day and when she calls half the time I don't pick up and the other half I do and say things like, oh it's you, what do you want? And she gets pissed off, huffs and puffs and raises her tone of voice and says why are you talking to me like this? At that point I say well if you're going to raise your voice at me like this and disrespect me I'm going to have to put down the phone. I hang up and ten minutes later she's calling me asking when I'm coming over. The less I care about her the more she cares about me. She sounds like someone that was neglected as a child and was looking for attention. She's also a complete narcissist. You can't criticize her about anything, even if it's constructive criticism without her blowing up. She came over to my place only once, but she doesn't know the address and she's been wanting to come back after seeing how I live. She's been asking me how to take the bus over here and I told her I'd come over to her place but I don't want her over here. The more I tell her no and the more I treat her poorly the more she seems interested in me. Years ago I would have loved to be in this situation. Now that I know what's going on and how it all works it's boring. I'm adding a link to an article called The Jerk Appeal in the description below. This article helped me to understand what's been going on with myself. Here is a line from that article: "in order for a man to develop a backbone and become more of a bad boy, in the hopes of attracting more women, he does have to be badly hurt once." I completely understand this now. As far as I can tell many jerks have already taken the red pill subconsciously and push women away emotionally and physically so they don't get hurt again. This comes across as self-confidence to women or a man in need of fixing. It seems women have a hard time figuring out if a man is either being emotionally distant or he is being self confident. The two modes of male thinking and feeling seem to be become difficult for many women to distinguish. And if it's a combination of both factors look out. I don't know why women seem to have trouble distinguishing between the two? Someone please enlighten me.The Jerk Appealhttp://ca.askmen.com/dating/heidi/hei...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Terrence Popp speaking out against feminism at the Men's Rights/Issues Conference in Detroit in 2014. Conference was organized and put on by AVFM. (A Voice For Men)http://www.redonkulas.com/Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I know I promised everyone more discussion about what I learned at the men's rights conference. But instead I want to cover a different topic. Clayton sent me a donation and wants me to cover a specific topic so I'm going to do that today. This is what Clayton has to say: "Hi Sandman, I have an idea for the future of MGTOW. I sent you a message, but I don't know how reliable the You Tube messenger is. It doesn't show up in my 'sent mail.' If this one alsodoesn't, I'll think of something else. Basically, my idea is about off-the-grid living. If U.S. MGTOWs (most of whom are in student loan debt) decided to check out completely, and created an off-grid movement: using solar & turbine power, composting toilets, and atmospheric water generators: to create MGTOW villages (In Nevada, so legal prostitution is near by), then that's everything we would need. Also, the idea of COMPETITION is so Alpha Male. I feel like Man's greatest achievements came out of CAMARADERIE, not COMPETITION. I feel like we need to start communities of MGTOWs, helping other MGTOWs out. Women have the government, we have each other. The more success WE have, the more of WE there will be in the movement. I would start with RVs moving across America, helping men out. Large traveling eco-drifter communities. Then once the money is there, start building with recycled shipping container homes. Leave women to the cities. They can have them. MGTOW should build off-grid cities of their own. Where Women have to show up with hat in hand, and ask us to do some physical labor for their cities. What would happen to these cities? Eventually? Women like to say "I don't need a man" then we should disappear, and give them what they want. If they don't need a man, then they don't need men, to listen to them complain about men. I'm not looking for publicity, just yet. I've still got to get this off the ground. So you don't have to do me any favors, or share my name. I just want you to think about this idea. If anyone is interested, send them my way. But, I have to protect my identity, for now. Well thanks for your comments and questions Clayton. Clayton even left a link to his website called Eco-Drifter in the description below. This video isn't about promoting Clayton's website but it's about the idea of MGTOWcommunities and collectives.The Female MRAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSCxD...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This is the first of two videos at the Men's issues or Men's rights conference. There was a car show going on during the second day of the conference so these are some of the pictures from that car show. You can almost say it was a men's rights car show. har har. Anyways I'll stop with the cheesy humor. This video is about a man called Mark Reed that was asked to leave the conference after acting inappropriately. He was there on the first and second day of the conference and he was inappropriately touching people in the audience and it seems like he was feeling up people that were somehow involved with the media. People that had cameras, audio recorders, etc. When I got there on the first day of the event he came up to me and handed me his card which I'm going to show everyone here. Maybe someone out there can do some additional digging on this guy and find out what he's all about. Paul Elam went on stage and said that some from the Detroit Metro Times wrote an article about Mark Reeds called: "I Was Molested At the Men's Rights Conference" I'm putting a link to that article in the description below so you can take a look at it yourself. Here are some lines from the article itself. This is what the author Lee DeVito had to say: "It was at this point that I got molested at the Men's Rights conference.An older man came up to me and immediately complimented my hairy arms (a first). He then started telling me all this crazy shit, about how he was from California and he makes movies and he wants to take me to Malibu and loves hairy guys. Regardless of sexual orientation, it was pretty weird. People started filling up the seats around us and I didn't want to make a scene, so I just politely accepted the compliment and tried to deflect. The dude kept petting my arms." That's what Lee DeVito said and Mark Reed also told me to come to California and that he was making movies out there and so I decided to look up the books and the movies that he was working on in California. I Was Molested At the Men's Rights Conferencehttp://blogs.metrotimes.com/news-blaw...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy