Facts Over Fear

The Alexander Brothers Verdict Is a Rare Reckoning in Sex-Trafficking Cases As the Epstein files raise new questions, civil rights attorney, Arick Fudali, who represents 11 of the Epstein survivors, breaks down a conviction that could send three wealthy brothers to prison for life.What does it means for the Epstein case and the future of accountability for the wealthy and elite? We discuss.FOLLOW NATALIEsubstack: https://substack.com/@factsoverfearnataliebinstagram: https://www.instagram.com/@nataliebencivenga/#tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nataliebencivengathreads: https://www.threads.com/@nataliebencivengapodcast via spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/47JYsn9LQchErS3cnHP2YFpodcast via apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/facts-over-fear/id1855901950FACTS OVER FEARLet's dismantle the fear that is used to divide us surrounding the issues impacting the people and talk facts.ABOUT NATALIENatalie Bencivenga is a socially-conscious journalist working towards building equity in our communities through storytelling. Her goal is to inspire, educate and activate people to become catalysts for positive change. Join her for transformative conversations that uplift and challenge the ways in which we perceive the world. Let's turn this moment into a movement – together.

A $93 Billion Pentagon Binge and a White House That Wants Voter Restrictions FirstAmerican politics has always had its share of absurd moments. But lately, the headlines feel less like a functioning democracy and more like a surreal montage of power, money, and spectacle.Take this week. Actually, take the last 24 hours.A new report shows the Pentagon burned through a staggering $93 billion in a single month—including millions spent on lobster, king crab, ribeye steaks, and even a nearly $100,000 baby grand piano. Critics say the spending binge reflects the federal government’s infamous “use-it-or-lose-it” budgeting culture, where agencies rush to exhaust funds before the fiscal clock runs out.The timing makes the optics even worse. The spending spree reportedly unfolded just weeks before cuts to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)benefits were set to hit millions of Americans who rely on food assistance to survive.Luxury seafood for government functions. Food insecurity for families.If that juxtaposition doesn’t capture the contradictions of American politics right now, it’s hard to imagine what does.Governing by Hostage NegotiationMeanwhile in Washington, Donald Trump is escalating a high-stakes political standoff.The president is now threatening to refuse to sign any new legislation unless Congress passes sweeping voting restrictions requiring proof of citizenship and tightening rules around mail-in ballots.Supporters frame the proposal as election security. Critics call it voter suppression.Either way, the tactic amounts to something closer to legislative hostage-taking: no bills get signed until lawmakers agree to a controversial election overhaul that faces fierce opposition in the Senate.In practical terms, it could freeze large swaths of policymaking in Washington.In political terms, it signals a governing strategy built on pressure and brinkmanship.The Iran Strike NarrativeTrump is also facing growing scrutiny over its messaging surrounding the recent U.S. strike that reportedly hit a girls’ school in Iran.He has publicly rejected claims that American forces were responsible, insisting that Iran carried out the strike itself. But critics say that narrative doesn’t match what investigators and reporting on the ground are beginning to suggest.The dispute is fueling new questions about transparency, accountability, and wartime messaging as tensions in the region continue to escalate.When information becomes contested in real time, the public is left trying to sort through competing versions of reality.And Then…the ShoesAnd just when it seems like the week in politics can’t get stranger, another story surfaces.According to The Wall Street Journal, Trump has been handing out pairs of his own shoes to staffers and cabinet officials. Yes, really.The gesture—apparently framed as a quirky sign of appreciation or loyalty—has left some observers scratching their heads and others laughing outright. Because in this administration, loyalty may now come with a literal dress code. Or at the very least, a matching pair of shoes.On today’s Facts Over Fear featuring award-winning journalist, Kim Lyons, we unpack all of it. Because sometimes the best way to understand American politics right now is simply to step back and ask:How did we get here—and what does it say about where we’re headed next?FOLLOW NATALIEsubstack: https://substack.com/@factsoverfearnataliebinstagram: https://www.instagram.com/@nataliebencivenga/#tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nataliebencivengathreads: https://www.threads.com/@nataliebencivengapodcast via spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/47JYsn9LQchErS3cnHP2YFpodcast via apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/facts-over-fear/id1855901950FACTS OVER FEARLet's dismantle the fear that is used to divide us surrounding the issues impacting the people and talk facts.

As the Olympic flame dims, the culture war burns brighter. So what, exactly, did we learn about men and women this week?To help me unpack it, I sat down with Jess Britvich — a former social worker turned razor-sharp content creator who covers the intersection of internet culture, trends, and politics.Her work has appeared in Teen Vogue, HuffPost, and BuzzFeed. She studied journalism and political science at Rutgers and earned her MSW from Fordham. Now she’s in Pittsburgh, decoding the chaos for the rest of us, usually with receipts.Here’s what we couldn’t ignore.1. The Locker Room OpticsThe director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Kash Patel, is facing scrutiny after appearing at a celebration for the U.S. men’s hockey team, including time in the locker room.On its face? A sports moment.In context? A reminder that proximity to male athletic spaces still carries power, symbolism, and access.To put it bluntly: When men celebrate, it’s patriotism. When women win, it’s politics.2. Flava Flav’s Feminist EraAfter the U.S. women’s hockey team reportedly declined an invitation from Donald Trump, they got a different one — from Flava Flav.Yes, that Flava Flav.He invited them to Las Vegas to celebrate properly. Internet reaction? A mix of delight, disbelief, and a deeper question: Why does recognition for women athletes so often arrive sideways?3. “Violence Porn” PoliticsMeanwhile, Rachel Maddow accused Trump of turning his State of the Union into “violence porn.”The phrase stuck because it captured something visceral: Dominance as messaging. Aggression as aesthetic. And helping people connect the dots between sadism and an insatiable thirst for power.4. The Surgeon General PickThen came the nomination of Dr. Casey Means for U.S. Surgeon General.Means, a wellness influencer-physician with a massive online following, represents a shift: medicine meets branding meets politics.The cultural authority once reserved for institutions now flows through personality. Credentials matter — but not the kind you think of. Dr. Means does not have a current medical license and does not practice medicine. So why is she about to become the nation’s doctor? We dig in.5. Christian Nationalism Meets 5GAnd just when you thought it couldn’t get more 2026 than that — enter Radiant Mobile.A self-described “Christian wireless service,” launching on the T-Mobile 5G network, promising network-level filtering of pornography, gambling, and “harmful digital influences,” alongside a steady stream of Jesus-centered content.Faith. Telecom infrastructure. Content moderation. Easter launch.The fight isn’t just over what we watch. It’s over what’s even allowed through the pipes.So…What Did We Learn?We learned that men’s spaces are still default power centers.We learned that women’s victories still require translation.We learned that politics is now aesthetic warfare.We learned that health, faith, sports, and telecom are no longer separate conversations.Most of all, we learned that the gender debate isn’t happening in op-eds anymore.It’s happening in locker rooms. On hockey rinks. On cable news. Inside Senate hearings. And apparently on your mobile plan.The Olympics may have ended. But the performance of masculinity and the renegotiation of womanhood? That’s going into overtime.FOLLOW NATALIEsubstack: https://substack.com/@factsoverfearnataliebinstagram: https://www.instagram.com/@nataliebencivenga/#tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nataliebencivengathreads: https://www.threads.com/@nataliebencivengapodcast via spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/47JYsn9LQchErS3cnHP2YFpodcast via apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/facts-over-fear/id1855901950FACTS OVER FEARLet's dismantle the fear that is used to divide us surrounding the issues impacting the people and talk facts.

Need a sunny spot to your day? Olivia Zhang was 14. She was grieving. She built a global movement anyway so that kids with cancer could be seen and supported.And now, she’s teaching other young people how to build nonprofits and communities of care.FOLLOW NATALIEsubstack: https://substack.com/@factsoverfearnataliebinstagram: https://www.instagram.com/@nataliebencivenga/#tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nataliebencivengathreads: https://www.threads.com/@nataliebencivengapodcast via spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/47JYsn9LQchErS3cnHP2YFpodcast via apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/facts-over-fear/id1855901950FACTS OVER FEARLet's dismantle the fear that is used to divide us surrounding the issues impacting the people and talk facts.ABOUT NATALIENatalie Bencivenga is a socially-conscious journalist working towards building equity in our communities through storytelling. Her goal is to inspire, educate and activate people to become catalysts for positive change. Join her for transformative conversations that uplift and challenge the ways in which we perceive the world. Let's turn this moment into a movement – together.

Here in Pittsburgh, there’s an organization quietly transforming maternal and infant health — one family at a time. Since opening its doors in 1982, The Midwife Center for Birth & Women’s Health has supported nearly 10,000 births.For more than four decades, The Midwife Center has championed personalized, relationship-based care that improves outcomes for parents and babies while expanding access to compassionate, evidence-based midwifery services.Emily McGahey, Clinical Director at The Midwife Center, joins me for this important conversation.Reaching 10,000 births is more than a statistic. It represents generations of families who chose a model of care rooted in trust, informed consent, and partnership.In a country where maternal mortality remains unacceptably high — particularly for Black mothers — community-based midwifery care offers a different path forward.Research consistently shows that midwifery-led care is associated with fewer interventions, lower cesarean rates, high patient satisfaction, and strong outcomes for low-risk pregnancies. But beyond the data is something harder to measure: dignity.Families cared for at The Midwife Center aren’t rushed through appointments or treated like numbers in a system. They build relationships with providers. They are heard. Their questions are welcomed. Their choices are respected.Across the United States, maternity wards are closing — particularly in rural and underserved communities. Reproductive healthcare faces growing political hostility. Access to prenatal and postpartum care remains deeply unequal. And the U.S. continues to lag behind other developed countries in maternal health outcomes.We do not have universal healthcare. We do not have guaranteed paid leave. Postpartum care is often fragmented or insufficient. Too many families are left navigating pregnancy and new parenthood without the structural support they need.And when maternal health is missing from community care, the ripple effects are profound: Higher rates of preterm birth. Increased maternal morbidity and mortality. Greater mental health strain. Long-term impacts on family stability. Black maternal health disparities remain especially urgent.Black women in the U.S. are significantly more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, regardless of income or education. Community-rooted, culturally responsive care models like midwifery are an essential part of addressing these inequities.This is why 10,000 births isn’t just a celebration — it’s a statement. Midwife care is here to stay. As we fall behind peer nations in postpartum support and universal access to care, community-based models will only become more essential. Expanding postpartum services, integrating mental health care, advocating for paid family leave, and pushing for equitable insurance coverage are all part of what comes next.I just donated $25.00. Let’s help improve the lives of our neighbors. Give now: https://form-renderer-app.donorperfect.io/give/midwife-center/10k-birthsFOLLOW NATALIEsubstack: https://substack.com/@factsoverfearnataliebinstagram: https://www.instagram.com/@nataliebencivenga/#tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nataliebencivengathreads: https://www.threads.com/@nataliebencivengapodcast via spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/47JYsn9LQchErS3cnHP2YFpodcast via apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/facts-over-fear/id1855901950FACTS OVER FEARLet's dismantle the fear that is used to divide us surrounding the issues impacting the people and talk facts.ABOUT NATALIENatalie Bencivenga is a socially-conscious journalist working towards building equity in our communities through storytelling. Her goal is to inspire, educate and activate people to become catalysts for positive change. Join her for transformative conversations that uplift and challenge the ways in which we perceive the world. Let's turn this moment into a movement – together.

Recently, Colorado State Treasurer Dave Young joined 14 other state fiscal officers in sending a letter to the Trump administration, warning that large-scale immigration enforcement sweeps are destabilizing state and local economies.These aren’t cable news commentators or partisan activists. They are officials responsible for tracking billions of public dollars, monitoring tax collections, revenue forecasts, pension systems, bond ratings, and economic stability in real time.Restaurants closing mid-shift. Construction sites stalled. Farms and food processors unable to operate. What began as anecdotal reporting has evolved into something more measurable. Workforce disruptions are now showing up in state revenue data. When a significant portion of workers disappear — even temporarily — the economic shock travels quickly through supply chains, small businesses, and public budgets.State fiscal officers don’t typically wade into federal policy debates. Their job is to maintain stability, safeguard taxpayer dollars, and ensure long-term fiscal health. But when labor disruptions hit major sectors like agriculture, construction, hospitality, and food processing, the consequences extend far beyond individual businesses.They affect: Sales tax revenueIncome tax collectionsLocal government budgetsPublic service fundingLong-term economic forecastsWhen projects pause or businesses close unexpectedly, tax revenue slows. When revenue slows, states face difficult choices about funding schools, healthcare systems, infrastructure, and emergency services.The warning from these officials is clear: enforcement actions have economic consequences that ripple outward, affecting communities regardless of political affiliation.What Happens When Part of a Workforce Disappears Overnight? Labor markets are interconnected systems. Remove a segment of workers abruptly, and the impact compounds:Supply chains tighten. Prices rise. Small businesses struggle with staffing. Construction delays push back housing and infrastructure projects. Rural economies reliant on agriculture feel immediate strain. Even individuals who are not directly impacted by enforcement may feel the secondary effects: higher costs, delayed services, reduced local investment.The question fiscal officers are raising is not whether immigration law should be enforced. The question is: What are the measurable economic consequences when enforcement is carried out at scale and who absorbs those costs?For state officials tasked with balancing budgets, the concern is practical: are these disruptions short-term shocks, or early indicators of long-term structural damage? Are states being left to absorb economic fallout without federal coordination? What happens to public services if revenue projections begin to shift downward?Because when workforce instability spreads across key industries, it doesn’t stay contained. It shows up in classrooms. In hospitals. In infrastructure projects. In the everyday services communities rely on.And that makes this story about more than immigration policy.It’s about economic stability — and who bears the cost when that stability is disrupted.FOLLOW NATALIEsubstack: https://substack.com/@factsoverfearnataliebinstagram: https://www.instagram.com/@nataliebencivenga/#tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nataliebencivengathreads: https://www.threads.com/@nataliebencivengapodcast via spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/47JYsn9LQchErS3cnHP2YFpodcast via apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/facts-over-fear/id1855901950ABOUT NATALIENatalie Bencivenga is a socially-conscious journalist working towards building equity in our communities through storytelling. Her goal is to inspire, educate and activate people to become catalysts for positive change. Join her for transformative conversations that uplift and challenge the ways in which we perceive the world. Let's turn this moment into a movement – together.

As rural communities struggle with unconstitutional school funding, stagnant wages, rising electricity rates, and threats to Medicaid, candidates must answer one question: who is state policy really working for?Voters aren’t talking about abstract partisan fights.They’re asking whether their kids can get the education they deserve. Whether their paycheck stretches to the end of the month. Whether their parents can age at home with dignity. Whether the community they love will still feel livable in ten years.I interviewed Rebecca MacTaggart who is running for State Rep. in the 48th District of Pennsylvania to discuss these issues and more. This conversation wasn’t about political theater. It’s about the real-world impact of state policy on families, rural communities, and the long-term future of Pennsylvania.FOLLOW NATALIEsubstack: https://substack.com/@factsoverfearnataliebinstagram: https://www.instagram.com/@nataliebencivenga/#tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nataliebencivengathreads: https://www.threads.com/@nataliebencivengapodcast via spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/47JYsn9LQchErS3cnHP2YFpodcast via apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/facts-over-fear/id1855901950FACTS OVER FEARLet's dismantle the fear that is used to divide us surrounding the issues impacting the people and talk facts.ABOUT NATALIENatalie Bencivenga is a socially-conscious journalist working towards building equity in our communities through storytelling. Her goal is to inspire, educate and activate people to become catalysts for positive change. Join her for transformative conversations that uplift and challenge the ways in which we perceive the world. Let's turn this moment into a movement – together.

Medical Debt & the Illusion of SecurityFollowing the death of Dawson’s Creek star James Van Der Beek at age 48 after a two-year battle with stage 3 colorectal cancer, fans raised over $1.2 million (as of this recording) in seven hours to support his wife, Kimberly, and their six children. The GoFundMe describes a family facing financial instability after years of medical treatment left them depleted. Van Der Beek had spoken openly about being unable to work during treatment — about the brutal math of illness in America. Even for a recognizable actor, cancer meant lost income, mounting bills, and the possibility of losing stability.The takeaway isn’t just heartbreak. It’s structural. If a working actor with name recognition can be financially undone by illness, what does that say for everyone else? The GoFundMe economy has quietly replaced systemic healthcare reform. We mourn publicly and patch holes privately.The SAVE Act & The Myth of Rampant FraudMeanwhile, the House passed the SAVE Act (Save America Act), tightening voter registration rules by requiring proof of citizenship and limiting mail-in voting. The vote was narrow — 218 to 213 — and the bill faces an uphill battle in the Senate.But the data tells a different story than the rhetoric. In Arizona, across 25 years and more than 42 million ballots, only 36 cases of fraud were found.None affecting election outcomes. In Pennsylvania, 30 years and more than 100 million votes yielded just 39 cases. Across swing states, fraud remains vanishingly rare.ICE Expansion in PennsylvaniaGov Josh Shapiro said this week that massive new federal immigration detention facilities “do not belong” in Pennsylvania. A proposed facility in Berks County could hold up to 7,500 people — in a warehouse built with water and sewer capacity designed for only a few hundred workers at a time. The infrastructure questions alone are staggering. So are the humanitarian ones.We’ve already seen outbreaks of COVID, flu, and measles intersect with reports of inadequate hygiene and medical care inside detention settings. Public health and human rights are not separate conversations — they are the same one.The Epstein Files & Manufactured MoralityThen there’s the outrage gap. Millions of newly released files related to Jeffrey Epstein include high-profile names. Rep. Jamie Raskin has said former President Trump’s name appears over one million times in unredacted materials. Longevity expert Dr. Peter Attia’s name appears more than 1,700 times, leading to his resignation from David Protein after scrutiny. An OB/GYN reportedly connected to Epstein’s payroll raises additional ethical questions.Yet the loudest moral panic this week centered on a halftime performance and vague appeals to “decency.” The question isn’t whether accountability matters — it absolutely does. The question is why accountability seems selectively activated. Who is deemed worthy of protection? Which victims provoke outrage, and which are quietly politicized?Connecting DotsMedical debt. Voting restrictions. Immigration detention. Public health crises. The fallout from the Epstein files.At first glance, they appear unrelated. But they share a throughline: systems that protect power while placing the burden of survival on individuals. A healthcare system that relies on crowdfunding. A voting system reshaped around fear rather than evidence. Detention facilities built faster than safeguards. Institutions that shield elite networks while policing cultural expression. These are not isolated controversies. They are symptoms of the same architecture — one shaped by hierarchy, patriarchy, and racialized power structures that determine who receives care, who receives scrutiny, and who receives silence.We are not just arguing about headlines. We are revealing our priorities. And this week, those priorities tell a story about who deserves scrutiny and who gets a pass.

Is ICE uniquely “American?”Liana Maneese, Liberation Psychotherapist, Founder & Clinical Director of Transitional Characters, joined me to dive into this question and the role white women have traditionally played in the perpetuation of harmful systems, what happens when they “step out of line” and these cycles can be broken to create a more equitable future for all of us.ICE was created after 9/11 and sits on top of a much longer history of state violence in this country.Lest we forget our history: the United States was built through the genocide of the indigenous peoples of this land, sustained by the enslavement of Black and brown people, and later justified through mass incarceration through systems like Japanese American internment camps during World War II.After 9/11, that same logic — fear framed as security — produced ICE, folding immigration enforcement into the Department of Homeland Security and giving it unbridled and unchecked power.As the BBC has noted, ICE wasn’t designed as a neutral civil agency; it was built as an enforcement arm.When you see ICE today, you’re not seeing an anomaly in an otherwise just and fair system. You’re seeing a continuation of how this country has repeatedly used law and bureaucracy to control, exclude and dehumanize.Thank you, Liana, for holding space for serious — and at time — uncomfortable conversations with compassion and curiosity. And a personal shout-out to her for being a paid subscriber, a long-time supporter of my work and for being my friend.NOTE: We had a technical issue towards the end of the show and Liana’s connection was lost, so I edited out a bit at the end. Liana will definitely be back on more regularly, and please share any questions you may have for us here to use for future segments.FOLLOW NATALIEsubstack: https://substack.com/@factsoverfearnataliebinstagram: https://www.instagram.com/@nataliebencivenga/#tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nataliebencivengathreads: https://www.threads.com/@nataliebencivengapodcast via spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/47JYsn9LQchErS3cnHP2YFpodcast via apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/facts-over-fear/id1855901950FACTS OVER FEARLet's dismantle the fear that is used to divide us surrounding the issues impacting the people and talk facts.ABOUT NATALIENatalie Bencivenga is a socially-conscious journalist working towards building equity in our communities through storytelling. Her goal is to inspire, educate and activate people to become catalysts for positive change. Join her for transformative conversations that uplift and challenge the ways in which we perceive the world. Let's turn this moment into a movement – together.

Arick Fudali, civil rights advocate and Partner and Managing Attorney at The Bloom Firm, is representing 11 survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network at a moment when long-sealed documents are finally entering public view.But instead of clarity and accountability, the release of the so-called “Epstein files” has triggered new harm — exposing victims’ names through egregious redaction errors while leaving critical questions about powerful enablers unanswered.Fudali has been at the forefront of public scrutiny over the Justice Department’s handling of those files. He has condemned what he describes as both incompetence and a troubling lack of transparency — particularly after one of his clients saw her name referenced hundreds of times in un-redacted material.For survivors who have spent years fighting to reclaim privacy and rebuild their lives, such disclosures are not procedural missteps. They are re-traumatizing breaches of trust by the very institutions meant to protect them.The controversy intensified during a House Judiciary Committee hearing today when Attorney General Pam Bondi rejected a request from Rep. Pramila Jayapal to turn and address survivors seated in the audience.The exchange devolved into a shouting match, with Bondi accusing Jayapal of “theatrics” and refusing to apologize.For survivors and their advocates, the moment underscored a deeper frustration: a sense that accountability is being treated as political spectacle rather than moral obligation.Bondi also clashed with Reps. Jerry Nadler and Jamie Raskin, dismissing questions about how many of Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators have been investigated or indicted and declining to provide details about the scope of federal review.Fudali argued that the reluctance to provide clear answers feeds a longstanding public perception that powerful individuals continue to avoid scrutiny, even as victims’ identities surface in public filings.Beyond the Epstein case, he has spoken out about what he sees as broader civil rights concerns, including the federal arrest of journalist Don Lemon — a development that has raised alarms among press freedom advocates.For Fudali, the intersection is clear: when legal processes appear selective or opaque, whether in cases involving sexual abuse survivors or journalists, public trust erodes. Transparency and equal application of the law are not partisan issues, he argues — they are constitutional imperatives.At stake is more than the release of documents. It is whether accountability in America is real or rhetorical. Survivors want truth, not spectacle. Journalists demand the freedom to report without fear of retaliation. And the public deserves to know whether justice is applied evenly — or only when it is politically convenient.As Fudali continues to press for answers, one question looms large: Will the system protect the vulnerable and pursue the powerful with equal vigor — or will history repeat itself, with exposure for victims and insulation for those at the top?FOLLOW NATALIEsubstack: https://substack.com/@factsoverfearnataliebinstagram: https://www.instagram.com/@nataliebencivenga/#tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nataliebencivengathreads: https://www.threads.com/@nataliebencivengapodcast via spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/47JYsn9LQchErS3cnHP2YFpodcast via apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/facts-over-fear/id1855901950FACTS OVER FEARLet's dismantle the fear that is used to divide us surrounding the issues impacting the people and talk facts.ABOUT NATALIENatalie Bencivenga is a socially-conscious journalist working towards building equity in our communities through storytelling. Her goal is to inspire, educate and activate people to become catalysts for positive change. Join her for transformative conversations that uplift and challenge the ways in which we perceive the world. Let's turn this moment into a movement – together.