As financial fraud continues to accelerate, its impact on victims goes far beyond monetary loss. The emotional and behavioral effects are long-lasting, shaping future decisions and sometimes undermining trust in their financial institutions.
Substantial progress has been made in strengthening fraud detection and prevention, but much work remains—especially in the age of AI. In a PaymentsJournal podcast, Dal Sahota, Global Director of Trusted Payments at LSEG Risk Intelligence, and Suzanne Sando, Lead Analyst of Fraud Management at Javelin Strategy & Research, discussed how fraud affects different generations and what banks can do to stay ahead of the problem.
Fraud Comes from Everywhere
It’s hard to go a single day without encountering a scam attempt or hearing about someone who has been targeted. This constant exposure underscores how sophisticated and pervasive fraudsters have become.
LSEG’s latest global research shows that most consumers believe scams are on the rise. As more aspects of life move online—opening new avenues for fraud—it is clear that everyone is at risk.
“This morning, I got an email from a car rental company about a supposed upcoming trip from Orland Park, Illinois,” said Sando. “As someone who lives in Milwaukee, about an hour and a half outside of Orland Park, I’m not picking up a rental car there. But you stop and think, ‘hey, I do find myself randomly researching trips. Could this have been something that I looked up and maybe I’m getting a prompt from their website?’ That’s how people end up clicking on phishing links or providing details they didn’t intend to reveal to a fraudster.”
Across the Generations
Because scammers have become highly skilled in targeting, each generation experiences fraud differently. Scams exploit areas where specific groups are more vulnerable. Older generations expressed the highest concern about fraud in the LSEG study, while younger groups reported greater exposure to emerging threats such as deepfakes and “quishing” attacks.
Reactions also vary by age. Some 97% of victims reported changing their behavior after being scammed, becoming more cautious online, sharing fewer financial details, and avoiding certain channels. Some may feel so insecure about certain payment types that they abandon them entirely. Older adults, however, tend to experience the greatest loss of trust compared with other groups.
“There are deep levels of distrust in any and all communication, which can be really devastating when you’re trying to maintain a relationship with your financial institution,” said Sando. “If you don’t even know that you can believe what’s being sent to you from your bank, what can you believe? Once that security feels like it’s just an afterthought and that trust has been violated, it’s really hard to go back to business as usual.”
The Information Gap
The effects of scams extend beyond individual victims—they ripple throughout the financial services ecosystem.
“That really comes out in the research, how that’s impacting consumers and the lack of trust when they’re interacting in digital channels,” said Sahota. “We found that 32% of respondents reference shame as an emotional impact. And this is very devastating in the market.”
A significant information gap exists regarding accessibility and the warning signs of potential fraud. Less than a quarter of LSEG’s survey respondents described themselves as well-informed in this area. Separate data from Javelin indicates that many consumers are unaware of the educational resources their financial institutions offers, even when these resources are available online or via mobile apps. These programs are only effective if consumers can locate and act on them.
“We can think about this in terms of vulnerabilities that they’re under and how those are targeted,” said Sahota. “Don’t assume that the consumer’s first language is English, for example. Those are nuances to work within, but the fraudsters really take advantage of those exposed vulnerabilities.”
Sando added: “A lot of financial institutions post really text-heavy articles. Frankly, you’re seeking out education when you need it the most. You’re not sitting around on your couch on the weekend reading education on your bank’s website. You’re going to it in that moment. So it has to be hitting the consumer right at the part where it’s most critical.”
A More Personalized Experience
Financial institutions could benefit from delivering a more personalized experience, tailoring education based on demographics and customer behavior. Understanding what resonates—by geographic location, generation, or product ownership—helps identify who is most vulnerable to specific scams and how to reach them.
“You’re not going to hit older generations with a lot of pop-up notifications on their phone,” said Sando. “That’s not the typical way that they consume information.”
Once someone has fallen victim to a scam, they often struggle to focus on available resources or their rights. This is when financial institutions must guide them through the recovery process.
“A scam victim shouldn’t have to be the most well-informed person on the process of reimbursement and resolution for your scam,” said Sando. “You want to have a highly trained investigator or case worker from your financial institution that’s there to walk you through because you’re already having to bear the burden of the financial loss.”
Playing on Offense
With money moving faster than ever, applying the right level of friction to the right type of payment reassure consumers. A small verification step can provide certainty that the beneficiary is legitimate. Friction that ensures validation is not a barrier—it’s a protective measure.
Too many institutions wait until validation occurs too late. In the era of real-time payments, once a transaction is submitted, the money is gone. Prevention must come before the payment, not after.
“We are focusing earlier on in building a full picture of ‘Who is this person I’m paying? What’s their historical account information?’” said Sahota. “Building a full picture and using the data that we have access to as financial services can make the difference in detecting suspicious activity before it’s too late. There are a number of vulnerabilities that the fraudsters and the scammers are exploiting. They continuously evolve. The leveraging of AI in that regard has really scaled the scams up. We need continuous risk assessment of all the aspects across the value chain.”
“We continue to play from behind,” he said. “We’re always on defense, we’re never on offense. We’re always being reactive when we should be proactive.”
To explore the full breadth of consumer insights referenced in this discussion you can review the complete survey findings in LSEG’s After the Scam research.
PaymentsJournal