Rethinking Education

Inside the Curriculum & Assessment Review: What Changed, What Didn’t – And Why

Dec 22, 2025
Lisa O’Loughlin, Principal and CEO of Nelson and Colne College Group, and Jon Hutchinson, Director of Curriculum and Teacher Development at the Reach Foundation, share their insights from the Curriculum and Assessment Review panel. They discuss the challenges of balancing ambition with political constraints and the importance of post-16 education. The conversation highlights the growth of oracy and the arts in the curriculum, while acknowledging the complexities of assessment reform. Their perspectives provide a rare glimpse into the evolution of England's educational landscape.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Arts Got Space Back

  • Scrapping the EBacc reopened space for arts subjects and participation hadn't collapsed as feared.
  • The panel recommended larger, applied post-16 arts qualifications to support authentic pedagogy.
ADVICE

Be Cautious With Assessment Overhaul

  • Tread carefully with assessment reform because rewriting qualifications takes years and affects reliability.
  • Balance curriculum specificity with assessment reliability to protect students' trustworthy credentials.
INSIGHT

Assessment Changes Were Incremental

  • Assessment threads through the report but changes were constrained by wanting to avoid destabilising GCSE currency.
  • The panel recommended modest exam-time reduction and subject-specific assessment fixes rather than radical abolition.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app