Dr. Chapa’s OBGYN Clinical Pearls

Dive into the fascinating world of cervical cytology reporting! Discover why endocervical cells hold less significance than previously thought. Unravel the latest guidelines for cervical cancer screening and the evolving role of HPV testing. Plus, learn how continued magnesium sulfate infusion during cesarean sections may affect patient care. Each question reveals a new layer of clinical insight that challenges traditional practices and promotes evidence-based medicine!

Discover the updated ACOG guidelines on cervical ripening that are set to transform labor induction practices. Explore the exciting recognition of combination mechanical and pharmacologic methods. Get insights into outpatient cervical ripening and the latest protocols for using oral and vaginal prostaglandins. This discussion is essential for healthcare professionals looking to enhance their induction strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Second and/or Third trimester vaginal bleeding is a common reason for L&D Triage patient assessment. The evaluation starts with determining the status of maternal hemodynamic stability. This together with IV access are key first steps. This is followed by an assessment of fetal-placental status. Typically this includes bedside ultrasound for fetal position, visual confirmation of FHTs, amniotic fluid determination, and placental location. At the same time, lab data is obtained to guide care: CBC, fibrinogen, type and RH, and possibly type and cross. Do you order a KB test as part of the STANDRAD evaluation for suspected placental abruption? In this episode, we will review a new study released ahead of print on June 8, 2025 in the European J of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Repro Biology. Listen in for details.

Dive into the evolving world of antenatal corticosteroids and their role in fetal lung maturation and neurodevelopment. The discussion centers on new research highlighting the effects of timing on both lung benefits and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Humor lightens the exploration of medical guidelines, as experts dissect the balance between benefits and risks. Recent studies spark debate on safety and efficacy, making for a thought-provoking conversation around prenatal care.

Innovation in medicine is happening. In our immediate past episode, we summarized how AI is improving standard mammography to now PREDICT breast cancer rather than just diagnosing it once it was appeared. In a past episode, we covered a new and novel “first in class” oral medication for uncomplicated UTIs in women called Blujepa. This is innovation! Well now, as of June 10, 2025, the FDA has granted a New Drud Application for a new and noval oral antibiotic against gonococcal (GC) infection! In this episode, we will review the current CDC treatment protocols for GC and highlight what this new medication’s MOA is and what to expect from this FDA process.

Each year, more than 2.3 million women worldwide are diagnosed with breast cancer—including over 370,000 in the United States alone. For more than 60 years, mammograms have saved lives by detecting early-stage cancers. Now, advancements in AI have lead to a first of its kind breast imaging algorithm that can PREDICT future (5-year) breast cancer risk in the patient (CLARITY BREAST). This is GROUNDBREAKING. Yes, there has been other new tools, like the recent contrast enhanced mammography data, for early detection of breast cancer, but this is the first technology to help PREDICT it in the future. Nonetheless, questions remain. Listen in for details. (CLARITY is not a sponsor)

The podcast dives into the fascinating world of medical recommendations, highlighting how different societies interpret the same data uniquely. It contrasts the Society of Family Planning's guidelines on early pregnancy loss with those from ACOG, revealing four key differences. The discussion includes the implications of terminology in reproductive healthcare and how they affect clinical practices. Listeners will gain insights into evidence-based practices and the importance of understanding varied therapeutic guidelines.

The white-coat effect is a measure of blood pressure change from before to during the visit in office/clinic when the blood pressure is recorded by a physician or nurse; this was first described in 1983 by Mancia et al, and was initially thought to represent a benign process. But it was unclear what this actually meant for pregnancy. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has been used in pregnancy for about 20 years now. Use of this monitoring option has revealed a subgroup of patients who have persistently high blood pressure (BP) in the presence of health care providers, but a normal ambulatory or self-measured BP. This phenomenon has been termed “White Coat Hypertension” (WCH). In 2013, The International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) published the revised classification for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, that included WCH, not previously included. The ISSHP guidelines also emphasize that a diagnosis of white coat hypertension in pregnancy should only be considered before 20 weeks of gestation. We now know that WCH, outside of pregnancy, is not an entirely benign process. The role of metabolic risk factors in patients with white-coat hypertension was first outlined in 2000 by Kario and Pickering. When metabolic risk factors are present in association with white-coat hypertension, the increased risk of target organ damage is determined not only by the blood pressure characteristics but also by the metabolic abnormalities. Recognizing the potential risks of white coat hypertension was also published in a commentary in 2016 out of the European Society of Cardiology. That article’s title was, “White-coat hypertension: not so innocent”. But what is the latest data on WCH in pregnancy? Is WCH linked to poor obstetrical outcomes? Does WHC need medication therapy? We have data from 2024 to help us. Listen in for details.

Uterine incarceration in pregnancy, is a rare but troublesome complication. This occurs when a retroverted uterus becomes trapped in the pelvic cavity during pregnancy. This happens when the uterus fails to move forward as it grows, becoming stuck between the sacral promontory and pubicsymphysis. It's more common in women with prior pelvic issues or uterine anomalies. Urinary retention is the most common symptom that occurs because of elongation of the urethra by displacement of the cervix, loss of the urethro-vesical angle, and mechanical compression of the bladder neck. It is estimated to occur in 1 in 3000 patients. How do we release an incarcerated uterus? Is laparoscopy an option? And how can an ultrasound probe help (April 2025publication)? Listen in for details.

In May 2024, the FDA approved vaginal self-collection for HPV as a cervical cancer screening tool. This was limited to health care settings. While this self collection option can help address some of the emotional deterrents to a speculum examination, it fails to overcome the remaining substantial clinic access barriers cited among those who are underscreened, including time off work, arrangement of child or elder care, and transportation. Then, the FDA approved the first at-home cervical cancer screening test on May 9, 2025. This test, called the Teal Wand (FDA-approved prescription device), allows individuals to self-collect vaginal samples at home to test for Human Papillomavirus (HPV). But is at-home testing valid? Does this work? A new publication in JAMA Network Open (May 19, 2025) answers this important question. Listen in for details.