Cardionerds: A Cardiology Podcast

CardioNerds (Dr. Josh Saef, Dr. Agnes Koczo) join Dr. Iva Minga, Dr. Kifah Hussain, and Dr. Kevin Lee from the University of Chicago – NorthShore to discuss a case of unrepaired congenital heart disease that involves D-TGA complicated by Eisenmenger syndrome. The ECPR was provided by Dr. Michael Earing. Audio editing by Dr. Akiva Rosenzveig. A 25-year-old woman with an unknown congenital heart disease that was diagnosed in infancy in Pakistan presents to the hospital for abdominal pain and weakness. She is found to be profoundly hypoxemic, and an echocardiogram revealed D-transposition of the great arteries (D-TGA) with a large VSD. As this was not repaired in childhood, she has unfortunately developed Eisenmenger syndrome with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. She is stabilized and treated medically for her cyanotic heart disease. Unfortunately given the severity and late presentation of her disease, she has limited long-term options for care. CardioNerds discuss the diagnosis of D-TGA and Eisenmenger’s syndrome, as well as long-term management and complications associated with this entity. “To study the phenomena of disease without books is to sail an uncharted sea, while to study books without patients is not to go to sea at all.” – Sir William Osler. CardioNerds thank the patients and their loved ones whose stories teach us the Art of Medicine and support our Mission to Democratize Cardiovascular Medicine. Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values. US Cardiology Review is now the official journal of CardioNerds! Submit your manuscript here. CardioNerds Case Reports PageCardioNerds Episode PageCardioNerds AcademyCardionerds Healy Honor Roll CardioNerds Journal ClubSubscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!Check out CardioNerds SWAG!Become a CardioNerds Patron! Case Media – Unrepaired Congenital Heart Disease Pearls – Unrepaired Congenital Heart Disease Early diagnosis of cyanotic congenital heart disease is paramount for treatment and prevention of future complications. Adult congenital heart disease requires a multi-disciplinary team for management in consultation with an adult congenital cardiology specialist. Eisenmenger syndrome is related to multiple systemic complications and has a high rate of mortality. Advancement in PAH medical management can offer noninvasive treatment options for some patients. Transthoracic echocardiography is the cornerstone for diagnosis. Other modalities (e.g. cardiac CT, cardiac MRI, invasive catheterization) can aid in diagnosis and management. Show Notes – Unrepaired Congenital Heart Disease Cyanotic congenital heart disease is often diagnosed in infancy and timely treatment is paramount. As these diseases progress over time, pulmonary over-circulation often pulmonary hypertension (PH), elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, and Eisenmenger syndrome will develop, which preclude definitive treatment. For D-TGA, before PH develops, there are surgical options such as the arterial switch procedure that can treat the disease. Unfortunately, once Eisenmenger syndrome develops, there are multiple systemic complications including hyperviscosity, thrombosis, bleeding, kidney disease, iron deficiency, arrhythmias, etc. that can occur. Management requires a multi-disciplinary team including an adult congenital cardiology specialist, but mortality rates remain high, with median survival reduced by 20 years, worse with complex cardiac defects. Bosentan is a first line treatment for patients with Eisenmenger syndrome, with PDE-5 inhibitors as a second line either by themselves or in combination with bosentan. Data are currently limited for latest-generation PH treatments in Eisenmenger syndrome and further study is still underway. References Ferencz C. Transposition of the great vessels. Pathophysiologic considerations based upon a study of the lungs. Circulation. 1966 Feb;33(2):232-41. Arvanitaki A, Gatzoulis MA, Opotowsky AR, Khairy P, Dimopoulos K, Diller GP, Giannakoulas G, Brida M, Griselli M, Grünig E, Montanaro C, Alexander PD, Ameduri R, Mulder BJM, D’Alto M. Eisenmenger Syndrome: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 29;79(12):1183-1198. Earing MG, Webb GD. Congenital heart disease and pregnancy: maternal and fetal risks. Clin Perinatol. 2005 Dec;32(4):913-9, viii-ix Østergaard L, Valeur N, Ihlemann N, Bundgaard H, Gislason G, Torp-Pedersen C, Bruun NE, Søndergaard L, Køber L, Fosbøl EL. Incidence of infective endocarditis among patients considered at high risk. Eur Heart J. 2018 Feb 14;39(7):623-629 Opotowsky AR, Moko LE, Ginns J, Rosenbaum M, Greutmann M, Aboulhosn J, Hageman A, Kim Y, Deng LX, Grewal J, Zaidi AN, Almansoori G, Oechslin E, Earing M, Landzberg MJ, Singh MN, Wu F, Vaidya A. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in cyanotic congenital heart disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Apr;100(4):1325-34. Jaïs X, D’Armini AM, Jansa P, Torbicki A, Delcroix M, Ghofrani HA, Hoeper MM, Lang IM, Mayer E, Pepke-Zaba J, Perchenet L, Morganti A, Simonneau G, Rubin LJ; Bosentan Effects in iNopErable Forms of chronIc Thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension Study Group. Bosentan for treatment of inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: BENEFiT (Bosentan Effects in iNopErable Forms of chronIc Thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 16;52(25):2127-34. Gatzoulis MA, Landzberg M, Beghetti M, Berger RM, Efficace M, Gesang S, He J, Papadakis K, Pulido T, Galiè N; MAESTRO Study Investigators. Evaluation of Macitentan in Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome. Circulation. 2019 Jan 2;139(1):51-63. McLaughlin VV, Gaine SP, Howard LS, Leuchte HH, Mathier MA, Mehta S, Palazzini M, Park MH, Tapson VF, Sitbon O. Treatment goals of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 24;62(25 Suppl):D73-81. Stoica SC, McNeil KD, Perreas K, Sharples LD, Satchithananda DK, Tsui SS, Large SR, Wallwork J. Heart-lung transplantation for Eisenmenger syndrome: early and long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Dec;72(6):1887-91.

CardioNerds (Drs. Amit Goyal, Jason Feinman, and Tiffany Dong) discuss Beyond the Boards: Diseases of the Peripheral Arteries with Dr. Amy Pollak. We review common presentations of peripheral vascular disease, ranging from aortic disease to the more distal vessels in an engaging case-based discussion. Dr. Pollack talks us through these cases, including the diagnosis and management of peripheral vascular diseases. Show notes were drafted by Dr. Matt Delfiner and episode audio was edited by student doctor Tina Reddy. The CardioNerds Beyond the Boards Series was inspired by the Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Board Review Course and designed in collaboration with the course directors Dr. Amy Pollak, Dr. Jeffrey Geske, and Dr. Michael Cullen. Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values. US Cardiology Review is now the official journal of CardioNerds! Submit your manuscript here. CardioNerds Beyond the Boards SeriesCardioNerds Episode PageCardioNerds AcademyCardionerds Healy Honor Roll CardioNerds Journal ClubSubscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!Check out CardioNerds SWAG!Become a CardioNerds Patron! Pearls and Quotes – Disease of the Peripheral Arteries Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm include traditional atherosclerotic risk factors such as age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and tobacco use. Screening for AAA should be for men over the age of 65 years with a history of tobacco use. If present, medical management includes blood pressure and lipid lowering therapies to decrease the risk of expansion. Decision for surgical intervention relies on size and rate of growth of AAA, with clear indications if it grows> 10 mm in a year or diameter of 5.5 cm in men and 5.0 cm in women. When diagnosis of PAD is not straightforward (presence of symptoms but ABI is normal), an exercise ankle-brachial index (ABI) test can be useful. An exercise-induced decrease in ABI by 20% or in ankle pressure by 30 mmHg is consistent with PAD. For PAD, treatment with low dose rivaroxaban and aspirin yields lower event rates than with antiplatelet therapy alone. This in combination with lifestyle therapies (diet + exercise) and risk factor management (hypertension and hyperlipidemia) are the cornerstones of therapy. Revascularization is indicated for continued PAD symptoms despite conservative therapy. Acute limb ischemia is an “acute leg attack” and is a life-threatening emergency. Common symptoms include pain, pallor, pulselesess, parasthesias, cold temperature (poikilothermia), and paralysis. Restoration of blood flow is paramount, and emergent or urgent revascularization is the first line therapy for those with symptoms < 2 weeks. Notes – Disease of the Peripheral Arteries Learning Objectives: Describe screening and therapeutic strategy for AAA management. Understand the risk factors and diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease. Compare different management approaches for PAD. Be able to recognize acute limb ischemia. Describe the overall treatment strategy for acute limb ischemia. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Abdominal aortic aneurysms are a source of high morbidity and mortality. The US Preventative Services Task Force recommends one time screening ultrasound for AAA in men older than 65 years of age with a tobacco use history. Risk factors include age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and tobacco use. Patients with AAA between 3-3.9 mm should be monitored every 2-3 years. Sizes 4-5 cm should be re-imaged every 6-12 months.  Additional screening can be done for individuals < 65 years who have a first degree relative with AAA. Women are more likely to have aortic dissection at smaller diameters than men, which is why intervention (open vs endovascular repair) is recommended at 5 cm diameter for women versus at 5.5 cm for men. Additionally, repair is also warranted if a AAA grows more than 5 mm in 6 months or 10 mm in one year. Risk factor management is key with AAA, including blood pressure, glucose, and lipid targeting.  The presence of an AAA should be treated as secondary ASCVD prevention like coronary arterial disease, since AAA is an atherosclerotic disease equivalent. Tobacco cessation is of the utmost importance here. Regarding strategy for repair: if the patient is not a surgical candidate, then endovascular repair is a reasonable option. If they are a surgical candidate, then the location of the aneurysm comes into play. Infrarenal or juxtarenal disease are more likely to require open repair. Peripheral Arterial Disease When a patient presents with claudication, in addition to thorough history and physical exam, checking for ABIs is important. Risk factors include known coronary disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. Women often report cramping in their calves/legs rather than outright pain. ABI < 0.9 are consistent with PAD, with > 1.3 consistent with calcified and non-compressible vessels. Toe brachial index (TBI) cutoff is 0.7. If there is strong clinical suspicion but normal ABI, then performing the test after a period of exercise (calf raises, treadmill) can be clinically useful. An exercise induced decrease in ankle pressure by 30 mm or change in ABI by 20% is consistent with PAD. Therapy for PAD includes supervised exercise training, lifestyle changes (e.g., tobacco cessation) and risk factor modification (blood pressure/lipids/glucose). Additionally, low dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin has been shown to decrease events compared to aspirin alone. If there are continued symptoms despite the above therapy, then invasive management can be considered. This includes percutaneous or surgical revascularization.  This would be proceeded with CTA imaging for further guidance. Invasive angiography is reasonable for someone with a higher likelihood of a single lesion amenable to percutaneous repair.  Discrete and singular lesions are usually repaired percutaneously while more diffuse or multivessel disease, then surgical management may be indicated. Acute Limb Ischemia ALI can present with the 6 Ps: pain, pallor, pulselessness, parasthesias,  poikilothermia, and paralysis. Limbs may (rarely) remain viable, with signs being a clear Doppler-able pulse without sensory or muscle loss. Otherwise, a limb is salvageable if there is a faint arterial Doppler signal. If there is muscle weakness, then the limb is considered threatened. If an arterial Doppler signal is completely lost, then the limb is considered non-viable. ALI is an “acute leg attack.” The initial therapy is systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin. If symptoms have been present for less than two weeks, then endovascular therapy with either thrombectomy or catheter-directed lysis are indicated. Major contraindications to lytic therapy include recent surgery, any history of intracranial bleeding or neoplasm, or if they are otherwise at a high bleeding risk. Non-viable limbs may better be served with amputation rather than revascularization. References – Disease of the Peripheral Arteries 1. Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Bosch J, et al. Rivaroxaban with or without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(14):1319-1330. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1709118 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1709118 2. Criqui MH, Matsushita K, Aboyans V, et al. Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Contemporary Epidemiology, Management Gaps, and Future Directions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association  Circulation. 2021;144(9):e171-e191. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001005 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001005?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org 3. Lanzi S, Belch J, Brodmann M, et al. Supervised exercise training in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Vasa. 2022;51(5):267-274. doi:10.1024/0301-1526/a001024 https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/full/10.1024/0301-1526/a001024 4. Sabouret P, Cacoub P, Dallongeville J, et al. REACH: international prospective observational registry in patients at risk of atherothrombotic events. Results for the French arm at baseline and one year. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;101(2):81-88. doi:10.1016/s1875-2136(08)70263-8 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213608702638?via%3Dihub 5. Zucker EJ, Misono AS, Prabhakar AM. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Practices: Impact of the 2014 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(7):868-874. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.020 https://www.jacr.org/article/S1546-1440(17)30200-4/fulltext 5. Hensley SE, Upchurch GR Jr. Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: JACC Focus Seminar, Part 1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(8):821-831. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.066 https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.066 6. Shishehbor MH, White CJ, Gray BH, et al. Critical Limb Ischemia: An Expert Statement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(18):2002-2015. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.071 https://www.jacc.org/doi/full/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.071 7. Kinlay S. Management of Critical Limb Ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(2):e001946. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.001946 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.001946 8. Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines [published correction appears in Circulation. 2017 Mar 21;135(12 ):e791-e792]. Circulation. 2017;135(12):e726-e779. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000471 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000471?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed

CardioNerds (Dr. Daniel Ambinder, Dr. Giselle Suero Abreu, Dr. Kahtan Fadah, and Dr. Colin Blumenthal) discuss arrhythmias in CardioOncology with Dr. Michael Fradley. In this episode, Dr. Michael Fradley joins us in the CardioNerds CardioOncology clinic where he uses his unique dual training in cardio-oncology and electrophysiology to walk us through the complex interplay and management of these disorders. We discuss the incidence and pathophysiology of these arrhythmias, including the link with various cancer treatments, screening and detection, and complex management including rate vs rhythm control in atrial fibrillation, need for anticoagulation, effects on the QTc and so much more. Given the unique challenges with this population we also delve into how this affects their oncology care and how to approach changes to their cancer treatment. Show notes were drafted by Dr. Kahtan Fadah and episode audio was edited by student Dr. Tina Reddy. This episode is supported by a grant from Pfizer Inc. This CardioNerds Cardio-Oncology series is a multi-institutional collaboration made possible by contributions of stellar fellow leads and expert faculty from several programs, led by series co-chairs, Dr. Giselle Suero Abreu, Dr. Dinu Balanescu, and Dr. Teodora Donisan.  Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values. US Cardiology Review is now the official journal of CardioNerds! Submit your manuscript here. CardioNerds Cardio-Oncology PageCardioNerds Episode PageCardioNerds AcademyCardionerds Healy Honor Roll CardioNerds Journal ClubSubscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!Check out CardioNerds SWAG!Become a CardioNerds Patron! Pearls and Quotes – Arrhythmias in CardioOncology Arrhythmias are common in cancer patients due to shared risk factors and bi-directional risk between cardiac and oncologic disorders. Many cancer therapeutics can be directly arrhythmogenic or lead to cardiotoxicities that pre-dispose to arrhythmias. Though incidence of arrhythmia can be significant increased with some cancer therapeutics (e.g. ibrutinib), there is not specific data to support proactive ambulatory monitoring for arrhythmia without evidence of clear symptoms. Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in cancer patients and management of atrial fibrillation, as well as other tachyarrhythmias, is unchanged from management in non-cancer patients. General principles of when to start anticoagulation or rate vs rhythm control are not significantly different (e.g. still use CHA2DS2-VAsC, monitor for symptoms etc), but providers should be more mindful of drug-drug interactions with cancer therapeutics. Cancer therapeutics as well as common medications used to treat side effects or complications (e.g. antiemetics, antibiotics, etc) can prolong the QT interval and increase risk of Torsades de pointes (TdP). The QTc should be monitored with an ECG for patients on these medications. If a patient does develop a serious arrhythmia like TdP, management is similar to that in non-cancer patients. The goal of arrhythmia management in cardio-oncology is to prevent cardiovascular disease from becoming a barrier to appropriate cancer therapy. Though cancer therapeutics should be temporarily or permanently discontinued in potentially fatal events (e.g TdP from QTc prolonging meds), the overall goal is to manage the arrhythmias appropriately to allow cancer therapeutics to be continued or restarted. Show notes – Arrhythmias in CardioOncology What is the prevalence of arrhythmias in patients with cancer? Arrhythmias are common in patients with cancer due to a multitude of factors. Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in this population and occurs in approximately 5% of patients with cancer. The driving forces are multifactorial and include the direct arrhythmogenic effects of cancer therapeutics and cardiotoxicities of cancer therapeutics that make arrhythmogenesis more likely. Additionally, there is a bi-directional link between cancer and cardiac disorders. For example, not only is atrial fibrillation more common in patients with cancer, but there is also a higher incidence of cancer in patients with atrial fibrillation, likely due to shared risk factors. Risk factors in patients with cancer that make arrhythmias more likely include advanced age, metabolic disturbances, electrolyte abnormalities, and elevated levels of inflammation and catecholamines. (How) Do cancer therapeutics increase the risk of arrhythmias? Many cancer therapies are either directly or indirectly arrhythmogenic. Though therapies like the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib have a direct link to an increase incidence of atrial fibrillation, other medications like immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause myocarditis, reduce cardiac function, and predispose to arrhythmias. The following table includes broad categories of cancer therapeutics that are linked to arrhythmia: What is the appropriate arrhythmia monitoring strategy for patients receiving cancer therapy? Though there is a clear increased risk of arrhythmia in many patients with cancer receiving specific therapeutics, there is not specific data to support proactive monitoring in these patients. One meta-analysis showed that when compared to alternative regimens, ibrutinib increased the risk of incident AF compared to alternative therapies (RR 3.9, 95% CI 2.0-7.5, P <0.0001), with overall AF incidence of 3.3 per 100 person-years compared to 0.84 per 100 person-years in the ibrutinib and non-ibrutinib groups, respectively. Though proactive monitoring might lead to more or earlier detection of AF in this population, there is a lack of data to support improved outcomes with monitoring asymptomatic patients. Additionally, the clinical relevance of subclinical and/or short episodes of atrial fibrillation remains uncertain. Because of this, there are no current recommendations for broad proactive monitoring, though monitoring should be considered in patients with signs or symptoms that could be consistent with arrhythmia. What is the management of arrhythmias in patients with cancer? Management of arrhythmias in patients with cancer is similar to general management in non-cancer patients. For AF, a rhythm control strategy is preferred for patients with paroxysmal AF and in patients who are symptomatic. For other patients who are asymptomatic, a rate control strategy is reasonable. One notable exception is when control of the AF becomes a barrier to the oncology team. In these situations, more aggressive rhythm control is preferred to facility oncologic care. Anticoagulation is also approached in a similar way to non-cancer patients. Patients with a CHA2DS2-VAsC score >2 for men and >3 for women warrant anticoagulation. Many patients with cancer are anemic, thrombocytopenic, or prone to bleeding, which should also be taken into account when prescribing anticoagulation. Left atrial appendage closure may be a consideration for select patients. As for medications that cause QT prolongation, malignant arrhythmias are quite rare and mostly occur in patients with QTc > 500 ms. This can be multifactorial as many patients with cancer may have episodic metabolic or electrolyte abnormalities in addition to cancer therapeutics or symptom/complication management medications (e.g. antiemetics, antibiotics, etc) which can prolong the QTc or lower the threshold for arrhythmogenesis. Life threatening arrhythmias like Torsades de pointes (TdP) are treated similar to that in non-cancer patients, which can include magnesium, increasing HR with isoproterenol or transvenous pacing, anti-arrhythmic drugs, or cardioversion in addition to addressing the underlying cause. Balancing arrhythmia risk with cancer therapeutics An important goal in cardio-oncology is to prevent cardiovascular disease from becoming a barrier for a patient to receive appropriate cancer therapy. The goal is to facilitate the treatment plan that the oncologist thinks is optimal for their cancer, not to protect the heart at the expense of appropriate oncologic care. This is a difficult balancing act and, in the case of serious or potentially fatal events (e.g. Torsades from QTc prolonging meds, vasospasm with ischemia from 5FU, severe myocarditis from immune checkpoint inhibitors etc.), it is often necessary to discontinue the cancer therapeutic temporarily or permanently. Ideally, the arrhythmia should be treated and controlled allowing the patient to continue therapy while minimizing the cardiac symptoms and side effects. References – Arrhythmias in CardioOncology Leiva O, AbdelHameid D, Connors JM, Cannon CP, Bhatt DL. Common Pathophysiology in Cancer, Atrial Fibrillation, Atherosclerosis, and Thrombosis: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review. JACC CardioOncol. 2021;3(5):619-634. doi:10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.08.011 Fradley MG, Beckie TM, Brown SA, et al. Recognition, Prevention, and Management of Arrhythmias and Autonomic Disorders in Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;144(3):e41-e55. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000986 Leong DP, Caron F, Hillis C, et al. The risk of atrial fibrillation with ibrutinib use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2016;128(1):138-140. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-05-712828 Meet Our Collaborators International Cardio-Oncology Society ( IC-OS). IC-OS exits to advance cardiovascular care of cancer patients and survivors by promoting collaboration among researchers, educators and clinicians around the world. Learn more at https://ic-os.org/.

CardioNerds join Dr. Tony Li Yi Wei, Dr. Rodney Soh Yu Hang, and Dr. Zan Ng Zhe Yan to discuss a case featuring a young woman with recurrent ACS ultimately found to have Takayasu Arteritis. They explore the potential causes of her condition, diagnostic challenges, and treatment options for Takayasu Arthritis.

The following question refers to Section 4.9 of the 2021 ESC CV Prevention Guidelines. The question is asked by Dr. Christian Faaborg-Andersen, answered first by UCSD fellow Dr. Patrick Azcarate, and then by expert faculty Dr. Melissa Tracy. Dr. Tracy is a preventive cardiologist, former Director of the Echocardiography Lab, Director of Cardiac Rehabilitation, and solid organ transplant cardiologist at Rush University. The CardioNerds Decipher The Guidelines Series for the 2021 ESC CV Prevention Guidelines represents a collaboration with the ACC Prevention of CVD Section, the National Lipid Association, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values. Question #35 In patients with a low risk of cardiovascular disease, which of the following is true? A Aspirin does not affect the risk of ischemic stroke B Aspirin increases the risk of fatal bleeding. C Aspirin reduces the risk of non-fatal MI. D Aspirin reduces cardiovascular mortality Answer #35 Explanation In 2019, an updated meta-analysis of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events found that patients with a low risk of CVD taking aspirin did not have a reduction in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. There was a lower risk of non-fatal MI (RR 0.82) and ischemic stroke (RR 0.87). However, aspirin was also associated with a  higher risk of major bleeding (RR 1.50), intracranial bleeding (RR 1.32), and major GI bleeding (RR 1.52). There was no difference in the risk of fatal bleeding (RR 1.09). Accordingly, the ESC does not recommend antiplatelet therapy in individuals with low/moderate CV risk due to the increased risk of major bleeding (Class III, LOE A). Although aspirin should not be given routinely to patients without established ASCVD, we cannot exclude that in some patients at high or very high CVD risk, the benefits may outweigh the risks. Main Takeaway In patients with low/moderate risk of CVD, aspirin for primary prevention is not recommended due to the higher risk of bleeding. For those at higher risk of CVD, low-dose aspirin may be considered for prevention in the absence of contraindications. Guideline Loc. Section 4.9.1, Page 3291 CardioNerds Decipher the Guidelines – 2021 ESC Prevention SeriesCardioNerds Episode PageCardioNerds AcademyCardionerds Healy Honor Roll CardioNerds Journal ClubSubscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!Check out CardioNerds SWAG!Become a CardioNerds Patron!

The following question refers to Section 8.5 of the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. The question is asked by Western Michigan University medical student & CardioNerds Intern Shivani Reddy, answered first by University of Southern California cardiology fellow and CardioNerds FIT Trialist Dr. Michael Francke, and then by expert faculty Dr. Shashank Sinha. Dr. Sinha is an Assistant Professor of Medical Education at the University of Virginia School of Medicine and an advanced heart failure, MCS, and transplant cardiologist at Inova Fairfax Medical Campus. He currently serves as both the Director of the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit and Cardiovascular Critical Care Research Program at Inova Fairfax. He is also a Steering Committee member for the multicenter Cardiogenic Shock Working Group and Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network and an Associate Editor for the Journal of Cardiac Failure, the official Journal of the Heart Failure Society of America. The Decipher the Guidelines: 2022 AHA / ACC / HFSA Guideline for The Management of Heart Failure series was developed by the CardioNerds and created in collaboration with the American Heart Association and the Heart Failure Society of America. It was created by 30 trainees spanning college through advanced fellowship under the leadership of CardioNerds Cofounders Dr. Amit Goyal and Dr. Dan Ambinder, with mentorship from Dr. Anu Lala, Dr. Robert Mentz, and Dr. Nancy Sweitzer. We thank Dr. Judy Bezanson and Dr. Elliott Antman for tremendous guidance. Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values. Question #30 Ms. V. Tea is a 55-year-old woman with a history of cardiac sarcoidosis, heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF – EF 40%), and ventricular tachycardia with CRT-D who presents with recurrent VT. She has undergone several attempts at catheter ablation of VT in the past and previously had been trialed on amiodarone which was discontinued due to hepatotoxicity. She now continues to have episodic VT requiring anti-tachycardia pacing and ICD shocks despite medical therapy with mexiletine, metoprolol, and sotalol. Her most recent PET scan showed no active areas of inflammation. Currently, her vital signs are stable, and labs are unremarkable. What is the best next step for this patient? A Evaluation for heart transplant B Evaluation for LVAD C Dobutamine D Prednisone E None of the above Answer #30 Explanation The correct answer is A – evaluation for heart transplant. For selected patients with advanced heart failure despite GDMT, cardiac transplantation is indicated to improve survival and quality of life (Class 1, LOE C-LD). Heart transplantation, in this context, provides intermediate economic value. Clinical indicators include refractory or recurrent ventricular arrhythmias with frequent ICD shocks. Patient selection for heart transplant includes assessment of comorbidities, goals of care, and various other factors. The United Network of Organ Sharing Heart Transplant Allocation Policy was revised in 2018 with a 6-tiered system to better prioritize unstable patients and minimize waitlist mortality. VT puts the patient as a Status 2 on the transplant list. There was a contemporary analysis of patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy due to cardiac sarcoidosis, published in Journal of Cardiac Failure, in 2018 that demonstrated similar 1-year and 5-year survival after heart transplant between patients with and without cardiac sarcoidosis. Choice B (evaluation for LVAD) is incorrect. While bridge to transplant with LVAD is definitely a potential next step in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, it is not recommended in patients presenting primarily with refractory ventricular arrhythmias due to granuloma-induced scarring. In this situation, patients benefit from direct heart transplant rather than bridge to transplant LVAD approach. The same study, described before in the Journal of Cardiac Failure, also showed similar 1-year and 5-year survival after bridge-to-transplant mechanical circulatory support between patients with and without cardiac sarcoidosis. Since cardiac sarcoidosis is not just limited to the left ventricle, patients being considered for LVAD need hemodynamic assessment to determine the risk of post-LVAD RV failure. Choice C (dobutamine) is incorrect. The patient is currently not decompensated in terms of contractility nor is showing signs of cardiogenic shock. Further, dobutamine may worsen arrhythmia burden. Choice D (prednisone) is incorrect as there is no sign of active inflammation on the PET scan. The recurrent ventricular arrhythmias are being driven by granuloma-induced scar. Main Takeaway Cardiac transplantation has a Class 1 (LOE C-LD) recommendation for eligible patients with advanced HF despite GDMT to improve survival and quality of life. Specifically, direct heart transplantation is the best next step in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and refractory ventricular arrhythmias rather than a bridge-to-transplant approach. Guideline Loc. Section 8.5 Decipher the Guidelines: 2022 Heart Failure Guidelines Page CardioNerds Episode Page CardioNerds Academy Cardionerds Healy Honor Roll CardioNerds Journal Club Subscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter! Check out CardioNerds SWAG! Become a CardioNerds Patron!

Dr. Frank Fish, a Pediatric Electrophysiologist, discusses electrophysiology in adults with congenital heart disease, highlighting the challenges of managing arrhythmias and the importance of proactive management. The podcast covers case studies and treatment decision-making, along with techniques and challenges in accessing the atria. It also explores the risk of atrial arrhythmias in patients with congenital heart disease and emphasizes the complexity of arrhythmias in this population. In addition to cardiology, the guest shares his passion for extractions and guitar playing.

Join CardioNerds Co-Founder Dr. Dan Ambinder, Dr. Nino Isakadze (EP Fellow at Johns Hopkins Hospital), Dr. Karan Desai (Cardiology Faculty at Johns Hopkins Hospital and Johns Hopkins Bayview) join Digital Health Experts, Dr. Francoise Marvel (Co-Founder of Corrie Health and Co-Director of Johns Hopkins Digital Health Lab) and Dr. David Cho (Chair of the ACC Health Care Innovation Council) for another installment of the Digital Health Series. In this specific episode, we discuss pearls, pitfalls and everything in between for the emerging digital health innovator. This series is supported by an ACC Chapter Grant in collaboration with Corrie Health. Notes were drafted by Dr. Karan Desai. Audio editing was performed by student Dr. Shivani Reddy. In this series, supported by an ACC Chapter Grant and in collaboration with Corrie Health, we hope to provide all CardioNerds out there a primer on the role of digital heath in cardiovascular medicine. Use of versatile hardware and software devices is skyrocketing in everyday life. This provides unique platforms to support healthcare management outside the walls of the hospital for patients with or at risk for cardiovascular disease. In addition, evolution of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and telemedicine is augmenting clinical decision making at a new level fueling a revolution in cardiovascular disease care delivery. Digital health has the potential to bridge the gap in healthcare access, lower costs of healthcare and promote equitable delivery of evidence-based care to patients. This CardioNerds Digital Health series is made possible by contributions of stellar fellow leads and expert faculty from several programs, led by series co-chairs, Dr. Nino Isakadze and Dr. Karan Desai.   Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values. CardioNerds Digital Health Series PageCardioNerds Episode PageCardioNerds AcademyCardionerds Healy Honor Roll CardioNerds Journal ClubSubscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!Check out CardioNerds SWAG!Become a CardioNerds Patron! Pearls and Quotes – Tips for the Digital Health Innovator A critical first step in developing a digital health intervention is defining the clinical problem rather than developing the technology itself. Most digital transformations – whether in medicine or other industries – require several iterations for the technology to develop and demonstrate value. A key aspect of this iterative process was human-centered design: involving patients, their families, and other end-users early in the development of the digital health intervention. Dr. Marvel and colleagues have developed a 6-step process for innovators to consider in taking a concept to product. Notes – Tips for the Digital Health Innovator In this episode, we discussed with Dr. Marvel and Dr. Cho some general concepts on how to develop digital health interventions (DHI). DHIs have a broad definition, including any software or hardware application used to improve access, quality, efficacy or efficiency and they exist in various modalities (e.g., text message, mobile apps, wearables). Dr. Marvel has previously authored a roadmap for digital health intervention that provides guidance for an interdisciplinary approach to developing effective and evidence-based DHIs. As discussed on the episode, a critical first step is defining the clinical problem an innovator is attempting to solve instead of attempting to develop the technology solution first and then adapting it to the problem. Drs. Marvel and Cho emphasized that most digital transformations – whether in medicine or other industry – require several iterations for the technology to develop and demonstrate value. Frequent assessment in a structured manner will help the intervention mature over time. Dr. Marvel noted that a key aspect of this iterative process was human-centered design: involving patients, their families, and other end-users early in the development of the DHI. For instance, with Corrie Health, Dr. Marvel noted that patients who had suffered acute myocardial infarction were involved in a Patient Advisory Board, demonstrations were held for the Patient Advisory board, and patients invited to participate on the research team. Our experts also noted there is a wealth of literature on the common barriers in DHI adoption, including regulatory and cost requirements. Data security and interoperability are other major concerns for digital health innovators. An understanding of the healthcare ecosystem can help innovators recognize these barriers early in the design process. In the aforementioned article, Dr. Marvel and colleagues define a stepwise process to help innovators bring their concept to product: Early multidisciplinary accelerators compromised of a variety of stakeholders Establishment of institutional navigators who can provide a pathway through institutional roadblocks and operational factors Encouraging mentorship and championship from faculty-level and administration Devotion of administrative/business/finance leadership to create sustainable business models to address the reimbursement and policy landscapes Creation of expedited IRB pathways for low-risk DHIs The design of systematic processes to access patient evaluations of new technologies and consumer-centered design. References – Tips for the Digital Health Innovator Marvel FA, Wang J, Martin SS. Digital Health Innovation: A Toolkit to Navigate From Concept to Clinical Testing. JMIR Cardio. 2018 Jan 18;2(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/cardio.7586 Glaser J and Shaw S. Digital Transformation Success: What Can Health Care Providers Learn from Other Industries. NEJM Catalyst. 2022 Mar 22. doi: 10.1056/CAT.21.0434

Dr. Michael Cullen, distinguished clinician-educator, discusses infective endocarditis, including native and prosthetic valve endocarditis. The hosts cover the diagnosis process, surgical intervention, and the role of multidisciplinary teams in managing the condition. They also discuss how the presence of a prosthetic valve affects microbiology, imaging, and surgical planning.

Dr. Eileen Handberg, Adult Nurse Practitioner and Professor of Medicine, discusses the ESC Guidelines for blood pressure screening. The podcast explores the importance of accurate measurements, the challenges of mass hypertension, and solutions such as patient education and smartphone health apps.