Opening Arguments James Comey, Seashell Assassin
8 snips
May 8, 2026 They pick apart an absurd indictment over a seashell photo and debate free speech and true threat law. They catalog recent DOJ settlements and question who benefits from government payouts. They survey high-profile civil suits, antitrust developments, and possible mass damages for January 6 participants. They close with troubling reports of police misconduct in Massachusetts.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Comey Seashell Post Became A Criminal Indictment
- The DOJ indicted James Comey for a May 2025 Instagram post showing seashells forming "8647," alleging a reasonable viewer would see it as a threat to the president.
- Todd Blanche defended the indictment as based on an 11-month investigation and a grand jury, though the public indictment cites only the Instagram post.
Indictment Claims Hidden Evidence Beyond The Public Charge
- Blanche repeatedly emphasized the indictment rests on a body of evidence beyond the Instagram post, but the charging document publicly lists only that post.
- Hosts argue the mismatch suggests either secret evidence or a politically embarrassing, thin case.
Purdue Settlement Ends Company But Leaves Small Victim Payouts
- Purdue's long litigation ends with a final settlement converting Purdue into a nonprofit and Sackler payments (
$7B) plus Purdue funds ($900M). - Individual victims face modest payouts (roughly $8k–$16k) requiring proof of OxyContin prescriptions.
