Julia Minson

In a riveting conversation, Jenn Wynn, an educator and podcaster focused on healing difficult conversations, shares frameworks for calming our nervous systems during conflict. Julia Minson, a Harvard decision scientist, introduces her HEAR framework to cultivate curiosity and understanding in disagreements. Together, they explore how to redefine conflict as an opportunity for connection and learning. Their practical tools aim to transform tough dialogues into meaningful exchanges—ideal for navigating both personal and professional tensions.

Julia Minson, Harvard Kennedy School professor who studies conflict and conversational receptiveness, digs into why teams need real disagreement. She explores how leaders accidentally silence dissent, why behavior matters more than intent, how status changes every clash, and why the real aim is keeping the conversation alive.

In this engaging discussion, Julia Minson, an associate professor at the Harvard Kennedy School and expert in decision-making, shares her insights on navigating disagreements. She distinguishes between conflict and disagreement, emphasizing the importance of curiosity and receptiveness in communication. Listeners learn actionable strategies for constructive disagreement, including the HEAR framework, which focuses on empathy and self-reflection. Minson highlights how fostering understanding can enhance creativity and collaboration in both personal and professional interactions.

Ken Adelman, former U.S. ambassador to the UN and arms control director during Reagan's administration, shares insights on the 1986 Reykjavik summit with Mikhail Gorbachev, revealing the depth of their surprisingly candid negotiations amid Cold War tensions. Julia Minson, a decision scientist at Harvard, discusses the 'psychology of disagreement' and how personal biases shape our perceptions of reality. Together, they explore naive realism, the challenges of conflicting views, and the vital importance of understanding diverse perspectives in communication.

Julia Minson, psychologist and researcher on disagreement and persuasion, shares why debates spiral into correction cycles. She discusses naive realism, why perspective-taking often fails, and practical ways to show understanding. Short, actionable concepts like listening with your mouth and the HERE framework make difficult talks less combative.

In this episode of The Decision Corner, Brooke discusses disagreement with Julia Minson, an Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and former lecturer at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Her research explores the psychology behind disagreement and collaboration — why we often suck at turning the former into the latter, and how we can be better. Brooke and Julia dissect the thought processes that often fuel our discussions, how discussions turn into arguments (particularly, unproductive ones), and the reasons we can’t seem to figure out why. Julia gives us practical interventions, applicable on a personal level, that can help us avoid the feared Thanksgiving dinner screaming match and other conversations like it. Specific topics include: Advocacy v.s. Inquiry mindset Why being a know-it-all is a problematic blindspot How to effectively signal open-mindedness Active listening: body language and verbal acknowledgement Cognitive misconceptions about our counterpart’s open-mindedness Scopes, baselines, and defaults The role of asking questions, and how to ask them with genuine curiosity Conversational receptiveness, intentional vocabulary, and the HEAR technique

Julia Minson, an associate professor at the Harvard Kennedy School, and Francesca Gino, a professor at Harvard Business School, tackle the rising trend of political discussions in the workplace. They discuss how political polarization affects team dynamics and personal relationships, especially in remote settings. The duo emphasizes the need for constructive dialogue and offers strategies to handle workplace conflicts. They also highlight the dangers of groupthink in leadership roles, advocating for diverse perspectives to drive innovation and understanding.

Julia Minson, Harvard public policy professor and founder of the Constructive Disagreement Lab, studies why disagreements escalate. She explains why trying to win backfires. She describes naive realism, the gap between thinking and showing receptiveness, and the HEAR language framework. She shares stories and metaphors that show curiosity can restore willingness to keep talking.

Julia Minson, Harvard public policy professor and author of How to Disagree Better, studies disagreement, persuasion, and communication. She recounts conversations with her conservative father-in-law and explores why silence and assumptions make conflict worse. Topics include how backgrounds shape views, storytelling to reduce hostility, social media’s echo chambers, power imbalances, and practical ways to invite dissent.

Julia Minson, Harvard Kennedy School professor who studies how people engage with opposing views and author of How to Disagree Better. She explains why we avoid conflict, how persuasion-focused talk fails, and introduces conversational receptiveness and the HEAR toolkit. Practical tips include practicing on low-stakes disagreements and using language to signal curiosity and keep conversations constructive.