Past Present Future

David Foster Wallace, American writer and novelist, discusses his experiences following the doomed campaign of John McCain for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000. The podcast explores the impact of negative campaigning and the rise of technology, comparing the 2000 election to the Trump era. It also contrasts Wallace's authenticity with Trump's cynicism as political figures and examines the influence of Trump's controversial remarks on the current political landscape.

Novelists Adam Biles and John Lanchester discuss the timeless appeal of Animal Farm, exploring why it has retained its hold and what makes the characters so relatable. They also discuss other favorite political allegories, from The Wizard of Oz to WALL-E.

Andrés Verlasco, a politician and economist, and Lorna Scott Fox, a writer and translator, discuss the Chilean coup and its significance today. They explore the unexpected military intervention, the multiple crises faced by Chile in 1973, the fragility of democracies, and the symbolism of Salvador Allende's death. They also touch upon the controversial death of poet Neruda. A captivating conversation on history, politics, and memory.

Lea Ypi, author of 'The Handover', discusses the power of the state, the impact of AI on human-corporate relationships, and the need to understand artificial agents and institutions in our modern world.

The podcast answers listener questions about political essays and essayists, discussing topics such as civil disobedience in the anti-vaccine movement, challenges in finding time to write, the role of religion in politics, the impact of political parties in democracy, the nature of essays and the rise of good essays in current online publications.

Joan Didion, a celebrated essayist, discusses her famous work 'The White Album' that explores the fracturing of America in the late 1960s. She touches upon Jim Morrison, the Manson murders, and the search for truth amidst chaos. The podcast also explores the concept of chaos, storytelling, and the limitations of naming and conventional responses in understanding the world.

Susan Sontag, an influential figure in art, criticism, and the avant-garde, discusses her essay 'Against Interpretation'. The episode explores interpretation in art, criticism, and politics, examining Sontag's views on cinema and the overproduction of experiences. It highlights the impact of political system forms on outcomes, the significance of understanding the artist's intention, and Sontag's obsession with courage and the erotics of art.

James Baldwin, a prominent writer and civil rights activist, discusses topics such as his complicated relationship with a cruel father, the racial hierarchy during the New Deal, racial dynamics during World War II, confronting injustice and risks, and his response to anger and hatred.

This week’s episode in our series on the great essays and great essayists is about Simone Weil’s ‘Human Personality’ (1943). Written shortly before her death aged just 34, it is an uncompromising repudiation of the building blocks of modern life: democracy, rights, personal identity, scientific progress – all these are rejected. What does Weil have to put in their place? The answer is radical and surprising.Read ‘Human Personality’ hereFor more on Weil from the LRB archive:Toril Moi on living like Weil ‘If we take Weil as seriously as she took herself, our nice lives will fall apart.’Alan Bennett on Kafka and Weil‘Many parents, one imagines, would echo the words of Madame Weil, the mother of Simone Weil, a child every bit as trying as Kafka must have been. Questioned about her pride in the posthumous fame of her ascetic daughter, Madame Weil said: “Oh! How much I would have preferred her to be happy.”’ Sign up to LRB Close Readings:Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPqIn other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This week David discusses George Orwell’s ‘The Lion and the Unicorn’ (1941), his great wartime essay about what it does – and doesn’t – mean to be English. How did the English manage to resist fascism? How are the English going to defeat fascism? These were two different questions with two very different answers: hypocrisy and socialism. David takes the story from there to Brexit and back again.For more on Orwell from the LRB:Samuel Hynes on Orwell and politics‘He was not, in fact, really a political thinker at all: he had no ideology, he proposed no plan of political action, and he was never able to relate himself comfortably to any political party.’Julian Symons on Orwell and fame‘If George Orwell had died in 1939 he would be recorded in literary histories of the period as an interesting maverick who wrote some not very successful novels.’Terry Eagleton on Orwell and experience‘Orwell detested those, mostly on the left, who theorised about situations without having experienced them, a common empiricist prejudice. There is no need to have your legs chopped off to sympathise with the legless.’More from the History of Ideas:Judith Shklar on HypocrisySign up to LRB Close Readings:Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPqIn other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices