Richard Epstein

John Yoo, constitutional law scholar with expertise in executive power, and Richard Epstein, renowned legal theorist in constitutional and property law, dissect the Supreme Court tariff ruling. They analyze statutory limits on presidential tariff authority. They debate non‑delegation, the major questions doctrine, whether trade deficits count as emergencies, and what statutes still permit presidential trade action.

In this thought-provoking discussion, legal scholars Richard Epstein and John Yoo tackle provocative topics ranging from the feasibility of a U.S. presidential acquisition of Greenland to the complexities of treaty termination. They dive into the boundaries of presidential power, especially in war decisions and the implications for the Federal Reserve. The conversation also addresses the contentious issues of transgender athletes in sports and recent firearm legislation in Hawaii, highlighting the intricate balance between rights and regulations.

Richard Epstein, a noted legal scholar and expert on constitutional law, explores the pressing question of whether the president can impose tariffs under emergency powers. He breaks down the nuances of Article I, highlighting the legislative limits on such delegation. Epstein contrasts historical definitions of 'emergency' with routine tariffs and cautions against using tariffs as political tools. He also warns that expanding the unitary executive theory could dangerously broaden presidential authority. The discussion sheds light on the potential impact on trade and separation of powers.

Richard Epstein, law professor and law-and-economics scholar, outlines how a market for kidneys might work and argues it could increase supply. He covers current wait times, paired exchanges, screening and safeguards, experiments like state purchases, and how markets interact with charity and technology. Short, provocative takes on policy, incentives, and practical hurdles.

Richard Epstein, a libertarian legal scholar, and John Yoo, a constitutional and national security law professor, debate U.S. action in Iran and the role of imminence in anticipatory self-defense. They dissect a major 2nd Amendment fight over banning firearm possession by drug users. They clash over parental rights, school secrecy, and where constitutional protections for parents come from.