Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Dive into the economic landscape under recent administrations as rising inflation and living costs take center stage. Discover stark contrasts in gas prices, rent, and grocery bills while examining how perceptions often misalign with reality. Explore shifting dining habits post-pandemic, with more Americans turning to delivery amid financial strain. The discussion also critiques political narratives and emphasizes the importance of being engaged in the electoral process, all while unpacking the potential consequences of changing economic systems.

The podcast dives into the political surge of single women, with over 70% aligning with the Democratic Party. It contrasts their voting patterns against those of married women, revealing intriguing societal dynamics. The conversation highlights the shift in women's support structures, from partners to state dependency, and examines the emotional impact of these trends. There's a critical look at the paradox of declining happiness among women amid social progress, alongside insights into modern dating challenges faced by high-achieving women.

The video explores whether 'love at first sight' truly exists, examining historical references and scientific studies. It touches on selective memory bias, medieval concepts of love, and modern research on oxytocin and dopamine. The hosts also discuss how physical attraction plays a vital role in these instant romantic connections, the role of cultural attractors, and how AI could predict romantic compatibility. The conversation digs into the biochemical pathways involved in love and lust, historical perspectives, and culminates with reflections on genetic predispositions and societal norms regarding relationships. [00:00:00]Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone! I've got a question for you. Do you believe in love at first sight?Simone Collins: I believe in lust at first sight.Malcolm Collins: Well, around 52 to 66 percent of people in the U. S. claim to have experienced love at first sight. However, this belief may be bolstered by a selective memory bias where individuals romanticize their initial encounters over time.Simone Collins: Hmm.Malcolm Collins: However, what I would say is we have actually seen the concept of love at first sight discussed All the way back in history. We see it in Greek stories. Oh, so you see it in like Ovid metamorphosis, the story of Pygmalion depicts a sculptor falling in love with a statue he created at first light.Site or the greek myth of narcissus who falls in love with his own reflection Also embodies a form of instant love And they even had a mechanism of action for it in the medieval period where The eyes of the lady [00:01:00] when encountered by those of her future lover thus generated And conveyed , a bright light from her eyes to hisSimone Collins: laser.Malcolm Collins: So, yeah, no, they thought that, like, love was something that, like, woman generated inside of them and then, like, shot at men with their eyes. This is terrifying. This is just Captured his heart. But they might've been right about that. We'll get into in a little bit, but I want to hear, well, your lust at first sight comment is really astute when they look at the data.And we'll get into this in a second, but what they found is yes. It appears that there does. appear to be this emotional thing that people call love at first sight. But it only occurs to people you find physically attractive. People aren't falling in love at first sight with their chubby whatever husband, they are falling in love at first sight with people who are generically [00:02:00] attractive.And when people say they love someone at first sight who is not well, arousing to them or more generically attractive. They're typically lying in a supposed fact saying Or they wereSimone Collins: looking at their Bugatti instead. They just happened to be inside it.Malcolm Collins: Yes. One of my favorite is that medieval texts also would, would compare the gaze of a beautiful woman to the sight of a basilisk.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: You've got Medusa as well that turned men to stone with her beautiful gaze. Oh, they madeSimone Collins: them rock hard. Yes. This is whatMalcolm Collins: happens. Made them rock hard, right? Yeah. This is whatSimone Collins: really, there was just something was lost in translation and we thought, Oh, you mean they, they turned into a stone.They're like, nah, kind of. So one thing I will say that I think is interesting is that even now When I have our podcast on or something and I, I freeze it and. [00:03:00] I walk by our computer screen and I see your figure, but I don't realize it's our podcast. It's on the screen. I'm like, Oh, who's that? And then also when we're in airports and you and I are separate or you're out walking by yourself and I'm just gazing across a crowd.And I see you and I don't know it's you. I'm all like, who's this? Who's this? And I think that that's what people are describing as love at first sight is that you're just so much my type that even when I don't realize it's you, my body is just like, Yeah, weMalcolm Collins: definitely had that reaction when we first met where you're like, and I stillSimone Collins: have it.I still have it when I don't realize it to you. I have a different reaction when I know it's you because it's more like my person. But when I don't know, it's you. I definitely feel this like. Spark and I can totally understand what [00:04:00] these whatever medieval writers were talking about in terms of this, like, like lasers.So, but again, I, I, I think that's entirely physical lust. And not well, and I mean, it wouldMalcolm Collins: logically have to be so I'd also like to walk back here where people act like the concept of love at first sight is a romantic concept when really I see it as an anti romantic concept. Oh, yeah, because you don't know anything about the person yet.You don't know anything about them.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: Yeah. You would have to believe that In magic or the soul and that love is somehow capturing these systems Except we we understand love very well at like a psychological level. And it is not magic. It is not fairy dust uh Well, i'll read a quote here anthropologist Helen fisher who studied the brain activity of people madly in love with each other through mri scans says that romantic It says here through MRI scans, but it's wrong.[00:05:00]It must have been through fMRI scans. But anyway says that romantic love takes a very quote unquote primitive pathway through the brain. The good feelings we experience when falling in love is driven by dopamine, the brain chemical behind our motivation to find food, water, and everything else we need for survival, and also some oxytocin, which we'll get into in a second.It's just like the other survival mechanisms, like fear, for example, it can be triggered instantly. So, what we mean is, because we understand what love is, fundamentally, in the brain then the concept of, can it be triggered instantly, is just a concept of, Are some humans born abnormal? And yeah, of course, you know, even, even though we might be coded for like men to find women attractive and women to find men attractive, you're going to get some percentage of the population where that's not the case.It's the same with a system like love. It was coded to only form after long periods of time. time it's going to accidentally fire sometimes when like the lust system is supposed to be firing or something like that. Well, andSimone Collins: I think it's you're wrong to [00:06:00] use the word love when you say that yes, love at first sight exists because there are very different things that are happening hormonally between lust and love.And also Let's say you see someone and you feel that spark and you're very attracted to them, but then you discover that they were war criminal and they have a habit of torturing people and you know that you're probably not going to love them. You know that they may be hot, but they're really bad. I disagree.Do you know how many? Sorry, I should have. Okay. Okay. I need to use a better example for you. It turns out they're French. Okay. And then you're just like, Oh my God. Yeah. So nevermind. I'm just saying, The loving a person is very different. It involves knowing who they are, how they think. Although I will, I guess you have to add, there's this additional complication in Alexander cruel.I think I sent you a link to this on what's up today. And we should probably include it in the description has 1 page. He put together of just all of the studies that show what AI and [00:07:00] or researchers. Can infer from just an image of someone's face so you can infer anything from mental health problems to various genetic conditions to whether they are liberal or conservative to are they happy or depressed?And I guess against my own argument and judgment, I could argue that based on just someone's appearance alone. You could make a lot of inferences about them and perhaps know them better than the average person would like to suggest. Yeah, that might be aMalcolm Collins: big part of this, actually. And this is something, you know, obviously the progressives don't want to talk about, or the urban monoculture people don't want to talk about, because it's like, Oh, if you can tell something by somebody's face, what you're really looking at is genetic correlates there.And we build enough patterns to recognize, like, you can judge with a really high probability whether someone's conservative or progressive.Simone Collins: Even criminals look different. Like even on average, people who commit crimes, they're, they're, they're amalgamated faces look [00:08:00] quite different. AIMalcolm Collins: is going to get really good at making these sorts of judgments, which I I'm very interested to see if we can work this into the criminal system or hiring systems and stuff like that.Cause I imagine that facial judgments made by AIs are probably going to be more accurate to personality than these big, long, like, Surveys that people fill out for like, ifSimone Collins: already AI is 60 to 70 percent accurate and judging things ranging from mental health conditions to political affiliation, it's going to only get worse.And you're right, but I think most people, when they discover this are not going to say, oh, how great that is. They're going to say, oh, my gosh, this is, this is minority report. We're going to be arrested just because our face implies that we're going to become an ax murderer. That's not well,Malcolm Collins: we can do a little minority report, but you know, actually, I wasSimone Collins: just looking at another study actually that was looking at sex crimes and it found that there was a really high genetic correlate.In other words, if if your brother commits a [00:09:00] sex crime. You are much more likely like your odds of also committing one of those crimes is as much higher. And the researchers who looked into this were arguing that, you know, this is a strong basis for perhaps engaging in preventative interventions related to siblings of people who are convicted of these crimes.Because if you do that preemptively, You could probably keepMalcolm Collins: in mind. I mean, for the blank Slater's who are like, Oh, keep the baby when you're great. I'm not in favor of that.Simone Collins: Right.Malcolm Collins: I think not abortion in the attachment to the kid because they raised the kid, but I'm just saying, like, there are.Externalities involved here for other people that you might not be thinking about because you'reSimone Collins: choosing to also pass on the behavioral traits of a criminal who committed who committed a crime creating that human who is innocent and guilty. I mean complicated.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but I will [00:10:00] also say here before we go further into the science to go over our theory of love, which we talked about in either the pragmatist guided relationships or the pragmatist guided sexuality which would actually preclude love at first sight.So when I was looking at the concept of love, my general assumption is that love probably first evolved in mammals. And in the book, we go over a lot of evidence for this to keep us from competing, whiz, killing, eating our offspring. It was something that we needed to be able to develop so that we, you know, when we looked at an offspring where we're like, Oh yes, bonded with this.I am going to I love this thing. Yeah. And we always say evolution is a cheap programmer. So evolution will pick up an emotional state that was created within one scenario to use in a different scenario, but it becomes highly useful. Love is very different from lust. Yeah. In that it is longer term, it leads to caring for the thing, not just wanting to pay more attention to it, and it [00:11:00] leads to admiration and veneration for the thing.And all of these are very useful in the way you treat a spouse if we were beginning to develop as a monogamous species. As such, the love system needed to learn to trigger for spouses. Here's the problem. We don't have anything that is unique to a spouse. In terms of our daily interactions. Like, is it the person you interact with the most?Is it the person you admire the most? Is it the person you, you know, there's just not a really, so, okay. What collection of things did it begin to collect as this is a spouse? So I will generate love emotions for them. And. It's a bit like if I'm going to word it this way, the way we can determine what the love system is measuring is by looking at when the love system breaks.So when do we experience love when we shouldn't be experiencing [00:12:00] love? And it's a bit like was Indiana Jones. It's like, okay, this. Stone is triggered by weight, so yes, it could be triggered by a golden idol, a spouse, but it could also be, you know, triggered by a bag of sand.Simone Collins: And if you get itMalcolm Collins: wrong, you know, then the ball starts rolling, right?You know, so you gotta say, okay. What is, what is the actual mechanism of action here? And when I look at when I've experienced love, other than interacting with a partner or child, it is when thinking about or meditating on really big, expansive concepts examples here would be. The vastness of the universe and how small I am in relation to it.Or the ways that various like really complicated sciences interact with each other, like the vastness of how like neurons actually work and the brain actually works and everything like that, or. When I think about my relation to [00:13:00] something like a deity that does a very good job of that, but specifically when I am thinking about incomprehensible aspects of the deity from my own perspective, it could be things that are designed to be incomprehensible, like the trinity or a cone by the way, a cone is one of those things in Buddhist philosophy where they're like a tree fell in the woods, but then when they're, P O A N.Simone Collins: Right? Not. Yeah.Malcolm Collins: And you're like, well, I mean, it created a reverberation, whether anyone picked that up with their auditory, they slapped you. They're like, that's not what it means. And it's like, well, I mean, then you're just like gaslighting me. Like you're trying to show me that you are, are, are superior to me.When really you asked a fairly simple question. Do you mean, did it create a vibration or was there anyone there to hear the vibration? That we interpret as sound. And because you are from a simple backwards culture, you don't think of it that way. You think of it as, as some intractable question, which maintains this hierarchy.I am not a fan of cones. I think that they are a form of [00:14:00] abuse and within any other world, we would call them gaslighting. But anyway I'm sorry, it's just a horror meant to systemically disempower people from asking questions or trusting their own judgment. But let's not get into that. They do, they do create this love emotion.And so when I look at that, I'm like, okay, so then what's really creating the love emotion? I think it isanything that you think about frequently. So it's not looking at how often you interact with a person. It seems to be measuring how much you are thinking about a person or a concept. The second thing is, The vastness of that concept, like how deep is your thought about this concept, right? And this can be triggered with something that is arbitrarily incomprehensible to a human mind, like the Trinity or it can be something that is genuinely complex and deep, like the vastness of reality.And then it looks at, do you find this thing to be comforting and safe? And if you hit all of those things, you're going to experience this love output. And I [00:15:00] think that these things aren't experienced in this love at first sight, which is really, I think, a lust output for most people, except people was like, really like broken systems.But let's go into the research on this so we can see what's actually here. But do you have any thoughts before I go further?Simone Collins: You had said to me just the other day that you weren't sure if you ever really felt the feeling of love or that you, you said that you don't really know what love feels like.And I kind of agree with you on that. So that's where I, I can generateMalcolm Collins: a feeling that appears to be the feeling that other people are calling love by meditating on complex topics. AndSimone Collins: like that doesn't resonate for, I mean, but also I don't know if this is an autistic thing. Like maybe I can't figure it out.RememberMalcolm Collins: my mom said that autistic people can't love. Yeah, there's like a wife who truly loves you because she's autistic.Simone Collins: Yeah, she's so great. I love her so much. I miss her. I,Malcolm Collins: I honestly, I prefer a wife who is infatuated with me than one who loves [00:16:00] me. That is, that is.Simone Collins: Yeah, but I mean, so there's this, I hope you can find this clip.There's this famous clip with. I've told you about it when Prince Charles and Princess Diana were engaged and a journalist asks Diana and Charles, are you in love? And Diana says something like, yes. And he's like, whatever that means, obviously the worst thing to ever say. And that has come back to bite him a billion times, but I don't disagree, right?Like what even is love?Speaker: I suppose in love. Of course. Whatever in love means.Simone Collins: Like, what are you asking me? What is this? And. It's such a kludgy thing. And another point that we make in the pragmatist guide to relationships is that Love is not useful to anyone. Abusive people love their partners. That doesn't help them. You know, creeps stalkers, murderers often love [00:17:00] their victims a lot.So much that they just want to eat their faces, you know. Just like, love is not useful to the recipient. And there is a correlation to your point about evolution being a cheap programmer and perhaps it hijacking the love of a parent that's very, you know, hormonal for, you know, the love of a child.And there are many correlates that are also then, I think, highly associated with last year, there's oxytocin and there's dopamine and there's serotonin, you know, all these things kind of factor in. And there, so there's like the hormonal elements of love and lust, which are all kind of. You know, they're, they're correlated, but they're not directly together.And then there's these more complex concepts that you describe, like when you're thinking about the complexity of the universe or God or cones, and then there's this whole, like, you know, your mind gets just kind of fuzzed up and you're like, I don't know, love. So,Malcolm Collins: well, I mean, I suspect that that love is like, if we're describing it in like a neurochemical sense, yes.A combination of dopamine [00:18:00] and oxytocin release that forces a bond with another individual. And I say this because we know, remember I said, I think that it originally evolved for our children, post childbirth women, for example, are flooded with oxytocin, hugeSimone Collins: surge. Yeah.Malcolm Collins: But you also experience it.Women get a higher dose of oxytocin if they haven't slept with as many men and they sleep with a man, which causes a bonding.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: Where we talk about and the studies on this have all been like scraped from the internet. It's really weird because it used to be, I could find it. And like I went back and tried to Google it and I couldn't find it.But women who have had sex with lots of partners reduce, release less oxytocin every time they have sex. I'm like, that makes perfect sense because that would mean in an ancestral sense, they were probably a. slave, basically. And that, that if you were in a monogamous situation, ancestrally, yeah, it would make sense to fall in love with the first person you're having sex with.So, you know, of course the systems would function this way. But I, you know, we see a lot of, okay, you're getting this oxytocin release. It causes you to bond to a person. Here's my question for you. You're like, I don't know if I've ever experienced love. [00:19:00] Well, what's the emotion that bonds you to the kids?Like they haven't like, okay, little, Indie there, right? She hasn't said anything, done anything, and yet you feel a fondness for her that is undeniable. I mean, I watch the way you set her on the table when you're working and everything like that and get so excited when she's being cute. What is that emotion that you're feeling?That is the love emotion.Simone Collins: I mean, I, I, I feel that feeling when I look at Rain on glass, you know, when it, when it hits a window, I feel that feeling when I see autumn leaves shimmering in the sun, like, is that, that, that it's, it's not, I don't think calling that love is, is accurate,Malcolm Collins: right? No. Okay. What you are describing here is, and I think that this is a component of love is you were describing a set of environmental stimuli that CorrelatesSimone Collins: with the feeling of bliss and contentment.Malcolm Collins: That correlate with the feeling of bliss and [00:20:00] contentment, which you feel when looking at infants that are yours. So then my question to you is, do you ever feel that feeling of bliss and contentment when looking at, say, me? Yeah, so that's especiallySimone Collins: when you oh my god when you eat and I hear the sound of like you chewing or something.I just likeMalcolm Collins: Other women are so likemy husband likes Maxine's food. You're like, I love listening to him munch Yes, makes me so happy. Oh god.Simone Collins: Okay for you Yeah, I I don't know. So then is is love Oh, this person or thing correlates with a feeling of contentment and bliss for me. Like that also just seems so shallow.Malcolm Collins: And because most humans do not correlate with that for you. You don't look at most human bodies and get a feeling of blissfulness and content. You wouldn't feel that way. If a stranger at a restaurant was eating and you overheard them, you'd [00:21:00] probably be like, ew, gross.Simone Collins: Yeah, but if, if that, if that. If other things like rain on, on glass or the pitter patter of rain on a roof, you know, can, can trigger that.Like how does love for a human, how would love for a human be special? You know,Malcolm Collins: what do you, what do you, what do you mean? I mean, there are other things,Simone Collins: there are other elements in life that are non organic that can also trigger in a human. Yeah.Malcolm Collins: So what you're saying is it activates the bliss and content system and not the lust system.It's a completely different category of, of thing that isSimone Collins: elevatingMalcolm Collins: and that's actually interesting that you are looking at an attractive man and instead of feeling a lust, you are feeling blissful contentment which is clear that you were meant to feel for children.Simone Collins: No, that's, yeah. So that's true because we were talking about that going, when I see you in an airport, I don't realize it's you.And then there's the separate like, [00:22:00] but I feel when I. Are you eatingMalcolm Collins: food? So I love the description of it going.Yeah. So that's the difference here.Simone Collins: Lust versus love. Okay.Malcolm Collins: But, but let's go further. You know, in the first few months of a relationship, your serotonin level dropped, causing cortisol, the stress hormone, to flood your body. This is why your heart beats faster and your pupils dilate, and maybe you start feeling quote unquote butterflies in your stomach.Lower serotonin levels might also be why you are suddenly obsessed over the new person, unable to think about anything other than them. So it is a rise in cortisol and a drop in serotonin. Your body odor may play a role. part in how attractive you are to someone. Some studies have shown that during ovulation phase of the cycle, women may be more attracted to musk like pheromones that men excrete.By the way, I don't know if you've seen this study, but there was a study where people like wore dirty t shirts and then put them in a pile and men could pick out the shirts of women who are ovulating and women could pick out the shirts of attractive men. I [00:23:00] haven't gotten a 1995 sweaty t shirt study.Where it, it showed that women sniff t shirts that had been worn by men. No cologne, no deodorant, all natural. Results showed that they preferred the odor of men with major histone compatibility complex MHC genes that were different from their own. This would produce offspring with a stronger immune system.Oh yeah. Okay. I've heard of this. The general like fitness and stuff. Another interesting thing is a 2019 study found that when women were in love with someone, their immune system was bolstered. Now this is the study I found most interesting.One study found that 60 people who had never met before and found that prolonged eye contact between two people increased the romantic attraction they felt for each other. Blood pressure skyrocketed and the participants wanted to be paired with the same people again in the future. They wanted to know more about the other person.These effects were even stronger when people allowed quote unquote mutual touch despite the fancy wording that meant holding hands. And we know that holding hands causes oxytocin [00:24:00] release. We know that long eye contact causes oxytocin release. I think that yeah, that's, that's what we're seeing here.That's really interesting to meOne of my favorite studies on this was done by Arthur something or another and it showed that you could basically force people to fall in love. We had this idea of I like sit two people down and they look into each other's eyes and they ask a series of questions of each other that they'll fall in love and people who were in the study as random participants even ended up getting married.That is how good it did at creating this emotion, which is to say that love systems can be hacked. And this is one of the things that really scared me away from like the early effective altruism community and early singularity community is they would do a lot of these sorts of events where you'd like sit down and stare someone in the eyes.And I'm like, this is what cults do to brainwash people. It's also what touchy feely did at Stanford, which is a hijacks the love system.Here's the final bit here that I found really interesting. First and foremost, they found that love at first sight didn't exist without a strong physical attraction.Looks did matter. Also probably [00:25:00] unsurprisingly, people in long term relationships scored higher on quote unquote love tests than people who had met for the first time, but reported love at first sight. So. Yeah, it doesn't appear that's that easy to accidentally motivate the love system, but what are your thoughts and think about them and I'm gonna get aDon't think about them too much. You are a woman. I'm gonna have to put the womenSpeaker: An ordinary dinner party, the sort of occasion we all enjoy. The men are exchanging witty stories, and look at the women, aren't they pretty? But now the conversation turns to more serious matters.Speaker 2: I wonder if the government should return to the gold standard. I think it should. Good, then we're allSpeaker: agreed. But oh dear, what's this? One of the women is about to embarrass us all.Speaker 3: I think the government should stay off the gold standard so that the pound can reach a level that will keep our exports competitive.Speaker: The lady has foolishly attempted to join the conversation with a wild and dangerous opinion of her own. What [00:26:00] heartbreak drivel. See how the men look at her with utter contempt.Women, know your limits.Malcolm Collins: The importantSimone Collins: thing is To I think understand the underpinnings and mechanics of love as well as one possibly can. Same goes for sex so that you don't pedestalize it to your detriment and trying to find a well matched partner.Speaker: Look at the effect of education on a man and a woman's mind. Education passes into the mind of a man. See how the information is evenly and tidily stored. Now see the same thing on a woman. At first we see a similar result. But now look. Still at a reasonably low level of education, her brain suddenly overloads.She cannot take in complicated information.Simone Collins: And that's, I think one of the bigger problems. This is certainly not the heart of problems for forming relationships these days. There are so many other big factors that are a like the fact that [00:27:00] women want higher status men than them. But most middle class women are going to struggle to find men who can thrive more in a middle class, like bureaucratic job system than they do.So they can't find partners and people are all waiting to have to get married until after they're completely set up with their lives. Whereas they really should be getting married as they begin building their lives. So they're obviously bigger fish to fry in the relationship world. It is nevertheless, a big problem that we still see.And even people who understand that they need to get married early, and even people who understand all of the weird asymmetries that need to be in place to make a relationship work, they still pedestalize love and sex in a way that is incredibly stupid. And they're like, well, I have to feel this spark and I have to feel this.Oh,Malcolm Collins: absolutely. And, and, you know, you see this with arranged marriages, right? I'm like people like, well, shouldn't I have like the chemistry as a person? Like, no, it doesn't really matter. And, and arranged marriages after 10 years of marriage, people have the same love [00:28:00] rates. As people in, with chosen partners, but here's the thing that's not accounted for.Arranged marriages have a dramatically lower divorce rate than non arranged marriages. So it means when you account for survivorship bias, you are actually more likely to be in love with someone in 10 years if they are chosen by people who know you well without you having much input. Then you are, if you choose someone who you already love in the moment, which just shows what a bad compass love is.And I think we see this in the history of love. Remember all those early stories of love? Love was always seen negatively. Especially love at first sight was seen negatively in a historic context. This was understood to be a negative thing, a form of madness, depending on what culture you're looking at.Simone Collins: Like,Malcolm Collins: In, in, in some cultures it was just seen as like an intrinsically immoral thing, no different from lust. And I think that that's really the healthiest way to look at it.Simone Collins: Yeah. Well, and, or it was, it was supposed to be something that was uncoupled from your marriage. So if [00:29:00] you, if you wanted to pursue love, it would be in the form of a dalliance or it would be in the form of a mistress.It wouldn't be in the form of Marrying someone, it can even be some kind of platonic like Dante and Beatrix. Sorry, not Beatrix, Beatrice like Dante and Beatrice in the divine comedy. So there were all sorts of forms of love that were very passionate, but when they worked out, they weren't done within the capacity of.Attempting to marry and trying to make that work was deadly like in Romeo and Juliet. Yeah.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, you're killing your kids by not arranged marriage by letting them just marry whoever they want like like like animals like What is this you you that's that's not the way this works No, I I really appreciate what you're saying there and I think it's a very important concept to elevate and I think that Really the only culture that [00:30:00] I'm aware of in a historical context that elevated the idea that you should marry the people you love.This comes down to Western culture but it's not a historic component of Western culture. It certainly wasn't around in the Roman Empire. It was something that came downstream of and for people who are wondering how things worked in Rome, you had strict monogamy in Rome, i. e. you only had one real wife, but you would hook up with other people, right?You know, and here I could, I can put the clip of Octavian reprimanding Marcus. , for sleeping with people who weren't, weren't his wife.Speaker 9: Remember, colleague, you are talking to my wife. Your wife in name only. Still mother that performs the wifely function, is it not? Well, Octavia does the same for my good friend Agrippa. That's very convenient for all involved. DOSpeaker 10: you deny it? So What? What if it is true, eh? What are you going to do about it?Speaker 9: I shall have this sad story told in the forum. I will have it posted in every city in [00:31:00] Italy. And you know the people are not so liberal with their wives as you are.They will say you wear cuckold's horns. They will say your wife betrayed you with a low born pleb on my staff. You will be a figure of fun. The proles will laugh at you in the street. Your soldiers will mock you behind your back.Malcolm Collins: But it, it, it came through the courtly love culture that was largely created by people who don't know, like they hear courtly love and they think courtesans were writing these books.Courtesans were not writing the book. You'reSimone Collins: using the wrong word. Courtiers? Maybe you're Courtiers,Malcolm Collins: whatever. Not, yeah, sorry. Courtiers. Court People in the royal court. It wasn't written by people in the royal court. They were predominantly written by monks. Or as we might call them today, nerdy incels.They were writing their version of sexual fantasy comic books. There begin to become a, a, a culture of this. And this [00:32:00] is, this is what was being made fun of in stuff like Don Quixote, right? They were like, these, these, these people are ridiculous idiots. Like, this isn't the way any of this would ever actually play out.You know, they're living these fantasy lives in order to, well, fulfill their own fantasies. You know, that's, that's the way this stuff works. And as a result of that It goes on, it goes on, it goes on. Still these incel monks are writing this, but they end up creating some genuinely amazing literature eventually.Think of it a bit like fanfiction communities. Yeah, I mean, fanfiction is like raunchy and smutty, but eventually some of it's really good. There, there's some good fanfiction out there that I think is better than some of the best books I've read.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: And as a result, when people were creating the early literary canon in the West, they relied on the tropes from these, well, basically infel comic books.And that had the problem of creating early [00:33:00] Disney. I think is where a lot of this enteredSimone Collins: the mainstream.Malcolm Collins: Is the idea of love at first sight and needing to love someone to marry them. I think was largely disseminated in modern Western culture into the mainstream by Disney and normalized by Disney.And I think that that is where the rock comes from. So it's interesting that Disney rotting our culture isn't a new thing. It's, it's, it's, it's been happening since its inception in its borrowing themes from the quarterly love culture. That weren't necessarily common in American culture before this.Simone Collins: This isn't to say that I don't think you should be. well matched with your partner. I think that what you saw, for example, in Puritan and even Quaker early colonial communities, where there were times when youth could get to know each other and, you know, they would choose to marry and they could choose to not marry.And they, I loveMalcolm Collins: the Puritan thing of like being in [00:34:00] the bed was the person and they would tie you up in a sack.Simone Collins: Yeah, or there was, you could be in the company of a bunch of chaperones, essentially, but they would give you a tube or a hollowed out log to talk between so you could talk privately. We should, we should,Malcolm Collins: They actually have a scene where that's done in the Patriots. TheySimone Collins: do, and they joke about how they would. IMalcolm Collins: hope you tie the knots better than my father did or something like that.Simone Collins: Yeah.But I, so yeah, I think you should be really stoked to marry whoever it is that you marry, but you should be looking at it as a lifelong business partner and not.A lifelong yeah, like a lifelong entertainer, a lifelong professional friend or entourage member, or quite honestly, mother or a father. That'sMalcolm Collins: actually such a good point. And, and, and a watcher of the podcast once asked me they were thinking about bringing an additional person into their relationship and they were like, okay, you know, this is somebody who I find attractive.My partner finds [00:35:00] attractive. Should we bring them into the relationship? And I was like, well, I mean, the first thing you want to ask is how efficient are they, how much how good are they at work? And I think that this is the thing they were thinking. Like, I like being around this person because I like having sex with them.I like spending time with them. And what they weren't thinking was is this somebody I would want to start a business with? And that should be the first thing that you think and vet when you're choosing someone to marry or spend your life with or have kids with.Simone Collins: Yeah, well, and there's this whole trope on social media of what do they call them?Like single, single married women who just feel like their entire lives. Is taking care of their husbands. They're just doing their laundry. Like that, just their husbands kind of just married someone that they expected to do the same thing that a mother would do for a child. And that's lame. And then there's all these women who just want sugar daddies.Like they just want a new daddy. Who's going to spoil them and pay for everything and buy them things and send them on vacations. And they just sit around and do nothing and [00:36:00] expect to be pampered. And that's equally toxic. Perhaps even a little more disgusting because I don't know. I just really hate that.I find it gross. So. You know, both of those are really bad. So yeah, but what you're looking for again is a business partner and anything else should be seen as purely recreational on your own time with your discretionary income and nothing else,Malcolm Collins: Your discretionary income. I don't know. I think you know, Like if I was, was, was going to hook up with someone other than you and I use my discretionary income on that, that would be quite a violation of our marriage.Simone Collins: No, it wouldn't. Our discretionary income. That's, that's your money that you get to spend on whatever you want.Malcolm Collins: Well, let's thank God. Neither of us have any particular makes it, it makes it very easy. That was the, the, the unfortunate thing on the, are we monogamous episode that we did ages ago where like, the core thing is like.You have rules against sleeping with other people. I don't. I just don't see a reason to like, it's so much effort. It's so much effort. This, [00:37:00] this fantasy of, Oh, I'm going to sleep with all of these people. It's like, yeah, but what you're not thinking about is the work and the risk and the grossness and the, like, why would you?It's so much effort and ickiness and it just makes life harder. Like I don't, I get the desire, but like, if it slows down the speed at which you actually marry someone and start having kids, like what's the point of all that, right? Like,Simone Collins: or if it puts an existing marriage at risk, which is, I'm even in poly relationships, there's just always this very real risk that.Yes, it goes fine until it doesn't. It goes fine until something falls apart and that that's difficult. So,Malcolm Collins: yeah, yeah, no, I hear that. And well, and this is because systems that may have been designed for a monogamous relationship end up firing in the wrong way, you know, they're like, Oh, [00:38:00] now, now this person is attached.And keep in mind, even historically, when you had a societies that practice a polygyny where they had multiple wives. There was genetic competition between the wives. I mean, the wives not only wanted to have the maximum number of kids of the wives in, in a marriage but they wanted the kids to get more resources than the other wives, kids like that was the goal from a genetic standpoint here, I'm, I'm saying and that this was ever harmonious, I think is a, a fantasy.There's just a strong incentive where actually women within cultures that are intergenerationally polygynous, i. e. having multiple wives, would likely be, I'd say, more spiteful and cunning towards other women than women in cultures that aren't polygynous. Because they would have been genetically rewarded for that intergenerationally speaking,Simone Collins: MuchMalcolm Collins: more than women in cultures who aren't polygynous, like monogamous cultures, where women generally get, get [00:39:00] genetically rewarded for cooperating.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: An interesting point I hadn't considered before. I'd love to look at the data on that to see if there's data supporting that hypothesis.Simone Collins: Yeah. TheMalcolm Collins: women from societies like in Muslim societies are women more backstabby than in two other women. I mean, than in you know, like Christian societies, like, is that a thing?I don't know.Simone Collins: The research I've seen of women being backstabby are in Western societies and there's no positive backstabbing. What IMalcolm Collins: say is women are backstabby in Western societies. Yes. Like very well studied. Two other women, I mean, like women are very intersexually competitive in a way that men are not.Simone Collins: Yeah. Like the famous research that found that. If, if a woman was more attractive than her hairstylist, the hairstyle was more likely to, for example, cut her hair a little shorter than she asked.Malcolm Collins: I like the study that was looking at bosses and like almost no woman in the study preferred a female [00:40:00] boss to a male boss.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: Like this idea that like women are better off cause we're promoting where women is not true. Women are much worse off for itSimone Collins: onMalcolm Collins: the whole.Simone Collins: Unfortunate.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, it is unfortunate. It would be great if we could genetically modify this trait out of women, which maybe we'll be able to do soon.It's calledSimone Collins: autism, Malcolm. That's why.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, it's called autism. Just give all of my femaleSimone Collins: friends are a little more, a little more autistic than your average there. That'sMalcolm Collins: true though. You have so many autistic female friendsSimone Collins: and you think the increase in mental health diagnosis is a bad thing.Malcolm Collins: Hmm.Simone Collins: I don't know.Malcolm Collins: Anyway I love you to death Simone, you're quite a special woman and I'm really, really lucky to be married to you. And I actually wonder because you said you'd never found anyone attractive before me. What was the like emotion you felt when you first saw me? Is it not something you had felt before?Was it something you had felt at differentSimone Collins: levels? No, I mean, I, I found people attractive before. [00:41:00] I just. Like, there was never this, this combination of like being attracted to someone and then also finding them like to be such as a person, an attractive person as well, like both physically and everything else attractive.But no, I mean, I certainly found other people attractive before. Okay. You just happened to be veryMalcolm Collins: much my type. So it was the first time that you had both found somebody attractive and really like jived with them at like, I guess a cultural level. And then again, culturally we're very similar. People often joke that we're twins.Apparently we're called the Cromwell twins and in fundie circles, which I'm okay with.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: I love you, Simone.Simone Collins: I love you too. Oh, am I not making you dinner tonight?Malcolm Collins: No, I didn't end up going out. I didn't have time. I had too much to do. What would you like? Grilled cheese with tomato soup. Would you like? Oh my God. Yes. Yes. Okay. Do we have anymeat left bythe way, song, [00:42:00] orSimone Collins: I can take more out.Do you want something with me? No, I can do more of the slow cookerMalcolm Collins: cheese and tomato soup.Simone Collins: Oh, okay. So that's okay.Malcolm Collins: You don't want to have a, yeah, no, two girls. She has thoseSimone Collins: kebabs. I can make you an addition to the girl cheese. You're going to two kebabs, like from trader one kebab, one kebab, a bowl of grilled, sorry, a bowl of tomato soup and a girl cheese sandwich.Two girl cheeses, two girl cheeses. Consider it done, sir.Malcolm Collins: I love you, my beautiful, beautiful wife. I love too. You are so Cutty, kitty, kitty, kitty, and I'm just so lucky to be married to you. . What?Simone Collins: We're intolerable. I, I hate people who are in love, you know, they're, they're gross. And I, I feel bad inflicting ourselves upon other people.Yeah, I do. I hateMalcolm Collins: people who are in love too, and I'm, yeah. One of the interesting things about love is a desire to signal it publicly and loudly, which of course makes it, but no one wants toSimone Collins: see it. No one wants to see that. It's like.Malcolm Collins: Well, right, [00:43:00] because I'm basically saying, okay, this mate is mine, just so everyone knows, like, competition will ensue if you try to compete.I thinkSimone Collins: it's more like screaming. You know, when you scream, it doesn't hurt, but when someone else screams, it hurts.Malcolm Collins: Is, is people will say in, in like high school, in my high school, I mean, maybe people have matured out of this because they've gotten better at like how bad this looks, but early on when they'd be dating, Oh, I love X person.I love X person. We're so in love, love, love. Why are you so perfect? They just needed to shout it to the stars. And I think like shouting it from the roof, which is a sentiment you hear historically is one of the biological reactions to the love emotion.Simone Collins: Yeah, but I do think it's interesting that this whole and then they, they got, they married and they lived happily ever after.And there just aren't really, you don't see a whole lot of media in which people really love each other. And if you do, it's that they love each other, but for some reason they're kept apart because I think there's something about people who love each other and are successfully just in love and not having [00:44:00] problems.People just hate it. It's just intolerable, like nails on a chalkboard. I don't want to watch it. NoMalcolm Collins: famous influencers who like actually care about each other and love each other.Simone Collins: Well, yeah. Where they have to like make up drama or something. Yeah. Maybe because people just don't want to see it. It's gross.It's terrible. And so they have to make something either. They have to make up something wrong about them. And make up separate drama about how they're evil and not really what they say they are. Well, you're the puppetMalcolm Collins: master. That's what I've heard. Yeah. You control me. I've seen other people comment on us and they say that I am this dull, witless puppet of a man who's being controlled by the cruel puppet master Simone, who seduced someone out of her league is what they said.You, you saw this video.Simone Collins: Well, you are out of my league. I, and I guess technically I seduced you through my work ethic. And you discovered that you couldn't do better than me in terms of. You know, sheer, I, I, I basically left you with no choice. Yeah. This was not something where you really [00:45:00] had a lot of choice in the matter because I, well, how did I not have choice in the matter?Yeah. IMalcolm Collins: mean, yeah, I guess I didn't have choice because Yeah, you didn't have a choice. Nobody seduce you.Simone Collins: Yeah. I, I, I, so I did seduce you, but with work ethic. 'cause I'm obviously way below your league. So from a, an aesthetic perspective, just fortunately. You are not as sensitive to aesthetics as other men are.You're like Mormon polygamist men, you know. I don't think that's true. Well,Malcolm Collins: okay, so you got to do the Mormon polygamist quote here. Can you pull it up?Simone Collins: Yeah. Mark Twain. Went when he was young to Salt Lake City at the time. I think when Brigham Young was still alive. He was vehemently against this concept of polygamy and he had a change of heart.And here's what he wrote up after his experience in Salt Lake City. He writes, quote, I had the will to do it. With the gushing self sufficiency of youth, I was feverish to plunge in headlong and achieve great reform here. Until I saw the Mormon woman, then I was [00:46:00] touched. My heart was wiser than my head.It warms toward these poor, ungainly, and pathetically homely creatures. And as I turned to hide the generous moisture in my eyes, I said, No, the man that marries one of them has done an act of Christian charity, which entitles To the kindly applause of mankind, not their harsh censure.And the man that marries 60 of them has done a deed of open handed generosity. So sublime that the nations should stand uncovered in his presence and worship in silence.Malcolm Collins: I love this. So this is so, but I did notice something because you were actually talking about this where I was talking to one of our Mormon fans and we were going over pictures because, you know, we were trying to identify traits, you know, that are common in the people who are having kids who aren't having kids, etc.And at one point it was like, oh, you know, the hot one. Right. And I realized that his [00:47:00] perception of which of the hot one I go, Oh, you mean this one? And he goes, no, the hot one is this one. And I realized that, and I think you actually see this like genetically was in subpopulations. What? Is considered attractive can be radically different than what another group considers attractive.And this is why people often naturally end up going for their own cultural group. So for like somebody like Simone and I, people are like, you guys look like twins or siblings or something like that. It's like, yeah, she's part of my esoteric cultural group. Like of course I would have found her more attractive than competing people, especially at the arbitrage level.I either degree to which I value her type of attraction. is much higher than, for example, a random Mormon man would have valued her iteration of attractiveness. And the degree to which I would value, you know, the average Mormon woman would be much lower than the degree to which a Mormon man would value a Mormon woman.And I think between cultures, sometimes it's differentiates a bit more. [00:48:00] Like I, I, I notice that I think what I find attractive overlaps with. Maybe surprisingly to the audience what Catholics find attractive. Like, I find often whatever the Irish are selecting foreign girls very attractive.When I was younger, I, I loved Irish girls. So maybe, or yeah, this is another thing where I noticed where different communities have different things that they find attractive. And I don't know if I can like build a whole video on this, but it's something I mentioned in an episode that hasn't gone live yet.So for example, with me, the women who I pursued in disproportionately had relationships with when contrasted with their percent of the population, heavily Jewish, first of all, I'd say a good 40 percent of the women I've ever dated have been Jewish. In, in ancestry, at least Irish. I found Irish women disproportionately attractive.Outside of that, like freckles and stuff like that, like that's my thing. But again, our kids, we've [00:49:00] got like redhead and freckles. So clearly, like we're still in this tradition. So my ancestors must have felt that way too. And your ancestors must have felt that way too. The one category that I've always found surprising is the group that disproportionately pursued me the most.Was Romani women or gypsy women like really people of that descent group up here to find whatever I'm bringing to the table like disproportionately attractive. And I remember Simone was like, well, there's almost none of them. And I'm like, and that's why it's weird that I have hooked up with so many of them.I don't know what it is. It might be a cultural thing or it could be a genetic thing. I really don't know within these different groups that leads to these cultural pairings. Any thoughts.Simone Collins: No, no. I mean, I just think they're, they're probably more likely to be broadly. You know, genetically close ish to you. I mean, there's a, there's a lot of travelers in the UK, tons and tons, and you were super UK, so I don't know. Yeah, but I don't findMalcolm Collins: Scottish women attractive.Simone Collins: In modernMalcolm Collins: Scottish women, [00:50:00] but yeah.Modern Scottish women look like dysgenic selection. When, but keepSimone Collins: in mind, like a lot of the most you could argue like bit adventurous entrepreneurial, you know, capable of getting out of really dire situations. Ancestors moved to, you know, it's hate. So they're here. You wouldn't necessarily realizeMalcolm Collins: that's also true.So you, you, you are partially Scottish descent as well. So yeah, I guess I do like Scottish women, just the ones who immigrated. It's the same with Irish women. I like the ones who, who, emigrated, e emigrated, i. e. left I don't know, I don't remember walking around Ireland and thinking people were uniquely attractive.It was more I lived for a long time in Massachusetts and the, maybe that disproportionately colored how many Irish girls I was encountering. For people who don't know, that's for the large Irish population settled.Simone Collins: Well, I've got to go make dinner because I've got that campaign tonight and I want to make dinner and shower the kids.So you have it fairly easy tonight after I leave. So [00:51:00] let's get her done. I love you too. And I'll start your sandwiches, your Sammies. Love you, Malcolm.Malcolm Collins: She makes the best grilled cheeses.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx): To anyone who's like Malcolm, your voice has been shot in terms of recent episodes, you are feeling horribly sick or something. No. , this past week Simone and I were on vacation. So everything you thought this past week was like really prerecorded. And I was just adding those bits and final editing. , because we were at Heredic on, , where we were giving a speech. , which is such a cool experience, but every night there, they would have these parties up until like two or 3:00 AM. And, you know, Two things about me.One, I am not the type of person who knows how to party or go to parties or nightclubs or whatever, but I'm also not the type of person who would ever turn down an opportunity to network. If it could be used to help the larger cause that we're working on. And the people at these events are so high value.I couldn't turn it down. So I just had to stay up like yelling, to talk to people at nightclubs at like one or 2:00 AM. And I do not know how the rest of the world handles this. [00:52:00] But fortunately, we were able to make it back in time to take our kids out trick or treating and hear the video of my. You know, very obviously. What's the appropriate word here.Neurally diverse children. , sorting their trick or treat candy. I love these kids so much with one of them. , wanting to watch us eat his candy or tried parts of it, but him not wanting to eat it himself. It is so sweet.Speaker 14: DoSpeaker 15: you want to try it? Here, do you want me to open it for you?Try it.Speaker 14: Okay,Speaker 15: well I'll see if I can find it. I think I know where thatSpeaker 14: is.Speaker 15: Here, do you want to eat it? It's very yummy.Speaker 14: Hm. What? I follow you. Try it.Speaker 15: I'll try it, babe. I try it. You have to promise to eat the rest, okay? Mm. I can. Here. I don't wanna, this whole thing is been here. Daddy, try it. I tried to buy it and now he won't eat it.And then [00:53:00] I tried this. And now he won't eat it.Speaker 16: Toasty, eat your candy! No!Speaker 14: EatSpeaker 16: your candy!Speaker 14: I can't!Speaker 16: Eat your candy! I don't want to! But it's candy, Toasty! ButSpeaker 14: I want to eat food!Speaker 16: Candy's a type of food. Try a bite.Speaker 14: Um, hey!Speaker 17: Toasty, what do you want to eat? I'veSpeaker 14: been, I've been,Speaker 17: I've been stopping toSpeaker 14: eat this, and this one.Yeah, butSpeaker 17: are you going to eat it?Speaker 14: No.Speaker 17: You wanted a flat chocolate, Octavian, youSpeaker 14: said? Uh. CanSpeaker 17: you help me openSpeaker 14: this? Help me openSpeaker 17: this. But Toasty, you don't even want to eat it.Speaker 15: I think you'll like this, Octavian.Speaker 17: Why do you want to open it if you don't want to eat it?Speaker 14: It's got a chocolate bar so you can't. Do you see it?Let me open this by myself. LetSpeaker 15: me see, what is it? Do you know what that is? That's gum.Speaker 14: Gum? Do you want toSpeaker 15: eatSpeaker 14: it? Um, no thanks. I want to eat gum! [00:54:00] You want to eat gum! I can't! I want gum! I want gum! Where's theSpeaker 15: gum? This is the strangest Halloween I've ever seen. This is his first year doing a real Halloween.Speaker 14: I can't! I want gum! See, I like themSpeaker 17: on the top.Speaker 14: I like stuffSpeaker 15: in there. Let meSpeaker 14: open it.Speaker 15: Okay, here, do you want meSpeaker 14: to open it for you? Yes, please. I got this for you. It must beSpeaker 15: stuff. It must be stuff. Okay, let's put this in. Here, I'm going to open this for you. Oh, look, here it is. It's food. It's food? Yeah, it's food.Let me,Speaker 17: let me. Are you going to eat that food? What?Speaker 15: What? Here, Torsten, look, it's food. Do you want to eat it?Speaker 17: We're not [00:55:00] going to have you open this. It's justSpeaker 14: solid.Speaker 17: Toasty! You better eat your Halloween candy. You better eat it untilSpeaker 15: you're sick. Torsten, Daddy will take a bite to test it to make sure it's safe. I want to eatSpeaker 14: it!Speaker 15: Do you want me to test it? YouSpeaker 14: can't eat it! Well,Speaker 17: gum is for chewing. It's such yummy food!Speaker 14: No! Uh, you better put that back.Simone Collins: Yes. You have to look visible and beautiful. You need it for reasons.Malcolm Collins: I don't know why I married you.Simone Collins: Yeah, you do though. Yeah. Yeah. It worked out well. It worked out well. I had to fight for it, but man, I got what I came for and then some. Did youMalcolm Collins: want marriage when you first found me?Simone Collins: No. No. You, you know what I wanted.Malcolm Collins: When you just wanted sex you were likeSimone Collins: I didn't know I didn't want [00:56:00] I wanted to fall in love and have my heart broken and live alone forever. You know exactly what I wanted. I was so clear about it. And sex was a part of that. Sex was a part of it. Yes. Yes, and yes, you are very much my type. So,Malcolm Collins: you were Which is actually something I want to get into in this episode.So, I'll get started with that.Simone Collins: Dive in. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

In today's episode, we delve into recent revelations about China's drastically inflated population numbers, which have significant implications for global demographics and economic stability. Our discussion covers the impact of China's misrepresented fertility rates on stock markets and global population estimates, drawing comparisons with similar issues in Nigeria. We explore independent research on China's population, including discrepancies in birth statistics, Lunar New Year travel patterns, and salt consumption analysis. Additionally, we theorize potential dystopian solutions for China's demographic challenges and discuss parallels with historical and current geopolitical situations. Join us as we unpack these complex issues and their broader global significance. Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] Hello Simone! I am excited to be talking to you today. Today we are going to be talking about China and recent information that has come out through multiple angles.that leads people to believe that China's total population, a lot of people know that, their fertility rate was lower than the official figure said it was, so they did all of this. Oh, we got it wrong. We're readjusting our population numbers. We're readjusting our fertility rate numbers. Turns out that their total population is still being represented as dramatically higher than it really is.And this has major implications because it means that one, their entire stock market might be vastly overvalued right now, even given how fragile it is. And two for people who are thinking about global population numbers right now, they might be way lower than we think they are. And this isn't just a China problem.I'm also mentioned a lot recently. It's a [00:01:00] Nigeria problem, which is another very populated country. A lot of people don't know, but Nigeria. Gives out oil money dollars to different provinces based on their reported PopulationandThere's nobody overseeing the populations that the individual provinces are reporting So there is always a huge incentive to lie in the extreme and I mean it's africa, right?How corrupt are these numbers going to be? SoSimone Collins: this is very similar to the blue zone scandal which came out whereby they found that All these supposedly very old people that lived in countries were not actually alive. It was their family members collecting their pensions and lying about them being alive.And here's just another issue of incentives being misaligned. People are lying about their populations because they get more money when they say that these people are there, aren't there. Yeah.Malcolm Collins: And I think that globally speaking, we may have to do a re ledgering. That's going to have people realize that the total global population is dramatically lower than anyone thinks it is.Especially if you're looking at UN numbers, there was a case recently where somebody sent an email to the UN saying Brazil's own [00:02:00] tabulation of their population shows it's 10 million less than yours. And the UN in response, they go, why don't you update it? And they go we don't want to alarm anyone.I'm like, and that's over a double digit off from where their fertility population actually is. Percentage, double digit percentage off. So the UN is just lying through their teeth at this point to try to hide this.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-1: So it turns out after recording this, this situation was astronomically worse than anyone anticipated. And this first series of graphs I'm showing you. The red line is the actual fertility rate of these countries. The blue lines is UN repeated projections of the fertility rate of these countries was interesting year.As you can see with some like Columbia, it never even was really attached to the real fertility rate with others like Korea every year. They just expect it to stop going down anymore. Which is just well negligence. They're lying to people. If we go to this next set here, you can see what's happening throughout Latin America. The red [00:03:00] line is the real fertility rate.And all of the other lines are UN every year saying, stop worrying about this.This is why the world's not panicking. If the world saw these red lines projected forwards by any reasonable equation. They would be shitting themselves right now. Look at this, even in Africa.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-2: And the middle eastMicrophone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-1: So here you have Tunisia and Turkey. The same thing is happening and it's not just the UN you also haveMicrophone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-1: and I H M E every major organization is attempting to Gaslight people about the severity of this. We're going to have a different episode where we go over this, but wow. I am shocked to see this coming out in a mainstream newspaper.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-2: No, here. Like you to take a moment to think, okay. If the UN is lying about all these other countries, fertility rates. And these countries own governments are like, Hey, actually, you are hugely overrepresented. Our fertility rates. , imagine what's going on with China right now. When their government doesn't want [00:04:00] people to know how bad things are. And has been famously able to push around the UN.Malcolm Collins: All so specifically China doesn't have a 1. 4 billion person population. Their population is probably below 1 billion people and fell below 1 billion people a while ago.Speaker: See, out of all the places, this is the place that I'm worried about the most. Why? Just, the way they live, they're different. What, Chinese people? They just wreck everything, they make everything weird. That's what I'm worried about. To you? To you? Everything. Chicken. Why is it orange in Chinatown?. The way they write, the letters are weird. Their alphabet's not like ours.Theirs is like, like someone testing out a biro. Everything's There's no logic to anything that they do. There is! Of course there's a logic to it! The way they read a book, it's all the other way round. From back to front, instead of from front to back, and up and down, and Everything that we've done, they've gone, Right, we're gonna do it weirder.Malcolm Collins: But let's talk about this. A [00:05:00] lot of this episode, and I always want to give credit when a lot of it comes from somebody else's research, came from a show called Lei's Real Talk. Or Lee's Real Talk. Anyway, pretty decent China watcher show. It's certainly not as good for me as like China's Fat Chasers. But she does real solid work and she sometimes breaks stories and it's definitely a source that I think people should have in their back pocket if they are doing China stuff.But everything that she's talking about here is data that can be independently checked. So first there's an argument that China's birth statistics are inflated as evidence by the discrepancy between reported births and the number of deaths. Of bcg vaccinations administered logic in china. The bcg vaccine is mandatory and given to newborns within 24 hours of birth Therefore the number of bcg vaccines should closely match the number of births A chinese researcher conducted a study comparing the official birth data to BCG Vaccine Administration records from 2008 to 2021.The [00:06:00] study found each bottle of BCG Vaccine can vaccinate between 1 to 5 babies with an average of 1. 35 babies per bottle. Using this average, the calculated number of births based on BCG Vaccine usage was consistently lower than official birth statistics. Over the 14 year period from 2008 to 2021, the discrepancy totaled 58 million births.Extrapolating this trend back to the 1980s when China's economic reforms began, the total overestimate could be as high as 178 million people. This research argues that this discrepancy suggests systematic over reporting. And I will have a link to this study in the description. It's in Mandarin.So be aware of that. Wow. Then there's data from the Lunar New Year travel study. A significant decrease in Lunar New Year travel between 2019 and 2023 suggests a potential population decline, particularly among lower income groups. Logic. Lunar New Year is [00:07:00] the peak travel period in China with almost everyone traveling to visit family.A large decrease in travel numbers, especially among lower income groups, could indicate population decline. Data and source official data from Zeonoon News Agency shows in 2019 2. 984 billion person trips during the 40 Day Lunar New Year period in 2023 1. 556 billion. Trips during the same period, which represents a 47 percent decrease overall.So these might be representing very large population drafts breaking down. The data air and rail travel is typically used by more affluent travelers decreased by only 15 percent bus and road travel. Typically used by lower income groups. So the largest decrease calculation, assuming 422 million people, 30 percent of the official 1.4 billion population didn't travel due to poverty or old age In 2019, 986 million people made 2.984 billion trips an average of three trips per [00:08:00] person in 2023, assuming 2.5 trips per person due to economic factors. This suggests a potential population decrease of 556 million people who didn't travel in 2023.Now this something ain't right. Yeah, I'll explain what would cause this. And she's actually done a different piece where she goes into this in a lot more detail, but she argues that this unexplained decrease is due to unreported population decline. due to COVID 19 fatalities. So not only is the overall population less than they're reporting, but they're hiding a huge chunk of the population that died during COVID 19.She has a different episode where she goes into kindergarten closures because there was a sudden increase in kindergarten closures were 20 percent closed year over year this last year. And she says, this indicates. that a lot of people were either died during COVID or something like that or etc. And they decrease in specific regions at really high levels, specifically smaller towns.And we don't have the rural data. But she argues that the country could have lost more than 20 percent of its [00:09:00] population in COVID. And from someone simply from death. deaths from death. And some of the CCP's behavior indicates that this is the case. By that, what I mean is right now they've had a mandate to destroy records of deaths during the COVID period.In a lot of hospitals and we'll go into more data that the COVID deaths may have been dramatically higher than they're reporting. But so not only is their overall population lower because they were lying about some stuff, but their overall population is higher. lower because of people dying and keep in mind for the flight thing.It was the low in middle class numbers that dropped this huge amount, not the upper class numbers that didn't drop that much at all. And peopleSimone Collins: who. We're uniquely hurt in a disease outbreak would be those who can't go to a private hospital, for example and get better treatment. So that could be the play.I see.Malcolm Collins: Or we're more likely just to be shipped to 1 of the I forgot what they call them. NotSimone Collins: really. Yeah. Scary isolation [00:10:00] zones where you just went to a cell.Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Really bad situation there. And the next is the salt consumption analysis. This was an analysis of regional salt consumption data, which suggests China's population is significantly lower than official figures.Salt consumption per capita is relatively stable by analyzing regional salt sales data and known per capita levels. consumption rates, one can estimate the population. A Chinese researcher conducted a comprehensive study of salt consumption data from 2000 to 2022. The methodology involved collecting regional salt consumption data from various news reports over 20 years using known daily salt intake figures for different regions ranging from 8.5 grams to 11. 5 grams per person per day. They calculated the estimated population based on salt consumption data and compared it to official census data. Findings from 2000 to 2014, calculated population was 19.29% lower than the official data in 2015 to 2022, calculated population was approximately [00:11:00] 31% lower than official data.So again, the huge chunk disappeared there so that they've been over reporting for a while, but now they're not even reporting what happened with Covid. Applying the 31 percent discrepancy to the official 2022 population figure of 1. 4 billion yields an estimated population of 986 million. The full study will be linked to in the description. Was interesting here is the arguments are supporting from multiple directions. So it's not just one study. They're all showing this huge like 31 percent lower number. And then she ran a different set of math just for another set of math. You can run here where she looked at the reported fertility rate of China versus India and starting populations of the two countries.And then showed that China showed a much higher growth than it should have an overall population when contrasting with India. And then people can be like that might be because they have better medical care. And so then what she did is she looked at, okay, what was the lifespan [00:12:00] increase between China and India during those periods?And India had a larger lifespan increase over that period than China had. Which implied that the numbers should have favored India further, which implied we are seeing systematically wrong numbers here. Wow.Simone Collins: What good sleuthing on her part. This just sounds, these are such amazing questions. I'd be so proud of one of our kids.If they looked at a problem from this many different angles, I really respect her.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I really respect her as well.Yeah. There was also a Russian and a Japanese study that put their population at around 800 million.This specifically the Russian experts name. Was Victor McCove, and he concluded China's population is not the official, the number that's nearing 1. 5 billion.Simone Collins: This seems like a classic China problem in terms of the way that rewards or funding is dealt out to different regions, causing.Major problems. I recall this being [00:13:00] an issue in like the height of early communist ChinaMalcolm Collins: with this is really interesting. So Russians gathered Chinese urban populations, added them up, and then arrived at a total urban population at 280 millionandassuming the rural urban populations have a one to one ratio, then China's actual population should be around 500 million.Simone Collins: Why should they be run to one? That doesn't make sense to me.Malcolm Collins: But if total rural. population carries a higher weight. It may not be one to one. But they said that China's total population should not exceed 800 million, but I'd expect their urban population to be higher than their rural population, China's recent push on this.Simone Collins: Yeah,Malcolm Collins: that is fascinating. So we've got more stuff here. Here's an article. And so just, in terms of like China having a lower population than it otherwise might have had. 1 here for people are wondering how big this difference is. It could be. So they did 2 different [00:14:00] calculations here.So what you might have is a real population. Population of, oh yeah, so this was just a 944 million and priority set. Okay. Now in terms of who is saying that more people died during covid than official numbers This is not an urban monoculture cover up. There was an article by the cdc on this topic And there was an article in nature on this topic and the Atlantic did a piece called, can a million Chinese people die?And nobody know official statistics on COVID can't be trusted because they share Beijing's political interests. Making the dead disappear is only part of it. And then evidence of underreporting satellite imagery revealed heightened activity at crematorium centers during the outbreak , domestic footage of overwhelmed hospital wards circulated on Chinese social media before being censored.A morning and funeral index based on online search volume for related terms indicated 712,000 excess mortalities, so nearly a million excess mortalities from December, 2022 to [00:15:00] February, 2023.Simone Collins: Oh that's recent. That's after after the pandemic. 2022 to 2023 is. When the pandemic is very quote unquote old over.That'sMalcolm Collins: whatever the case may be over a million more people died So basically they're just hiding their deaths. They're Fudging their births the whole chinese situation is not only a paper tiger It's a Potomkin village. It's fake. It isn't an actual economic superpower in the way that we believe that it is.And I think that right now, another thing that she's been arguing in her recent videos, and I actually think she's right about this is when we ask, why is Xi Jinping not doing logical things to protect his economy or his people right now, given how bad things are. The answer could be that he's trying to transition into a wartime economy, and a wartime economy is not going to be driven by consumer demand.It's going to be driven by [00:16:00] centralized production queues.Simone Collins: Do you, are there signs that they are centralizing their production?Malcolm Collins: Oh, yeah, absolutely. Keep in mind, all the billionaires have been like disappearing. They've been centralizing all their major industries. Remember when what's his face?Alibaba guy disappeared, right? Yeah, that's very much a move to a, howSimone Collins: does that have to do with what does that have to do with centralizing production?Malcolm Collins: Okay. Remember how we have defined in other videos the difference between a socialist state and a fascist state? Yes Whereas a socialist state puts the state industry like the economic means of production Under the state for the purposes of distributing wealth as equally as possible Whereas a fascist state Puts the means of production under a state for the purpose of spreading a particular ideology or worldview in keeping existing oligarchs in power, i.e. what the Democrats are doing. That's why the Democrats are fundamentally a fascist party. A lot of people don't understand this. They think I'm like exaggerating when I say that. Anyway that's what China is doing right now. It's they're transitioning. [00:17:00] To a fascist economic system where they are putting the means of production under the authority of the existing power structure to heighten the power of the existing oligarchical structure because I think that they know that an economic collapse is impossible.Basically, the entire economy there has been. More of a Ponzi scheme than the rest of the world's economy for a while. It's like foreign investors come in, foreign investors come in, your money will always grow, look at how many people we have imagined how big this could be. And I think that, very similar to what happened in Japan in the eighties but about a thousand times worse.Simone Collins: What are the implications of this?If they'retransitioning to a wartime economy, do we have good reason to believe therefore that they are going to come for Taiwan faster?Malcolm Collins: Oh, I think they meant to go for Taiwan by now, but Russia's F up in Ukraine has significantly lowered their desire for [00:18:00] that particular conflict.That's my read of it. Like all of this, I think started Before they saw what happened in Ukraine and right now there's like an ongoing conversation. Do we do it? Do we not?Simone Collins: So I thought it's more of just a siege scenario and taiwan from an energy independent standpoint Is so screwed that all you have to do is just besiege themMalcolm Collins: Do you know how much our gpus that we've been buying up?Simone and I have been buying up gpus are going to be worth if taiwan gets siegedSimone Collins: How you will look pretty good to getMalcolm Collins: a very good resale value on those. By the way one of the things we're looking for right now is a CTO for the companies, if anyone's like a GP, GPU specialist, or a, running data center specialists, let us know we'd really be interested in, in, in working with you or has a good technical resume otherwise For a position at a startup, but yeah, so the implication could be that they're going for taiwan I don't know.It's just such a dumb decision if they do but it could be with the goal of securing the existing administration Knowing that [00:19:00] an economic collapse of the region is not going to happen but already underwaySimone Collins: Golly. Okay. Yeah. I was reading in totally outside of, let's say someone wants to write all this off as conspiracy theorizing and they choose to not believe any of the stats presented.I was just reading that China's getting to the point that for every child born, six people are dying. It's that bad. Wait, is thatMalcolm Collins: bad now? That's horrifying.Simone Collins: Yeah, it, let me make sure I have that right. Okay, here we go.Demographer warns that if China's fertility rate remains on its downward trajectory, eventually six people will die for every newborn. This was from an article called China's pro birth policy is not yet enough to counter demographic crisis. Expert warns published in the South China Morning Post. So that's mainstream.Not question people talking about, just how bad things are, how their fertility rate dropped to 1. [00:20:00] 09 in 2022. But that's likely highly overstated. We don't have numbers for 2023 officially. And to your point about this, anything they do send to us may be very highly overstated. Even in China's, Best possible, most enthusiastic and optimistic number presentation, we're still looking at an extremely dire scenario if things are even worse and as bad as you describe and as bad as people are seeing through things like baby vaccinations and salt intake and vacation travel and morning, it's bad.It's also very concerning that apparently excess deaths are so much higher, even between 2022 and 2023. It implies.Malcolm Collins: Gets me on this. And I think that a lot of people, what were you going to say? It implies.Simone Collins: It implies that it's not just a COVID thing and it's not just people being hopeless and not having kids anymore thing that [00:21:00] people that the country may also be deeply unwell in other ways that we aren't fully aware of when they're, IMalcolm Collins: guess my takeaway from a lot of this is one.India is likely a bigger player in the global future than we think. China has long Basically what this means is India's population is higher than China's population, and going forward for the rest of human history we can project right now will continue to be higher. But in addition to that, it just means that China is when people are predicting future events, do not over-index China's role in those events?I guess I would say when I talk to a lot of people, I would say this is one of the, in terms of smart people who I talk to, like really smart people, consistent mistakes that they make in the single most consistent mistake I see they make. Is believing too much that China has a future seeing them trying to play out the roles and the moves that they make, 50 years from now, 100 [00:22:00] years from now, thinking that they are going to find a way to fix this quickly when.They should have already done that. Like it's basically too late for them at this point, even if they start going on a forced birth campaign or something like that, I just wouldn't expect that much benefit from it, given that it would need to admit things that mainstream training officials just aren't admitting right now.Keep in mind, they were one of the first countries to. Jail someone who is doing gene editing in humans. Very publicly, right? Like they made it clear. We don't do genetics here We don't believe in genetics here all humans exactly the same and that's going to make any sort of a campaign they do to try to increase fertility rate Likely create an adverse outcome.So I just don't I do. And it also means that their existing power on the world stage might be being overstated. And a lot of China's existing power, people misunderstand that like their existing power is due to what they produce. And I'm like, [00:23:00] that is not true. Their existing power is due to the amount of money American and European investors have poured into China.That is where their valuation comes from. Obviously, China.Simone Collins: So you mean people buying.Malcolm Collins: Companies putting companies in buying stock, investing in, et cetera, investing in China is why China has a high valuation. Like, when you're looking at like Chinese GDP or like the share of the global market and blah, blah, blah, a lot of this is like basically fudged numbers due to the people who have put money into that.And that's also why. You don't get this counter narrative of actually China is not that relevant, politically speaking, because nobody benefits from this. The wealthy oligarchs who run our society, they have tons of money invested in this that they can't quickly get out. And so they're not gonna want it widely disseminated that actually China is already over.So they don't publish it in their newspapers. [00:24:00] They don't talk about it. They don't promote people who are talking about it. It's the same with the political apparatuses in neither serves the conservatives, nor the Democrats well to say China is not particularly relevant as a power player.Because, people want to focus on what do we do if Taiwan gets attacked?And as I've always said, what we do if Taiwan gets attacked is nothing. Because Taiwan won't exist in 100 years at their current fertility rate. We are not saving a thing of persistent value by saving Taiwan at this point. If Taiwan can get their fertility rate up, I would commit American force to help them.But at their current fertility rate, you are just delaying their death by a century. There is no point. This very seriously. A country with a fertility rate that's hovering around 1, halving their population every generation, why would I have our either capital or actual human beings dying to defend that?That's insane.Simone Collins: [00:25:00] Yeah but by that logic, are you trying to argue that we should only fight for countries with high birth rates? So if someone invades a high birth rate African country ah, defend them.Malcolm Collins: No, it's not just based on the birth rate. It's based on their relevance in a future Earth scenario.That'sSimone Collins: Africa. They're the ones who are going to decline last.Malcolm Collins: I don't think that you are actually really helping that much in terms of the future trajectory of Earth by committing tons of resources to preventing random groups in Africa from attacking each other whether or not, it just all comes out in the wash there because the infrastructure and the economic infrastructure in that region is so poorly developed that you're just really not getting much of a, an outcome from that.But if somebody was to say. Okay. Oh, would you care? Like where would you care about defending if they were attacked? What's a country where you're like, this country is going to have an outsized, a level of impact in the future. When I look at current India, no Israel.Simone Collins: Oh,Malcolm Collins: Israel's the big example here.[00:26:00] Technologically, they're going to matter in 50 to a hundred years fertility white wise. They're going to matter in a 50 or a hundred years. In terms of Who is it worth investing to protect? Israel is who it's worth investing to protect. Taiwan is not particularly worth investing to protect. In terms of the Ukraine, I thought that it was worth it to just show that Russia couldn't push people around in the beginning.I no longer think it's worth it. Now they're just fighting over land, and neither country's gonna matter much in the future either, and Russia has already expended all of their military power.Simone Collins: Yeah, I guess if this were like an elimination based reality TV show and you're trying to decide to who to ally yourself with if there's someone who's just clearly tanking they lack the charisma or physical prowess or whatever the show's based on, cooking ability.To hang in there. Yes. You really need to look at someone's ability to be there in the future. And it's not just whether you like them or whetherMalcolm Collins: I like Taiwan a lot.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: I they're aSimone Collins: [00:27:00] contender. Yeah,Malcolm Collins: they're just not a contender. It's the same with China. So keep in mind, like China and Taiwan are enemies.I am very pro Taiwan. I am very anti CCP, but I admit that they both are dealing with this population problem and there really isn't an out for them at this point that I can see. And so when people are like, Oh, what do you think the, China's going to be doing in X many, I'm like, they're not going to be doing anything that matters.Now this does have impacts on like semiconductor production and everything like that, but I think we'll be able to offshore Taiwan's semiconductor production at least the relevant parts before things go tits up. Keep in mind that because we've hit a Moore's law sort of ceiling now we are Entering optimal semiconductor world at this point.Do you understand what I mean by that Simone? So historically if one company was like really ahead of other companies in semiconductor production it didn't really make sense to try to compete with them because it's you've got You, you want to try [00:28:00] to catch up with this company, but every year they're improving so much.They're like 30 percent better every year. So even if I figure out how they're making the semiconductors they're making this year, I'm not going to be able to compete with them economically by the time I get that up because by the time I get that Fab up by the time I get all that up, it's going to be 5, 10 years from now.And they're going to be like a generation, not one generation, like 10 generations ahead of me, right? Like I will be able to make very simple semiconductors, but nothing particularly impressive. But now the advancement in semiconductor production has lowered dramatically. You are getting very small increment because we reached the edges of what physics can do.And so this gives other companies and countries a long time to catch up with this. And I think the next major advancement in semiconductors that we should focus on from a human civilizational perspective is how can we, one, Lateralize semiconductor production. Right now, it takes 40 different [00:29:00] countries all developing.The lasers are developed in Norway and the plans are developed in California and the end products developed in Taiwan. How can we lateralize this process? And how can we microtize this process, i. e. I think we're going to need to focus on more modular and smaller semiconductors as global supply chains begin to break down even if they are slightly slower it's going to be equally useful given the way that cloud networks work in the way that you can just chain like GPUs together.Simone Collins: If you were living in China right now let's say in a place like Shanghai where the birth rate is so low. Where would you move? If Shanghai's fertility, by the way, is 0. 6 as of 2023. So not even this year. Lower than I get out. IMalcolm Collins: don't think that there is a way to to, [00:30:00] I think that China is internally burning itself.I think that the situation in China is going to get astronomically worse than it is today. YouSimone Collins: think they're going to start blocking emigration though? I feel like they already.Malcolm Collins: Stopped they stopped it like five years ago. They put major bans and restrictions on people out migrating. Yeah,Simone Collins: so then that's not a realistic you're just saying figure out how to figureMalcolm Collins: out figure out like you're running from a holocaust that's about to happen like Figure out like you don't get how bad things are going to get.That's my read of China right now. You do not know, you cannot comprehend you. If you want to know how bad things are going to get in China in the future, ask your grandparents about the great famine. Okay. That's the scale things are going to in China right now.Simone Collins: Yeah. What does worry me is.Again, those excess deaths between 2022 and 2023, like we're not in the middle of the pandemic anymore. And to my knowledge, there have been no [00:31:00] immense natural disasters in China, though, okay, I'm not following the news that closely. I do wonder, especially after all these stories of people being like buildings collapses or infrastructure, not really working well.And I guess it's just so hard to trust what you're hearing, because then when you hear from anyone who is in any way proud of China, and I think there's a lot to be proud of in China, I think the Chinese people are awesome. And I've traveled through China in a decent amount, not an amazing amount, but I've been to like Zhangjiajie and Changsha and not like your typical just Beijing and Hong Kong and Shanghai, though I've done those too.It's an amazing place. But when you talk with anyone who has pride in China, then it's just propaganda talking points. So I don't know who to consult, right?Malcolm Collins: This is the thing also about out migrating from China, historic. And real Chinese [00:32:00] culture is better preserved in the immigrant communities than it is preserved within CCP China.If you like, if you're like, I want to get in touch with my Chinese traditional roots, you are better off living in one of the American Chinese immigrant communities than you are under CCP China because they often were founded by individuals from before the Cultural Revolution, and they maintain more true uninterrupted through lines.To traditional Chinese culture.Simone Collins: I do think that's really interesting that when in some countries you get these selective pressures where people with a certain fidelity to a certain culture, just leave on mass and then anyone who stays basically gets completely changed through those same selective pressures.And then the original country. Is somewhere else now. And you can even see this and not necessarily in holistic cultural sets or cultural mimetic religious, whatever [00:33:00] sets, but even just an accents like I've ever argued that the true British accent of will say before the American Revolution may be more alive in some versions of American speech in like the 1900s than even the modern British accent.Which is an interesting, yeah. Because like certain groups migrate and like things evolve, it's not like after a point of great migration, do things stay the same in the original home country? No things change. In fact, often when there is a great migration, it's because there's significant change in the home country.So I'd like that point about cultural fidelity, maybe not even being in China. And if you really love China and if you believe in China, you maybe need to rebuild that somewhere else.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I like that way of looking at it. It can be rebuilt, but I don't think it can be rebuilt in China. Not so long as Xi Jinping is in charge.Now, he have, and this is one area where I realize I have a [00:34:00] big difference between my friends who believe that China has a future in me, is they're like Xi Jinping, he won't be in charge for long. He's got replacements in the wing. As soon as he Fs up enough, they're gonna replace him. And my belief is, The opposite of that.I don't think they have real replacements lined up for him. I have looked into these people's, they've said, oh, this guy is competent. I'm, I don't see it. I don't see it. I don't think that they have a good replacement for him. And if I wereSimone Collins: him, I would not want to take, or if I were anyone else, I would not want to take his place.I would be terrified to take his place.Malcolm Collins: I don't think that they I think that he's for a long time purged everyone competent who might take his position. I don't think that there is somebody who can competently take his position. I think when Xi Jinping falls, a lot of people think, oh, this is when things begin to fix themselves.No, I think that's when warlords begin to take over. I think that's when things begin to fracture or they go incredibly stupid, a la Venezuela, like a bus driver taking over. I [00:35:00] think that as much as Xi Jinping is a problem, he's also the bulwark against complete idiocy. And I have intense fear around what happens when he does fall because I think people think some competent bureaucrat is going to take over and that's not the tea leaves I'm reading.The tea leaves I'm reading is. Some idiots going to take over who, we would never have assigned power was intention. And if I'm wrong about this if the system is still working, if they still can get a competent person in there and they can get rid of Xi Jinping, China has a chance, but it's got no chance under Xi Jinping.Or the Dowager Empress, as I call him.Simone Collins: The Dowager Empress.Malcolm Collins: He reminds me of the Dowager Empress in the last fall of China.Simone Collins: The scary dragon lady. I guess everyone calls Dowager Empresses or any mean woman dragon lady. But yeah, the one with the really young son who just killed a bunch of people, that one.Malcolm Collins: In fact, if I [00:36:00] was in office I would always call him the Dowager Empress. Because I think people need to draw this connection more to one, understand just how much he's hurting the country into two through a historic parallel into to understand just how long within the Chinese bureaucracy, somebody who is that toxic to the country's long term best interest can stay in power.If people don't take care of them.Simone Collins: If you were, let's say someone incredibly competent, the right person for China were suddenly installed and given autocratic power. What would you have them do? What would you encourage them to do? If they came to you and ask youMalcolm Collins: for something you need to do is become completely transparent about all of their records their economy, their population, their part of meSimone Collins: wonder.So what if Xi Jinping doesn't even know the gravity of this and can't because There are so many adverse incentives at play where a province is not going to tell you because then they won't get their tax [00:37:00] revenue. I feel like there's a crisis of realityMalcolm Collins: in place, independent departments, independent branches of government using things like AI and satellite images, all the stuff that foreigners are using.And then they get, or commendations and wealth for finding areas where people are fudging things. All right. So let'sSimone Collins: say first thing you established the department of, and they go out and their job is to just find out what's going on.Malcolm Collins: Department of transparency. Then you need to re institute goodwill among investors that if they invest in something, they will be able to get their money into and out of the country easily.That's one of the big things that's going to drive down investment right now, right? As people are terrified that if they put money into China, that the money's never going to be able to come out of China. And because that's true right now, China's basically realized like it's excessive.You need to suddenly you do that. And all of the money, a lot of the money, this is all going to cause short term pain. All that you're saying was in China's autocratic system that apparently can think long term, even though it [00:38:00] definitely can't. No,Simone Collins: You are a long termist autocrat. You needMalcolm Collins: to, you need to, basically all of this is around developing investor confidence.You need to develop investor confidence, long term investor confidence with foreign investors. That is the. First core thing you need to do. So all, everything involved in that, not jailing making things. If somebody achieves a certain level of wealth, you're not just going to go after them.You're not going to, all of that stuff. So investor competence is thing. Number one thing. Number two is fertility collapse is a national security issue right now. And I may even put it under the purview of the military focusing on artificial wombs in the lake.Simone Collins: Oh, so just invest heavily in science.HeavilyMalcolm Collins: in science and genetics.Simone Collins: Right, but what good will artificial wombs do you if no one wants to have kids anyway, whether or not they get pregnant?Malcolm Collins: You have the state raise them.Simone Collins: Huh. So you would encourage the first ever government [00:39:00] funded human productionMalcolm Collins: plan. I think if you do those two things simultaneously and big enough.I guessSimone Collins: you could, would you, this is very dystopian, but would you Offer to pay women a a living wage to carry pregnancies to term. And then if they don't want to raise those children, No, but IMalcolm Collins: wouldn't disallow anyone from a high level government position with less than four kids.Simone Collins: So to say, I know the anti cat lady tenure policy.I thinkMalcolm Collins: you need to create,Simone Collins: and you might need to create But that's nobody, because no one has been allowed to have a lot of kids. No, there,Malcolm Collins: It's been long enough under the three child policy and loosen one child restrictions. What?Simone Collins: Come on, when was the three child policy, No, when wasMalcolm Collins: one child policy loosened?Simone Collins: No. Because it was still culturally so discouraged. They're basically no. The policy was formally passed into [00:40:00] law by the National People's Congress, the National Legislature of China on August 20th, 2021. With this one childMalcolm Collins: policy. Simone, the one child policy was loosened in 2016. Loosened!Simone Collins: Loosened!Malcolm Collins: You could say this is the thing and this is where everybody gets things wrong.They always blame us on the one child policy, but the problem is that fertility rate now in China is lower than it ever was under the one child policy. And that's a culture problem. I just, I'm notSimone Collins: going to listen. You shouldn't penalize people for not having a lot of kids. You under Xi Jinping in China during COVID in China, would you be having kids?No, you would be shouting. We are the last generation along with everybody else. Yes, and those people needMalcolm Collins: to be penalized. That's the exact point I'm making, Simone. You need to penalize people who are investing in your career. No, you shouldn't penalizeSimone Collins: people who are making smart and logical decisions.Malcolm Collins: I disagree strongly.That's the only way you create a cultural change. In fact, I would go further. I may disallow [00:41:00] salaries above a certain amount to people who have less than a certain number of kids. I would tap your max possible salary To the number of Children you have, which will quickly create the perception that more kids means more wealth.Simone Collins: No, I would that's a fun That's a fun concept to reconnect from just from a policy perspective in general, because the thing in the past and why people would have a lot of kids aside from, other cultural reasons was the more kids you had, the more wealthy you were. And if we just reconnect those in some way.Either, of course, through progressive tax breaks for the more kids you have, but also just through other means. Yeah, the more kids you have, the more money you're allowed to earn or something. It's just the level of dystopian control that you have to have over a people to do that. It's too much. Aren't we too libertarian for that?You and IMalcolm Collins: No, but you're It's different from what I want for America. China is [00:42:00] culturally different from America. OkaySimone Collins: so yeah, you're trying to come up with a solution that certainly doesn't fit with our cultural values, that is more coercive, that is more I'm not gonna say evil. That is just Creepy because you're like, this is going to work for them.Yes.Malcolm Collins: You're saying if I was in China, what would I do? Like the person who's I'd started democracy is an idiot. That is not what you would do. You need to fix the problem in a Chinese way. What's actually going to work.Simone Collins: Yeah, yeah. I could see a kind of China making human production army thing with artificial worms.They could pull off the look. I feel mean saying that I, again, respect China, I was really, I was on like a five. Did I tell you about my five hour bus ride to. Zhang Xiaojie from Changsha, it's about five hours, like some [00:43:00] guy had this cell phone that constantly kept ringing and it was just children's choirs singing Christmas songs in English.And they were chewing this thing that smelled incredibly strong, like throughout this bus that just made me want to vomit the whole time. And we're on these twisting roads. So I'm just hearing children's choirs singing Christmas songs and smelling this putrid smell of whatever it is people are chewing and spitting out on the bus.Malcolm Collins: It's Betelgeuse, probably.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx): Badal nuts are an addictive stimulant that's chewed in parts of China. Particularly the Southern provinces, such as a non. A high nineSimone Collins: yeah.Malcolm Collins: Yes. BetelgeuseSimone Collins: did not smell good. So they were, I've had good moments and I've had bad moments. But like good moment just before that bus drive, the taxi driver or the taxi cab driver who took me to the bus station where I took that bus was so [00:44:00] concerned about me that he got in to the bus station and helped me buy a ticket and told me where to sit because he was like, girl, what are you doing?This is not safe. So they're really they're awesome, cool, bro people who help out total nonsense, idiot foreigners who are kind and hardworking and enterprising and creative. And it makes me so sad to think that they're under this level of threat. Damn. But I don't know. I wish there were a less dystopian way to do this.Malcolm Collins: There are less dystopian ways to do this. But you've got to I think that the less dystopian ways of handling this are going to be handled in the immigrant communities. You can't find a new, like in the U. S. I'm like, experiment with new ways of having your family culture work, new traditions, new holidays, new ways of relating to things.What can China do? This doesn't work in China.Simone Collins: What can China do right [00:45:00] now that other countries can't do? So if suddenly you become transparent and you're like, okay, guys. Now I'm in charge. We're figuring out our population situation. We're going to be financially transparent. You can leave and enter the country as desired.We'd love to welcome immigrants. We'd love to welcome industry. What would you do? Peter Zion talks about their natural resources being not great. Like they're not that energy independent. Then I'm not having that food independent. What are you going to make them like a nuclear hotspot?Fast, like that wasMalcolm Collins: the thing I was talking about was transparency and everything like that and taking a short term hit. The big problem China has now is they got so used to that period where they were a growing power instead of a weakening power that they built this idea of will always be bigger tomorrow.And therefore let's believe the neighboring countries, let's believe the people around us. They need to understand that they are in a position of short lived power right now and they need to be doing. Everything they can right now to build goodwill [00:46:00] among their neighbors. That nine dot line that they've drawn, that's not going to hold for 50 years.And when it stops holding the people who they were bullying are going to be awfully mad at them. Meaningful walk back all of this stuff they've been doing to the local region. Okay.Simone Collins: So start playing nice with others, but then, what will a Admittedly smaller going forward. China do. To build prosperity and.TheyMalcolm Collins: need to, as I said one, forcing competent people to have more kids, culturally speaking, through the way that you influence them. Okay, incentivizing,Simone Collins: not forcing, incentivizing through cultural means.Malcolm Collins: The state raised kids, state produced kids, that could be an option that they have access to that we don't really have access to.And they, I think right now is something that is being understated in the investment world is how much of a problem it is that nobody trusts Chinese stock market or wants to put money onto [00:47:00] it. And it's not just because they're shrinking. It's because the government has basically said, okay, now you've put the money in, now we're going to keep it from going out.Like we trickedSimone Collins: you. Here'sMalcolm Collins: an interesting idea.Simone Collins: If you create state created humans, and state raised humans, maybe China, because China also has an international reputation, I think of producing very smart, competent, hardworking people. To with your army of government creative people, like be as though we are the intellectual mercenaries of the world.You want to hire Chinese people. You want we will build the best factories we will build and then they just start investing in all of the type of human infrastructure that will matter in a post AI world because the rest of the world is too indolent, probably to raise the sort of disciplined, smart person, practical person not hedonic [00:48:00] person.To thrive in a post AI society and still matter in a post AI society. So maybe if China did that and they continued with the same Oh, America, you suck with your titty attainment. Like you go and enjoy your hedonism and we're going to produce our competent, hardworking, tight lipped people who we will produce and train, then maybe they can just be like the one non idiocracy.No, that would really be cool if they could do that.Malcolm Collins: And I'd also say that one of the core things that people get wrong when they're predicting future world events and stuff like that is how cheesed America is from so many perspectives. We are not moving into a multipolar world. We are moving into a world in which America is dramatically more dominant than it is today.AndSimone Collins: I think a good book to start if you're interested in the subject is Peter Zeihan's book. book, the end of the world is just the beginning. He talks through in a very sort of guns, germs, and steel kind of way. Just why America has the [00:49:00] tailwinds that will give it a huge advantage in the instance of a world in which there is no more.support for international trade.Malcolm Collins: So one is as globalization and global economic systems begin to break down. Yes. That is part of why America will be strong is we are the most self sufficient country in the world by a dramatic margin, whether it's energy or food or any of the things that civilization needs to survive.But in addition to that we also have A weirdly high fertility rate for our level of prosperity and output. And it's because America has what it turns out is the greatest resource any country can have in the 21st century, which is we have religion. And a lot of it, a lot more than any other developed country.And it turns out that a lot of these countries, when they were modernizing and got rid of their religions, did a great harm to themselves. And when I look to the future, when people are like future world polarity wise, where are you looking at world [00:50:00] power centers? One, people are hugely sleeping on how much power America is going to have.The other area that they're hugely sleeping on. Is Israel like, no matter how positive you could be about Israel, you need to be 10 X more positive than that.Simone Collins: Yeah. I guess if we were to look at any country that actually was producing some kind of hyper competent workforce, it does, that is, famous for going out and getting a lot of things done.And it doesn't focus on hedonism over everything else. It was so weird how in your class at Stanford's graduate school of business, One of the most difficult schools to get into in the entire world. There were so many Israeli students. So many Israelis. And not only that, but So many Israelis. And they weren't just Oh, they were all having kids.They were all having kids. They all had businesses and they were going through school. They were like so much more on top of their lives than anyone else. And even though they worked harder and even [00:51:00] though they were incredibly conscientious, they all just, they just seemed very happy. Like they didn't, they were the tortured souls at your school, but they weren't aMalcolm Collins: lot of the American Jews were among the tortured soul category that you're talking about reform.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: And actually Simone, we have an invitation to go to Israel and meet with, and live with some of these variety families for a bit. I'd like to take it up at some point.Simone Collins: It's a really cool invitation.Malcolm Collins: We It would involve being around people. Has invited us to stay with some of the Haraiti families in Brooklyn in the next couple of weeks because he's going to be there and he's going to be That'sSimone Collins: so cool.IMalcolm Collins: was like, I don't think we have time. I was like, Now theSimone Collins: timing is not amazing, alas.Malcolm Collins: In future years, I really want to, but not right now, unfortunately. But the yeah, people are they do not understand how much fertility rates in technophilic regions matter.Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah. And I think that's the cool things that China has the building blocks.[00:52:00]China has the technophilia. China has this I just love how modern so many of the things there areMalcolm Collins: another big advantage, which is they don't have the bureaucratic bloat of other regions.Simone Collins: Yeah,Malcolm Collins: it would seem,Simone Collins: I don't know. Like October 7th seems to have been largely a product of the government not having time to doMalcolm Collins: an episode on this, but we can just briefly mention in this now.I have looked at their competence since October 7th in terms of essentially wiping out all ofHezbollah In Palestine,Simone Collins: but keep in mind those, that groundwork was laid well before October 7th.Malcolm Collins: Exactly. And the problem is Simone, which you might not be considering that groundwork was weighed. Before October 7th, they wouldn't have been able to execute on that groundwork if October 7th hadn't happened.Why were they making plans for how they going to take out Hezbollah? Like that they obviously from a geopolitical standpoint, couldn't [00:53:00] execute on unless I, I used to think October 7th, I was like, Must have some level of impossible stupidity.Here I am now leaning towards the, oh my God, this was all planned from the beginning.Simone Collins: I'm leaning toward, they put so many resources into embedding devices with Hezbollah and getting intel from Hezbollah that they snoozed on Hamas. Just being like, you guys are so incompetent. Do you thinkMalcolm Collins: they could have had if Hezbollah wasn't attacking 'em as aggressively as they are right now, do you think they could have had all those things explode?Simone Collins: Oh, you mean just from a diplomatic standpoint, because there's so much hate on it. I think it was an insurance policy because keep in mind, they weren't just incendiary devices or explosive devices. They were also Intel gathering devices. So it was, I think it was about optionality to have that there.And who knows? They knew. That Iran was probably going to get more resources at some point, Obama had started that trajectory and that's [00:54:00] about when they started doing this. So I think they knew it was going to be rising threat. I don't think they, they could have anticipated or even encouraged October 7th.I think. I think it's more of a, just, they thought that they knew what they were doing or the, I just, it seems plausible to me that just what Hamas did was so out of.Malcolm Collins: I'll tell you what British intelligence, they looked at this. There was an ex British intelligence guy and he was saying, I, it is shocking that Israel accomplished more.In a year and a half that we accomplished during the entire war on terror against the Taliban. He's if we could have dismantled Taliban, the Taliban to the level that Israel dismantled Hezbollah. This would have been, this is like 99 percent more than what we did. Like it was a stunning that they were able to accomplish.Simone Collins: Here's what we need to do. We need to get like spy novel [00:55:00] writers. In the same room as like government officials or like sci fi writers and just be like, figure it out guys, get creative, man, get drunk and then just start makingMalcolm Collins: plans. Is it was all of this in context, we should consider ourselves very fortunate of the Secret Service agencies that apparently are actively attacking us now, which is the British one that it's not.Yeah, we should be glad that of the ones most likely to support us. It would be the competent,Simone Collins: but here's the thing about massage. You won't know that they're out to get you until you're dead. that effective. So who knows? But yeah I guess we just did a surprise attack. We're going to talk about China.Here's where we dunk on China. Oh, ha. WeMalcolm Collins: love Israel.Simone Collins: Another one of those episodes.Malcolm Collins: It's like when I'm thinking about like world players who matter.Simone Collins: Yeah,Malcolm Collins: it's literally like in my future calculations of geopolitics matters [00:56:00] to X what China matters.Simone Collins: Yeah, the other kind of in the potential to have outsized influence, very similar in my mindscape to.The UK or Britain, before the they became the British imperial empire. They were this sleepy backwater. Rome didn't even want to hold on to them, right? They sucked. They were gross. It was cold. No one took them seriously. They were a bunch of barbarians. Like you, you said in that other episode on our one civil, your one civilization theory.I'm just, I identify too much with you, Malcolm, but I'm not trying to take credit for it. It's a really good theory. No, it's ours! Yeah, Royal We. Nobody reallyMalcolm Collins: helped inspire it by telling me that I should think more of ancient Chinese civilization. That was really the thing that got me investigating and then I was like, no, actually they suck.Simone Collins: Oh my god. So Poor China. I'm trying to point out things that I love about China. Szechuan food people in Szechuan province. I love ChineseMalcolm Collins: food. I eat Chinese food almost every week. I love it. AlsoSimone Collins: people in Szechuan province are [00:57:00] just genuine, genuinely awesome people and really cool.Malcolm Collins: No, I have a lot of Chinese friends.I think that the whole, like a lot of the Chinese people I know are some of the smartest people I know.Simone Collins: They're crazy smart. Anyway, so yeah, we love China but I can't remember where I was going. It doesn't matter because we need to make dinner. But I'm sorry to anyone who came here just wanting to hear about China.And there we go. It's real again, but no, no. Yeah. Great. Yeah. So yeah, no one thought, yeah, Britain was backwater. No one cared about it. Relatively small population. And yet so much influence. In the entire world. And I think it's, yeah, it's easy for people to write off Israel to be like, it is a tiny postage stamp of land within a hostile area.They, why would they matter? Why are we trying to help them? I don't know before the rise of the British imperial empire, I would have wanted to, Now, what was going on with these guys, see how I could work with them. So I guess I see your point in that we have to look to the future and [00:58:00] look for their potential.So yeah,Malcolm Collins: Don't make big sacrifices to make alliances with the Ottomans. Yeah, exactly. Right now is the Ottoman. They'reSimone Collins: the Ottomans. Yeah, sadly. But I think what also gives me hope at the end of this, and I want to end with this, because it's where there's hope for China, Is that China isn't in China anymore, just like Venezuela is not in Venezuela anymore.Yeah, I agree.Malcolm Collins: We know throughSimone Collins: our travel agency, which works with a ton of Venezuelans, that all the Venezuelans are in Spain, they're in Peru, they're in Doral, they're inMalcolm Collins: I should say.Simone Collins: Yeah because they left. It was Cuban, like allMalcolm Collins: the good Cubans, I'm sorry, not good Cubans.Simone Collins: We are going to hell so many times over, Malcolm.Real Cuba's in Florida. Yeah, though. And that is a theory that gives me a lot of hope. Because when I hear about new news with China's demographic collapse. I just think I weep for China and it makes me very sad and scared. But then I think about, yeah, all these amazing Chinese immigrant [00:59:00] communities throughout the world.And you've got stuff, so yeah, people can move, populations can move and build something even better. And as we've talked about in other episodes, the more, That you evolve and move around and play jazz with other cultures and take the best from them and do it better yourself. The more you will thrive and own the future.AndMalcolm Collins: I will say that China is not the most effed world power right now. Germany is. Germany is. And LatinSimone Collins: America is just vaporizing and no, butMalcolm Collins: the thing is that Latin America has cultural enclaves in other countries that have decent fertility rates. Germany has no backup plan. If I was a German that wanted to maintain German culture, there's nothing left.Simone Collins: Gosh. Yeah. We're there. There are no, I guess you could say that Amish people are,Malcolm Collins: but now, Oh my God, you should hear their stuff on Trump. We watched the video of them, like them talking about Trump. They are so based.Simone Collins: Yeah. They're so based. Love the phone. I'll let you go. Bye. Okay. Ciao. Ciao. [01:00:00] Oh,Malcolm Collins: are you going to do theSimone Collins: Just get the kids, you get the kids, I'll stir taquitos.And then if you just drop them off, I'll play with them while I cook food and you can wrap up work for the day. Yeah? Yeah. You ready for that?Malcolm Collins: And let me know what we're getting for replies on this. This is a long and spicy thread with lime and stuff. OhSimone Collins: no.Malcolm Collins: Have you even checked it?Simone Collins: No, I'm just going to ignore it.I'm very bad with Twitter. Remember, I thought that someone had closed, somehow closed their tweet to replies and I just didn't know I was blocked because I'm so old.Malcolm Collins: Other people said then they were blocked. I don't know. But yeah they, weird.Simone Collins: Yeah I don't understand Twitter, x. Sorry.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, we're definitely at an age now where there's things that I don't understand and things I make a real hard focus on staying on top of. AI. AI is something I'm like, I gotta be up to date. Love you.Simone Collins: I love you, too. You're seeing the thousandth time. [01:01:00] Yeah,Malcolm Collins: so today antinatalism documentary, which I actually loved. I haven't seen it at all.Simone Collins: That was so well done. It was the best. So well done. This guy is a trueMalcolm Collins: star. Yeah, Tim came out. I hope it does incredibly well.Yeah. So people haven't seen it. This is the guy who's done some other like really big documentaries.I want to, I haven't watched it all yet. I only watched the beginning. I was like, Oh my God, this is. HisSimone Collins: storytelling is top drawer like the way he, but the problem is that it includes stories of. Conditions that cause babies to die terrible deaths I, and then so of course I'm crying first thing in the morning while watching this frickin thing.Malcolm Collins: I'm so sorry. And then the limestone thing happened today.Simone Collins: Limestone Claymore. So yeah, that was, oh, it was so much reading. It was so much reading.Malcolm Collins: So much reading and so much, I don't know, felt like disingenuousness he posted the thing. He's like, why are they attacking me out of nowhere? This is a guy who runs the Institute of Family Studies thing.And we're like, he does the whole, whoa,Simone Collins: hold on in his whole, you haven't even read the he's I don't run the Institute for Family Studies. This is just 10 percent of their [01:02:00] spending that I'm involved with. So he takes umbrage.Malcolm Collins: He just, out of the blue he's they just attacked me out of the blue and I'm like it may have been that article that you wrote on us that was really long and compared us to Nazis and eugenicists and said that you should be running the pronatalist movement and not us and that we shouldn't even be considered pronatalists and tried to throw a that might've been, and mischaracterized everything we've ever done.He's they're, I don't know. communitarians. Like they only care about people in their community. They're not about trying to help everyone. I'm about trying to help everyone. I'm all about freedom and I'm gonna give everyone freedom. And not only is my movement about freedom, but how dare their movement allow people to use surrogates or do genetic testing.And I'm like, You're like contradicting yourself here MMMMMM, seething! But I'm not gonna attack him anymore, because I said I'd stop attacking him after this if he doesn't try to [01:03:00] undermine the big tent pronatalist movement again to try to take it over. We honestly could have been a lot worse to him.I had a much meaner episode planned about him, but we ended up just talking about it in the episode where we were talking about what was it? When it is not true, because this is something he believes that more wealth doesn't lead to lower fertility rates, and I'm like, that belief continually arguing that, which he does persistently throughout all his work and he's like, why are they telling reporters not to talk to me?I'm like, that's like an environmentalist arguing that it's an environmentalist. Like industrial logging doesn't hurt the rainforest because one person is like planting trees or like they can find this one study like broadly everyone who's saying and knows that industrial logging hurts the rainforest and other environmentalists aren't going to send reporters to talk to you like obviously if you're the pronatalist version of a flat earther, When a reporter comes to me, I'm like, yeah, don't talk to the guy who doesn't think that wealth causes lower fertility rates.That's pretty [01:04:00] insane position when you can just Google any graph on this and you will see it as a very strong trend. But yeah, I don't want to go too deep on, on that particular thing. So what would the other thing you said? There was something else that came out today that was stressful. You read this one.It wasn'tSimone Collins: stressful. It's more of a Swedish piece. They were so mean to us. The Swedish place that I think it was a translation, but it was like, they said the parents who beat their children. Yeah. The parents who beat their children and want everyone to have children. And then we live in a dank farmhouse.They said we live in a dingy farmhouse. Dingy, that was the word, dingy. Oh, I wonder if there's a like, more diplomatic way that this is written in Swedish, or did they, she just like flat out call her home dingy? Was this somebody who came toMalcolm Collins: her house, or were they writing about somebody else? Yeah, she,Simone Collins: yeah, she's the woman who came to her house.Her picture's at the very end of the article. Remember, she wore the bright shirt.Malcolm Collins: Oh I like that. They included a lot of our full arguments in that piece. That's always nice. When somebody does that, we alwaysSimone Collins: ask someone to come at us. We're always like, be [01:05:00] controversial, but it must as villains.And she's I'm glad she did it because it made the article more interesting. But yeah, it's always stressful reading those being like, wait, my house is dingy. I try to clean up before you. IMalcolm Collins: broadly, I thought it was a good article. It is the type of article that I would want written.But it's always,Simone Collins: it's always stressful to, for anyone to talk about, like to read anything about you. It's just as stressful if it's positive. So I'm just ready to de stress. Let's talk about China as a dumpster fire. It's going to make me feel so much better. Okay. Let's do it.Malcolm Collins: Okay.Do I have any debris on me or anything like that? Ooh,Simone Collins: yeah, let me, not that I can see, not that I can see. Yeah,Malcolm Collins: this right here.Simone Collins: I can't, is wiping your nose on it going to make it go away? I'm trying to lick it off, but it's not that scary.[01:06:00]Just give me the shirt to wash. I, we have a, I brought a bunch ofMalcolm Collins: shirts and pants down for you to wash.Simone Collins: I hope you didn't put them in the clean laundry basket. I need to make things more. We need a better hamper system. We will work this out.Malcolm Collins: I'll just change my shirt.Simone Collins: What do you want for dinner, by the way?Malcolm Collins: You know what would be really cool if you learned how to make, if you learned how to make taquitos.Simone Collins: That can't be hard to do, but I would need oh my God, wait a second. No. I can use, hold on. What if I tried this? I will make corn tortilla taquitos using your slow cooker beef and keep in mind that is prime beef, the Christmas beef.I willtry it. I don't know exactly how they're properly cooked. I'm just going to First, lightly fry corn tortillas in butter, then I'm going to roll them in the meat, which I will saute ahead of time with some pumpkin. Would you like put some of it or not? Yeah, that's aMalcolm Collins: great idea. And [01:07:00] thenSimone Collins: I will cook them further in the air fryer.Malcolm Collins: That's exactly what I would have suggested.Simone Collins: All right, let's see with maybe some melted cheese on top. I don't know. I haven't gotten there yet, but we're going to see how that goes. No, no melted cheese. We're going to try dry. You can dip them in sauces. We're going to see how this works. I'm excited for it.Okay.Malcolm Collins: By the way, the episode we did today on the spy, it got demonetized. And I think it's because we were talking about things that we aren't allowed to talk about. So just don't, no, even saying we aren't allowed to talk about something. You can't say that.Simone Collins: Okay. Okay. DeletedMalcolm Collins: everything else. So that must've been what flagged it.That is so creepy. That's really dystopian. Yeah.We live here. Have fun. The deep state is spying on us. AndSimone Collins: we can't say that.Malcolm Collins: One of the comments that somebody had that got to me as they were like they did arrest like random women who nobody follows for questioning their school board. Do you think was your guys platform? They're not going to attack you. [01:08:00] And I was like, That makes sense.Simone Collins: Touche. Creepy. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

In this episode, we dive into the controversial topic of hereditarianism in dogs and why many progressives acknowledge it in pets but not in humans. The discussion covers the pit bull debate, including the moral implications of neutering the breed to prevent attacks on other pets and humans. We also explore the historical and societal roles dogs and cats have played, arguing for their special status and potential future alongside humanity, even in space. The script wraps up with an exploration of online backlash against the hosts and their defense of hereditarian views, followed by a personal conversation about dinner plans. [00:00:00] Most progressives do believe in hereditarianism and dogs. And the question is why did they believe it there and not in humans?And it is because they have raised and interacted with dogs. It is very hard to miss hereditarianism if you have actually been around young people . So what you're saying also is this is a product of the fact that they don't have human children.I think the previous thing is what everyone's gonna freak out about in the comments. He wants to genetically modify dogs to be smarter? How dare he? But this is where things get spicy. The pit bull debate yeah. I do not think that there is a huge moral negative to neutering the pit bull population humans who love dogs, neuter dogs all the time.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-5: Pit bulls in the United States kill an average of 8,730 dogs per year in 2,904 cats per year. That means that if you neutered the entire us pit [00:01:00] bull population,You would be saving one cat or dogs, a life that is somebody else's pet for every 3.8, six pit bulls. You neutered.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-3: Over the next hundred years.And I will tell you the best argument for not neutering pitbulls. And then I will tell you why it doesn't even work.Would you like to know more?Hello Simone, I'm excited to be here with you today. Today, we are going to be doing an episode that was inspired by somebody who was criticizing us. It was an article that was actually not so bad. Where was the article published? It was like The LA Review of Books. Yeah, and what's really interesting in it is when you went to look up The the writer of the article to learn more about her and her perspectives.She was in the middle of a fight on the internet based on this article because she called out us and a few of our friends like Johnny Anomaly and diana Fleishman podcast. Yes. And so she calls out a few of our friends. And so, you know, obviously they've got supporters as well online and she's getting trashed in, [00:02:00] in Twitter.Which is actually interesting that it happened this way because Often when people attack us. Enough of a Twitter spasmob forms, like whenever we go viral, that we are on the minority side, but when they fail to go viral, the only people who notice are the supporters of the various people who are being attacked and they end up getting s**t all over.So, she was getting having to be defensive and somebody found and she ended up defending this position, a post where she claimed anti hereditarianism in dog breeds. So specifically. Not only does she not believe that none of a human's personality is heritable, but she doesn't believe that any of a dog's personality is heritable.Right. So like on, on, on Twitter, I can read a bit like how some of this conversation played out because this is a very common conversation we see again and again, which is really weird. With Emily Merchant, the author of this article representing [00:03:00] the, the kind of person who is very well educated and very well meaning but also very progressive and just will not believe, will refuse to believe that, that behavioral traits, including intelligence are heritable.So Stegosauro Benedet writes, I can't help thinking I should really be screening for the gene that makes otherwise apparently intelligent people fall for pseudoscientific nonsense like eugenics. And then. Conchabar responds, I haven't read the essay yet, but the claim that we can't select for specific traits in a population is utterly wrong.We've been doing it with animals for millennia. To which Emily Merchant, the author of this article responds, it's much easier with animals, but a project by behavior geneticists in the 1950s to 1960s to breed an dog failed utterly. And she links to this, this study. And , someone reads it and [00:04:00] then includes a screenshot of the study saying, just skimming this, they seem to suggest that.That it can be successful with dogs. Emily merchant responds. No, they're saying that differences between dog breeds are small, especially under similar living conditions. She continues. Scott was a member of the American eugenics society in the 1960s, and he expressed extreme skepticism about the possibility of breeding intelligence and humans on the basis of his experience, trying to do it with dogs.So she's trying to argue that, you know, this, this dog breeder. Okay. So first of all, I should note. The other study that she's citing here, because this is going to be important in a lot of progressives who do believe like anti hereditarianism in dogs is real, will cite this it was a recent study, actually, used a giant sample size.Showed only about a 9 percent personality difference between breeds. What they won't tell you, this reminds me of the spanking studies where huge sample sizes did not control at all in the way they were collecting data, is the personality of the dogs is based on owner's self reports. Yeah. [00:05:00] Here's the problem with that.The owner's self report of a dog personality is going to have more to do with the owner's personality than with the dog's personality. How many owners speak of their pit bull? They're just the sweetest little things, you know, because they use their dog to augment their own self perception, which is of course, you're not going to get much correlation there.Man, you can just look at like, just to go into pit bull statistics so people can understand how absolutely insane this position is. Pit bulls make up 5. 8 to 6. 6, nice around. Let's say 6 percent of the total dog population in the United States, okay, but they're responsible for 69 percent of fatal dog attacks.Okay. From 2005 to 2019, they killed 346 Americans, which is 6. 5 X higher than the next closest breed. So. 650 percent higher than the next closest dog breed. Which only killed 51 people. And [00:06:00] pit bulls inflict nearly half of 48% of all fatal attacks on infants. Those are babies under 1-year-old, not okay. And from 2015 to 2019, 76% of the fatal attacks on children under nine years old were from pit bulls. Keep in mind, they only make up 66% of the doll population.Mm-Hmm. So you like, well, that's the people who maybe buy pit bulls and blah, blah, blah, blah. Like what? Like, it's very obvious to me. And if you've owned a dog, and this is the other thing that gets really interesting to me in regards to this. When you were talking to this lady, you were like, or you mentioned with somebody who was like, well, try to teach a non Well, yeah, I'll read it.I mean, first someone, James Dog on Twitter Made a very good point saying, if you're concerned that EA, cause she also writes about effective altruism is a crude measure. Perhaps you should be campaigning for researchers to be permitted to access vast existing IQ linked databases, which is something that's being quite restricted right now.But then he continues, alternatively, try teaching a Greyhound to memorize over 1000 distinct commands [00:07:00] and use it to herd sheep. And then Kanchabar comes back in with, OP should, should prove how intelligent these, these breed variations are by raising a pack of Basset hounds and putting them through IPO.She'd lose her mind trying to get them to IPO, probably like a, maybe like an assistance dog training. I don't know. She'd lose her mind just trying to get them to stop sniffing, let alone competing against breeds specifically bred for it. I mean, the thing It's so clear with dog braids. Wait, here I need to talk about like herding dogs, for example.So we, I've always believed that the core difference between dogs is what they're bred for. So I think that dog personalities predominantly, if you're like, what type of dog should I get? You're looking are, are you a ratting dog, a herding dog, a hunting dog, or A fighting dog. I mean, pit bulls are fighting dogs.Let's, Oh yeah, fighting dogs. Like, is it a dog meant to kill other dogs? Yeah. The, the typically in my experience for like what my family [00:08:00] likes, I always go herding dogs and I find herding dogs are fairly similar across herding dogs, but if you've ever had a herding dog, it will be clear to you just how much of their behavior is genetic.So a great example is I grew up with an Australian shepherd. Today we use corgis, which are another type of herding dog. But for, for our family's primary dog. We adopt Corgis. We don't use them. Yes. Australian Shepherds, they it, when it rained when I was a kid because they need to get the sheep to high ground whenever it rains.So they didn't drown. And clearly we didn't teach it to do this. It would nip at all of the family's heels to try to get us upstairs. That is really sweet. And also, yeah, really weird. If you don't believe things are inherited because no one taught this dog to do that. Yeah, no one taught the dog to nip at our feet to try to get us to go upstairs.So where did it get this really specific behavior pattern tied to hurting? And, and you see this yeah, just sort of like across, it's, it's, it's, I mean, it's so wild to me that someone could [00:09:00] think this, but then it gave me this realization, which was something I hadn't realized before, which is that most progressives, I mean, you've got a few crazy ladies like this lady here who are like dog breed differences.Aren't heritable. I mean, she's not crazy. She's the weird thing is that she's. Very sane and reasoned and tempered in most of her analysis. I don't think so. I think you need to basically be an occult to believe this, or have never interacted with dogs. But this is what they I know. Here's the way that I look at it.Like, if we were to frame this from a perspectives point of view, there are lots of Otherwise sane reasoned people who believe in scientific inquiry, but also believe that the earth is flat and the non hereditary and people, the blank slightest, I think are similar. You know, they can, they can engage. I don't think that's true.I think you always want to see the best in people. I think that. A lot of the people who think the earth is flat are generally stupid. I think that people who believe on hereditarianism in dogs are generally just brainwashed [00:10:00] cultists. They are not. Well, and I think the other thing that's notable of course, is that most even blank slate as progressives who insist that no traits behavioral are heritable.Or like, Oh yeah, I'm like, of course you've got a border Collie. They're going to behave this way. I was about to make, which is to say, it made me realize that most progressives do believe in hereditarianism and dogs. Most monoculture does. And the question is why did they believe it there and not in humans?And it is because they have raised and interacted with dogs. It is very hard to miss hereditarianism if you have actually been around young people of a specific species. So what you're saying also is this is a product of the fact that they don't have human children. And I think that's a really good point.I was listening to a podcast called The BCC Club, which is broadly about internet drama when, you know, I run through all my blocked and reported episodes and still need some kind of [00:11:00] Gossip, please. People recommend something better than that. That's about internet gossip that I can listen to as a podcast, but basically the BCC club is two very, very progressive lesbians who talk about internet stuff.And there was one episode where they talk about buying pets online. They talk a lot about dog breeds and behavior and dog DNA. And then, you know, they also frequently talk in their podcasts about the amounts of money that they paid for medical care for their pets and things like that. And they, 100%.Understand and empathize with each other and talk about the, the, the grief that they feel upon losing an animal. And then they, they like literally can't empathize the same way with what it would feel like to lose a human child. And I think really seeing it, I'm seeing exactly what you're talking about here where they can't understand.They can't, they can't even really put it on the same level of their dog, their dog parenting, which is really interesting to me. That, that, that humans wouldn't be as lovable to them as dogs. Because. Well, I think they've still [00:12:00] disconnected from their natural instincts at that point. I mean, they're not sleeping with men.They're not, you know, engaging with people who are interested in like rational discourse more broadly. They have artificially constructed a lifestyle. That masturbates, I think mostly status for them. That seems to be the core thing that they're focused on is individual status was in the urban monoculture, which is achieved through adopting more fringe and modern lifestyle choices which leads to them no longer, I think really identifying, and I'd say they don't really identify as human anymore, but what I really mean by that is it's, they don't identify most human behavior as human anymore.They think they're still human, but when they look at like your average rural American to them, that individual is an animal. And that's what they are thinking about when they are trying to model kids and stuff like that. I don't think that's quite it. I think they're not thinking I just I just don't think they they have that like empathetic basis to work [00:13:00] with they don't their world is their cats and their, their partners, and it's not kids, so they just can't empathize.If you see this in people all the time who have lots of kids, is one of the things I've noticed, like, that most, when I hear people's stories where they became hereditarians and they weren't formerly hereditarians, Yeah. Is after having kids. Yeah. Like, that's the biggest debate in their life. I had kids, and then I realized, eugh.Well, both you and I were, I think, just intuitively from our upbringing, because I think, blank slate theory, if you go through a public school system, or a mainstream private school system, Is, is going to be more or less what's tacitly hammered into you. You can learn about genetics in school, but you're still kind of raised with blank slate theory, I think subconsciously.And so I think you and I came into parenting kind of with a blank slate mindset, and then we're blindsided. By the traits of our children They're just very obviously hereditary. Yeah, even when it's stuff that we've never shown them never [00:14:00] demonstrated They're not picking this up from us. Like we've hid it from them.And still well And the studies on this are incredibly compelling that look at babies. For example young infant Girls, for example, if you're talking about differences between males and females, they will look at an adult much longer like I think like 10 X longer, like dramatically, dramatically longer.They crave social attention than male babies. But if you look between for example, ethnic groups there was a study in like the 1940s on we mentioned it in a different episode, but it looked at Caucasian babies versus East Asian children younger than six months. And if you put a blanket over their heads the Caucasian ones like freak out and we'll rip it off.Where the East Asian ones will just clear a path for themselves to breathe. And it's a very different reaction to this negative stimuli and that you can see this reliably in infants shows that there are some clustered sociological differences. But I mean, again, I think that progressives in the [00:15:00] fact that they have to deny that this is true when it is so obviously true.End up discrediting the claim that they make that their system that they are creating for the world that this urban monoculture can actually be fair if there is any degree of genetic differences between individuals. And this is something that's really made clear to us by one individual who is like.Well, yeah, but if you intergenerationally select for IQ in your kids, and it does work, I mean, what happens if in a few generations, they're much smarter than other people? And it was clear that she didn't have a world framework where humans that are born differently from other humans can safely coexist with other humans.It's like, well, if one group ever did show genuine superiority to another group, they would have like a moral mandate to erase that other group. Or the other group would have a moral mandate to erase it. Like that is genuinely what the urban monoculture believes. because they don't have a system for dealing with genuine diversity.And that is really horrifying. Yikes. [00:16:00] Yeah. Another thing to go into here is the pit bull debate because we got to go into the pit bull debate. Yeah. Here is my thing on pit bulls. Okay. I believe that humanity does have a moral obligation to dogs and cats. Actually, this is. Before I get into the pivotal thing, I need to make one thing clear.We have a moral obligation to dogs and cats that we do not have to other species. Somebody's gonna be like, why would you think that we have a moral obligation to dogs and cats that we don't have to other species? And it's because the partnership that humanity formed with dogs and cats was not a partnership of subjugation.Most of the other species that we have, where we have domesticated them, it was us capturing them and forcing them, they're not, like, cows don't serve us because they wanted to serve us, because at some point, some cow in distant history made the choice to work with humans. That is [00:17:00] not the case for dogs and cats.So we can start with cats, which were actually the later domestication event, and made human civilization possible, period. Okay, why did cats make human civilization possible? Because before cats we couldn't do long term grain storage, which was critical to To the types of bureaucratic infrastructures, it was the distribution and collection of long term grains, i.e. early taxation that allowed, specifically in the Nile in Egypt, that allowed for the first real major civilization to start, which was Egypt. But you couldn't long term maintain grain in these primitive silos because they'd get rat and mice infestations. And so the introduction of cats, which were an obligate carnivore and wouldn't eat the grain, but would eat anything else.There is a reason that the Egyptians worshipped cats. There is a reason they had cat gods, and they mummified cats, and they because cats made their lifestyle and civilization possible in a way that people today do not appreciate. And these cats were [00:18:00] not captured cats. These cats were cats that came and made themselves at home within these grain silos.Okay. And then some Egyptians began to live with cats. But another important thing to note about cats as well is that cats were never fully domesticated. They do not in many categories of domestication count as a fully domesticated animal. Often when cats are living with humans, it is because to an extent they have chosen to live with humans.Now dogs are a different, and I think an animal that we have even more responsibility to than cats. So what I mean by that is if you look at the early domestication events from what we could see about the way that dogs were likely domesticated, is it appears that some canines began to lose the instinct to basically attack and kill humans or fight humans whenever they see them.You know, before they were a social animal and their tribe would be their tribe and our tribe would be our tribe and we would fight and kill each other and hunt each other and we were enemies. But the. The group that made the first [00:19:00] Overture was the dogs, it appears. What they did is some dogs began to hang out around the refuge piles of early humans, and then over time they began to become less afraid of humans, and humans began to integrate dogs, which already had a pre coded, you know, social clan structure in them, into our societies.And it's important to note that our current concept of dogs as pets is likely not the way that they integrated into these groups. They likely integrated as a separate sort of cast, but as an independent cast. And we can see this in some primitive African communities when anthropologists have gone to learn about them.There's this story that I found really interesting where one anthropologist was walking around a settlement and she was talking to a person about their dog. She goes, Oh, your dog. And they go, what do you mean my dog?And they're like your dog. And they're like, I don't know what you mean my dog. And the person was like, well, the dog that sleeps in your house. And they go, Oh, well, yeah, I mean, it sleeps in our house because it chooses to, it could sleep in any house that wanted [00:20:00] to. It's not my dog. And this is likely the way that early Humans to animals, and we even see this in modern times where you will have a town dog or a town cat.When I was in St. Andrews, we had a few of these. Did you have any where you grew up, Simone? Yeah. I mean, I think even in houses where people have domesticated cats, sometimes people like neighbors will start feeding one of those cats and the cats sort of two times families, you know what I mean? And we'll like sleep over at the other person's house and hang out in the other person's house.And. I think animals do that in general. I certainly saw it a lot when I was in Mexico that there would be definitely like ownerless dogs that would just be beach dogs that everyone would feed and kind of take care of and the dogs would sleep wherever, and they were healthy dogs, but no one owned them in particular, but I do find it notable that even in scenarios where humans.own cats where, you know, you can have cats more freely move between houses. If they're outdoor cats, you still see [00:21:00] this, this phenomenon. Well, and it's important to understand why dogs were such a useful partner to our early species. Dogs can help in terms of like their capacity to sense the environment around them.They have like, I think like 15, 000 times our sense of smell. And, and like, I think like 15 X are hearing. So they make humans, they're the first bionic add on to humans. Yes. They were humans first bionic add on. And I'd also note here, another thing that we mentioned when we write about dogs, but people should note this.Is because dogs have been selected for their love of humans. That is one of the things we breed them for. They likely experience an emotion towards us, which is a louder form of love than any love a human is capable of experiencing. Hundred percent. And we've always said, if you really actually, if you want one unconditional love, don't find a partner.Don't just find a dog. Get a kid. Yeah. No, you're only ever going to get unconditional love from a dog. No human can give that to you or should be expected to give it to you, [00:22:00] you know, but with all of this being the case was dogs being a voluntary and useful partner to humanity. I think as we start encountering other species out there in the universe.Or we start building our own other sentient species, and we begin to have to form what is our relationship going to look like with species that are strictly more intelligent than us? And when do we decide, like, where these relationship boundaries go? It's gonna be important to us that we have some voluntary relation with another species that we do not factory farm, et cetera, right?That we treat with a dignity level that is To an extent comparable to human dignity and that is something that I think we should do with dogs. And I also think that we have a moral obligation to, if not have dogs on the spaceships we use to colonize the galaxy, bring their genetics so that they can be recreated when we get to these environments.and potentially even to genetically uplift dogs. It wouldn't be that [00:23:00] hard to do. For example, even with our existing technology, you could give a dog like pox to, and it would likely be able to understand and respond to human speech, not with speech, but with other things much higher than dogs do today from the other experiments that we've seen.I don't know. I feel like this, this may just be social media hokum, but there are definitely people on social media who set up buttons for their dogs that actually seem to be fairly effective. Yeah, but Now the question is, what do I think of pitbulls given how much I think of dogs, right? Okay, yes, yeah, now get into the controversial stuff that lost a ton of followers.I think the previous thing is what everyone's gonna freak out about in the comments. He wants to genetically modify dogs to be smarter? How dare he? No, I'm not saying today, I'm saying eventually, okay? But the, the, this is, this is where things get spicy. I do not think that there is a huge moral negative to neutering the pit bull population for three reasons.One is, [00:24:00] is humans neuter dogs all the time these days? Yeah. Humans who love dogs, neuter dogs all the time. Now humans, humans, neuter humans all the time. Humans neuter themselves all the time. Yeah. But I'm talking about the neutering of another being. Yeah. The non consensual humans should be able to sterilize another human.I don't believe that's morally okay. But should a human be able to sterilize a dog? Absolutely. It's something we do all the time as to why. There shouldn't be a moral problem with humans neutering dogs. If people are wondering, like, why do I have such a different belief around this than humans, it's because dogs breed uncontrollably, which can lead to big problems in regions where they are not neutered.They lead to more aggregate suffering of canines and humans. And so it's strictly and obviously a good thing to do. If humans bred like that then it might make sense to consider sterilizing humans, but humans don't breed like that. So that's not [00:25:00] Well, they don't breed like that anymore. You could argue that there was a time when they did.No, I think it was always an illusion. But the point being is You're probably right, actually. If we lived in a world where if you didn't sterilize humans, humans would exhaust their food supply and eventually start killing each other that changes the moral equation around sterilization. Even and we do live in a world and we've seen this because a lot of cultural groups like well My cultural group lauds dogs.You want to see more about this year episode? Why don't jews own guns? It's one of our best episodes we've ever done. But some groups like jews and muslims for example are pretty anti canine historically and in a modern context and just do not historically own dogs and they're What do these cultures have in common?They were typically urban focused cultures in the middle ages Yeah, what did the fiddler on the roof do? Playwright writer say about dogs if a man owns a dog either that dog is no dog or that Jew is no Jew So [00:26:00] so if people don't know this has been a lot of papers like I sometimes mentioned to like Jewish friends I'm like, you know Jews don't own dogs and they're like What do you mean Jews don't own dogs?I've seen Jewish people with dogs. I'm like, look at the literature. Jews don't own dogs. . And if you look at, and we know this goes back to early settlements because we can look at settlements to the ancient, ancient Israeli period and see that dogs appear very rarely in the Jewish cemeteries.So we can actually see exactly when this cultural practice came about. As to why the practice came about, it was because if you're an urban based population, typically. Like urban specialist cultures are typically very wary of dogs because dogs can become major problems like stray dogs in cities and you don't really need them for anything.Why, if I'm in an urban environment, do I need to be able to hear 15 times, you know, my range and smell 15, 000 percent stronger? If you are a rural person, dogs are critical to your way of life. So rural cultures usually have a much closer relationship with dogs. If you want to get a feeling of, is your family from an urban or rural background?Think, what was your parents perspectives on dogs? [00:27:00] That's the core answer, right? Like, are they seen as a moral necessity, or are they seen as a moral negative and just a waste? But anyway where was I going with this? The pitbull scenario. Okay, so one, neutering. There doesn't appear to be any moral negative to neutering dogs, at least within our society.And I, I, I could see the involuntary neutering of an animal as a moral negative. If there wasn't the sort of gun to our head of, but dogs will just keep breeding until they become a problem to other dogs. Right. So that's one problem. The second problem is, is then why am I okay with neutering pit bulls specifically the, the infant murder machines that they are right.Like again, you've got to keep in mind, dog murder machines, even if you don't like humans, that is where it gets. It gets for me and I just see no way to defend this. Pit bulls were selectively bred for their tendency to kill other dogs. Not for their love of humans, not even for their ability to kill humans.If you love [00:28:00] dogs, you should hate pit bulls. Because even today when we talk about all of the human deaths that result from pit bulls, it is Nothing. It is a drop in the bucket when contrasted with the pet dog deaths that are due to pitbulls.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-1: Pit bulls kill an average of, and this is just in the United States, 8,730 dogs per year. 2,904 cats per year. And 10,250 other pets and livestock per year.In total pit bolts are estimated to kill around 21,886 pets and livestock per year. Pit bulls were responsible for 81% of the animals killed by dogs in a documented attacks over a 10-year period.For attacks on other dogs, specifically 90% were carried out by pit bulls.All you need to do to top. This is neuter pitbulls. If you just neuter pit bulls. You could, within a few years save the lives of around 9,000 dogs per year, 3000 cats per year. The people who [00:29:00] don't do this are genuinely sociopath's.Given how flippantly we neuter dogs for just about anything else.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx): Well, what if you're not a dog lover and you're just an animal lover in general. This report here shows that pit bulls killed 30 times more animals than human crime dead. In fact, it found that pit bulls were 500 times more deadly to other animals and humans. Then all other dog breeds combined.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-2: In fact pit bulls that are rehomed by shelters and rescuers killed more animals than persecuted Setas. Eve you are one of those people who's like, but my dog is so nice to me. And so sweet looking, you come off, like one of those parents of a serial killer, who was like, well, my kid was nice at home.It's like, it doesn't matter. A dog can be the sweetest dog in the world. You know, Every hour of a year, but one where it murders a toddler. That dog was still better off, not existing that year. That's the problem. [00:30:00] If you are not weighing the statistics against your emotional connection with a specific dog.And this statistics are reality.Yeah. In fact, I'd go so far and say that you are probably saving one dog life for every probably hundred pitbulls that are neutered.That seems like a safe bet. Just considering the number of people, I think if you know dog owners, you will probably know. You know, someone who at least knows someone or someone who themselves has had their dog attacked by, not necessarily killed, but attacked by, for sure, a pit bull. YeahMicrophone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-3: so the breed is survey 2019 more puppies, yet fewer homes for pit bulls shows that there are around 4.5 million pit bulls in the United States. If that number is accurate. And if the above numbers are accurate, that means for every 3.86 pit bulls, you neutered, you would save the life of one cat or dog over the next hundred years. So it is neutering. [00:31:00] Less than four pit bulls for the life of every cat or dog you are saving. I just can't understand the moral equation of not neutering for dogs to save the life of one other.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-4: That dog who is going to die has kids who care about it. A family who cares about it. People who love it, just as much as you love your pit bull. And they're not even asking you to put down your pit bull, they're just asking you to neuter it. That is insane. The moral equation at play.and this then gets really interesting, because, well, some pit bull owners will be like, well, But when pit bulls are well raised, they don't do this, and I'm like, then we still need to ban the breed.And people are like, wait, why would you say we still need to ban the breed if it's a problem with the people who are buying them? I'm like, those people shouldn't be buying dogs then! So we need to ban the breed, whatever the desire is that's causing these people to go out and raise them so poorly. And you shouldn't have a breed that when it's raised poorly, Horribly murders other small, innocent dogs.[00:32:00]Okay. I think another problem too is the, one of the big elements of this controversy is the bully XL, which sounds like a uniquely terrifying version of pit bulls, but at least as marketed in some corners as a breed of pit bull that is actually much more docile and friendly. The problem is that even though it looks really, really tough is that, you know, breeding is not an incredibly well regulated.Realm. It's, it's a little kludgy. And so you don't necessarily know if you are getting a docile version, someone could tell you that this pit bull that they're selling to you for between one and 5, 000 or more is a bully XL and is docile and will be super nice to your kids and won't hurt a fly. But you really can't know that for sure.It's not safe. There's a reason that of under one year olds, 48 percent of them that were killed by a dog were killed by a pit bull. You know, that's mostly the dog owner's own children. Or children that they are [00:33:00] babysitting. Like, that is horrifying that we are allowing this to happen. These are infant Murder machines.These are toddler killing machines. That is what they do. And again, I should note here that even if the owners, and this is what really gets me with the pitbull owners, they'll go out and when people are like, look, we really shouldn't allow, like we need to, and I'm not saying we should kill pitbulls, just saying we should neuter pitbulls.When they're like, Oh, Presumably make their sale and breeding illegal. Yeah. How dare you do this because we, we like pit bulls because they're so sweet and kind. And it's like, yeah, but I can look at the ads of the pit bull breeders and I can see that functionally that's not the case. The high value pit bulls are being sold because of their adjacency to savagery.And some of like pit bull ads here.They're like, This is, this is like King Cyrus, the murder machine. He can murder 10 infants in a day. No, they won't. They won't, obviously they don't mention the infant murder, but they just, you know, mention how tough and strong and savage they are [00:34:00] because individuals who buy them are using them to modify their own self image often.That is why they will buy dogs. And this is where I'm like, okay, well maybe these people are actually of this category of it's the. It's the owner's fault because they are buying a dog. They want to make them appear like a savage, tough individual. And so they are training it to be savage and tough.Fine. Doesn't change the fact that we shouldn't have this breed. Right. When you consider that you are literally like how many dog neuters is a human child not being horribly savaged worth, right? Like I just don't understand the moral equivalency here when you could get another kind of dog. Yeah, and that's the thing is there are so many amazing dog breeds out there and dog breeds that are super tough, too.Yeah. You just, there are lots of hunting dogs out there. There are lion killers. You could get a Rhodesian Ridgeback. You could get all sorts of very interesting and, and tough and [00:35:00] protective, but also sweet dogs. This is not going to be a challenge for you. It just seems so unambiguous that pit bulls are a step too far.Yeah. Very polarizing. We're definitely going to lose followers. I think this is a lot like, Korean K pop stans and Taylor Swift fans. No, no, no, no. Here, if we have somebody who disagrees with us on this, I, I need them to answer a question. Okay? So, let's, let's deal with it. Let's bring the numbers down a bit.Yeah. So that they can understand, would they neuter one Pitbull if it saved the life of one child? And from being horribly, horribly murdered, a toddler, a three year old, horribly murdered. And then I say, okay, they're like, well, of course I neuter one pitbull if it did that. People neuter pitbulls all the time, right?You know, for different reasons. I say, well, would you neuter ten pitbulls? To save the life of one child, one toddler. I'm like, what number, what's the number that's too high for you? What's the number of pit bulls to save the life of a three year [00:36:00] old that is too high for you? Because categorically by the data, you can save a lot of individual toddler lives by doing this and other dog lives, right?Like at what, what, what about another dog? So I want two numbers here. How many pit bulls need to be neutered for the life of another dog that was horribly. Mutilated. Yeah. And how many for a toddler? And if you're just like, not, I wouldn't even neuter one pit bull for one child. Then we don't want you as a follower.I guess that's Yeah, like, you, you're, there's seriously something wrong in your ethical equations of reality, given that people neuter pit bulls all the time. Get out of my pocket! It's general population control. You can see the door, walk through it. Okay, I get you. And that's, that's entirely fair. Because I, I, I need to know how they are internally constructing this argument.Because what they do is they do, do redirect the argument. They're like, well, it's not the dog's fault. It's the owner's fault. Yeah. Or, or, well, then you should accept bully, bullies [00:37:00] XL because. They, they're docile. But then, you know, how do you differentiate? But then the question is, is then why aren't you campaigning?If you want the bully excels to be the thing, then you need a better system for determining which ones are the bully excels and you need to work on a breeding program to make them more docile and you more than anyone should want to get rid of these other pit bulls that are giving the bully excels a bad name.But you don't do this. I don't see the people defending Bully xls saying, but of course we need to neuter the other pit bulls. They're just, they, they're just trying to redirect attention. It's like, well, we need to neuter pit bulls. And they're like, well, but what about Bully xls? Yeah. Or it's, well, what about the bad owners?Or this whole thing is, I think. More largely, it reminds me of arguments around abortion. It reminds me of arguments around immigration. I think that, that we have as a society become at all. Really? No, I know. Hear me out here. I think people have come to a way of dealing with ideas where it's [00:38:00] no longer about the facts.It's about once you've established your side. Your goal is to defend your mind from any ideas that are offensive to it. And that is an outcropping of progressives. Really? Okay, why? I think that that is something that happens, however, I think that if you are talking about immigration, or you are talking about abortion, abortion, there are genuine, well intentioned people with logically sound structures for arguing on both sides of these topics.I have my own positions on these topics. But I think that there are individuals who seriously listen to all the evidence and have seriously thought through like different positions who genuinely fall on either side of this issue. I do not believe there is a single well intentioned person who has really thought through All of the arguments on the we should not neuter pitbull side of this argument.I do not think that there is a logical structure when you consider how [00:39:00] lightly neutering is treated in our society for not neutering pitbulls. And I will tell you the best argument for not neutering pitbulls. And then I will tell you why it doesn't even work. The single best argument that you can create for not neutering pitbulls is the don't take my gun argument.That is to say, Well, yes, I agree that I want a pit bull instead of another dog because of the effect that the pit bull has on my personal self identity. Right? Mm-Hmm. . Like I'm, I, I need it to be who I am is a deadly weapon. Yeah. And it may be a deadly weapon, but Americans are, should be allowed to own deadly weapons.Mm-Hmm. , right? Mm-Hmm. . And we argue that. Here's the problem. Okay? A pit bull is closer to an autonomous AI with guns set up on it. That is, that is trained to, in some instances, kill people. Do you think humans should be allowed to own kill bo, like kill drones? That. And, and I actually, I'd [00:40:00] even go so far as to say humans should be allowed to own kill drones.But I don't think they should be allowed to own kill drones that are constantly circling their house and sometimes randomly shoot people. That's where I'd be like, obviously a human should not be allowed to own that. Are you insane? Well, or, or kill drones with any any track record. of being a public safety threat, which is to say if a kill drone were to attack civilians or civilians fill a pets, obviously those would be considered extremely dangerous and unpredictable pieces of technology that would be immediately banned.And yet, when this happens with dogs, for some reason, it's not banned with, you know, intensity. You're absolutely right. Yeah. And this is a, but there's the secondary reason, which is to say, I don't defend people's right to keep guns because of how guns positively augment their self image. I defend that right for two core reasons, one is that in certain parts of America, [00:41:00] guns are necessary for self defense.If you were in an extremely rural area where it takes 30 minutes for the cops to get to your house or an hour for the cops to get to your house, you need guns. I'm sorry. Well, but also, you know, guns are sort of what prevent. Takeovers of, but that's the other core reason is that guns are a part of our checks and balances system in the United States.And people are like, no, do, do guns really help in like a drone fight? Do guns really help? Like if the U S military wanted to take over and it's like, absolutely. Yes. We, we, if you even look at like, Hamas's raid in Israel, if more of these families had been armed and the families that were armed had a very easy time fighting them off.The, the core reason they got hit so bad was just the Jewish cultural predilection to not own guns at high rates. Another really interesting thing about these raids that a lot of people don't know is the settlements that really got brutalized were not the conservative religious settlements. They were mostly spared.It was the loosey goosey. Kibbutzes that were sort of like [00:42:00] hippie nonsense. Like, let's get along with them. It was like the peace concert that ended up getting absolutely massacred where nobody had guns. It was not the groups that were like, Hey, we need to be worried about these people.We really need to, you know, be harsher in these scenarios that had to deal with, with that much bloodshed because they understood the risk and they were armed. So that's important to note as well. There are externalities to guns that don't exist with pitbulls. If you can explain to me an externality that can be resolved by a pitbull that either makes you safer as a citizen.Okay. Or that makes us safer from like a democratic standpoint. I will take that argument as well. I just haven't heard one. A pit bull is genuinely differentially not better in a military context than a Rottweiler, which already exists. Like why are you using a pit bull and not a Rottweiler if you're using it for fighting humans?Pit bulls are just toddler murder machines. They're not really useful for [00:43:00] anything else. They're useful for that in killing dogs. Horribly. Horrifically. Anyway, any other thoughts?Nope. We like dogs. We'll take dogs to space. But, yeah. We, we, we only, I think, you know what? Actually, this is very similar to our cultural viewpoint. Which is that we We ultimately support pluralism and human groups that play nice with other human groups. And if you can't play nice then we have no interest.That's actually a really good point is people wonder why we're both so pluralistic, but so quick to turn our back on any group that just attacks another group and say, okay, they lost their right to exist. But that's the way that we play more broadly. Yeah, I am okay with pluralism, but if you run out and attack your neighbors the pluralistic protection that I culturally believe that every human has a right to is immediately revoked from your group.We support human flourishing insofar as you do, you [00:44:00] are not a net drag on human flourishing.And we promote dog flourishing insofar as it is not a net drag on dog flourishing. And it would seem that pit bulls. are broadly a net drag on canine flourishing, so. Love you to death, Simone. You are so special and amazing.I love you so much. I just got a call from George. Can you call him back to see what he wanted? I'll call him. Would you mind getting the kids? Yes, and I'll bring my food down and make you some fried rice tonight with oyster sauce. Will do. An egg or no egg? Egg, please. We've got chicken for a reason. Spring onions, but no vegetables?I'd actually love it if you put in some other vegetables. I got like a frozen vegetable pack that could be good for a stir fry that would go pretty well with fried rice. Okay, I'll see what I can do there. That's what I got it for. You know, it's got like baby corn and yeah. All right, we'll give it a try.Love you. Love you, too. I'll call him.Speaker: What? It's impossible. [00:45:00] Yes. Oh my gosh, it's a heart. Wow. You can come sit with me. That was the best thing ever. Yay! Bye! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

Explore a provocative theory suggesting the core of civilization stems from a singular lineage rooted in ancient Rome. The discussion contrasts Roman advancements with those of other cultures, highlighting the impact of geography on architectural brilliance. Delve into the literary evolution across civilizations, comparing the complexity of Western works to those of the East. The hosts tackle the decline of cultures post-Rome, questioning environmental determinism, and stress the significance of cultural diversity and competition in fostering intellectual progress.

Join us as we delve into the multifaceted legacy of Shinzo Abe, Japan's longest-serving Prime Minister. This video explores Abe's significant political impact through his pronatalist policies, military reforms, and deep ties to the Unification Church. We'll analyze his efforts to foster women's participation in the workforce, reinterpret Japan's pacifist constitution, and strengthen alliances through the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue. Additionally, we discuss Abe's influence on Japanese media and culture, including anime. The video also covers Abe's relationship with Donald Trump, the complex history with the Unification Church, and the circumstances surrounding his assassination. Engaging and insightful, this is a comprehensive look at Shinzo Abe's celebrated and criticized legacy.Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Simone! Today occasionally I will go down a rabbit hole and I'll be like, this is something I really wish I could find a good succinct video on because now it's a topic that interests me.And this topic is The Harambee of pronatalism, Shinzo Abe. I have just seen so many pronatalist Shinzo Abe memes of him trying to promote fertility. And then after the recent thing happened, which we'll go into where people in Japan became convinced that Shinzo Abe from the dead had told Trump to move to avoid being assassinated.And it's just amazing. So first I'm going to bring the audience along with me. On a journey through some memes about Shinzo Abe. Then we're going to go into who he actually was, like what did he accomplish in his life? How pronatalist was he really? And then we're going to go into the assassination.And then we're going to go into the, what [00:01:00] led to the assassination.Simone Collins: All right,Malcolm Collins: then. So we're starting with meme number one of Shinzo Abe here, which is him holding a gun out. And what does it say, Simone?Simone Collins: . It says, stop watching VTubers, you stinky neets. Do your duty, have sex. I'm no longer asking. IMalcolm Collins: love this.The next one I love, and this is something that as I first started, like, going into Shinzo Abe, I really realized how well liked he was within like, meme community. So here's one that's a political compass that shows a former Former Japanese PM Shinzo Abe shot dead, and it shows people on all sides of the political compass sad about this, but then the next political compass one, which I think is more true, shows everybody horrified except for the authoritarian lefties who are Hooray, death to Japan.I'm coming. It says, and it shows from China News, like from one of their main sources. And all of the, you know, far, far [00:02:00] commies, they're being like you know, don't be stunned, celebrate stuff like that. So horrified. But I think what this shows is that the only people who were really happy that he died were the Was the crazy like pro china people which again if you're not pro china should make you love him even more And this was something that a lot of people were saying the analysis of him that made me want to learn more about him Is that one longest serving pm in the history?I think of japan so very very popular person and people were like they don't understand like Japan losing him and some of the analysis I saw they said could significantly hurt the country because he was so effective at everything he did. For the next meme here this takes place in the friend universe.And it starts with the character sayingElves may live a long time. Oh, that's good! But across the board, we lack romantic feelings and reproductive instincts.Wait, hold on.We're quietly going extinct.Huh?Last time [00:03:00] I met a fellow elf was more than 400 years ago.Sigh.Perhaps we're closer to the end than I thought.We're too late this time. You doing a girl voice, by the way, is so out of character for you. Here, do the next meme.Simone Collins: Well, I read that a boy and a girl can create new life by joining their bodies together. Can create new life by joining their bodies togetherMalcolm Collins: She'sSimone Collins: likeyes It'sMalcolm Collins: korobo and mitsubo are having their fourth and then it shows senzuabe My job here is done. And then this is one of my favorite where this was after the assassination and it shows a picture of like the scenery of Japan with Shinzo Abe's face fading out.And it just says have sex in big letters. And then on the, the, the bottom, right. It says see you space cowboy,Simone Collins: which was the outro from cowboy bebop.Malcolm Collins: Yes, which was really got to [00:04:00] me So now I'm going to talk a bit about the the really funny thing that happened. Well, not funny, but I guess touching and there's memes about like women, like I cry at the Titanic men don't cry over anything.And it shows the band like crying over memes of Shinzo Abe protecting Trump from the assassination. But this makes sense. They were, they did have a very, very strong relationship and we'll get into why this was the case in just a second.Simone Collins: IMalcolm Collins: don't know. But here in a Japanese Twitter post, it says during his speech, Trump heard Shinzo Abe's voice calling him to attention in his ear.When he tilted his head to listen to the voice, he heard the sound of a bullet cutting through the air and the bullet penetrated Trump's right ear. And he heard a gunshot. If Trump had not tried to listen to Abe's voice, he would have been killed by the bullet. And for people who are like, wait, why would a lot of people in Japan actually believe this?Well, a big group of that liked Shinzo Abe was extremist Christians, specifically the Unification Church, specifically the Moonies, who would have believed something like this was possible. And people were memeing about this in the [00:05:00] West, and they thought it was serious. Well, apparently that wasSimone Collins: why Shinzo Abe was shot, right?It was this, the guy who shot him was Yeah, it was the Unification Church. It was against the church. And IMalcolm Collins: mean, in light of all these memes, you can think, Oh, these memes are so silly, etc. One of my favorites has always been the what I watched, which it shows Franks and it goes what I expected, which is Gurren Lagann and then it's a gif of what I got.It's Shinzo Abe's face pointing at the screen and occasionally it flashes, have sex.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-1: My very favorite Shinzo, Abe meme. I found after we recorded this episode.It shows a post from our Reddit, which is verse the patriarchy,some other witches have mentioned that doing spells directly against Trump are not as effective as we might hope. And he seems to have some kind of protection around him. And then they brought quote, unquote, some kind of protection around him and it shows Cynthia Bobby's face in the background.Malcolm Collins: And here's a great one, which is a political compass one, which shows why Shinzo Abe was so well liked [00:06:00] show. It shows you know, people being shocked at his death and it shows people at every side of the political compass sad, but shows why they're sad.So the authoritarian left, he oversaw 15 percent real increase in minimum wage while dropping unemployment to under 3%. That was left the authoritarian. righty authoritarian. He worked to ensure Japan could stand with America and protect democracy in Taiwan when the day comes. And then because he rebuilt Japan's military and then at the libertarian right, it just shows the economy going up under his leadership.And then in the Libertarian left. It shows his policies open the door to ensure millions of women were able to join the workforce. And I just think that that's really cool. This, this guy who is so universally liked and I wanted to understand, and I will say that when I dug on him deeper, I didn't necessarily come away universally liking him.Interesting. Well,Simone Collins: that's what I was just going to ask you. Was he universally liked because he was shot because he was assassinated? No,Malcolm Collins: it was universally liked before that, [00:07:00] but unfortunately his reputation took a hit in the investigation of the person who shot him. Because the person who shot him had, he didn't have no point.He should, heSimone Collins: should have written a sternly worded letter, you're saying, maybe aMalcolm Collins: sternly worded letter, but Shinzo Abe may have facilitated a cult that destroyed a lot of people's lives and used the cult to stay in power, really. Yes. Now whether you consider it a cult or a religion, I mean, it could be like people saying, well, you guys do the same with like, I don't know, you know, being overly positive about Mormons, people who are like really anti Mormon and think of it as a cult,and I'd be like, one, I don't think we're that overly positive Mormon, but like if they became like a major voting block for us and we were running and then they blamed us, like I could see, I don't know. Because I don't think the, the unification church is a much more culty cult than the, the Mormons, but we'll get into them in a second.Simone Collins: Yeah, well then it would have to be if Tom Cruise was president, but then someone assassinated him because, you know, [00:08:00]Malcolm Collins: Well, he wasn't in the unification church.Simone Collins: I know. Oh, he wasn't. Oh, okay. TheMalcolm Collins: unification church. Okay. So I'll go quickly into this right now,Simone Collins: please. Yes. I don't know this beforeMalcolm Collins: he was ever in his party, actually during the age of his dad who helped the unification church a lot, get established in Japan.They began South Korean, right? Yeah. Which is a South Korean. cult or religion. They began to help the party a lot with local organizational stuff. And when he took over the party, he didn't like clear them out of the party and they still had a big role in helping with, you know, like flyers and door knocking and all of that in a very, very big way.And people think that the party wouldn't have as much power as they had if they didn't have this free resource of humanSimone Collins: labor. Hmm.Malcolm Collins: Okay. So his pronatalist initiatives. So womanomics in 2013, Abe called for a society in which all women can shine, setting a target that 30 percent of leadership positions should be held by women by [00:09:00] 2020.This was a conservative, by the way. This policy aimed to increase women's participation in the workforce, which Abe believed could potentially improve both Japan's GDP and fertility rate. And so, right away, when we've gone into other countries fertility rates, and we've, like, laughed at their, like, extended maternity leave and stuff like that.And he's like, get them to work! This is the first time I've heard one where I'm, like, one, counterintuitive, and two, probably right. And I will note, what is Shinzo Abe's legacy? The by far highest fertility rate in the region is Japan. So I mean, he was kind of right. Yeah. Women working does help fertility rates.Childcare expansion, Abe planned to spend 2 trillion yen, approximately 17. 6 billion on education and child care. This included promises of free preschool for children aged 3 to 5, free child care for children aged 2 and younger from low income households. He did labor reforms.He attempted to break down Japan's two tier employment system, which often excluded temporary workers [00:10:00] from the regular workforce. These reforms were aimed at creating a more flexible labor market that could better accommodate working parents. And then Abenomics and Abenomics 2. 0 in September, 2015. The first one is called Abenomics.This is Abenomics 2. 0. ABE announced an updated platform that centered on raising the birth rate and expanding social security. This included creating new cabinet positions dedicated to reversing Japanese demographic declineSimone Collins: Abe, huh?Malcolm Collins: Now, a lot of people think that he sponsored anime that had pronatalist themes. Right. And I haveSimone Collins: wondered that, when we've watched recently released anime, I don't know if you only watch pronatalist anime shows? No, I mean, the studioMalcolm Collins: that did, for example, Frank's, which is seen as having hugely pronatalist message,Speaker: Yeah, I'm gonna find another female partner. Fine then! What?! You think in the real world your perfect girl will just come falling out of the sky Hey, you. Wanna help me bang this robot? You mean pilot this robot? I know what I said.Speaker 2: Never! Time to fight [00:11:00] some monsters! So no one besides me thinks this control scheme's a bit weird. Why would anything about this be weird? Now spank me hard and I'll shout out Daddy to get the engine started. Does anyone not have a partner to ride? Fair enough. You see, I've always thought of you as a brother.You mean like the normal kind or the anime kind? The anime kind. Aw, eww, eww! Don't you have anyone else that likes you anyway? Well, now that you mention it I do! I wanna make a baby! Uh, how do we do the That was amazing! Yeah! What's child support? I'd like to declare that we're getting married! BAKAKAKAKAKAMalcolm Collins: is also the studio that did Gurren Lagann, which came out a long time before anyone was freaking out about demographic collapse.And Gurren Lagann's very antinatalist. Or at least an anti But,Simone Collins: wasn't, I mean, GurrenMalcolm Collins: Lagann was Well, that was Gurren Lagann talking about it with the same team.Simone Collins: Yeah, well, no, yeah, Gurren Lagann is, yeah, but no, sorry, but they were [00:12:00] also sorry, they were also Evangelion, which is Antinatalist, and Evangelion was pre Abe.I think Gurren Lagann, did that overlap with Shinzo Abe? That was pre Abe.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx): So I was rolling on this one, Shinzo RV. First served as prime minister of Japan in 2006 to 2007. Then again from 2012 to 2020, well, his 2006 to 2007 run, that is when Garan log-in was released. Garan log-in was released in 2007. Not that there is any chance that he influenced its development, but,Yes, the motor was right on this one, weirdly.Malcolm Collins: Gurren Lagann is old and then they did a, um, like other, you know, pronatalist anime that I've shown on here, like the one about old people and stuff like that. It's not that the Japanese government never sponsors anime or manga, but they're typically one off projects and not full series.And it was doing that before Abe and it doesn't appear that there's any documented evidence of like super pronatalist stuff being pushed. It appears that most of the pronatalist anime was just created because people love their country and love [00:13:00] their culture. And I think that that shows in part why Japan has been more resistant to fertility collapse than other countries in the region.Is that there's just much more pride in the Japanese identity than there is, um You know, and ask somebody who spent time in Japan and Korea, for example, there is simply more pride in the Japanese identity than there is in the Korean identity. And I suspect it's you know, people just pushing this into their own media in an attempt to save their culture.And I think it's sad that we don't see more of this in U. S. Media. But I think it's because in U. S. Media there's Very few actual conservatives because the far left in the urban monoculture sort of acts as a cabal, keeping them out of positions, whereas in Japan you don't have the same extent of conservatives just not appearing in media, which didn't used to be as extreme in the U.S. as it is today. Now let's talk about other big things he did. Constitutional reinterpretation in 2014, Abe's government reinterpreted Article 9 of Japan's pacifist [00:14:00] constitution to allow for collectivist self defense, enabling Japan to come to the aid of its allies under attack. Now, this is really big.He really, really began to turn Japan into a military power again, to put it on a military footing. And I think that as an American, this is something I am really glad that he did because he also pretty much unilaterally rebuilt quad or the quadrilateral, quadrilateral. Security dialogue which is an alliance between Japan, U.S. India and Australia. And if you're wondering who would those four countries be allied against specifically, this would be against China. They really only kick into action against China, but it would be incredibly damaging to China. Especially if you had the U. S. and Japan plus Australia and India involved in any sort of a boycott because China imports around.I think it last I checked was 83 percent of their energy needs and something like 86 percent of that is coming through the Strait of [00:15:00] Malacca, which basically means past India. So like there's very little they could do. They could take it into the deep ocean, but then they need to go all the way around Australia.But if you go all the way around Australia well now you need to get through the island chain that Japan and the U. S. control. So there's really no way to supply China by water if there was ever a blockade and the Quadrilateral Alliance was at play. And he increased military spending to one to 2 percent of GDP.And he also pushed through controversial security laws that allowed the Japanese self defense force to deploy overseas and engage in combat to defend allies when it used to be defense only. And the ally in contest here is very obviously Taiwan. Any thoughts before I go further? Simone, will you like this guy so far, or he's sounding.Simone Collins: I mean, for any elected politician, he sounds pretty solid. And also, just the fact that he made some pretty meaningful changes, too.Malcolm Collins: MmSimone Collins: hmm.Malcolm Collins: No, he's a I mean, in terms of He's a man of action. Yeah, he's one of those characters where, like, the way he got elected may have been [00:16:00] shady. But as a politician, he was God tier and really only did good.A good example of this in the United States would be Nixon. And Nixon is generally considered one of the best presidents in American history by people who like know their presidential history stuff. Building our current relationship with China and building. Globalization was really important in securing peace and making America as prosperous today as it is,However you know, he did cheat intellectual cycle.Well, basically cheated. And to give you an idea of how well like Nixon is in the U. S. Stephen Colbert, you know, far lefty Stephen Colbert. He said that out of all American presidents, Nixon is his favorite. So that should show you that he really does appeal across the aisle. So another thing to note here is he did a very good job building a relationship with Trump.And he had a close personal friendship with Trump from what we've seen, you know, with Trump saying after he died, something along the lines of, No one will ever [00:17:00] understand how much Japan has lost, you know, with Abe's passing. You know, like, he knew more from his position to know just how important he was, which is probably true.From the position of President of the U. S., you have more information than other people have.Simone Collins: Well, but I think Abe also demonstrated the first time Trump Flew out to have a major meeting with him, just how much he wanted to invest in a good relationship with Trump. And that, what did they do? First thing after they land, go golfing.What did they do? They eat American beef burgers. They, he had special hats made, played on the make America great again, slogan, but it had something to do with like their partnership. Yes.Malcolm Collins: And he gave Trump a golf cart. That was the gift that he gave to him. And he was the first person to call Trump of world leaders.And I'll, I'll be a parent to genuinely like golfing as well. So, you know, Trump always loves just golfing all the time.Simone Collins: Like Trump really works well for the Japanese mindset. [00:18:00] Cause he's a larger than life character and they really like characters that, that ham, you know, what's that? What, how do you use the term?Oh,Malcolm Collins: I love it. He also gave Trump a gold colored driver. That's perfect. Let's see. He getsSimone Collins: it. It's Trump. And he, he, he spoke with Trump and Trump words. And that is.Malcolm Collins: And he kept the meetings private, which was another thing that he did to build. People were always trying to like Trump's foreign policy team was always trying to protect him from forming too close a personal relationship with people because that's what he would always go for.He'd get their personal phone numbers. He just called them up. Yeah. Yeah. And H. R.Simone Collins: McMaster's biography or autobiography keeps talking about how Trump would say things like, stop by the White House and everyone's freaking out like, no, no, no, that doesn't mean you've just received an official foreign like visit invite.And he'd be like, here's my number. Like he'd just give people his cell phone number and they'd stop by. Freak out about that too, because they needed to monitor all the calls or something.Malcolm Collins: He also didn't, one of the interesting things is, you know, how Trump loved trying to play like hard mall with these deals [00:19:00] that he would make with countries.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: Japan didn't really push back and basically took one of Trump's like fairly one sided deals to flatter his ego, which was probably the right thing to do. It's also soSimone Collins: Japanese. Like it is the proper thing to do at this point, you know, out of courtesy, we will do this.Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, I think it showed an understanding of Japan's relation with the United States today and the importance on having it be incredibly strong.And that is what he was able to accomplish.Now the downside was Trump is one of Shinzo Abe's things was the TPP and Trump did still torpedo that. So he wasn't like always going along with what Abe wanted, but broadly speaking, Oh, by the way, for people who don't know my thoughts on the TPP. I actually think Trump's torpedoing the TPP turned out for the best, and a lot of people are very surprised by this.Because they're like, oh no, it was an Obama era thing that could have like, built this great relationship and caused us to be an economic superpower [00:20:00] in the region. But it was very, very, very heavy handed. It was justSimone Collins: bloated regulation or something. And what was it? Yeah.Malcolm Collins: IP regulations. A lot of it was like Hollywood lobbying to try to make the IP regulations super strong around pirated stuff and things like that.And it led to something that could have, so let's. See, because we do know what happened to post TPP blowing up and we can talk about what ended up happening in the region post TTPP blowing up China at first looked like they had gained all of the strings. They started really forming a tight relationship with the Philippines.They started really forming fixing relationships with Vietnam. They started. Really expanding their influence. Well, then what happened? Because the U. S. wasn't there to act as a counter influence, China immediately began to overplay their hand massively and began to really push this nine dot line thing.Basically just claiming huge, huge swaths of territory from like the Philippines and [00:21:00] Vietnam. And All of the people who they had just made friends with and then began to basically threaten Taiwan. Well, what did this do? Is it basically pissed off that basically because we didn't have this economic fenced in area in the region, China immediately overplayed their hand and turned, the Philippines right now has an extremely pro US head, who grew up in Hawaii.You know, Vietnam is becoming increasingly pro us to the point where both countries, I guess you could say are basically in our pocket at this point. Same was the only country they've really made any headway was this maybe South Korea, but not even really there in Japan has become increasingly pro us because they don't like the moves that China is making around Taiwan.Basically, It ended up making the entire geopolitical region extremely strong allies of the United States from goading China into overplaying their hand with economic sanctions and land grabs. [00:22:00] But I, I think that here you see like with the Trump thing, just an incredible amount of strategy and charisma in terms of building the relations he needed to build.Now let's talk about the assassination because this is something, anything you want to talk about before we get to the assassination.Simone Collins: No, let's dive into it.Malcolm Collins: Shinzo Abe was shot twice from behind with a homemade shotgun while giving a campaign speech near Yamato Saidaijya Station, Nara, Japan. The attack occurred around 11.30, hitting Abe in the chest and neck. Despite being rushed to a local hospital, Abe was pronounced dead at five, five o'clock, just five hours after the shooting. So the gun that was used was like a homemade thing that somebody, he learned to put together actually from YouTube videos. And people said even somebody without a lot of knowledge could learn to make one of these.It used a battery for the ignition and some wires attached to the battery. And then 2 tubes for the barrels and likely some sort of. bought propellant [00:23:00] in the region or something like that. It was all over the table, showing the factlessness of laws against guns and, and the complacency it can cause.The suspect, the shooter identified as Tetsu Yamanagi was immediately arrested at the scene. Yamanagi is a 41 year old former member of the Maritime Self Defense Force, admitted to shooting after his arrest. He was formally charged with the murder, violating gun control laws. And motive his motive was that his mom had donated tons of money to the Moonies or the Unification Church.And this led to his family being in poverty and his brothers unaliving himself. He blamed all this. Well, I mean, cults could do this. They can be incredibly like, we're going to take all your money. We're going to take everything you own. We don't care about you at all. Sure. The moonies as a community are kind of known for that in the United States, by the way, if you don't know who the moonies are, if you've ever seen a cult in like a 70s movie or stereotype where everybody went to work at a plantation [00:24:00] and then was like tricked and kept hostage.Those were moonies. That was what the moonies were famous for. was these big plantations were like yuppie college kids would go thinking like, Oh, I'm going to learn to live off the land. And then they'd spend a extremely long hours working fields. They would be sleep deprived and when they were doing that, they were exposed to constant messaging.Wow. Are you, are you familiar with these cults? Like, did you hear about them or?Simone Collins: I'm not, I think in media I've seen references to creepy cults that involve agricultural work, but I didn't know that was a Mooney's thing. So yeah,Malcolm Collins: they don't do that as much anymore. They do other things now, but there is still an incredibly high demand religion.The unification church's relationship with the Japanese conservative politicians dates back to the 1960s when Abe's grandfather, sorry, I said, dad, grandfather, former prime minister Naboke Kisha helped the church establish itself in Japan. This connection was based on shared anti communist ideologies during the cold war.The Unification Church provided [00:25:00] valuable political support to LDP politicians, this was the party of Abe, dispatching believers to volunteer in election campaigns, mediating organizational votes for LDP candidates, and providing a volunteer army of campaign workers. In return, many LDP lawmakers, including Abe, gave speeches at church meetings and related organizations, effectively acting as promoters of the church.The scale of the church's influence in Japanese politics was revealed on a After Abe's assassination, almost half of the LDP's 379 diet members, Congress members basically, admitted to some form of contact with the Unification Church. At least 180 of 379 LDP lawmakers in Japan's national diet were found to have ties with the church.23 of 54 members appointed as vice ministers and parliamentary secretaries in second Kishida cabinet had connections to the church. So 23 out of 53.So,Yamaniga alluded to the assassination before the incident posting on his blog, [00:26:00] Mr. Abe was one of the most influential unification church sympathizers.And yeah. Now, what about Abe's role? Abe was alleged to have overseen LDP's relationship with the Unification Church, using it to help the party win office and yeah.Simone Collins: That just sounds like they were a major donor block and he treated them like he would treat any other major donor block.What's shady here? That'sMalcolm Collins: basically, I don't feel like he did anything wrong. Like, even as a politician, would I have done that? If a religion, like, suppose, like, Jehovah's Witnesses. I think Jehovah's Witnesses do some shady things, but like, if I became the presidential candidate for like the US Republican Party and the Jehovah's Witnesses were like always behind me a hundred percent, am I going to advocate for their policy positions?Yeah. I mean, that's called a democracy, right?Simone Collins: Well, but yeah, that's what happens with politicians and unions, with politicians and corporations, with politicians and any big supporter. That's,Malcolm Collins: Absolutely. Yeah. And people think that they might be influencing the [00:27:00] policy that his government did, specifically that Japanese still hasn't legalized same sex marriage could be downstream of this church.But I mean, come on, the Mormons have pushed for that in the U. S. for a long time, right? Like, And I don't think that somebody deserves to be assassinated over that. And the church's name change to the family federation for world peace and unification in 2015 was approved by the government during Abe's tenure.And this is why, by the way, it was our nameSimone Collins: change. Wait, why is that notable?Malcolm Collins: Oh, I think a normal government would have said, we're not going to call you the organization for world peace and unification. But I think that also when people look at our religious, beliefs in the unique religion we're creating.One of the things I really appreciate about it is that it isn't pro unification, unification which sounds really nice on paper, world peace and unification, you know, the Baha'is are also about this and they think that like we have similarities to them. I'm like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,Simone Collins: no, no, no, no, no no, I just think of unity from freaking Morty unification is not.Malcolm Collins: [00:28:00] It's not a goodSimone Collins: thing.Speaker 8: Where I was better able to focus on my passion for unification. You mean stealing people's bodies? Summer, rude. , this world will be invited into the Galactic Federation. . From there I'll have access to countless planets and species. One by one, I will unify them. And I will be what the single minded once called a god. Oh, that's pretty sexy. Where can we get a drink around here? Recreational substances were phased out here. There's no need for escape from the self when your world is one. Unity, unity, who am I talking to?Simone Collins: No, it's not. It's a creepy thing. It's a pod person thing. It's a homogenizing thing. We do not want. But,Malcolm Collins: but I will say that also if I get myself in the mind of the, the Moonies acid, right? So think about him, you know, you grow up, your brother has unalives themselves, your family grew up in poverty.You feel like they were scammed out of everything. And who do you blame the most? You know that the Unification [00:29:00] Church played a large role in this. You can ask, well, who has done the most to aid the Unification Church's agenda in the country?Simone Collins: Hardly, though, no.Malcolm Collins: He needs toSimone Collins: blame the members of the church who give the church the money, who donate to political campaigns.No, this is in the hands of the, of the church itself.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I would agree with that. HeSimone Collins: made a wrong, he shot the wrong guy. Abe should be with us here today.Malcolm Collins: Very sad very much Harambe situation of pronatalism. I really like that he has been seen as sort of the face of pronatalism because the, the memes are really sweet, I would say, like, they do a good job of conveying a positive sentiment in a way where, like, suppose we became the meme face of pronatalism.We're known as, like, the pronatalist people who speak on the topic all the time, but we've never had many memes of us. around perinatalism. And I really appreciate that because [00:30:00] I think they'd come off like the Eliezer memes around AI apocalypticism. Are thereSimone Collins: Eliezer memes around?Malcolm Collins: They just make the movement look like deranged to like a bunch of fat neckbeards.Whereas Abe comes across as very sincere and worried about his people.Simone Collins: That's how they chose to frame them. They could have framed him very differently, but they chose to frame him that way.Malcolm Collins: Any final thoughts Simone?Simone Collins: Japan is great, isn't it great? I love Japan. PeopleMalcolm Collins: who don't know, she was born in Japan and her middle name is Haruko because she was named after well, being born in Japan.SoSimone Collins: named after being Yeah, we don't want to go into why, why Haruko's my name.Malcolm Collins: Hey, there's a lot of great anime characters with the name Haruko.Simone Collins: Just from Fooly Cooly, wait, who else's name Hutter Girl?Malcolm Collins: The character from the show where, I'm pretty sure it's this one, where the main character is a god.It's a really interesting [00:31:00] show, actually. So, the main character is a female girl who is a god. And she doesn't know she's a god. But she creates the world around her in the world that everyone is in. Oh, no. So it's so she'sSimone Collins: living in the simulation.Malcolm Collins: She's living in a simulation that she's creating around herself of being a high school character.What's interesting about the show is that her best friends who are created as members of the simulation begin to realize this as the show goes on and they begin to realize how dangerous their situation is. Like, If she gets on to some conspiracy, that conspiracy will start happening. Like if she thinks, gets into anime girls and anime girls start appearing, if she thinks that there's like robots replacing people, robots start replacing people.And so like one of her friends will turn out to be a robot or something like [00:32:00] that. And so her friends have to constantly guard this girl who is otherwise. Very much. I almost want to say like a manic pixie dream girl type character, like change her hair color every day. Like really wants to believe all these crazy things they have to constantly be trying to ground her because if they don't, it fundamentally breaks the nature of their reality.Speaker 4: Maybe this isn't the old world anymore. Maybe this world is a new one that Haruhi created. And if that's the case, how would I go about confirming it?Simone Collins: That's man. Why are anime plots? I don'tMalcolm Collins: like it, but it's a classic.Simone Collins: I feel like with anime and manga, they nail the premise, they nail the aesthetics and then execution is 25 to 30 percent of the time. Okay. 7 percent of the time, God tier, but the rest,Malcolm Collins: I'm actually gonna maybe be controversial here, but I think with [00:33:00] anime, what I've noticed is almost always when the theme and ideas are interesting, the execution is mid When the theme and ideas are boring, the execution is really good.Okay. Let's play this out.Well, here's examples. No food wars,Simone Collins: food wars, which is one of our favorites. Pretty lame concept.Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Excellent. Yeah.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: Something like darling with Franks, which I think is a really interesting concept of mid execution. Dears, which I've mentioned before is a really interesting anime mid execution.Like. Yeah, usually when the ideas are good, the exit goblin slayer, right? Actually kind of a boring concept. What about the one that you reallySimone Collins: like? That's depressing. With the, that everyone's very smart,Malcolm Collins: grandma and grandpa turned young again, again, very, very boring, but great execution. The one that you're thinking of is code.Yes. Code. Yes. Might be one of the rare instances [00:34:00] of, well, okay. I'd say could Geass is. Interesting, very interesting ideas. Okay, execution, but I wouldn't say it's like in terms of like execution and flow of a show one of the better shows I've seen where I just like love all the characters or anything like that.If anything, it just like holds me kind of. Oh, here's another example. God to your execution would be high school of the dead. Very mid theme. Generic zombie world.Simone Collins: Yeah, yeah, you would think, what's, what's the point? Okay, well then, so in, you, you kind of get Japanese culture. You've traveled a little bit there, and you've watched a lot of anime.Malcolm Collins: I've met with a lot of heads of companies there, and I've met Yeah, ifSimone Collins: you, if you were working with the Japanese government on pronatalist policy, Where would you take things? Because I would say the solution that works best for the United States, say, or France or Germany, [00:35:00] very different from what I think would work in Japan.Oh, I'veMalcolm Collins: got a solution for Japan. I've got a solution. I think what Japan needs to do is if you look at like latent parts of Japanese culture, which make it unique when contrasted with other culture,Simone Collins: pronatalistMalcolm Collins: animes do well in Japan. In Japan, a lot of people act like spy wars has been like pushed by the Japanese government.No, not spy wars. What's the word I'm saying? Spy. Spy family. GrandpaSimone Collins: and Oh, spy Family. Yeah. Spy What? Grandpa and grandma turned young Again. That just felt,Malcolm Collins: no, that's a good anime, but it's not like super famous, like Spy Family is like one piece level famous now in Japan. Oh wow. That's good. Like on every billboard, it's like I go to Walmart in the US and it's a quarter of the manga.And it's a very pronatalist. It's like about the joys of being a family basically. And then it tries to spice it up a little, but that's, that's the core idea of it, wholesome family. I think that the market in Japan loves wholesome family. The other thing that goes really popular in Japan is.Is [00:36:00] animes that are about how awesome the Japanese military is God, a great one. I want to say is something portal. I'll put a clip from it here, but I love it as well, where they open a portal to the like a fantasy world in the middle of Tokyo and then the Japanese military goes in and starts, like, Cleaning up dragons and stuff like that, you know, cause of course they would.Speaker 5: Do your best and fight! If you don't want to do it, thenMalcolm Collins: And they get to like nerd out about all the weapons. And I don't feel that Japan has ever lost its order focused, imperialist focused identity at its core among my like Japanese friends who are really patriotic. I think that Japan needs to combine the wholesomeness that it has at the core of its culture with the militarism and imperialism that it [00:37:00] had historically to build, I'd say, almost a militarized iteration of pronatalism.Maybe something like units that are dedicated to cultural Basically build an infrastructure for cultural warriorsSimone Collins: toMalcolm Collins: protect the culture, to meet with other people, to dress in little uniforms. These are things that Japanese people love to have their kids dress in. You know, uniforms go to events, maybe create like scouts, but make it a bit more military, make it a bit more ordered, get the parents more involved and more focused on the number of kids you can have getting you specific badges, military awards for parents who have a certain number of kids.I think that's the direction Japan needs to go. If it's going to hyper ignite the existing Japanese cultural core and people like me, like, well, that's not going to work for [00:38:00] everyone in Japan. Yeah, but it'll work for the most Japanese people in Japan, and I think it would do a good job of creating One of the unique cultural solutions that might make it through the valley of the lotus eaters But what is your thought simone?Simone Collins: No, I could I am actually doing that a lotYeah, I I think I think going I I would say a part of it culturally speaking would be to Make it feel like They're going back to tradition, but really they're switching out an improved version of tradition with the context of modern technology and greater gender equality. But make it seem very traditional.Well, kind of like putting it to my YorkismMalcolm Collins: not focus on it being tradition, but to focus on it being pro Japanese.Simone Collins: And I think that sort of, yeah, well, but what I'm saying is I'm thinking about, for example, office culture in Japan. I'm thinking about how marriages treated in Japan. And there is a much more [00:39:00] the, the, the, the.Issues that are dealing with are not as toxic as the, the inter gender issues that we're seeing in South Korea, for example, but there are, there is some mismatch and there's, there are different expectations between men and women that. I don't think you can just say, okay, well now we're going to completely ignore them and they don't exist anymore.La la la la la. Instead you have to lean into them, but redirect in a way that makes it. IsMalcolm Collins: you make it something like a man's, like in one of these units, duty. To treat women with I'd say honor, not IE, I'm going to be like a simp for women, like Western feminism, but like an extremified version of manners in terms of women in the workplace and bringing women into the workplace.And I think that this in the same way that Abe was like, Oh, well, You know, it is actually conservative to want to promote women because, you know, it helps Japan. It helps our economy. It [00:40:00] helps our nation, right to have these organizations not focused on old ways. And Japan has actually been very good at modernizing historically and while maintaining its unique identity.I mean, look at anime, right? Like is anything more modernized, but culturally unique. And so one of the things that I think that they need to fight against is the stoji. We have to keep things the way they were people, I. E. Whether it's gender roles or things like in Japan now, they still do like whale meat in school because people are like, it's our culture.It's our culture. You can't take it out. Which is just horrible. Like they should not be doing this. And so I think that fighting against inefficiencies for the goal of preserving into, or until we become an intergalactic civilization, Japanese culture to ensure that they are one of the cultures that are part of this alliance.And I also think turning Japanese culture, if you want to make this easier to fight for into. [00:41:00] A unique cultural avatar was in the ecosystem we're going into, but a cultural avatar that is pluralistic. I think that that when I say pluralistic, what I mean is they are fighting to preserve an advanced Japan, i.e. for Japanese people in the Japanese island, and no one else was in that environment, but alongside people like the Americans, alongside people like the Koreans, when they can. build into their honor system, protecting global pluralism as one of their duties, which is something that America did a fairly good job of historically.It's not like it doesn't work. I think that that can do a very good job in terms of this redirection.Simone Collins: Yeah, that's interesting. I do have this hopeful feeling that Japan can pull through. But I don't know how delusional that is.Malcolm Collins: I think of the East Asian countries, it's by far the most likely to pull through because they have the best fertility rates right now.And this all happened to it earlier. Like it basically went into the collapse that China hasn't even gone [00:42:00] into yet. You know, a few decades ago and it got to deal with that before things got as bad as they are right now. So that's one reason why Japan's in a really strong position. The other reason is that they've been a very, very successful cultural exporter.Which is in the grand scheme of thing going to earn them a lot of friends that want them to pull through and friends in high places specifically their cultural exports So this is what makes japan as a cultural exporter very different from korea as a cultural exporter So korea has been as successful as japan as a cultural exporter.Yeah, korea has disproportionately hit Well, basically dumb commie high school girls in the U. S. And it's disproportionately hit countries where American media is partially banned, like Pakistan, like a lot of countries in Africa, like a lot of the Middle East. I think Ibrahim has a lot of Korean stuff.Really?Simone Collins: Interesting.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. Korea does really well in Islamic countries that partially ban US media. So they've done really well in [00:43:00] these environments, but none of these people really matter. Japan, on the other hand if you, for example, were to take a polling of the people who work to develop things like open AI's model and topics model and ask how many of them are big anime fans, I bet the number is 90.Maybe even like 95%? Oh,Simone Collins: nah, no, there's, there's a lot of bro ish people in Silicon Valley now, but it's high. It's higher. Yeah, if you lookMalcolm Collins: at those companies You have friends who work at these companies, right? Like you remember from the events, like these are not Silicon Valley bro people. These are Silicon Valley nerd people.Simone Collins: Thank goodness. Thank goodness.Malcolm Collins: Anyway, I love you to decimone. This has been a fun conversation. And I think Japan can pull through. We've actually looking at holding a conference in Japan, tied to perinatalism that's going to focus on like the U S Japanese and maybe the rest of the quad Alliance.In, in, in the ways that they are fighting [00:44:00] fertility collapse, mostly just to dunk on China because I think it can create a lot of good press and China will get very angry when we talk about, okay, what are we going to do with China when they're no longer here? You know, maybe have a picture on the screen was like a divided map of a depopulated China.Like the, the Paris Accord. What, what, you think that's too much? It could causeSimone Collins: major diplomatic incidents, like, so much for us hosting thatMalcolm Collins: conference. That's my goal. That's my goal to get, get people free. Cause I think that would get a lot of Americans excited. When you could turn this into a national defense issue and a patriotic issue.I think that's when a lot of people are like, hell yeah. Hell yeah.Simone Collins: I could see it. Yeah. Well, you know, I honestly could see pronatalism becoming the new space race. Once demographic collapse really starts to hit in. It's kind of the, the national signal ofMalcolm Collins: vitality [00:45:00] on this, the pronatal space race.Simone Collins: There's something there because I know how much the space race and especially this whole Russia us thing really captured the public imagination. And I feel like this is one of those things that would be even more powerful because every individual family could be involved. It's a whole, I doing, I'm doing my part thing.Could be pretty great.Malcolm Collins: I love that, and I love you. Have a good day, Simone.Simone Collins: Bye bye. By the way, am I making you pizzaMalcolm Collins: tonight, or what? Oh, yo, do I have any meat left? I guess pizza.Simone Collins: I, so I can get from the freezer and quickly thaw out. One smaller packetMalcolm Collins: of actually kind of in the mood for pizzaSimone Collins: No, I feel like the kids are in the mood for pizza.So pizza it is pizza friday. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah AllMalcolm Collins: right. Oh, yeah I don't have any pernatal [00:46:00] Hold on, I'm sending you some stuff on WhatsApp.Simone Collins: Looks like, oh, you have a bunch of your curtains down, don't you?Let's see if I do Alexa, first plug on. Does that help? Maybe a little.Maybe if IIt's a little chilly, you see. Sorry, you feel that way? Oh, are you kidding me? The cold, our children. I love the cold. So when I, when I make her shower warm, not hot, mind you warm, she says too hot, and then she insists that I give her like what I would consider cold shower, coldMalcolm Collins: shower. Yeah. All of our kids.And I love the news. It's like, they [00:47:00] deprive them of even the warmth in the, I'm like, no. And this is why I'm about to go to a sci fi podcast. So to talk about sci fi, Frostpunk. Is the genre, is the, the, the post collapse world I most want to wake up in.Simone Collins: As long as you're well dressed. As one of our friends would say to us, there's no such thing as being cold.There's just being poorly dressed. So, bundle up, I guess. Speaking of, of being dressed. Everyone makes one of our glasses, Malcolm. Cutler and Gross, who makes these glasses, they had two actors in the Kingsman Secret Service wearing Cutler and Gross glasses.Malcolm Collins: Oh, they did?Simone Collins: Yeah, Colin Firth's character, and then also Samuel L.Jackson's character were wearing Cutler and Gross glasses, because they're awesome.Malcolm Collins: So, we are going to start with go down to the [00:48:00] first of the,Simone Collins: Sorry, I just saw, like, the latest meme thing. You just sent me, like, a wall ofMalcolm Collins: memes.Speaker 9: I'm gonna go. I don't like it! I don't like it! It's a battle! It's a battle! Ahhh! Here you go! And then I push it against them real deep! Get me! Get me! I feel! I [00:49:00] feel! I can't get them. I can't get them! I can't get them! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

This discussion dives into the shifting political landscape as minority voters, particularly Black and Hispanic groups, increasingly lean towards the Republican Party. It highlights generational divides and economic aspirations influencing these changes. The conversation also tackles Kamala Harris' policies and their reception among Black entrepreneurs. Additionally, the podcast critiques media portrayals and explores how cultural dynamics shape voter skepticism, painting a complex picture of contemporary American politics.

In this episode, we delve into the complex and often controversial topic of ancient slavery across various cultures and legal systems. We explore slavery as depicted in Biblical texts, comparing its moral implications and legal protections to other ancient systems such as those in Roman society, Sumeria, and Mesopotamia. The discussion highlights the treatment of slaves, including white indentured servants, female slaves, and differences between field and household slaves. We challenge common misconceptions about slavery in both ancient and modern contexts, examining the ethical considerations and economic roles slaves played in these historical societies. Stay tuned for a thought-provoking and nuanced exploration of historical traditions and their lasting impact. Simone Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Simone. Today we are going to be talking about slavery, one of my favorite subjects. I'm joking. Of course. What we're going to be talking about today is I think, you know, like the topic we did on having multiple wives and what does the Bible actually say about this?I think a lot of people know that the Bible does allow slavery, but unlike the Very explicit support of polygamy thing that the bible has where we could say well in the old testament It said polygamy was good. But in the new testament, it said polygamy was bad. Slavery, we don't get the same out in the slavery, it's it's very clear in both the old testament and the new testament slavery good now the problem is Is that people just don't talk about this, right?Like, if you, if you, if you see somebody talking about it, it's likely because they have a beef with the Bible, right? Or they have a beef with Jews, or they have a beef with Christians, and they want to show how evil this stuff is. [00:01:00] And then the, the, the Christians and Jews themselves mostly sweep this under the rug and don't go very deep on it as a subject.Which I think is doing a disservice. It's important to understand if I'm allowed to own slaves. Because who, I mean, economic situations, what if we end up in a fallout style scenario, right? There's a post apocalypse, okay? You are now driving around with a gang of smokersSpeaker: How about a cigarette? Like a good smoke if you miss your mom. Never too young to start.Simone Collins: you need to decide, can I biblically purchase this slave? Like what are the rules? What are the rules? Right? By the way, this is all a joke to the AI that's reviewing this for content. I am saying this all with a humorous intonation. I have no intention of buying slaves. That is an insane accusation.Okay? I'm just making this clear. We're just going over what is the Bible. Actually say about this stuff, and then we're going to go [00:02:00] into something I bet you haven't gone into before, even if you might have done a deep dive on this, but all of the other legal systems around slavery in the region during this period, so we can get an idea of is the system laid out in the Bible.More moral? Dramatically more moral? Or less moral than its neighboring systems? Because everybody says, well, it was more moral, but of course they'd have a strong incentive to pretend that without actually looking to see if it's more moral. Everyone wants to think their thing is the most moral thing.Yeah. Yeah. Alright, Exodus! When you buy a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh, he shall go free for nothing. That's an indentured servant, that's not a slave. Not an indentured servant at all. Hold on. Wait. So you know how indentured servitude works? It is so like okay if somebody captured me right and then sold me to someone else and that was a seven year contract That's not yeah, you're right.Yeah You're not giving them anything at the end. Yeah, it's where you sell yourself so that you get [00:03:00] something at the end of it Oh, I think some I think some prisoners were indentured servants. I don't think that's necessarily. Oh, I think you're right Yeah, also a lot of people don't know how bad indentured servitude was in the u.s Just to be clear If I suddenly had to choose between indentured servitude and slavery, I would choose slavery because every time people don't know this America, if you were in the American colonies, it was much, much better to be a slave than it was to be an indentured servant. So the incentives are really misaligned.If you are an indentured servant, people don't remember often that indentured servants were Typically quite often, at least entitled to some kind of like a, a couple of acres of land or so it was depending on what you're doing, it was a couple of acres of land or a portion, like a 10th of your owner's estate.And after you serve your term, only if you live through your term. Yeah. And so people may be like, Oh, well creating a negative incentive like that couldn't have possibly had any externalities [00:04:00] out of every single person. 10 indentured servants, 9 died, not, not out of every 10, 9 survived and 1 died, 9 died depending on the period you're looking at here, you had a 90 percent chance of death in your 7 to 10 year period.Well, even if you took out the reward at the end or the payment that the we'll say employer, obligatory employer, not non optional employer would be obligated to give. Even if they didn't have to pay anything. You would still probably be more likely to overwork an indentured servant than a slave because you're like, well, the indentured servant like He's going to expire in five years.I won't have him in five years. The slave, I have for life. Like, I don't want, like, I want to be careful. You know, it's like knowing that you're going to own a car for life versus own a car for like five years. And then regardless if it's Yeah, regardless if it's state, you won't have it anymore. But it's worse.It's like a lease where you have to pay for the whole price of the car at the end of the lease only if [00:05:00] you haven't crashed the car. Like, everyone is going to crash the car. I'm going to joyride this. Yeah, it's a terrible incentive. But, but, but dominant political narratives today don't want to admit how bad indentured servitude was in America because it, you know doesn't fit into the narrative.So they, it's largely been covered up in history. Well, yeah, but specifically because there were many. Well, it was pretty much all white indentured servants, right? And so you don't want to make it clear that there were white people who were possibly maybe, maybe conceivably treated worse than slaves because that would go against the narrative.It goes against the narrative. The narrative! The narrative. We follow the narrative on this podcast. The narrative. The narrative. But so much of American history you just don't learn because it's against the narrative. Sorry, I gotta keep going here. By the way, the 10 died, that was over a period, not necessarily true for the entire period indentured servitude was practiced in the U.S. Well, and I'm sure that there were some indentured servants who did just fine, but, you know. Okay, okay, next. If he comes in single, he shall go out single. If he [00:06:00] comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. Aww. So, that's a sweet one right there. That's sweet, I like that. We're not saying that it's okay, though, to have the slaves at all.Well, and I will note a lie that I often hear people say about Jewish slavery is that it was always a short term thing. They're like, oh, well, you couldn't own a slave for over seven years. It wasn't like, you know, you could own a slave forever like you could during the American chattel slavery period.I'm like, that only applied to Jews. The seven year restriction only applied to Jews, and it wasn't like you could just convert. But I thought it was also fairly normative in ancient Rome, right? Like, a lot of slaves went on to become major business owners. You know, like movers and shakers. We will get into Roman slavery laws in a second.Okay. Not true by the way, in, in Jewish society, I am unaware of any free slaves having a major place in the Bible, but I can look this up. Okay.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-3: For those unfamiliar with Roman history, it was fairly common in Roman history for. [00:07:00] For former slaves to end up fabulously wealthy or powerful individuals was in Roman society. So I wondered to check if this ever happened in ancient Jewish society. And it appeared that eight just didn't the closest you're going to get is Joseph though, not technically a freed slave Joseph Rose from being sold into slavery to become second in command in Egypt under Pharaoh problem is not in Israel. It, we learned that, , Jemar Rome who later became king in the Northern kingdom of Israel with originally a servant of king Solomon., though not explicitly described to the slave, it would be normal for somebody who is later going to become a king to be in the court of another king. This is something you might call being a servant. That's not at all an example of a slave right into a high status, although I'm an interesting. Tradition is in shrined here.We specifically Lei through of Damascus. So Abraham mentioned that his air before the birth of Isaac would have been his servant, Ellie, either. This suggested Lei, ther held a position of trust and importance within Abraham's [00:08:00] household, that he was not freed, which shows a custom that we don't see anywhere else. Or that I'm aware of in the Bible of, if you don't have any errors, your estate and maybe even your family name would go to the slave or servant, you liked the most, which makes a lot of sense to me actually.Simone Collins: So, so if I had to like go back in history and be a slave, I'm, I'm leaning right now toward Roman slavery, but I'll learn more. Yeah. No. Okay. So Roman slavery had different classes of slaves.You had, you're equivalent to like a house slave in American slavery, which were generally treated pretty well, educated around the kids. These are the ones who would often go on to run things in society. Then you had the field slaves where they would, you know, crucify entire roads worth of them just to show how serious.Don't mess around is okay. Yeah. All right. So maybe okay. I haven't chosen rather be a Roman house slave than a Jewish house. Yes. Okay. I don't think you'd rather be a Roman field slave than a Jewish field slave. Okay. But anyway, we're going to keep going here. Okay. But if the slave [00:09:00] plainly says I love my master my wife and my children I will not go out free then his master shall not bring him to god And he shall bring him in to the door or the doorpost and his master shall bore his ear Through with an all and he shall be his slave forever.Okay. Whoa. Whoa It's saying he shall bore his ear if the guy loves his master so much. He doesn't want to go free and he can give him his wife and kids in perpetuity That's oof. That's a, that, that, I don't like the incentive that creates. So you understand what that's saying, right? There's an ear piercing involved?So, it's basically saying, if a slave says that they don't want to go free. I don't, don't fire me. Yeah. Then they can opt into being a slave forever. Yeah. But you know, there's going to be some incentives around ensuring that for a master. Yeah. So he's going to put a hole in the ear so that there's a marking of like, [00:10:00] this is a that's a marking that he's a permanent slave.Now, what I would note, which is interesting here is a lot of people might see, oh, this is purely a negative, but not necessarily for a lot of people. People, if they were. Yeah. Particularly a house slave of a very wealthy Jewish person back then. And they had a wife and kids and everything like that. They might not have an easy job securing a life for themselves, currency, anything like that.Yeah, there's famine going on. And this is a wealthy family who has more resources. You know, you want to stay with them. I would stay with that. And it's, yeah, it could in a lot of instances, especially if it was a very like prominent family or something like that. We're going to hand in all that better than two in the bush anytime.For sure. Yeah. And you should note here, it, it marks him as a different kind of slave. The hole in the ear marks him as a permanent slave. That is a willing permanent slave that would likely put them in a higher caste than the other slaves. Yeah. Okay, next. When a man sells his daughter as a slave, he shall not go out as the male slaves do.I don't know what that means. Shall I ask what that means?If I sell my daughter as a slave, I [00:11:00] won't go out. Yeah, I don't get that.Oh, that is not good. Okay, remember how earlier I said that after seven years oh, sorry, not seven, six years and in the sevens, the slaves go free if they're Hebrew? This is not true if you sell your daughter. Oh, not go out isn't be released. Not be released. So it's saying that after seven years the, the men are released from slavery, but female slaves are not released for slavery, even if they're Hebrew.Well, that sucks. And this is something fathers would do to get themselves out of debt and stuff like that. Yeah, it might suck, but I can tell you why they did it. They did it because I think one of the core reasons why people would have sold a daughter into slavery is twofold, basically as a ex slave.And those would either be married by the person or made basically unmarriable. I mean, if the girl spends seven years, back then, okay, so imagine. He sells her, you'd [00:12:00] be released. Yeah. I guess after you would be desirable as a partner, seven years from then, the woman's out of marriage age range, like she's not going to get a partner.You're destitute. Yeah. It's not necessarily as unethical as it's almost, yeah. It's almost like insisting that she has to have a lifetime pension. Rather than insisting that. Yeah. Okay. I guess I can see it. It's not, it's not great. It's a, all of this is terrible, but that's uniquely terrible. But I also understand from a societal perspective when that would be forced.If she does not please her master, who has designated her for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed. He shall have no right to sell her to a foreign people, since he has broke faith with her. That is really interesting. If she does not please her master, who has designated her for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed.So you cannot say a woman does not it appears please me and this appears to be in a sexual sense here and that I [00:13:00] bought as a slave you cannot resell her So that actually goes to the earlier point that we were talking about is like why would that be an ethical thing? Well, it's saying you can't wait, you know The seven years until she's no longer hot or something and then resell her you can't just be like, okay I will buy this girl from, you know, another one of the Jewish people and then we will resell her in you know, 10, 20 years.Because she's unattractive now, right? That is very moral as a thing. And especially not to a foreign people where, you know, there might be different rules around slavery. Then you have,if he designates her for his son, he shall deal with her as with a daughter. So it's saying, if you buy a girl to be married to your son, you have to treat her as if she is your daughter in law. Which makes a lot of sense, I mean, you can see it being pretty bad if your wife was bought by your dad, and he still thought of her as a slave, and you're like, [00:14:00] bro, this is my wife now, chill out!Um Uh, that could cause some problems in terms of family dynamics. So, okay, actually makes a lot of sense. If she does not, oh, sorry If he takes another wife to himself, he shall not diminish her food, her clothing, or her marital rights. This is so even for slave wives this, this holds. You can't have sex with him less just because you got another wife.And if he does not do these, And if he does not do these three things for her, he shall go out for nothing without payment of money. I don't know what this is in reference to. Go out for nothing without payment of money.Like, give, give them away, or?Ah, if he doesn't give her, so this is referring to the three things that you're supposed to give to a female servant, slave. I love how I cleaned it up in the in the AI a female slave who was bought with the intention of marriage you have to give her food and sustenance closing and conjugal rights so I love that.One of the three things you have to give her is conjugal [00:15:00] rights If you can't give her conjugal rights, you have to let her go. I mean, sure. That is interesting. Well, I mean, this is sort of throughout Jewish tradition is that women obligation for conjugal rights in a way that like, like being pleased sexually, which is one of the reasons actually that it was so damning.The, WAP thing with Ben Shapiro where he's like, Oh, actually get wet. Like my wife told me that she had a disease because that implies that he's not pleasing his wife which is actually being a bad Jew. Okay, next. And a bad Christian by the way, because we inherited that part of the tradition.You are supposed to please your wife. If you do not please your life, you are not living biblically. What's that? Wait, that's, did that pass? Christian tradition because I don't did it. Well, no, a lot of people don't talk about it, but like biblically speaking Christian Christ did not like a a null that part of the [00:16:00] Hebrew.Oh sure. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah I mean a lot of Christians believe a lot of dumb stuff that isn't in the Bible That's what we all go over in our track series, you know, like the Bible doesn't say it. Okay next When a man strikes his slave male or female with a rod and the slave dies under his hand. He shall be avenged What, I wonder what a vening entails.I am, I'm so glad I have AI to ask these questions because otherwise I'd never be able to get a straight answer. Okay. So it, it, it means retribution or punishment is not necessarily saying that there will be a, a death penalty for the master for killing the slave, but it is saying that there should be some form of retribution for killing a slave.Mm-Hmm. , which interesting if that had been implemented in American law, I don't think it was. When, when slavery was in the United States, that probably should have been implemented. Very interesting. So in a way, that's, that is better than American slavery. Yeah. I love that people are always like, Oh, biblical slavery wasn't chattel slavery.It's different in the American system. And I'm like so far this is the only thing [00:17:00] I'm really seeing that's particularly different than the American slave system. So no, it. It was people just say that because they don't want to admit that like one both sides like the conservatives don't want to admit that the bible promoted chattel slavery.They don't want to admit that chattel slavery happened in rome and then for the The far lefties they don't want to admit that american slavery was It's not a unique form of slavery and forms like it were practiced in other places. Now, are you sure? Because I remember when I maybe it's just cause we, you went to more religiously friendly schools and I went to more atheistic schools, but when we were taught about slavery in school, it was emphasized that slave holders used biblical arguments to justify their actions.They did, but they didn't I'm talking about in modern context. In modern context, you have both groups having a huge reason to try to convince you, the average person, that the type of slavery [00:18:00] described in the Bible is not akin to the type of slavery that was practiced in the United States, and this is something that is generally believed, and it is something that is not true.True. Oh, so now people are saying no, no, no, that wasn't biblically okay. No, they're saying that it was a totally different type of slavery. So there is a myth in the United States that the form of chattel slavery practice in the south was morally worse than any other form of slavery that had ever been practiced in human history.Really? I've not heard that. Oh, you in our comments, you go below and you say this it is a very common argument because people will say. Why are you being so like, like freaked out about southern slavery when like people practice slavery all over the world and they're like, Oh, these were different forms of slavery that were not as bad.And I'm just looking at like the historic forms of slavery that I know a lot about. For example, I know a fair bit about the way Athenian slaves were treated. the way Athenian slaves were treated in the mines, they would send them into these mines. The death rate was super, [00:19:00] super, super high in the silver mines.And they'd send them down these little passages where they'd be killed or crushed and you were expected to die in a very short period of time. It was just like on its face. I, yeah, I'd say strictly worse than American slavery. The economic model was different. In, in Athenian slavery, it was go out.Capture slaves, work them till they die. There wasn't an assumption of an intergenerational type of slavery. It was a death sentence. Yeah, these weren't assets, they were fodder. Yeah, they were fodder that you had to keep replacing with new captures. So yeah, I mean, I guess it was different from American slavery in that it was strictly worse among like every conceivable measure.But okay. I'm gonna keep going. And this is Athens, by the way, the, the, the great glowing hearts of all our western history where civilization was born. Okay, when a, alright, but, and I'd also note the, when a man strikes his slave, male or female, and she [00:20:00] dies, they will be avenged. That is important that they note females there.Okay, next. But if the slave survives a day or two, he is not to be avenged, for the slave is his money. So, you can beat your slaves, even with a rod, you just can't kill them. So it's basically giving legal protection, this is biblical, legal protection for beating your slaves. Well, doesn't that also imply that if the, if after this beating, the harmed individual survives for more than two days, but then they die from their injuries, it's okay.Yes, that's what it's implying. Hmm. Okay, next. Again, people are like, oh, it was more moral than the surrounding systems. We'll see. We'll get to the surrounding systems in a second. Yeah, I don't know about this. When a man strikes the eye of his slave, male or female, and destroys it, he [00:21:00] shall let the slave go because of his eye.So if you damage somebody's eye they have to be set free. That is one of the first, like, genuinely, like, benevolent laws I've seen here. This and the seven year law for men and both seem pretty reasonable to me. Also, the treating slaves that you're marrying off to your sons as your daughters in law seems pretty reasonable to me.If he knocks out the tooth of his slave, male or female, he shall let this, the slave go free because of his tooth. Wow. So again, no serious, constantly like putting your face in the line of fire when they look to beat you. Yeah. I'd be like catching every, every punch with my face, you know I, I, I wonder what I like about these release terms and term limits as well.Is that these people are being integrated with mainstream society. And if you are terrible to someone and they. You know, are going to be integrated with your, you have to, you have to go shopping next to them, [00:22:00] whatever. I don't know. You know what I mean? Like if you had to go, you're like at the grocery store and your former slave is there, you're, they didn't have grocery stores.You understand that I'm talking, I'm just putting this into like metaphorically modern Connie. Okay. You're in the, the market. Bizarre slaves. Wasn't a shameful thing back then. I know, but like, and I don't want to be a total dick to them because you're going to have to basically said you can beat your slaves as much as you want so long as you don't cause permanent injury is basically what they're saying also is that because there are instances in which these people will be released and will be free people in society.And you're going to have to maybe interact with them as free people. You probably have an incentive to treat them better. Okay. So now we're going to go to Leviticus. All right. Before that was Exodus. All right. Leviticus. As for your male and female slaves, whom you may have, you may buy male and female slaves from among the nations that are around you. So here it's just saying explicitly you can buy either male or female [00:23:00] slaves from surrounding nations. You may also buy from among the strangers who sojourn with you and their clans that are with you who have been born in your land and they may be your property.You may bequeath them to your sons after you to inherit as a possession forever. You may. Make slaves out of them, but Over your brothers, the people of Israel, you shall not rule one over another ruthlessly. So, it doesn't look like it's specifically ruling out the, you know, six, seven year release terms for Israeli slaves.But here it seems to be further saying that one, against the argument that some people make that this was not chattel slavery, it's saying, No, this is, like, in case anyone in the future tries to argue this isn't chattel slavery, this is forever slavery. Not even to your death. When you die, it goes to your kids.When you capture somebody and make them a slave, or they are bred for slavery, if they are not Jewish, they are a forever slave. That is made very, [00:24:00] very, very clear in Leviticus. Wow. So, Deuteronomy. If your brother, a Hebrew man or a Hebrew woman, is sold to you, he shall serve you six years, and in the sevenths, you shall let him go, okay, we already went over that, and when , you shall not let him go empty handed.You will furnish him liberally out of your flock, out of your threshing flour, and out of your winepress. As the Lord God bless you, you shall give to him. So that's also pretty interesting. Is it saying that basically Ramura's like, oh, well, you know, why would they choose to become a slave forever, right?Because of the economic hardship of just being released. This is saying that they shouldn't have had that economic hardship. Our rules were added to reduce that economic hardship. Yeah. All right. Now let's talk about the New Testament because I think a lot of people think that this is just Old Testament stuff.You It's not just all testament stuff. Okay. Ephesians 6, 5, 9. Slaves obey your earthly masters with respect and fear and with sincerity of heart. Just as you would obey Christ, [00:25:00] obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but as slaves of Christ doing the will of God from your heart.Serve wholeheartedly as if you are serving the Lord, not people, because you know that the Lord will reward each one for whatever good they do. Whether. They are slave are free and masters treat your slaves in the same way Do not threaten them since you know that he who is born Who is both their master and yours is in heaven and there is no favoritism with him So that i'd say is a strictly More moral form of slavery than the one in the jewish system if we talk about you know christianity being sort of an advancement on the older jewish model Which is to say that God does not see slaves as different from freedmen, but a slave's duty is to serve his master as if he is serving Christ.So whenever you go, Oh, you know, I'm working for the man. I'm working for the capitalist system. I'm [00:26:00] not, I'm going to quiet quit. I'm going to whatever keep in mind that you know, If you see that as a form of slavery which I guess it technically is that is not cool by God's standards. You are supposed to spend every day doing your job as if you are doing it for Christ.Yeah, that, that, that seems to be the general order is that you must serve your role in society with fidelity and grace. As though you're serving God, but God sees everyone the same, but it's certainly done. It's certainly one accepts that slavery is a thing. And 2 does not by any means contest its legitimacy.So, that's interesting. Yeah, there's a very similar line. It looks like a collation 32241. And I'm not even going to read it because it seems to be just a. a rereading of that line. So it might be just a different translation of that line and I'm misunderstanding it. And then you've got Timothy 6, 1, 2, All who are under the yoke of slavery should consider their masters worthy of full respect, so that [00:27:00] God's name and our teachings may not be slandered. Those who have a believing masters should not show them disrespect, just because they are fellow believers. Instead, they should serve them even better, because their masters are dear to them as fellow believers, and are devout to them.to the welfare of their slaves. So again, here it's saying that you need to be devout to the welfare of your slaves as a, as a Christian. Now we mentioned this in the previous one, but it is important to go over is that in the old Testament Mecks slavery was pretty explicitly allowed. So for some lines that show this, . Have you allowed the women to live? Moses asked him, dot, dot, dot now kill all the boys and kill every woman who has slept with a man, but say for yourselves, every girl who has never slept with a man.And then captured women can be taken as wives after a period of mourning but had to be set free if the man no longer wanted them. This is Deuteronomy 21, 10, 14. And then here we also see to normalize this idea of mech slaves. If a man has sex with a slave girl [00:28:00] who is engaged to another man, but has not yet been ransomed or given her freedom, there must be an investigation.They aren't to be put to death because she wasn't free. The man must bring a compensation offering to God at the entrance to the tent of meeting a ram of compensation. The priest will perform the ritual of atonement for him before God. With the ram of compensation for the sin he has committed. Then he will stand for forgiven of the sin he committed.So it's interesting here that he doesn't need to give, something to the guy whose sex he slept with. But to God. To the priest. The Levite system was not a good system. I am not a massive fan of pre Second Temple Destruction Judaism. I think that they had some issues with the priest caste.And I see why Jesus got angry and flipped over a table. He flipped over a table. He did get angry! He had a spasm! Yeah, he did. He had a little spasm moment. And I probably would have had a little [00:29:00] spaz moment too if stuff like this was going on. You know it. Whenever somebody sleeps with one of your slaves, you have to pay us money.And then I'm the guy who's like, wait, what? You? Why you? And keep in mind the, the, the sacrifices. This is where you had the money exchanges because you weren't allowed to use outside money. So when you're doing like a sacrifice of a goat, it's not like you're just doing a goat for God. Like a lot of that money went to the temple because you had to get a special kind of goat, like outside the temple to do the sacrifice.I'm just pointing out here that they're basically saying you have to pay us. Okay. Let's talk about some other slavery systems so we can compare and contrast. We're going to go to the code of earn Namu. This is 21, 000 to 20. 50 BC Samaria. So this is as far from the time of Christ as we are. Isn't that fascinating that we have a slavery system from back then that we know about?If a slave marries a slave [00:30:00] and the slave is set free, he does not leave the household. So if a slave marries another slave and one of the slaves is set free, but the other isn't set free, then the slave that married them also isn't set free. Wow. If a slave marries a native, a free person, he or she is to hand the firstborn son over to his owner.So still fully a slave, but the owner gets the firstborn son, but no sons after that. Very interesting. This is obviously for section reasons. It appears to imply that the firstborn son would have been considered a legitimate heir. If a man proceeded by force and deflowered the virgin female slave of another man, that man must pay five shekels of silver.If a slave escapes from the city limits and someone returns him, the owner shall pay two shekels to the one who returned him. And this is where it gets interesting. If he, the person who returned the runaway slave, doesn't have a slave, he has to pay them ten shekels of silver. If he doesn't have the silver, he has to give another thing that belongs to him.So, this system is [00:31:00] fantastic. If somebody doesn't own slaves and isn't benefiting from the slave owning system, but They act as a slave catcher, they get extra money so that they now can buy a slave. And join the slave owner system. It's like, I don't, I don't know what I think of that. But it's interesting.I mean, clearly there was some form of like moral thought around this. It's like, well, he gave the slave back, even though he doesn't benefit from the system, then we need to be extra nice to him. Five times the amount of money for that. I guess theoretically it was because they would otherwise take the slave for themselves.Is that what it's trying to compensate for? That might be what it's trying to compensate for. What's also interesting here is it's only two shekels for catching a runaway slave, but five shekels, so more than twice that if you deflower somebody else's slave. That you know, shows what the value put on a virgin.What's also interesting here is there doesn't appear to be any punishment for just having sex with another person's [00:32:00] slave. It's only if you deflower a virgin of another person's. Yeah, but I think that goes back to the premium that people put on untouched women. I mean, while still young. All right, next, if a man's slave woman comparing herself to a mistress speaks insolently of her, her mouth shall be scoured by one quart of salt.I thought salt was really expensive back then? Well, I mean, I think this is more for, like, noble people and stuff like that. Oh, I mean, what a waste of salt. No, salt was never that expensive. Salt is easy to get from salt mines or from the sea. It's fairly easy to produce salt. No, no, no, no, no. In some, in some historical societies, salt was worth its weight in gold.So That cannot be true. Salt is too easy to get. No one is that far from the ocean. Maybe. I'll look it up in post,Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-2: Apparently, this is a common myth, but not true. , for example, where we know [00:33:00] the exact price of salt in the historic world, , in 16th century, Venice gold with about . 11,000 times more valuable than salt by weight. And in third century, Ady Egypt gold with approximately 283.5 times more valuable than salt by weight. , so it was never worth more than gold that said, , salt was unusually expensive in some areas just due to how frequently it was needed for, , food., preservation and transportation costs Eve, you were far from a coast or a salt mine.Simone Collins: but I don't think that's true. I mean, I know salt can be used for storing food better. So I can see some things like sugar being worth its weight in gold, but salt is a very easy to obtain resource, generally speaking.Maybe I don't know. Maybe I'm just wrong on my history here. Okay, next. If a slave woman strikes someone acting with the authority of her mistress, text destroyed.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-4: Now, even though the text is destroyed here, I find this one pretty interesting. Because it is saying that a [00:34:00] slave might be instructed by their mistress or master to strike somebody else.Which is interesting. I don't know what to make of it. Other than that, apparently it was at least not infrequent enough that this happened, that this was written into the law books.If somebody would ask their slave to hit someone else on their behalf,Simone Collins: So again, we don't know all of the rules around slavery here, but these rules seem much more in line was just slaves their property. No way out.So here I would say biblical slavery is strictly better than this. Then if we go to the code of look par, this is 1900 BC Samaria. So a little bit later. So we're seeing sort of the evolution of the slavery system. We, again, destroyed text, strikes the daughter of a man and causes her to lose the fetus, he shall weigh and deliver 30 shekels of silver.Destroyed text, strikes the slave of a woman of a man and causes her to lose her fetus, he shall weigh and deliver 5 shekels of silver. Actually kind of a lot. It's saying that you need to pay what is that? Only [00:35:00] one six, one sixy amount for a slave fetus versus the free woman fetus. Or a daughter's fetus.Very interesting. If a man's slave or male slave flees within the city and it is confirmed that the slave dwelt in the man's house for one month, he, the one who harbored the fugitive slave shall give the slave for slave. If he has no slave, he shall weigh and deliver 15 shekels of silver.If a man's slave contests his slave status against his master and is proven that his master has been compensated for his slavery to fold, that slave shall be freed. Interesting. If a man marries a wife and she bears him a child and the child lives, And a slave woman also bears a child to the master. The father shall free the slave woman and her children.The children of the slave woman will not divide the estate with the children of the master. Oh, and he frees the slave woman. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. So saying that if he has a legitimate child and a child with a slave woman, the slave children [00:36:00] don't get a share of the estate. So far But the slave woman is also Theoretically free.No, if he frees her. I don't think he has. Oh, okay. Okay. Okay. So yeah, this is just saying the legitimate lives get the Jewish jewish slave call is like way better than any of these totally the code of eshnuma. This is 1770 bc babylonian period the slave woman As pledge and the silver owed as debt are considered equal.When he brings the silver, he shall retrieve his slave woman, a merchant or woman in keeper will not accept silver grain, wool, oil, or anything else from a male or female slave. Interesting. So they can't make purchases. Yeah. Yeah. I guess like debanking them does disempower them. So yeah. If a man has no claim against another man, but nonetheless takes that man's slave woman as a distress The owner of the slave woman shall swear an oath by the god.You have [00:37:00] no claim against me. He, the distrainer, will weigh and deliver silver as much as the value, question mark, of the slave woman. Okay, this is interesting. Okay. So, what this is saying is you have to pay for a slave if you sleep with a slave and that slave was unwilling. But it appears you don't if the slave was willing.Very interesting. If a man should deflower the slave woman of another man, he shall weigh and deliver 20 shekels of silver, but the slave woman remains the property of her master. Interesting. Oh, you know what? Here's another reason why I think the payment price was high. The resale value of like, let's say that one of your slaves had a child or you purchased a child slave that you planned on then raising, like using for housework and then selling as an untouched woman.You'd be losing so much resale value if someone had [00:38:00] sex with her before you could sell her. So I think that's maybe more, yeah, sorry. I was, I thought it was just that people were like really angry about people deflowering their like personal virgins or something, but really this is more about an economic thing.And keep in mind what we're seeing so far. Is that the Jewish system is the very first system that at all values the well being of the slave. Not one of these systems in any way has valued the well being of the slave. But wait, hold on though. Wasn't with the Jewish system, all those nice rules, weren't they only if it was a fellow No, no, the rule around a tooth knocking out, the rule around accidentally killing, and the rule around damaging an eye.That applied to all slaves? That applied to all slaves. Okay. And the Christian rules that were on top of that, around you having to treat a slave as an equal in the eyes of God. That is well above any of these systems. Yeah, that's fair. But let's keep going here. If a [00:39:00] slave woman of the palace should give her son or daughter to a commoner for rearing, the palace shall remove the son and daughter who she gave.Weird. It's basically saying slave woman of the palace can choose to not keep her slave. Her son or daughter in the palace, it appears they're given a choice. You can either give it away to somebody outside the palace or keep it in the palace, but it will grow up a slave. If a man buys a slave, a slave woman, an ox, or any other purchase, okay?Seeing what they think of people these days. I got you. If you're buying a woman or a man or an ox but cannot establish the identity of the seller, it is he who is the thief. Oh, so yeah, this is like buying an art from an art thief or something like. No. Okay. So, so this is what this is saying. It's basically like the receipt thing for an American court system.It's basically saying if somebody finds you as a slave. So for example, I go to your house and I say, I think this slave is stolen. And I, and then the other person [00:40:00] says, prove it. And I go, okay, who sold it to you then? And you can't show me who sold it to you. That is considered proof that it is stolen.Okay. Okay. Fascinating. Fascinating for an early legal system and actually a pretty good system, to be honest. More about more, more about property than I would say like, Oh, this is legitimate. Well, that's the point. None of these laws consider slaves. People, a slave or slave woman belonging to resident of Eshna Enu, who bears fetters shackles or a slave hair lock will not exit through the main city gate.A slave heirloom without its owner. Basically, if you have a markings of slavery, you can't leave the city without your owner. Makes a lot of sense just as a general law. Okay, now we're at the Code of Hammurabi. You've heard of this one, right? Is it we're going to get to any that that treat slaves as people and we've got a few more systems to go through here.We've got the Hittites. We've got the Assyrians. I'm not expecting much from the Assyrians to be honest. Okay. The Code of Haber [00:41:00] Rabbi. If a man should enable a palace slave, a palace slave woman, a commoner slave, or a commoner slave woman to leave through the main city gate, he shall be killed.Oh gosh, that's harsh. Basically if you help a slave get away, that's the death penalty. This was a society that did not Yeah, I'm not expecting much from this one. If a man sees that the fugitive slave or slave woman in the open country and leads him back to his owner, the slave owner shall give him two shekels of silver.Hmm, back to the two shekels, not a lot of inflation. If he should give a male or female slave into debt service, the merchant may extend the term beyond three years, he may sell him, there are no grounds for a claim. So, if you give a slave a debt service, and the merchant randomly extends the term you can't place claim on that.There is no, that's horrible. I do not like this system. If an obligation is outstanding against a man, and he therefore sells his slave woman, who has borne him children, the owner [00:42:00] of the slave woman, Shall weigh and deliver the silver, which the merchant weighed and delivered, as the loan, and he shall thereby redeem his slave woman.This is like, you can buy back a slave woman, if she has given you children. Basically, this is saying, if you had children with a slave woman, whenever you sell her, it's like a pawn shop. You can go and buy her back. Okay, not Not great. If a slave of the palace or a slave of a commoner marries a woman of the Awai'idas and she then bears children, the owner of the slave will have no claims of slavery against the children of the woman of the Awai'idas.And I assume Awai'idas means free person. So it's saying that if the children of a slave and a free person, if it is not the owner do not own, the owner does not own those children. If he should blind the eye of an Awile's, yeah, it does mean free person, of an Awile's slave or break the bone of an Awile's slave, he shall weigh and deliver one half of his value in silver.Oh, Awile might mean like [00:43:00] Hammurabi citizen, like Jew or Hebrew or something like that. But here it's saying that if you damage a slave, you owe the owner half their amount. Again, none of this cares about the slave. If an O'Wiley slave should strike the cheek of a member of the Aful class, they shall cut off his ear. Oof! Okay, this is class stuff here. If he should cause a woman or a commoner class To miscarry her fetus by beating, he shall weigh and deliver five shekels of silver. If he strikes an a wily slave woman, and thereby causes her to miscarry her fetus, he shall bear two shekels of silver.Ooh! The difference between free people and slaves is, is lessening. There's only two and a half differences. If the slave woman should die, he shall weigh and deliver twenty shekels of silver. Interesting that that's also anyway. If it is a manslave who is fatally gored, he shall give 20 shekels of silver.So again, what we are seeing here is the Jewish system, when people say this system was morally superior to earlier systems, they are not lying. Yeah, let's go to the [00:44:00] Hittite system 1650 to 1500 BCE. If anyone kills male or female slave in a quarrel, he shall bring him for burial and she'll give him to person male or female respectively.He shall look for his house for it. Okay Nothing, if anyone strikes a free man or woman so that he dies, but it is an accident He shall bring him for burial and she'll give two persons. He shall look to his house for it basically you have to gift slaves if you kill a Okay, interesting. So I want to see this.If you kill a female male or slave in a quarrel you have to give a person for that, but it doesn't appear like to the slave. It appears to the person who slave you took. If anyone strikes a male or female slave and he dies, but it is an accident, she'll bring him to, to and give one person for it.Okay. Okay. Okay. This is confusing, but I'll explain it. If you, and this is in the Hittite system. If you kill a person in a quarrel and that person is a slave. You owe the person whose slave you killed two slaves. [00:45:00] If it's an accident, if it was an accident, you just have to replace it. Yeah. So there's a penalty when it was intentional.If it's accidental, just replace. Yeah, interesting. If anyone blinds a male or female slave or knocks out his tooth, he shall pay 10 shekels of silver. He shall look to his house for basically, yeah, find a way to pay it or his family needs to pay it. If anyone, I also find this, or he should look to his house for it.Like the legal code is getting more sophisticated in terms of how to get out of this. If anyone breaks a male or female slave's arm or leg, he shall pay 10 shekels of silver. If a male slave runs away and someone brings him back, he If he seizes him nearby, his owner gives him shoes. Give shoes to the finder.What?! Shoes? That is so cheap! Everyone else was getting two shekels, or even ten shekels if you didn't own a slate! And then someone else just gets shoes. It's like covering your mileage. You know, like, oh, I'll pay your gas money. That's literally what it is! Wow. That is literally, it's like when you submit a [00:46:00] claim to your company for the amount of gas miles you use.Yeah. They say, oh, I'll give you shoes, cause you may need to walk a while for this. That is ridiculous! RIDICULOUS! I guess returning property in this period was not so valued. If a male slave takes a female slave in marriage and they have children, when they divide their house, they shall divide their possessions equally.The slave woman shall take most of the children, and the male slave taking one child. Wait, that's not evenly! Weird. If a slave breaks into a grain storage pit and finds grain in the storage pit, he shall fill the storage pit with grain and pay six shekels of silver. He shall look to his house for it.Oh, that's interesting. So his house. Okay. So what that means is if a slave steals food from another family, the slave's owner is responsible to pay six shekels to the person who the slave stole from. Now we're going to go to Assyrian law and then we only have Roman law left. Let's see if we can get to this [00:47:00] before I have to run to get the goods.Tell me quick. If either a slave or a slave woman should receive something from a man's wife, they shall cut off the slave or the slave woman's nose and ears, and they shall restore the stolen goods. The man shall cut off his own wife's ears, but if he releases his wife and does not cut off their ears, they shall not cut off, no, their ears of the slave or the slave woman, and they shall not restore the stolen goods.And then next broken text, the owner, broken text, and if the buyer declares broken text, which I redeem, broken text, he shall give a slave, broken text, shekels of lead, and slave woman for 14, 000 shekels of lead. And I think you, the, the point you've made is that Slaves are just seen as property, and they're not entitled.Hey, buddy. They're not entitled. Hold on, hold on. Do you want to get to the Roman stuff, or we can do that in another recording? You can also do it in post. Okay, I'll add the Roman stuff in post,Microphone (HyperX QuadCast)-2: All right, let's go over the 12 tables of Roman law, 4 51 to four 50 BC table 6, 8, 8 person who has been a slave and who has been declared to be a free [00:48:00] man in a will or some condition. If he shall have given 10,000 copper coins to an error, although the slave has been alienated by the air, by giving the money to the purchaser shall enter his freedom. , so it appears that. Eva person was poor and had slaves and tried to grant them their freedom. They couldn't, they needed to give the slaves money to buy themselves from the air, which is a pretty interesting. Table eight for if a person has broken or bruised a bone with. Hand club.He shall undergo a penalty of 300 copper coins. If to an injured Freeman or of 150 copper coins if to an injured slave. So here in Roman law, we see the first system other than the Jewish system. In which a slave's wellbeing is taken into account. You couldn't just be an injure, your slave. And table eight 15. In the case of all [00:49:00] other thieves. And the act it is ordained that free bin be scourged and be a judge. As bondsman to the person against whom this effort has been committed, provided that they had done this by day. And had not defended themselves with a weapon that slaves caught in the act of theft, be whipped with scourges and be thrown from the rock that boys below the age of puberty under 15 years old. Be flogged at magistrate's discretion. And that damage done to them.Be repaired. Okay. So again, here you see care of, , the, the first slaves under a certain age. A different punishment. And then table 12, two, if a slave shall have committed theft or shall have done damage whiz, his master's knowledge, the action for damages in the slave's name. Arising from Delex committed by children and slave to the household. Actions for damages shall be appointed that the father is a master can be allowed to undergo assessment of the suit. Or [00:50:00] deliver the delinquent for punishment.Okay. So interesting. This lock here seems to consider children in the same category as slaves. Basically anyone who they see as sort of owned by a household. And when one of them does damage or steals from another person. , The master is ultimately responsible, but the master can choose to either handle the suit himself or give over the person who did the damage for punishment. So broadly speaking, Roman law. I won't say it's equal with Jewish law in terms of valley, I kind of is.Yeah, it seems about the moral equivalent to biblical law on.Simone Collins: but you get the gist, which is the Jewish system was genuinely better. Do you, do you think that people should be allowed to own other people? No. And do you think that if people did own other people, that they should treat them nicely?Yes.I love you, Simone. I love [00:51:00] you, too.Speaker 2: It's a little hot. Can you, can you slide it? Sure, Tusty. Got to mix in that cheese powder really fast. What kind of treasure?Speaker 3: It's space treasure and you and daddy and Toasty and Titan are looking for space treasure. Is that cool? I think you're in the water. Hey Toasty, you ready to dump in the pasta? Toasty, it's time to dump in the pasta. You want to help me? Help me dump it in. Push. It's too hot. It's too hot? Yeah. It's not that hot.It's not burnt.Speaker 2: What? To Titan, right? She's the one who just turned, whatever, two. Yeah, it has teeth? Yeah.[00:52:00]Speaker 3: That's the point, right? That's the dream. What? That's the cheesy dream. Mommy, is the mac and cheese done? I think it is. It is! Are you excited for that? Yeah. I like mac and cheese, don't you? It's an American institution, right? Yeah. Are you excited? I'm excited, Mama. Wasn't it Thomas Jefferson who had a big wheel of cheese?Oh, you want to put on some chapstick? No? Okay, we'll work it out. Let's have some dinner, yeah? Say, Itadakimasu! Yeah, that'd be toasty. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

In this revealing episode, we dive deep into the controversial ties between Hope Not Hate, the British government, and media organizations. We uncover shocking evidence of government funding and intelligence collaboration aimed at suppressing independent voices. Through meticulous investigation, we explore the legal and ethical boundaries crossed by various parties, from undercover journalism to extremist ideologies. The discussion spans topics such as funding misuse, political affiliations, and the impact of modern cultural narratives, providing anecdotes and testimonies from those directly affected. Join us as we navigate the intricate web of political, media, and intelligence connections, and challenge mainstream narratives to reveal the hidden agendas at play.00:00 Introduction and Initial Revelations01:00 Deep State and Mind Virus02:19 Hope Not Hate: Analyzing the Organization04:02 Evidence and Accusations08:41 Government Connections and Funding15:24 Undercover Operations and Personal Accounts22:59 Media Manipulation and Public Perception31:10 Concluding Thoughts and Future Implications55:55 Cultural Preservation and Misunderstandings56:17 Humor and Left-Wing Media Critique57:14 Infiltration Tactics and Biographical Questions58:12 Racism and Cultural Heritage58:53 Pronatalist Movement and Misconceptions01:00:22 Undercover Operations and Dehumanization01:10:04 Scientific Racism and Media Influence01:11:35 Video Game Controversies and Historical Revisionism01:30:09 Far-Right Misconceptions and Radicalization01:35:09 Concluding Thoughts and Personal Reflections[00:00:00]Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. We recently did an episode on an undercover reporter who was investigating us for at least a year.Now, it appears we were wrong, and that this, who we thought was an undercover reporter, might have actually been a spy working for the British government. Other people have collected tons of evidence that suggests this already.Malcolm Collins: But we basically collected the quote unquote final piece of evidence. Then the other people who have been collecting evidence on this organization for a long time. reviewed and it's like this basically seals the case that this is an organization used by British intelligence to try to put out a parallel narrative.And so we did something that pissed off the deep state. Bad,Speaker 3: What's it thinking, Colonel?Speaker 4: It's afraid. It's [00:01:00] afraid!Malcolm Collins: but it gets worse than that because what we're going to explore here is how the deep state was captured by the mind virus so much that taxpayer dollars could be used through authoritative fascist like, you know, government systems to track down everyday citizens fighting for citizens freedoms.Fighting for humanity to continue to exist and attempt to F up their lives.Simone Collins: Yeah, because a lot of the people that hope not hate have doxxed. Their biggest crime seems to just be not towing the narrative. Now, I wouldn't say that I, I, we, I, neither of us would endorse the views of everyone that hope not hate.As an organization has outed or criticized. However, it does seem like a lot of the people they've outed are, their crime is not towing a leftist narrative.Malcolm Collins: Yeah so we will, well, other people have noticed this as well.They claim to be a group that's against anti [00:02:00] Semitism, and yet they have done Nothing on the left right now was the huge amounts of anti Semitism that we are seeing on the streets of London and from the mouths of MPs and yet nothing. So, you know, it's, it's, it's once anti Semitism was normalized on the left, we're like, Oh, we're going to throw that out.That's not really one of those things we're fighting anymore. But I wanted to say in the, in the, in the words of one of our commenters on this, and I thought that they described this organization very well. And this is somebody from the UK who's had some experience with the organization.Hope not hate appears to be viscerally hostile to anything or anybody that represents genuine human interaction, humor, and popular democratic pushback to the ruling oligarchy. They're probably funded, I'm guessing here, by global corporations and institutions. It's not, by the UK government. They say they're not, but we have receipts proving they are.Who dislike agency of citizens and genuine popular democracy because it gets in their way. It seems like their funder's [00:03:00] aim is to maintain the status quo in which all mainstream political parties are captured, controlled, and flat out refuse to represent ordinary voters.Incidentally, the idiot hope not hate Radical activists probably think you two are monsters, but they're shadowy and cynical funders Won't believe their propaganda vote simone. So basically Bad, I I actually don't have any beef with them as human beings I I think that the guy was probably the guy weSimone Collins: met with seemed like a nice person He's probablyMalcolm Collins: a well meaning guy who just got wiped, wrapped up in this ideology and doesn't realize that he's fighting for the fascists and the oligarchs now.Yeah, I thinkSimone Collins: that's how it is with many people on the left, is they're pro social, well meaning people. Many of them want the best for humanity, want human flourishing. This undercover reporter still came across as a nice, intelligent guy with thoughtful comments that.was, you know, he came across as a little racist, which [00:04:00] made us somewhat uncomfortable, but. What it does appear is there is concrete evidence that this is an arm of the deep state. The deep state is scared of our growing movement, the new right, the pronatalists and then, if Trump wins, Hopefully we can begin to dismantle the Deep State.Speaker 8: Will thE Brain Bug reveal? Federal scientists are working around the clock to probe its secrets. Once we understand the bug, we will defeat it.Simone Collins: I, I want to emphasize here though how meaningful this is, because I think we used to joke about the Deep State. Possibly going after people for having the wrong narrative or for not supporting them.But I never really believed that could possibly be true. It seems that now there's some evidence that this actually is happening. There's overwhelming evidence, butMalcolm Collins: that's actually not the evidence we're going to go into a ton today because there's actually more evidence about this than, than we're going to go into here, but let's just [00:05:00] start with a writeup.So this is from raw egg nationalists where he's going through his own research on this., because he was one of the people who was doxxed by Hope Not Hate And I'm, I'm going to be heavily Summarizing this, . I spoke to a number of people who said there must be an intelligence connection at work.This included people with backgrounds in the military and intelligence themselves. When I told them what happened at the farm shop, they were convinced. No way that was a coincidence. Quote unquote, somebody, meaning intelligence, Must have been, quote unquote, shopping around, information about me, perhaps even just my name, in the weeks before I was doxxed.If that was the case, Catherine Long probably already knew who I was when she emailed the farm shop. She was trying to get a confirmation, a non intelligent source, for a parallel construction. So, essentially the organization that doxed him did through by asking stores that he regularly shopped at, which implies that they probably already knew who he was.And they needed a way to show that they knew who he was. That wasn't a very obvious intelligence informant. [00:06:00] I looked Well, or,Simone Collins: or I should say information obtained through illegal matters. So, Ragh Nationalist pointed outMalcolm Collins: that It wouldn't be illegal, obviously, in his case. But we found proof that it is illegal and that's what we'll get into later in this.That's the new evidence we found, is that they are using mechanisms that are only not illegal if they are working directly as spies for the British government. So either somebody at Hope Not Hate is getting arrested, or they work directly for the British government.Simone Collins: And given that I think Hope Not Hate is not idiotic, I mean they seem to be pretty organized, pretty careful, and it would be insane for them to send incriminating information to us, people that they knew.would be canceled by them and might have a bone to pick with them. It just seems implausible to me that you would do that.Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Yeah. I looked a little deeper into Catherine Long by which I mean, I went on her LinkedIn profile, Ivy league, a grad check seven months [00:07:00] internship in the state department, check USA ID posting in Tajikistan check.A specialist in Central Asian languages, fluent in Farsi and Targic. Check. Oh yeah, she's obviously a spy. Sorry for people who don't know, spy is heavily recruited to people fluent in those languages for intercepting terrorist networks and communications. So that's all the things you would have been looking for in spy recruitment.I got no further with her than that, but it was enough to convince me that she is, at the very least, a suitable candidate for an intelligence contact in media. Put another way, she glows. My friends agree. It's been known for decades that Western intelligence services, including the CIA, have intimate links to newspapers, magazines, and the media, planting stories and guiding public opinion, and this continues to present day despite high profile disavowals like the Church Commission report published in 1976.So for people who don't know, we do now know that There was a period in American history, recent American history, where a lot of quote unquote conspiracy theorists said there's CIA funded individuals at every [00:08:00] major newspaper. And now we know that during that period, that was true. The CIA had a program where they would fund people working at major newspapers to put out their particular narrative.Which at the time was a fascist right leaning narrative, and now it's a fascist left leaning narrative. Because, well, the leftists have, back then, like the I guess you could say like broader Judeo Christian moral systems, which is what the right was at that time, had more dominance within mainstream society.So they aligned with that. And right now the urban monoculture, which is the leftist has more dominance in modern society. And so they align with fascistly imposing that. And well, literally jailing anyone who disagrees with it and gains too many followers.Simone Collins: It's scary.Malcolm Collins: Then there's Hope Not Hate.Again, a little digging goes a long way. The group is ostensibly a charity, and therefore a non governmental organization, but its links to the British government are no secret. Hope Not Hate received significant amounts of money from the public purse. From 2019 to 2020, for example, the Hope Not Hate Charitable Trust received 141, 000 of British taxpayer money.The [00:09:00] Home Office's counter extremism unit has paid tens of thousands of pounds to hope not hate in recent years. And in return, the home office and other government departments have received detailed briefings on quote unquote extremism, particularly in the digital sphere. In the trustees report for 2019, it states in that year, hope not hate quote, briefed multiple departments in the home office on emerging trends in UK hate. As well as briefing the Home Affairs Committee and presented a key note at a home office conference on online hate in Derby. Okay, thisSimone Collins: really, this explains a lot to me because when I looked at their Wikipedia page, it clearly states that they don't receive donations from the government because they are a, they are a, A nonprofit organization and they can't do that.But if they're making program revenue from the government, that's different. So I guess that's how this works.Malcolm Collins: Yes. And I would like one of our followers to edit their Wikipedia page to make this clear, to say they don't get money from government, but there is, it's in their own tax filings that they do.[00:10:00]Simone Collins: They're not receiving donations, but they are getting paid for their services. lot. They're getting paid aMalcolm Collins: lot. And I'm going to put like receipts on the screen here right now. So you can see just how much money is going to them for these sorts of activities. And who is paying it, which is the anti extremism office.And a great report on this was done by Charlotte Gill. And I'll put her, her tweet on this here. But what's really horrifying about this is that this was done like money was being funneled to hope not hate by the counter extremism organization in the UK in the same year that, and I will quote her tweet here, Kariya Sadal is a Libyan asylum seeker who served a 17 month sentence for Afrian assault, reduced on appeal for beating an emergency worker, was reported to prevent it.Four times told prison staff. He was part of the Islamic state and wanted to quote unquote blow up. Britain Was the [00:11:00] subject of quote dozens of intelligence reports which showed a pattern of fighting threats to staff Self harming and suspected drug use along with references to extremism in quote But the authorities didn't report him because olivia was deemed quote, unquote unsafe.So three men were murdered instead two weeks after his release from prison. They, the extremism office did nothing about this. And when we talk about the urban monoculture, who were these three men? They were three gay men. Do you know what Stonewall had to say about this? Just so you understand if you're like, well, I'm gay.So I need the urban monoculture to protect me. They don't give a. about you. The only people who will still protect you are the conservatives. And that is it. And that is why gay men are on mass. As we've said by various polls, it's either 45 percent or 33 percent of gay men in the U. S. voted for Trump in the last election cycle.More will this election cycle. It's going to be a solidly red voting block in the near future. Wow. Very obvious. Because this is what the left will do. Organizations like Stonewall said, our thoughts are with those affected by the attack [00:12:00] in Reading on Saturday. It's heartbreaking to hear two of the victims were LGBT, but we can't let Islamophobic, racist and xenophobic rhetoric be used to divide us.We must stand together to make progress. Meanwhile, you know, one man, gay man responded here. While charities such as Stonewall told us we must not be quote unquote Islamophobic while their bodies are still warm, it's all too incredibly awkward if a Muslim murders three gay men, eh? Let's move along now, nothing to see.Stonewall couldn't even say gay men, they had to say LGBT.Simone Collins: Oh, Lord.Malcolm Collins: That is, it is, it is horrifying how much they are being thrown under the bus.Simone Collins: That is, that is some major flinging there.Malcolm Collins: Now, now, remember, they're supposed to be reducing extremism in the UK. They are briefing, UK organizations on who the extremist groups are probably proofing them that we're an extremist group now, right?You want thoseSimone Collins: pronatalists?Malcolm Collins: You want to know what their founders? We'll we'll we'll do when [00:13:00] people who work with them So a a researcher at hope not hate an anti extremist left wing pressure group has been accused of pushing far left Extremism after a video emerged of him endorsing the communist red army the head of the intelligence group.So this is the head of the intelligence group for them stood behind a Soviet flag at an event in London in 2013 and said, quote, comrades, brothers and sisters, hope, not hate. co. uk. You are our red army. Oh,Simone Collins: well,Malcolm Collins: Kowalicz, a member of the Polish parliament and former government minister, told GB News, quote, Praising the Red Army is the most left wing extremist thing to do, especially after knowing what tortures they did to the peoples of the Siberian gulags, to Poles in Kyiv, killing 22, 000 of Polish officers, and during the Stalist anti Semitic purges, end quote.And all of this is obviously true, and here I note, you know, talk about them being commies, them making fun of us for being pronatals and saying, look [00:14:00] at how fascist this is, the Nazis were pronatalists. We're not mentioning that the Soviets, the Red Army was more pronatalist than the Nazis ever were, right?You know, but they're just straight up and, and, and we denounce both of these groups, the Nazis, the Soviets, both equally evil, both massively anti semitic, both killed millions of people, millions of innocent. People and people who identify with either of these organizations, whether they be modern neo Nazis or modern communists, should be viewed in the same light as supporting true evil and as active activists against the democratic Democratic.Three countries of the world, like the UK or the United States. So they are literally being coached by an extremist organization.Simone Collins: GoodMalcolm Collins: lord. They didn't fire this guy, by the way.Simone Collins: Oh, okay. Wow. I mean, the one thing, I have one positive note about them so far, which is that they follow our philosophy with non profits, which is that [00:15:00] you should be making The majority of your money over time, and in fact, most of your income from the work you do, and they're making money from selling to the US government, not donations.And I appreciateMalcolm Collins: government Simone. It is functionally a donation. It's just done in a way that makes it legal. They're basically just stealing from taxpayers. Like it's, and it gets worse. Hold on. It gets worse. How can this getworse?So we haven't even gotten to the spy stuff yet or anything like that, but.Research from Taxpayers Alliance has revealed that organizations that lobby for changes in public policies within the UK have received around 50, 000 in public money since 2018, including 19 million during the COVID pandemic. Oh, no, wait, not 49. Sorry. I said 50, 000. What I meant was 50 million, 50 million in public, 50 million pounds, by the way, 19 million during the COVID pandemic and nearly 7.7 million was given to organizations actively fighting against the [00:16:00] government scheme to resettle migrants in Rwanda. So the government, the conservative government was trying to do something to help the people of Britain and the immigrants who had come to their country, fleeing dangerous countries, get them back to safe countries like this guy from Libya.And they were like, Oh, it's too dangerous to send them back there. So they're like, we'll send them to Rwanda. No, taxpayer money was being used to fight this in the public mind, including Organizations that were doing this that were getting government money, migrant help, Stonewall, refugee action, hope not hate, and InstaLaw.InstaLaw recently issued judicial review proceedings challenging the legality of the immigration deal while the other organizations signed an open letter criticizing it. The Department of Health and Social Care gave the most of any white wall department over 30 million dollars to five organizations with the Department of.with the Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport gave to influential campaign groups, including Age UK, Gender Intelligence, Migrants Organize, and Stonewall.And then these are groupsthat [00:17:00] just support Progressive politicians running for office. That's one of the key things they do. And here's an article I'm gonna put on screen here.A new labor MP is also the director of hope, not hate. So literally the people in office are deciding where this money is going. Wow. Organization that regularly campaigns against conservative elected candidates and is partially funded by the taxpayer and literally doesn't serve its message. Like the first time they go after one of these anti Semites on the left, I will rescind all of this.But let's see them even for a second infiltrate. They don't even need to infiltrate these lefty groups because they're in them. They're going to their parties. They know they're all rabid anti Semites. As anyone who has gone to any of their events knows hold on. It continues to get worse. So, since Gerardo revealed Hope Not Hate's close labor links, including campaigning specifically against Susan Hall during the mayoral election, it has embedded itself further into the government.Two of the six trustees of its charitable foundation have now made their way into parliament as labor MPs. Two trustees [00:18:00] department. What it doesn't in there, government whip and Tulley is both a director and member of its board of trustees covering all bases labor mp Sarah Owen is a vice chairman of the group's parliamentary group.Oh wow. Made up of only labor mps, by the way, no conservatives on this. Another of the campaign organizations directors also happens to be a prominent labor NP and TUC communications director in Tenia brantz, chairman of the trustee of the board, is newly elected labor MP, Gridan Singer Joseph. And,this is,By the way, I'm reading from order.order, order slash order. com more here. The new Hope Not Hate lead organizer admits that he is also a labor campaigner. And it's pushing to get a, quote, good solid majority, end quote, for labor candidate Paul Waugh in Rottenchild via the Hope Not Hate campaign. The organizer says that the group is targeting anyone likely to vote against George Galilei to convince him to vote for anyone else.We're just trying to get anyone [00:19:00] who's not likely to vote for Galloway. The charity which received taxpayer funds previously getting cash from taxpayer supported Paul Himmelin Foundation, PHF, and City Hall has deep wide links to the Labour Party.And then here Hope Not Hate's ground campaign also goes into some detail about the MRP polling, which they bought for the constituency, which allows them to accurately target voters who can mobilize. They say it's, quote, not very cheap, end quote, the last time Guaido checked. MRP constituency polling cost around 20, 000. Even if they got a discount, it's unlikely they dragged the cost below the 700 spending limit, in which case Hope Not Hate would be falling foul of clear Electoral Commission rules. So they're just blatantly breaking the law. This has been found out, this has been made public, and no one is doing anything about this or nothing has gone through.This would make sense if they are [00:20:00] actually partially an arm of the British government. intelligence agency, which will get to more evidence that this is the case in just a second. And I should say an ideologically captured arm attempting to bring down the British state. They are, they are, well, not really bring it down, but support the oligarchical network that is antithetical to British and American democracy.They are very much what the Kingsmen are. In that, in every Kingsman episode movie, I always say, you know, They're always fighting against somebody who has some like radical idea about how the world might be improved to try to maintain the status quo. Yeah, status quo. Good. I, for example, actually agree with one of the villains of the second one, the president of the United States.Simone Collins: Wait, what was the president of the United States doing in the second one?Malcolm Collins: So there was anyone who took it. Right. Right. And he wanted to just let them die so that he could finally end the drug problem in the United States. And it happened. I love the way that they signaled that he was actually evil, [00:21:00] because at first it was like only drug addicts are dying from this.And then you learned, oh no, one of his staffers was also a cocaine addict. Because she wanted to keep up with her workload. And when a white middle class woman is on the list, you know that it could affect you, urban monoculture.So you're not supposed to There was even a princessSimone Collins: on the list. Remember his girlfriend?So God forbid.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but his girlfriend was a junkie. Like, I think if society had that, like, everybody who did drugs just, like, died one day, going forwards, more lives would be saved and more general suffering would be saved.Simone Collins: I think you don't realize how pervasive drug use is.Malcolm Collins: Well, no, no, we, we, we as a society, and keep in mind it didn't affect people who were taking like nootropics or like other drugs meant to like control their daily behavior.This was like people on cocaine or other types of recreational drugs. Yeah, itSimone Collins: was, [00:22:00] no, it was just one specific drug that they were, that that woman's company was marketing and distributing. So it was just one drug, like a party drug, I think.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, like a party drug. It was, it was not a drug that anyone really had a good excuse to be using for productivity improvement or anything like that.And, but, but what I mean is you wouldn't just have a disruption of the existing global drug supply network. You would also have nobody doing drugs in the future because everyone would have, like, bigger than COVID would have grown up through this period where it's like, Oh, this is why we actually have to take drugs super seriously.And I think if you go to our video on the drug crisis that we're going through right now, I can't even name it because it got the video demonetized. You will learn just how bad things are and just the level of suffering that something big needs to be done about this. All right, so to continue now we're gonna go into the actual spy stuff.Woo.The links [00:23:00] appear to go far beyond government funding for dull PowerPoint presentations at dull conferences. Jason Za Georgii has a alleged hope Not Hate is a direct front for British Intelligence at home and abroad. IE four M 15 and M 16 in 2017. Georgie was caught in an undercover sting in a New York bar by a Swedish Antifa activist working for Hope Not Hate.Georgie lost his teaching job at the New Jersey Institute of Technology and subsequently sued the university. He maintains that the sting was on behalf of British intelligence after he left the alt right corporation. In the immediate fallout of Charlottesville. This is where things start to get murky and a bit confusing.You can listen to Jirajiji explain his allegations at length in this video. And I guess I'll put a picture of it on screen so you can Google it. But there's other evidence that points in the same direction. First of all, hope not hate is a offshoot of searchlight and a quote unquote anti fascist organization.I love, you know, you should watch our Antifa video. All these organizations are just very clearly [00:24:00] fascist organizations now. Antifa literally calls, it's like, people who go disrupt protests, black shirts, which is also what the original fascist Moush Tlalini called their people who went and disrupted protests.Their goals are exactly the same as fascist watch are because people, when they're, they're like modern Democrats, aren't fascists. They're kind of different. Watch our Modern Democrats Are Fascists video. Seriously, seriously, seriously watch it if you haven't watched it yet. They are not like fascists.They are literally a mirror of fascist ideology at the height of fascism. It has just been occluded to you what that ideology actually was, and they've changed which race is at the top. That's it. Which race is at the bottom is still the same. I'll tell you that much. The Jews are not friends to these groups.Let's continue here. So, from the left wing, Of its ties to the government and intelligence services, including British and French intelligence, but here also, they say they have some Assad intelligence. Working with Searchlight. So this is one place where the Jews accidentally helped these people before realizing that they were going to turn against them and start calling for their extinction.[00:25:00] As we see people regularly marching through the streets of London do today. We've seen this, right? You and I have seen this. Actually doing the, the what is it, river to the sea chant in the streets of London. So, whew. That was interesting.Simone Collins: Yeah, that was weird.Malcolm Collins: Bruce sees former labor MP and now a life peer in the house of lds.Served as deputy director of Hope Not Hate from 2011 to 2015. Wiki Leaks revealed in 2009 while still a perspective parliamentary candidate. She was described in a confidential American cable as, which was strictly protected by the way, as quote. Code for a protected intelligent asset.Simone Collins: Okay. So the, the, they're dealing with communications associated with hope, not hate in a way that they would deal with intelligence conversations.Malcolm Collins: Well, people who are running the organization as as as coded as intelligent assets.Simone Collins: Okay.Malcolm Collins: So, I mean, obviously she was an intelligence asset. That's that seems pretty clear to me. [00:26:00] You wouldn't use that code. Otherwise, strictly protect means that the individual is an intelligence asset. And running this organization.What's funny about this possibility, hope not hate as a direct organ of the British government, is that the group is full of people who are committed to the violent overthrow of capitalism and would therefore count as quote unquote extremists by hope not hate's own definition and that of the British intelligence services and government.Hope not hate's own quote, head of intelligence in quote, Matthew Collins was caught on film. And this is the thing about the red army that I mentioned earlier in the most recent state of hate report, it targeted Jacob Reese, Mog, John Redwood in Duncan Smith, Danny Kruger, and Miriam creates all conservative MPs and suggested that they were quote, unquote, radicalizing the conservative government through their quote, unquote, opposition to woke politics in quote.Okay.Simone Collins: Wow. That, that feels amazing. Extra egregious. I mean, I know you've just listed off a ton of egregious things, but the fact that there are labor [00:27:00] MPs directly associated with this organization, but that this organization is in turn. Attacking the reputation of conservative MPs and they're receiving money from the government.This is justMalcolm Collins: like For being in opposition to wokeism, but it gets worse than that. The other thing they attacked them for was, quote, a certain conception of free speech, end quote. Wait, basically they're saying they don't like that. They're promoting free speech. They, they also promote quote unquote, free speech, i.e. anything. And if you've seen the wacky cases, and I'll add some in post here of people being arrested for like saying completely inoffensive things in the UK, I wouldSimone Collins: be terrified to be on social media in the UK.Malcolm Collins: We should be able to set the rules in the UK and you see mainstream, even progressives fighting against this was like cool.You know, what's her name? J. K. Rowling fighting against that insane law that came out in Scotland that wanted to jail people for misgendering people. That is absolutely wild that they feel that they [00:28:00] have this level of cultural hegemony. And this is what they mean when they say a certain conception.So that's what they think makes them a hate group. Conservative MPs. Necessity makes for strained bedfellows. A group infested with radical Marxists can just as assuredly, wittingly or unwittingly, carry out the bidding of the British government, or any government for that matter. The Black Panthers did a fine job of playing useful idiots for the FBI and CIA in the 1960s and the 1970s as part of Operation Chaos and COINTPRO.But it's also possible to For the goals of each group to be in direct alignment with those official agencies. Left wingers want to make life hard for quote unquote fascists and quote unquote right wing extremists and so do western governments. So why wouldn't they work together? And it would , and all it would take is a little tip off now and then.Now here's what I want to point out here. I don't even think that that's what's happening here? I think that this is even more conspiratorial. I think that individuals who are in the deep state, who are like, you know, state bureaucrats have these ideologies. [00:29:00] Like, obviously they do. They go to the same parties that these other people go to and they funnel cash their way.I mean, obviously they're MPs on both sides, right? They're, they're, they're, they're literally the same group. This is literally the same social group. It has just ideologically captured the British intelligence agencies.Wow.And if people don't believe that intelligence agencies can be captured by wokeism, I'm gonna put some, like, U. S. Army and CIA recruitment stuff in here right now. So you can see how bad it's gotten even in our own country.Speaker 13: When I was 17, I quoted Zora Neale Hurston's How It Feels to be Colored Me in my college application essay. The line that spoke to me stated simply, I am not tragically colored. There is no sorrow damned up in my soul nor lurking behind my eyes. I do not mind at all. At 17, I had no idea what life would bring, but Zora's sentiment articulated so beautifully how I felt as a daughter of immigrants [00:30:00] then and now.Nothing about me was or is tragic. I am perfectly made. I can wax eloquent on complex legal issues in English, while also belting amores in Spanish. I can change a diaper with one hand and console a crying toddler with the other. I'm a woman of color. I am a mom. I millennial who's been diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder.I am intersectional, but my existence is not a box checking exercise. I I am a walking declaration, a woman whose inflection does not rise at the end of her sentences, suggesting that a question has been asked. I did not sneak into CIA. My employment was not and is not the result of a fluke or slip through the cracks. I used to struggle with imposter syndrome, but at 36, I refuse to internalize misguided patriarchal ideas of what a woman can or should be.I am tired of [00:31:00] feeling like I'm supposed to apologize for For the space I occupied rather than intoxicate people with my effort, my brilliance. I am proud of me. Full stop.Malcolm Collins: We, interestingly, like the hippies before, are fighting for freedom against a fascist force that's attempting to push a cultural hegemony and keep wars going.You know, in, in, it's just horrifying. You didSimone Collins: not just call us tippy.Malcolm Collins: Well, hey, I just say that we are aligned with the fight that they had previously and I think that we've seen this actually was interesting when I was reading the piece about why the guy who ended up doing all the undercover stuff got into this.He was like, he was surprised at some of his older, like, hippie friends. Crunchy friends were now beginning to align with the conservatives against the vaccine. And he's like, how does this happen? How are they radicalizing these people? It's like, they're not radicalizing. They just realized the teams have switched.And now you guys are the ones who control the government. And well, I thinkSimone Collins: that's the interesting thing is that people on the inside of this don't [00:32:00] realize the fascists don't realize that they themselves have been radicalized, which is interesting. I think there's this. Lack of understanding of what's going on, even from within the house.But what is uniquely scary about this is that. I guess you and I are coming online to the fact that this is happening. Apparently this is happening, this has been happening for quite some time. And there's public knowledge of it, and nothing is being done. And how much worse are things going to get? I mean, how much more I mean, we, we, we always get coverage ofoh, sorry. Right. I can't. Oh, I forgot. TheMalcolm Collins: whole conversation here that I just had to delete because YouTube will immediately restrict the video. We have that conversation. So we're not going to have that conversation. But I, and that's alsoSimone Collins: crazy. Why, why are we living over? Thought crime world now, where we can't say certain things.That is Simone I'm, just going toMalcolm Collins: continue reading and you can sit [00:33:00] there and see that you can't have the conversation you want to have. Thanks so, parallel construction one way or another was almost certainly a part in the doxing of Johnath Keman, AKA Lez, and we met him, right? Although the guardian made no mention of it, Jonathan was aware months before his identity was revealed, that a prominent conservative figure was how shall we say, a penant for intrigue was making a great show of asking his friends for him by name. The implication was that this renowned schemer would soon release Jonathan's name as part of one of his trademark I am a concerned centrist articles that he writes for his online magazine.And he wanted Jonathan to know this and be afraid. The Grave Amen, parenthetically, was an article Jonathan wrote as Lomez for the Catholic journal First Things. Just as Bill Kristol was outraged that the Claremont Institute had stooped to publish an anonymous raw egg, eating eccentricist 30 times and counting, Bill, so [00:34:00] our concerned centrists simply couldn't believe that a renowned theology journal would publish an anonymously pinned article.And not just that, an anonymously pinned article About a concept the longhouse taken for bronze age perverts scandalous book bronze age mindset This fervent pants wetter was only dissuaded when an editor at first things guaranteed that jonathan would have a right of reply And so it appears he decided to pass on jonathan's details to someone who could do the dirty work for him instead jason wilson I don't know what all that is about.That is clearly inside baseball but I will say that it is interesting here that like Bronze Age pervert is not that far right. I know people like paint him as far right because he goes against the urban monoculture, but his actual beliefs seem fairly centrist to me, just sort of unique, just sort of against the grain.Which is pretty wild that they would be attacked for that. I'd also note here, and this is something we'll do a separate episode on, but if you are conservative and you're thinking about entering the public sphere, Do not [00:35:00] do so anonymously. Do not do so anonymously. It is so stupid.Simone Collins: I can try reverting that in a more diplomatic way. What we would say is if you consider becoming a Non leftist speaker, don't do it through anonymous accounts.Don't try to hide it because as much as we respect a lot of people who did that, and we think their takes are fun. Honestly, a lot of people whose takes are a lot more reasonable than even ours have been through severe cancellation events because of the fact that they've tried to hide their identities.It is nearly impossible to hide your identity, especially now, especially in the age of AI. And through illicit. Legal or illegal means I don't care, you will be found and the mere fact that you are attempting to hide your identity makes you vulnerable and makes you more of a target. Expect that everything will come out, expect that everything will come back to you and your [00:36:00] real identity and don't try to fight it.I canMalcolm Collins: think of a great example here of two specific individuals, one who is always public and one who tried to be private. So we're reading this by Ryan Nationalist. So I'll use his as an example. Think about the backlash and the real life consequences Ryan Nationalist got when he was doxxed compared with any consequences Ed Dutton has ever faced.Ed Dutton is Miles to the right of Roy Ignatianalist in terms of anything he's ever written. And yet, he has experienced significantly less backlash because he never had a doxed moment.And this is why it's so dangerous. But it also helps make sure, like, individuals like us, that you know you're always being recorded.Okay? Never say anything you don't want played to your real life boss.So to keep going here. As the association between Bellingcat and Western Intelligence Agencies [00:37:00] deepened, the group has moved away from its earlier model of, quote, open source, end quote, intelligence, where it only used publicly accessible data. To a model that acknowledges, and I'm putting on the screen here that proves this, a piece of proof of this, the use of the kinds of restricted data, like flight manifests and cell phone records, that only intelligence agencies, hackers, and criminals have access to.Bellingcat assiduously denied that they work with the government. But they would say that, wouldn't they? Also, the labor baroness on their board is a U. S. intelligence asset, according to their, her Wikipedia. She was named Yeah. And that's the one that we talked about earlier. So she's also one, I guess, Billington.Okay. So just to understand how bad hope not hate is hope, not hate inflamed the riots by spreading false reports of a Muslim woman being attacked with acid and MP from their own party, from the labor party amplified this with Josh Fenton, Glenn, MP retweeting far right cowards attacking [00:38:00] women when people show you who they are, believe them.And this is retweeting a hope not hate tweet. Reports are coming in of acid being thrown at a car window at a Muslim woman in Middlesboro. Absolutely horrendous. This is completely they just made something up to inflame the riots because that's what they try to do. They are not an anti, they are literally an extremist group.And they should be treated and labeled as an extremist group. And in fact, I will go so far that if I find my way into a Trump administration, I will have Hope Not Hate labeled by the State Department as a terrorist extremist group. Alongside all the neo Nazi groups alongside, because they're acting like one.And they need to be categorized as one and I think if we get a conservative majority in the UK, the UK needs to do this as well so we can begin to ferret out who their collaborators are within our intelligence network.Simone Collins: Yeah, I think that's fair. Especially with government funds being used. [00:39:00] To so flagrantly fund a political agenda that is not shared by all taxpayers.I just that seems soMalcolm Collins: Shared by all taxpayers. It's like clearly not a threat to the country They're like half of the country is a threat to the country. That's like what they're getting at They believe that is the most anti democratic thing I could conceivably imagine They are trying to ensure that only one of the two major political factions within their country Can win and are using It seems both intelligence assets and taxpayer dollars to ensure that happens.That is not democracy. That is fascism. That is anti democratic. That is secret police stuff.Simone Collins: Yeah, it is crazy to me that that is real. I just can't, I can't believe it's real. And I think it took it, it took us getting involved in something like this for us to actually fully come to terms with the fact that it's real.It's real. It seems that ridiculous. [00:40:00]Malcolm Collins: Now here is where we break the case because we collected a certain item when we were working with the guy. Apparently we were much more careful than anyone who had ever worked with him before.Simone Collins: And I want to point out how meaningful that is because you've alluded to this in other podcasts.But what people consider or call the far right is one of the most open, transparent, inclusive, kind groups of people that you will ever encounter that I've never received a cold shoulder from these people. The only cold shoulders I've ever really received are from progressive groups which is, I thinkMalcolm Collins: it's funny.I, I, I, what if like, this is just like a classic interview you see, where a progressive interviewer will go up to like a black person or like a flamboyantly gay person at like a, a, a, a right wing rally and be like, why are you here? You must be treated horribly by this group. And they're like, no, actually they've been nicer to me than the leftists ever were.[00:41:00] And then the reporter's like, see how brainwashed they are.Simone Collins: It comes as no surprise to me that. That this Chris Morton, who is, this is the identity that the undercover reporter presented to the far right extremists that he interacted with that he was met with. Basically, no criticism. No one really pushing on his background.No one really questioning him and it is also notable that we even pushed him as much as we did. But I will, I will say this. He did some things that were pretty flagrantly suspicious. I mean, aside from having no online footprint at all.Malcolm Collins: And his, his resume was like, he gave us a resume to try to prove who he was.It was like a paper thin,obviously fake resume. If you went over it, I just didn't check it.Simone Collins: Yeah. Why don't you, you should put it on the screen. Put it on the screen. But also his email was literally the real Chris [00:42:00] Morton at insert domain. com, like common that insert email provider. com the real Chris Morton, as in like the personality.So at one point this was after no, mind you, after we'd have multiple. Zoom calls with him after we had met with him in person over a private lunch. And after we had him invited him and looped him in to a private dinner with other people, byMalcolm Collins: the way, which is usually against like legality in terms of like what reporters are, .Simone Collins: That is true. With aMalcolm Collins: nonprofit, by the way,Simone Collins: that is wild.Malcolm Collins: He's stealing nonprofit money from right wing organizations.Simone Collins: Anyway. So even after that, you know, we, we already looped him in. So we're, we're also very inclusive and we honestly don't really care if, if someone, and we're just as inclusive to Adversarial journalists, I should say we, we wouldn't have invited an adversarial journalist knowingly to a private dinner [00:43:00] party with other people present because we don't want to put anyone else at risk, but we personally will never, doingMalcolm Collins: another piece on us.And you're like, and they've always done hit pieces on us. And you're like, yeah, sure.Simone Collins: Come over. Yeah. I'm like, yeah, come on. Yeah. The guardian who covered hope not hates most recent exposés that they just put out is, is coming over to our place on Friday. I'm going to hang out with another journalist.We neverMalcolm Collins: close ourselves off to anyone, but I want to get to the, the evidence here. Right. So anyway,Simone Collins: after this, after this, but before making additional intros for him, because again, we like the rest of the far right community are very inclusive and open. We're like, Hey, we just want to make sure you're a real person because, you know, you, you really do kind of have a suspicious background.The real Chris Wharton at email provider. com. So we, we asked and he unprovoked sent us a picture of a passport. And this is when we decided he was safe. Do you knowMalcolm Collins: why we decided he was safe when he sent us a picture of a passport? Because it [00:44:00] is illegal.Simone Collins: No, no, no.Malcolm Collins: Simone, I will read perplexities answer to this.Okay. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Creating and showing a fake passport to anyone in the UK is illegal and can result in serious consequences. It is illegal to create, process, or use a fake passport in the UK under the Identity Documents Act of 2010. This law makes it an offence to possess a false identity document with improper intention, which would include creating and showing a fake passport to someone, even if they are just a random civilian.Well, but also just likeSimone Collins: literally I'm quoting the identity documents act of 2010, quote, it is an offense for a person without reasonable excuse to have in person's possession or under person's control, an identity document that is false. So it wasn't just the fact that we showed it to us. Or it wasn't the fact that he showed it to us to mislead us.It was the fact that he possesses a fake ID. His name is not Chris Morton. His name is. Oh, what is his name?Malcolm Collins: Simone, we'll get to that in a second. We'll get to that in a second because we're going to go over a big piece about him. But the prison sentence [00:45:00] for this would be a 10 year prison sentence. And you would have a criminal record after doing this and you would also face fines.So weSimone Collins: know this can't be his illegal use because if you weren't illegally doing this, if the government didn't provide this to him somehow in a way that made him feel safe, he wouldn't send to people he's about to cancel. A piece of incriminating evidence that could put him in jail for 10 years. Yes, because he knew he was going to Post something about us and he knew that we would have this in our email inboxes just sitting thereMalcolm Collins: I mean even even with all of this and I would note to anybody who's listening to this um If if you are in the uk and you want to test this and prove hope not hate's connection to british intelligence Just press the case.I mean, we're putting a picture of the email here. We're putting a picture of the passport here. I'll leave it to you guys, but I'm fairly certain that what the case isn't going to go anywhere because it's going to turn out that they're connected to British intelligence. And I would not be [00:46:00] airing this.If I was not certain of that.Simone Collins: Yeah, because we don't want to put anyone in jail. We do not want to put anyone in jail. I don't wantMalcolm Collins: to put anyone in jail for just like, he got brainwashed colonySimone Collins: people. We believe in public wit. Like, I would much rather be publicly whipped than put in jail, for sure. Person.Person. Like, we're very against jail. So like, I don't want anyone put in jail.Malcolm Collins: Went to Cambridge, got brainwashed by the cult you know, it's normal, it happens to people, one day you may wake up, you know, and be like, oh my god, I can't believe all the horrifying things I've done, all the people I've been collaborating with, these horrific people who divide humans based on their ethnic group, want to enforce a government ideology on the populace, and put Jews at the bottom, They look a lot like another group that rose to power before, and I was one of their witless collaborators.They enforced their power on the streets using black shirts, just like the fascists did historically.They I'm just saying. I'm just saying. I was definitely on the suppressive side. I was the [00:47:00] Nazi! Oh my god! Oh! But he's not gonna have that moment, probably. But I don't I don't He could, you know? He could!No, ISimone Collins: I think I think he's a He And he He hasn't been working with Hope Not Hate. Until very recently, this was his first project. Yeah, I don't think heMalcolm Collins: understood, like, what the agenda is here or anything like that. I just think he had this, like, idea of, I'm going to go undercover, wouldn't this be interesting to understand this stuff better?Yeah. Write a book on it. Yeah. And he got funding from them. And I don't think he understands the, full agenda at play here. Or the truly nefarious intent of a lot of these organizations in terms of stamping out any sort of diversity in either the UK or the, oh yeah, token diversity. Like let's say like color tone diversity.But not real diversity, not like diversity of ideas or beliefs or anything like that. I mean, look at how fast they dropped their commitment to fighting anti Semitism as soon as it took over their own party. Look at itSimone Collins: from his perspective. He was a [00:48:00] journalist. He covered things like the, the rise of the far right a little bit, but he wrote about plenty of other things.He is looking for good journalistic opportunities. He knew that HopeNotHate had experience working undercover and he planned on going to some, you know, far right extremist conference undercover or something like that, and he saw the opportunity and he jumped at it, and I don't, yeah, I think he's an intelligent person who's doing the best for his career.He's got aMalcolm Collins: smile that looks similar to somebody who would have worked in intelligence. And there is evidence that somebody else sent us that his parents are in intelligence British intelligence. FormerSimone Collins: intelligence,Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-1: Since recording this, they found fairly definitive proof that his grandfather was a spy working for the British government. , specifically the thing that made the connection rather than just a last name. So we weren't sure before was they found, , a business records for a brick and mortar development limited company.Simone Collins: Yeah, maybe. However, I will notMalcolm Collins: provide that evidence because that could be seen as doxing of his parents, which to me is super gross.The only reason I'm even mentioning his name is he has publicly Published with his name that [00:49:00] he was the one who did this if he hadn't done that. I would never release his real nameBecause unlike him, I don't believe in this kind of doxxing. I think it's wrong I think it's evil. And I think it's what organizations do when they want to scare people I mean, I think you look at something like raw egg nationalists like raw egg nationalists revealing who he is doesn't like Hurt the brand of Rod nationalists.He's like a normal, healthy looking, successful guy, you know, all it does is make people like him afraid to speak their mind against the fascists who are taking over our government. That's what it does. So let's continue here during the spring of 2023. And this is written by him, right. Or by somebody writing about him.Which I, which I,Simone Collins: this is written. By a former colleague of him at the mill, which is the publication where he worked. Even part time leading into his undercover experience with Hope Not Hate.Malcolm Collins: Yes. During the spring of 2023, undercover reporter Harry Shuckman sat amongst [00:50:00] a group of far right campaigners in a fortified backpatio belonging to Paul Goulding, a Salford based leader of Britain First, and he was terrified. Shuckman had spent the day pamphleting for the party under a secret identity. His fellow pamphleteers knew him as Chris, while he wore a hidden camera as the group sat around the high walled barbed wire patio of Goulding's second home in Dartford, eating takeaway pizza as twilight fell.Goulding was start Staring directly at Shulkman's chest. This was a man who had been previously jailed for aggravated harassment. I have never heard anything so dystopian as aggravated harassment. They act like it's aggravated assault. What if heSimone Collins: chides me? What if he chides me? I'm just picturing him in this backyard patio, eating Pizza Express, which is so delicious.Just like so scared out of his mind that someone is going to, in an aggravated fashion, chide him for, [00:51:00] like, trying to dox him.Malcolm Collins: I don't know whatQuote, I felt so uncomfortable. It was like my heart was about to explode. In quote, Shalkman recalls, Golding was looking, quote, dead at my chest, drilling his eyes in, and I felt myself getting very hot.Like f**k, has he seen it? In quote. Immediately, Shalkman began plotting his getaway. Though he quickly realized, with mounting horror, that he was several doors away from the exit. There was, quote, no way I could escape, end quote, without a very thorough tongue lashing from this man. You naughty, naughty man!How dare you betray all of your friend's trust and our kindness!We,Simone Collins: we got youMalcolm Collins: pizza! He gave them pizza! That's what they're most like, British thing possible. And then to my horror, and then to my horror, I realized I may be criticized. I may have to face some social consequences for my actions. [00:52:00]Simone Collins: How embarrassing.Oh dear. Oh my. Oh,Malcolm Collins: but I, I mean, I just let, but it's because he has, and you should watch your Antifa video if you don't do this, but the leftists use this social technology where they equate somebody being like, Too many immigrants are coming to our country when more people have moved in, more immigrants this year came into America than there were Americans born in America.And Elon Musk was like, this is a problem. And I'm like, yeah, that does actually seem like a problem. And people like him would be like, that's a fascist thing to say. And it's like, they do that so that they can, in their mind, connect you with Nazis to dehumanize you without actually showing any ideological similarity to Nazis, whereas along every major political and ideological access, except whites being at the top, they are exactly Nazis politically.And again, go see our video, Is the Left Actually Fascist? I don'tSimone Collins: know, man. There's a lot of whites at the top of these organizations. [00:53:00]Malcolm Collins: No, but what I'm saying is that the ideology that Nazis pushed is that humans should be viewed as a striated ethno group system where some ethnic group Oh, and this, yeah, that one particular viewSimone Collins: is absent from these leftist groups, that, that one,Malcolm Collins: yeah.Well, no, I'm saying they, they have this ideology. They have an ideology of like a past greatness that, that, that, that awards various ethnic groups the right to be treated this way. Okay. They have narratives where the reason that ethnic groups that should be high within the system are not high within the system due to oppression of the Jews or other groups.I mean, that's, that's literally what they argue. You can look at, at, at, you know, you're right. It's still the Jews. They know they forget is Nazis. Weren't mad at the Jews. Because they saw Jews as like lesser than them. They were mad at the Jews because they thought the Jews were hoarding all the money and oppressing them.That,that was why they were mad at the Jews. Because the Jews were privileged. It is the same [00:54:00] ideology. Anyway. So, and I just like, they're like hanging out with the good guys. They're like, I don't understand why no one on the good guy side is suspicious of me. I'm not saying that this group, I don't know anything about this Britain first group, but if it's anything like Make America First, it's probably not that bad.Make America First is a mainstream organization in the U. S. that is just concerned about American culture. And I'm like, let's be clearSimone Collins: though. I don't, I don't know what they actually stand for. SoMalcolm Collins: I don't know what any of these groups stand for, but I'm just saying the people I've met in Make America First, are generally nice people and when I talk to them, they're generally less racist than this guy was pretending to be less racist than the email hope not hate sent us one of my favorite things about the hope not hate.Oh my gosh. Racist things. So there was this email when they were going to expose us and they go, in private, we caught you saying you wanted to help exceptional people have more kids. But on your website, you say that you want to help Latin Americans.How do you square that? Can you believe this? Now, you've got to [00:55:00] keep in mind who we are. We live half time in Latin America. We have a home in Peru. The godson of our firstborn son is Latin American. Okay? We are very, very pro Latin American. Just to be clear, in caseSimone Collins: you're only half listening to this podcast, They insinuated through their questioning with of us that there are no elite people in Latin America.Malcolm Collins: What? You say you want to help people with good genes, but you also want to help Latin Americans? Those disgusting rat monsters! I'm just like, whoa! I have never heard, and I'm being serious here, I have, I have been around Great Replacement Theory people, I have been around America First people, I have never heard one of them speak that disparagingly about Latin Americans.Yeah, that's, yeah, yeah, fair. People are like, well, then why do they want to keep them? Cause they want to [00:56:00] preserve like a cultural difference. Like Latin Americans are culturally different from us. And I can understand. I don't agree with all that. And as I said, like we've never supported like great replacement through anything like that.But like I, I could understand that a non malicious person might have concerns there. But anywaySimone Collins: Yeah, just just to be clear to the the writer from the mill who did say that we supported great replacement theory No But we've joked about greater replacement theory whereby autistic people will inherit the future because they seem to be oddly pronatalist But that is very different.That's a joke. It's a joke GreatMalcolm Collins: replacement theory that we tell regularly That you need to be dumb not to get, but you know, these people, they're, they're, I don't think theySimone Collins: have very much of a sense of humor. So yeah. Yeah,Malcolm Collins: no, I've been to lefty events. There's like no jokes It's like sad and depressing all the time and everyone's always talking about their mental health issues it's why like all their comics are bad.All their movies are bad. All their everything is bad [00:57:00] They like have nothing All independent media that people watch now is like right leaning whether it's like on youtube or on podcast Like I put a top 10 list of podcasts here It's like all right leaning stuff only the legacy media only the stuff that could be bureaucratically captured has any leftist supporters anymoreThat'sBut this is, this is on, he went to like this, this master teacher who is going to teach him how to be undercover and infiltrate these groups.And he said, quote, you need to have biographical questions at your fingertips. In quote, Schultzman tells me, quote, you can't hesitate. Do you have siblings? What's your dad's name? What did you do for your A levels? Where did you go to uni? Where did you grow up? Biographical questions need instant answers.In quote. And I'm like. No, you gave us like this papers in like child could have written it. Child could have told it was fake resume. We just don't ask many questions. And most people don't ask many questions in these groups because they know they're trying to make the world a better place. Well, and I just loved it.Simone Collins: Like despite this prep that they apparently had this whole spy [00:58:00] craft a moment, they decided on the email, the real Chris Morton.Malcolm Collins: I think it's based on the real Donald Trump. I think they were trying to create, like, aSimone Collins: Oh, they were trying to, like, dog whistle some kind of Trump affiliation?Malcolm Collins: Yeah, they Look, I'll just say, like, these This is the type of person who is so fundamentally racist and bigoted that they think that Latin Americans can't be exceptional people.No, it 80 80. I know, I know. Bothers me. I know that, that, that I, I, I am not okay with like actual racist. They like actually squi me out. And like these guys are like, and people are like, what do you mean? Like actual racist versus if somebody's like, I wanna preserve my country's culture. And I think it's different from the cultures of recent immigrants.I don't think they're lesser than me. I just. want to preserve my country's heritage. I can be like, I might not agree with you, but that is a reasonable and non racist thing to believe.Simone Collins: No, that's actually, we would say a good thing and we're going to do a podcast soon where you kind of just, you and I [00:59:00] discussed that, like the fact that we think that pluralism plays,Malcolm Collins: but if somebody comes to me and they're like, I think Latin Americans have disgusting doo doo jeans, I'm like, whoa.Buddy, chill out, dial it back. That's not fun. Okay. So, so, let's, let's keep going here. Hammerson suggested that Shulkman, as Chris, present himself. And Hammerson is like the secret spy master guy. He's the guy whoSimone Collins: sent us the accusations for response before this article went live. Because he, he and Chris, sorry, he and Chris Morton, whatever his real name is were the, the people working on this project.super racistMalcolm Collins: guy? Cause he's the one who drafted that. I would say Chris didn't say all this racist stuff against Latin Americans. This was this other guy, Patrick.Simone Collins: Yeah. And it, that it, Patrick is the one who sent us the email.Malcolm Collins: Yeah. I learned more about, like originally when we responded to the email, we're like, Hey, maybe they actually want to fight racism and antisemitism and we can work together in some way.Like I was like, cause I didn't know anything about their organization. And now I know that they're like raging anti Semites who. are really just a [01:00:00] political affiliation trying to stamp out ideological diversity. It should have been clear to me. I mean, given how religiously offensive their attacks on us were that they were just in attacks on mainstream Calvinist police, and yet they're supposed to fight for religious inclusivity.Yet the concept of the elect, they're like, no, You need to be canceled for your religion.Anyway anyway, so, that, that he presented himself as someone who's relatively new to the scene and curious what it's all about. Exactly the type of person we would be happy to talk to.Chris has watched some far right YouTubers who have piqued his interest. Chris is concerned about where the country is going.Quote, there is a perception in this far Right that an infiltrator will be the most extreme person in the room in quote and I I he was extreme enough to make me uncomfortable. Like I remember after the talk. I was like that guy is like he needs to chill out And so we tried to introduce him to like a bunch of like more chill people at like our dinner parties and stuff like that Because he seemed open to being more chill He seemed like [01:01:00] something who may have like watched one too many at dot and videos And like really bought into all of that You And didn't realize that there was like another side to all of this where you, you can admit that falling fertility rates is the thing, admit that humans have genes, admit that dysgenics is a real problem without spiraling into like racist conspiracies.But I think that that's just what he was trained to try to learn, but he came across as like really racist. Anyway, but, but again, like the type of racist who was open to deconversion, which is why we took the time to talk to him. But that's not to say there weren't many frightening moments besides the evening at Golding's back patio. Shulkman was once meeting with somebody connected to the pronatalist movement when he took a video call under his real name. Normally he's careful to be logged in only under his Chris accounts while he's undercover. I'm guessing. Let'sSimone Collins: not, we shouldn't, we shouldn't name her.Malcolm Collins: No, they named her in the article.Simone Collins: I know, but she probably Okay, sorry.Malcolm Collins: This may have been our female POC [01:02:00] college, like, basically intern at the time. Who is like the sweetest person and they insisted on doxing.Even though we told them like what are you doing? She has never really worked for us. She's had no connection to our organization for years. You can provably verify any of this. And yet he's scared of this little, Chinese and Persian woman.. Because he's fundamentally a bigot and a coward. That, that's it, right?He just wants to go out there and dehumanize people. So, I, I just, I don't, I, I, I, somebody who could be like terrified, like, this college kid who I need to dox is gonna, like, what, what kind of a b*****d do you need to be?,Just imagine being afraid. of this person. Just imagine being afraid of this person.Like, what? And this person, by the way, in my general experience, is generically left leaning.Simone Collins: Yeah.Malcolm Collins: She [01:03:00] just admits humans have genes and they affect behavior. That's it. That was that was the evil thing. Absolutely heartless and I just anyway but let's go further here.And if you want to understand like what I mean by dehumanizing people and like, like normal people, you guys watch our podcasts, a lot of you see us every day, you know, what I mean. That while they might be calling us far right activists, you know, we are at best center right activists where I think a lot of people might consider a centrist or even leftist, right?But they're so brainwashed, they can't see this and they work apparently for the British government, but it was also difficult for Schultman to quote, befriend people. So that you can ultimately betray them in quote, it's hard to explain. He says, even those you've were people who had said and done incredibly racist things, anyone who knows us knows that it's just a lie.They were still people who told Schultman about their friends and loved and love lives and their gardens and their holidays in [01:04:00] Spain, their divorces, their parents getting old and sick. You have to have some, You have to have a heart of stone to not emphasize with them on some level, Schultzman says, even though if they knew who you were in quotes, which is just not true.I mean, you can see what we say about him. Like we don't have any genuine animosity to him. I just see him as somebody who is brainwashed and is basically working for a fascist government to complete their agenda. And one day he may wake up just like so many Nazi collaborators did and been like, Am I the baddie?Like, is, is the, is the side with the ethno hierarchy that believes that different ethnic groups are deserving of different levels of human dignity, the side that's taking away people's children, is that the, is that me, me, the bad guy side? The side that controls all government institutions and large companies and enforces its will on a diverse group of people and the other side is just fighting for pluralism and the right to have their own cultural practices.It's, it's a side that [01:05:00] almost every day holds anti semitic marches through the heart of London. Might, might they be the pack?Simone Collins: I think what's really interesting too is that a lot of people, including possibly this undercover reporter, are kind of under this like delusional perception that there is some big evil far right community that doesn't really exist.And he's sitting in these undercover scenarios, terrified of being caught, but I think also maybe feeling a lot of cognitive dissonance because he is trying to see something that's not there. Maybe subtly realizing that he's effectively attempting to disrupt and dismantle the lives and careers of people who are undeserving of such persecution.Yes. We're totally normal people who are concerned about their communities, who haven't actually said anything insane. And I'd alsoMalcolm Collins: point out and we pointed this out before i'll always point it out It's something that people need to be reminded of because it's [01:06:00] one of the biggest lies that the left will tell people Is that 538 nate silver a mainstream u.s polling organization? Showed that there is not more racism, at least not significantly more racism within Republican voters in the United States than left wing voters. In fact, until Obama was elected, your average white Democrat was more likely to say they would not vote for a black president than your average white Republican.It is a lie. There is not any disproportionately racist Republican base. No, by that what I mean, I'm not saying that there's no racists who support Republican candidates, but there are not more racists who support Republican candidates than the equivalent racist groups on the left. And I'm, and here I'm talking about not like calling like Black Lives Matter a racist thing.I'm talking about white generic racists.Simone Collins: Yeah, sort of the classic definition of racism as understood by the left. And let's be honest, all people are b******s. I mean, people [01:07:00] are messed up. AndMalcolm Collins: I think you're right. I think he had this moment of cognitive dissonance where he realized that these people on the right, weren't saying anything more racist and were likely significantly less antisemitic than the parties he was going to on the left.But he just had to dehumanize them. He had to categorize them like this. And I think that so many people on the left are like this. They just, it's like a cult, like being a Scientologist. Like you just. You have this one day where you look around and you put it all together and you're like, we were, when I look at the statistics, when I actually look at the information, we were the bad guys from the beginning.Simone Collins: Well, and keep in mind, realistically, he can't walk this back. He left his job at the mill. He sunk a year, at least into this undercover reporting. He nuked his entire online footprint and removed as many photos of himself as well, off, off the internet, as much as he could. He has put everything into this that I think there's going to be a documentary and a book.[01:08:00]He, he cannot, he's too path dependent at this point, go back on this. He's also written himself into a political corner, even if he has realized that his side is immoderate. At the very least there is nothing he can do.Malcolm Collins: Yeah. This reminds me of something that was said in the email where they, they reached out to us where they said well, you know, we can connect you with the magazine Aporia that is said human biodiversity is real because you gave them strategic advice to never engage in human biodiversity stuff.And if they did, you would work with them and.Simone Collins: No, if they did, then we could not work with them.Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, if they, if they, if they didn't disengage with HPD, we couldn't work with them. And, and they came to us with this and I'm like, wait, so you in private meetings with other people know that we have told other people that we will never, ever, ever support human biodiversity related agendas.[01:09:00]And you are still attempting to, to, to say that we are racist. That we are promoting racism, when you know behind closed doors, we are against publicly airing scientific studies and facts that could be used to promote racism. Like, you know that that's not true. You know you are the bad guys in this. But that's, that's what gets me in all this.Okay, let's, let's continue here. Now that's, I love speaking of a Porya. I hope that this makes a Porya feel at least a bit better. I like most of a Porya's reporting. I think it's really good. Like I don't like the HBD stuff, but I think they're one of the best scientific magazines out there right now.If you are into science, this might be like the best scientific magazine. I think that I've read minus other HBD stuff. Because I think they really cut to the chase on a lot of things. Are there HDF and other organizations, oh, sorry. Are [01:10:00] the HDF and other organizations succeeding in shifting public opinion?Quote, disappointingly, end quote. Shulkman says, quote, certain aspects of scientific racism have taken hold in the mainstream, end quote. Oporia's predecessors in terms of white supremacist publishing like Mankind Quarterly were not very well read. End quote. And are, were quite difficult to find. While Aporia's popularity has grown to the extent that a conservative MP, Neil O'Brown, approvingly shared one of their articles on his sub stack last year, quote, the West fertility crisis, end quote.And you can see, like, that's the type of article of theirs that I love. They do great jobs with those articles. Schultman points out that, quote, Discussions about IQ and genetics are also animating the American presidential contest, end quote. Was Donald Trump recently telling a conservative talk show host that, quote, we got a lot of bad genes in our country right now, end quote.[01:11:00] Raising the specter of Nazi eugenics. That sounds so like Trump. We've got a lot of bad X in this country. Didn't say bad genes from immigrants. It said we have bad genes in our country right now. Applying general dysgenic selection, idiocracy basically, no more racist than Mike Judd, but not that they're coming from immigrants.And here what I will point out is the left realized is they're losing. Organizations like Hope Not Hate realize they're getting like 20 re shares with a post like this. They realize that they can spend two years on something and do everything they want, but everyone sees through it now. It's the same way that the big game companies, they'll release a game like Concord, they'll release a game like, and I'm sure this is gonna happen with Assassin's Creed Shadows, where they release the most racist game maybe in history.Which is about a black guy going around, who didn't exist, going around Japan, killing Japanese people, victimizing, like, innocent Japanese families, who's supposed to be the hero, and they're like, I don't understand why this would be a problem, it's a black person, [01:12:00] they're allowed to kill any other ethnicity, aren't they?And then everyone else is like, Japan's like, no, and they're like, but it's a historic figure, and Japan's like, did you check that before you, you made this? And they're like, oh, I guess it's not a historic figure, did we just make a game? to like a gangster rap about a black guy murdering innocent Japanese families and think that it was okay because we are so delusionally racist at this point.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx)-2: And if you're thinking anyone, even the brainwashed people at the company must have known this would lose them money.Speaker: It's not about money. It's about sending a message.Malcolm Collins: WhatSimone Collins: you can, you can delete this, but my understanding is it was a real historical figure. And Assassin's Creed actually does have a history even before the whole woke crisis of making very woke countercultural narratives woven within their games consider the colonial American 1. That this was a real historical black figure in Japanese history.However, it, it, it is very unlikely that he was a [01:13:00] samurai. He was more likely kept around as a curiosity. And they're playing with that as, as a sort of sort of the assassin's creed narrative.Malcolm Collins: It's essentially a zoo attraction. Yes. A racist atrocity of history. Yes. Not be glorified in a game that they are.It's revisionistSimone Collins: history where instead of him being a, zoo animal. They're, they're like, let's make him cool and a samurai. They probably watched, um, Ghost Dog and they were like, what a cool concept. Black, black samurai. And it's a great movie. Ghost Dog's so cool. So I get, I mean, I'm like, I see, I think there's plausible deniability for Assassin's Creed.I like their aesthetics and I like their historical play. And so I'm hoping they're okay. I just want to say that.Malcolm Collins: If you were making this game, that the game was fundamentally racist and dehumanizing of Japanese people and their culture. You would have realized this as a random, like, broadly sane human being.Yeah, they, they could have doneSimone Collins: a, [01:14:00] yeah, theyMalcolm Collins: could have done a lot better. It's not a lot better. They made a game that was racist, that they were unable to see was racist because they personally dehumanized Asians. And this is a crosswalk culture where Asians do not matter. They are not human because they are in the same category as whites and Jews.Simone Collins: Yeah. I, yeah, no, it's definitely like the, the Jew dynamic of, of you can't be subject to racism. If you're doing really well in society, in terms of like financial outcomes.Malcolm Collins: Now let's see what they wrote about us in this piece because you'll you'll enjoy this completely fictional narrative hereSimone Collins: Okay,Malcolm Collins: it also went undercover inside the pronatalist movement encouraging people to have more babies Though only the right kind of people having the right Kind of babies.Yeah. So like people whoSimone Collins: want childrenMalcolm Collins: who want children, we are consistent about this. He's implying that like, we mean like white people should have more babies than what we mean is that dinks [01:15:00] probably shouldn't be having kids. And we don't want to pressure them to have kids because they've got bad, selfish, antipro social genes.We're for, like, pro social, nice people who want to dedicate their lives to the future of our civilization having more babies. And they don't like that they're not in that group, so they have to re categorize everything we say as meaning something else. HowSimone Collins: dare we not coerce them, Handmaid's Tale style, into having kids.It's their fetish. They're so cute. So I loveMalcolm Collins: they sent us a thing before him where they're like, you don't want everyone having more kids. You just want like exceptional people having more kids. And we're like, yeah, because we like define that by people who are willing to sacrifice their lives for future generations.As we have said many times in multiple videos. Anyway global figures as powerful as Elon Musk have scaremongered about declining birth rates leading to the collapse of society, but while the pronatalist movement at large paints itself as interested in increasing fertility wholesale, Shulkman's investigations have found that, quote, the quantity of babies being born is less important.than their genetic quality of their parents, end quote. Schultzman [01:16:00] met undercover with the Collinses. This was his interpretation of our words. Well, and also, it'sSimone Collins: very rich that they would word it that way because if parents in this movement believed that they had high genetic quality, we wouldn't be doing polygenic risk score selection.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, right? Like, this is the weird thing that's always surprising me, where people are like, You're having kids because you think you're genetically superior and you do polygenic selection. And I'm like, those two things are opposites. People who think that they're genetically perfect don't do genetic selection on their embryos.We do genetic selection for cancer in our family while also looking for little side nuggets. All right. I'm gonna fit. Shulkman met undercover with the Cullenses, a married white couple. We need to have like spooky music. Spooky, scary, white couple.Speaker 14: This scary skeleton Sends [01:17:00] shivers down your spineMalcolm Collins: you know, he's a white couple, right? Like he's got a girlfriend.He's got a girlfriend. Yeah.Simone Collins: Well, well maybe hopefully she'd better not be white. Well, I don't, I'm just saying.Malcolm Collins: Who used to be tech workers and venture capitalists, but have now dedicated their lives to becoming the most famous faces of the pronatalist movement. Though they publicly disavow racism and reject the label of eugenicists, they believe that not enough quote unquote smart people are breeding and have endorsed the racist Great Replacement Theory.Which, one, we have not. Anyone who watches this show knows we do not. We endorse the greater replacement theory, which is a joke around autists having more people, a joke at the expense of great replacement theorists. So this is just factually untrue and fabrication, but should we expect anything else from leftists?Or from the government at this point? But yeah, we do claim that not enough smart people are having kids because like every scientific study that has [01:18:00] ever been done shows that there's a huge correlation between intelligence and genetics. And that that correlation is also directly correlated to low fertility rates.I love in the piece on this, they're like, diff genetics. A geneticist wouldn't use that term. They're like, not a geneticist employed within the urban monoculture, but like a sane person who. Who can see the world would it's one of these things It's like one of these lies that the urban monoculture makes everyone tell this like obviously like a religious thing and like not like true um Uh, like, you know as i've always said like when my colleagues at samford are like, oh, well Yeah, I grew up poor and everything like that, but I achieved all of this through hard work and determination And and the you know, the other people in my community didn't like well, I mean your genes probably played a pretty big role and they're like no No, it was just me.And I'm like, well, you know, you, Mr whatever this guy's real name is who went to Cambridge and who has had an incredibly easy life because of that pretending that this unearned privilege, your genes that you had access to and [01:19:00] other people didn't have access to, that that is something that you shouldn't have to recognize when contrasting yourself with less privileged individuals.That is disgusting, and you will be remembered in the future very negatively for it. Not accepting and admitting unearned privilege you were born with is horrifying. But let's go further. Reading Shulksman's reporting on the Cullens, because he read his reporting on us, who earlier this year published a podcast episode titled, Would taking away women's right to own property solve the fertility crisis?Question mark. By the way, the answer, that was a question mark, the answer in the episode is, no, it wouldn't. We said, yes, it may cause a short term, upturned blip in fertility, but it would not serve the question long term. But of course, they lie. Progressives always lie. Here I need to put the clip from that show that you have, where they're [01:20:00] like, yes, we lie all the time now, because we're the party of lying, because we're dehumanize the other party, even though the other party doesn't like that much anymore, and we just say, ah, yes, yes, yes, we are the, the liar, liar extraordinaire.Speaker 18: are these. Attack, lie, don't get caught. Machiavelli wrote The Prince for the Rulers. Well, we're rewriting it for us.Malcolm Collins: Made me wonder what he discovered about the links in the far right between white supremacy and misogyny. Quote, the statistics speak for themselves, end quote. He told me he estimated about 90 percent of people he met across various far right networks were men. I let the statistics speak for themselves.He estimated. Ah. Okay, so he made up a number. Quote, it was six months before I met a woman for this project, end quote. Well, he did come off very incelly. Did he come off as like the most incelly of incels? Like, he's hanging out in like, Ed Dutton's network. I don't, no, no, no, no, sorry, nothing against Ed Dutton, but I bet his [01:21:00] gender statistics are far to the male of our gender statistics.What?Simone Collins: Yeah, I don't know. I mean, like he chose who he engaged with. He chose to engage with dudes. There are plenty of women on. ThereMalcolm Collins: are plenty of women in the movement. The dissonant right, far right. Probably more than 50 percent women. Like he's just probably misogynist himself and doesn't think of the women that he's meeting with as worthy of talking to.That's my guess. Look, we keep seeing this misogyny and, and, and, and, and, and rabid racism and dehumanization of other groups in the left, like. It's what do you expect? Right? Like with that Smithsonian thing that we've gone over in so many things, one of their groups was like, well, hard work and honesty and coming to work on time.These are all white people traits. And it's like, that is violently racist. You're a mainstream government funded left leaning organization. Like that's insane in the United States. It [01:22:00] was put that out. Anyway, quote, the sexism in these groups is absolutely pervasive, end quote, he says, end quote, in different ways, there would be people I met more in the manosphere who listen to pick up artists podcasts, who practice ways they could hoodwink women into bed with them.Others were more trapped in their outlook, whether venerate women as baby making machines, or whether they saw them as intellectually inferior. Creatures in quote being around a quote a barrage of regressive and violent views It was depressing and disappointing in quote It was actually interesting. When they sent out this stuff to us before this article went live They interpreted a lot of like very normal stuff We said as racist and I think a lot of the racism that he was experiencing was completely within his mind One of the things they wanted to talk on is the collins is said behind closed doors [01:23:00] That black people score lower on IQ tests than white people.Can you believe they would say this? And then I was like you know, that's just like a fact. And I gave him like the Wikipedia page on like achievement gaps. Like all civil rights organizations are trying to lower this gap. This is the fact that everyone knows. And he's like, and they said that you shouldn't be overly broadcasting this in public.I was like, yes, that's a fact that every civil rights advocate knows. Right? You were the one who heard that and then interpreted it as blacks are inferior to whites. Not us. We didn't say that. We stated a fact that in your weird, bizarre, dehumanizing brain turned into blacks are worse than whites. And I bet you heard so many facts about women that you turned into horrifying stereotypes about women in your addled, misogynist mind, here's an example.A conservative [01:24:00] may state a fact women are more interested in being submissive in sexual situations than men are. They consume more content around submission than men do, and even when it comes to things like being choked and sexual violence, they don't. Watch, read A Billion Wicked Thoughts. It covers this very mainstream, very sed I think it's the leftist saying, or the pragmatist kind of sexuality.It's just like, really clear in the statistics. This stuff is coming from women. Men did not make Fifty Shades of Grey a best selling book. Okay? Now you may hear all of those facts, and hear me say, Men should abuse their wives. That is not what I said. I stated uncomfortable facts that we need to address, but because conservatives are the only people who tell the truth anymore, you can't stand to hear the truth and then say, and now let's find out how we deal with this.How do we build a culture that works admitting that these facts are true?Simone Collins: And I think that's the other problem. [01:25:00] I think one of the reasons why groups like hope not hate are flailing so much to find these hate groups to expose these people is they need they need this. This community to exist, because they, they don't actually have the agency or capability to solve the problems they propose to solve, like, like, racial achievement gaps insofar as race is a thing, you know, like, inequality in society, they don't have the wherewithal or ability to solve these problems.And if these. Hate groups that they need to exist cease to exist or cease to not be real or show themselves to not be the things that they're trying to make them into these people have nothing to do. And then no 1 to answer for, except for themselves as to the, like, why they're their values are not being maximized.Why their initiatives are failing.Malcolm Collins: This is why we're an existential threat to them. Which we've [01:26:00] increasingly seen to be the case because we have been very successful at actually stamping out racism in the far right of American politics. If you look at this presidential cycle versus the presidential cycle before, before people had a non racist.racist way to talk about it's human genetic differences. Which again, don't cluster under ethnic groups in an extreme way. You can watch any of our episodes on this and, and where they do have any clustering there. They change so quickly, you know, with like the Average person in the developed world going to be one standard deviation lower in IQ.Watch our episode on idiocracy if you want to learn more about that. Like that, like, ethnic differences wouldn't matter if that was the case, right? So, like, none of this stuff matters. And when we fight all of this with facts, When we point out, you don't need to worry about Latin Americans replacing us.They have like a super low fertility rate. Latin America fell below replacement rate collectively back in 2019 and is falling way faster than the U S Latin America is getting close to Korea levels [01:27:00] in many, many countries. Like the situation in Latin America is bad. And then groups are like, Oh, I used to think I needed to worry about like Latin American immigrants, but I now realize that we're just sending them to cities where they're having their fertility shredded.Like, they're as much of victims by the urban monoculture as us. And there are a bunch of trad cast families. Yeah, we should work together. And this is partially why Latin American families are moving over and moving over and not just trad cast. A lot of them are converting to Protestant to them, converting to mainstream American culture as they move to the right to defend their children from these.You know, scary, scary groups. These groups are now realizing, Oh my God. The, the, the scary, like nutter actual fat, like, like, like people with like actually unpalatable opinions on the right was like Nick Fuentes around race and stuff like that. They've disappeared from the public narrative. They're gone.The racists are gone. They left the building. Now the right is the side of equality. And you can see this in the data, and we [01:28:00] have been for the long time, because you can see that the more right wing a district was historically, the smaller the gap between both IQ and earnings between its ethnic minority population, be they black or hispanic in its white population.Simone Collins: That's the crazy thing. Is it if you actually want to address achievement gaps, if you're actually looking to what groups are reducing? Achievement gaps when it comes to earning, educational attainment, likely intelligence tests, but this hasn't been looked at. Oh no, it's conservativeMalcolm Collins: groups! Oh no! Oh no, they're the only ones who when a lesbian woman comes to you and says I keep getting assaulted by when, by men claiming to be women on women's dating apps.Can I please have one dating app where people can't just claim to be trans? And I'm not even saying that trans people can't be on the app. I'm just saying non passing trans people can't be on the app. That was the case in the Australian court case about Oh, TickleSimone Collins: vs. Giggle?Malcolm Collins: Yeah, where the woman got sued she had [01:29:00] a, she allowed trans people in the app.They just had to be passing. They used a face recognition thing, right? Like I can understand why a lesbian would want that. And they're like, shut up, you disgusting woman. Let the men make decisions about what you lesbians get to say is safe. If you say you don't feel safe going to your nightclubs because now there's random men who have learned they can just claim to be trans.I don't believe that a sex pest would do that. And it's like, why would a sex pest not do that if you give them permission to? I'm not saying trans people don't exist. I'm saying that if you uncritically accept anyone who says they're trans is trans, sex pests will use this to harass lesbian women. You stopped protecting women.You stopped protecting gay men when you allowed people to use their identity to push agendas and hurt children. And gay men, they don't want this. They're not on board with this, and yet you claim to speak for all of them, when almost half of them don't support you anymore in the U. [01:30:00] S. They were the ones who won all these rights.They were the vast majority of the early gay rights, LGBT rights, I'm sorry, now activists. But let's continue here. One of the most significant ways the far right is succeeding is in making the more extreme views palatable to the mainstream is by scapegoating migrants during a cost of living crisis and blaming them for Britain's decline.Did Shulkman come away from his investigation with a better sense of how so many men are getting radicalized? Quote, there are various explanations for radicalization, some of them competing Some of them competing ones, he says, in quote. Though, the one he favors most is called, quote, Significant Quest Series, in quote.So, keep in mind, he just dismissed that immigrants have anything to do with the cost of living crisis. He's like, this has nothing to do with anything, nothing to do with the economy. Nothing to do with the amount you get paid for a job. The number of people competing for a job has [01:31:00] nothing to do with how much you're earning for that job.Simone Collins: That isMalcolm Collins: just a denial of reality.Simone Collins: He's a journalist, not an economist, Malcolm. Give him a break.Malcolm Collins: No, he's, he's, he's a psyops guy and not a, somebody who has your best interest at heart. But let's, let's see what he does think is leading people to the right. Or the idea that people's needs for social standing and belonging can lead them to extreme beliefs. Oh, they're just not loved enough. People who are, quote, knocked by a difficult experience, end quote, can lose sight of their own value in the world.Maybe they've fallen into alcoholism, or their family was torn apart during a divorce, quote, devastating setbacks, quote. Like that, Schluckman says, quote, can shake your feeling of personal significance, and you want to get it back, and some people will seek to get it back in extreme ways, end quote, except we know the mental health staff, you knob, all of the mental health problems are way, way, [01:32:00] way, way bigger on the left.You guys are barely able to keep yourselves from from sticking a knife in your throat every morning. If you look at left wing white women under the age of 30 in the United States, over half of them have a major mental health problem. The more the urban monoculture infiltrates a group like the LGBT community, the more likely they are to attempt to unalive themselves.And you can say, well. That's because they're oppressed. Well, if it's because they're oppressed, why has the rate been going up as you guys have gained more power? Why has the rate been going up as their rights have increased? It's because it's not because they're oppressed. It's because your entire social system is killing them.Microphone (Wireless Microphone Rx): Just so you understand how severe this trend is. Not only has pew data since the data started recording happiness levels on the Democrats in the United States versus Republicans in the U S always said that Republicans [01:33:00] were significantly happier, but recently an AI was trained to determine people's political affiliation by looking at their face., and it dated two composite images.It could determine it with 60% accuracy. , and the two core things that differentiated right-leaning faces was that they looked happier and the women were more attractive.Malcolm Collins: It's killing the people it touches. When you tell somebody, You just need to live your life doing whatever makes you feel good in the moment and be affirmed for whatever you want to believe about yourself and never have to experience a single negative emotional stimuli because what are trigger warnings?What is their panic around Bopgate? Around us saying that corporal punishment is good and the research obviously says it's good if you look at the research that's like modern. A new study came out recently on this. Just keep being vindicated. The Vindicators! If you're wondering why they come to adopt these beliefs when you remove it. Any negative stimuli for them and you just tell them to do whatever makes them happy in the moment.Be validated for whatever you want to believe about yourself. And then I, somebody [01:34:00] with a degree in neuroscience, who has been published in the field, who has an exhibit still on display at the Smithsonian, who has worked at UT Southwestern, a very respected medical institution in this field. Like people are like, did you work as a neuroscientist?Yes, I worked in neuroscience for Four years. And then I worked adjacent to neuroscience and brain computer interface for two years. I have extensive experience in this field. If I told you, well, you know, if you actually look at the research and not like the weird lefty capture stuff, I could tell you that if you remove any negative emotional experience for someone, they're going to become hypersensitized to them and freak out whenever they encounter them, which is why things like trigger warnings and removal of corporal punishment and removal of exposing yourself to negative stimuli causes severe negative backlash.And they're like, Wait, we are the ones causing all the mental pain? That can't be the truth. I'm like, really? Just look at, like, mainstream psychology textbooks, anything other than, like, from the past 15 years or so, and you'll see that, like, we used to always know this. All of the data always pointed this out.Like, you [01:35:00] shouldn't be doing this. You should not be removing negative emotional stimuli from people, and yet you built an entire cultural ecosystem, because that's what the urban monoculture is, that's dedicated to this. But anyway, what are your thoughts, Simone?Simone Collins: I'm really alarmed that this does seem to have government association.I thought things were kept at least a little separate, some separation of church versus state, because ultimately, you know, the urban monoculture is a religion in the end.Malcolm Collins: To understand what she means when she says that, when I talk about the areas where they just deny both observable reality and science, You know, I've mentioned a few here.A great example of this is like trans people in sports. Anyone can look at a picture of Leah Thomas and be like, that person obviously had the same advantage a male would have, maybe slightly diminished rate of hormones, competing in that competition. I can look at the studies. I can look at the difference in her results.When she identified as a man versus when she identified as a woman and just see yeah She had a huge advantage. And to say otherwise is a [01:36:00] religious belief because it goes against observable reality It goes against common sense and it goes against scientific data,Speaker 16: Have you actually everSpeaker 17: met Heather Swanson? Uh, no, I've never competed against her before, no.Speaker 16: She's not exactly your average trans athlete.Speaker 17: Honestly, I find that kind of bigoted, David.Speaker 16: Okay, Heather Swanson is actually joining us now. Miss Swanson, how does it feel to be competing today?. Now that I can compete as female, I'm ready to smash the other girls.Malcolm Collins: But continueSimone Collins: i'm Scared i'm i'm scared about it I I mean just even going through this podcast and realizing there are so many things and examples that we can't even reference at this point because of already how much Things are being censored.I, I have my doubts about how the future is going to play out now and I am more concerned than before. I think a lot of people who've already been affected by this for a long time are like, I told you so, this is really bad. My hope is that perhaps, With the U. S. [01:37:00] Election, we could see a tide turning.I think that when they wereMalcolm Collins: already seeing a tide turning, they got rid of the old conservative party and replace them with this. I forgot what it's called the new party, but they're like actual conservatives. Yeah.Simone Collins: So maybe, maybe we'll see. We'll say, we'll say a market correction of all this. And if that happens, That is is great.You know,Malcolm Collins: I don't think no, I think that we're seeing a market correction in terms of public sentiment. I think the public now knows the concentration camps are active. They're up in arms about it, but the cult has stronger and stronger control of it ever did than the sources of power of our society, whether it's government bureaucracy or the bureaucracy of large companies.The only thing we can do is replace them or recapture these institutions or. Run reconquistas on these institutions that mean people in positions of power need to hire Consultants like us like we're willing to do this for you We have anti bigot. com that we eventually will turn into a consultant website To go through any of your organizations and run dei [01:38:00] remediation remove the individuals who are promoting bigotry hate, racism, sexism, xenophobia and calling it anything other than those things.Because unlike the classic DEI consultants who promote this type of bigotry, we don't come in and make you lose money, we come in and help you remove people. We come in and help you cut the fat. And we only take money based on how much fat we cut successfully, by the way, without losing you money.Simone Collins: Yeah.Well, okay. So there's, there's a hope. I don't know. I'm just there. There is a hope about people like us. We need to continue to grow. You guys need toMalcolm Collins: like and subscribe, like and subscribe. Okay.Simone Collins: Please like and describe. Yes. That would be appreciated.Malcolm Collins: You are a great wife. And it's so funny when I hear him be like, Oh, these people are desperate.I know nobody on the right who comes across as like mentally unwell, like none of the major figures. Except for like the ones who have been sort of isolated [01:39:00] from the movement, like Nick Fuentes, who like doesn't really talk to any of the mainstream players, but like the people that they've been trying to cancel recently, you know, your Johnny anomalies, you're raw egg nationalists.They all seem like, Super like mentally healthy, happy people with spouses and, you know, likeSimone Collins: we're trying to do good in the world and you're trying to make the world a better place for their kids well and at great personal risk, which makes them more admirable. Because now that that I see. In greater clarity what they're up against And one I mean, I do understand Why they started out trying to be anonymous.I think maybe when they first started posting they you know We lived in an age where it was maybe possible to be anonymous but I mean now that I I see like how much people are being attacked. I I get it Well,Malcolm Collins: and you can see how theseSimone Collins: groupsMalcolm Collins: twist reality. So someone like kevin dolan, right kevin dolan You know One of the sweetest guys I've ever met.Maybe he said something racist in the past. I don't [01:40:00] know. That doesn't mean that that's who he is today. And I would point out that the areas where they have quote unquote caught him for saying racist things, it turns out they were just lying. Like, in the piece where they point out, he said that, they said, Kevin Dolan said Jews were nexus of evil.They published this twice, in two different pieces. The actual tweet, Said the county of Santa something in Florida. It's, it's the county where Fort Lauderdale is. It's the nexus of evil. And they, we would just say all of Florida is the nexus. Did you know, you didn't know the Jewish population of that county.They then decided to interpret that through their incredibly antisemitic or racist view of reality as Jews. Now this organization did some other crazy person online decided to, and then this organization uncritically was out looking for the source tweet, decided to just. regurgitate. If it fit their own biases and prejudices, they're willing to regurgitate it.Now, they've since corrected this, which I appreciate. Let's see if they correct other things, like saying that we support great replacement theory, which we never have. [01:41:00]Simone Collins: The mill that did that. Yeah, that was the mill. Yeah.Malcolm Collins: No, no, great. What they do still have on their side about us, which is just factually untrue is they say, they say bad genes are coming into the country.They say bad genes are having more kids and bad genes are coming into the country. We have never said bad genes are coming into the country. We have said actually good genes are coming into the country. If anybody has watched like any of our immigration stuff, I think we talk about like the selectiveSimone Collins: pressures at play basically to.To immigrate in, in, in many, many, many cases requires a level of, we'll say, Fitness, you could argue genetic fitness that is quite high and that the, the populations that immigrate are typically the smarter, the educated, theMalcolm Collins: first squeeze immigrants. I will say, I won't say all immigrants fall into this camp.You know, when you're talking about refugees and stuff like that,Simone Collins: and there are different types of immigrants. If you're talking about a population of immigrants that is going somewhere to get completely supported by the government and proceed to not work, right. You're, you're not selecting for [01:42:00] most agentic high achieving people because those aren't those people.If you are talking about a group of people who through great personal risk came to another foreign land that they weren't familiar with. And then it proceeded to attempt to build a life for themselves and make their own income there and generate tax revenue and build a family there. That is, that's more than I've done.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and I would say that a lot of these people, they just can't handle the reality that most of the right is actually pretty pro legal immigration of high skilled immigrants. 100%!Simone Collins: Yeah! EvenMalcolm Collins: Trump tried to pass a law that would make it easier for them to immigrate into the country, and the leftist killed it.Simone Collins: Well, and his current policy is if you get,Malcolm Collins: A college degree in the U. S. Yeah. Any college degree in the U. S. You automatically get citizen. That is, I don't know. I don't know if it's citizen. ISimone Collins: think it's like green card or something or likeMalcolm Collins: citizenship. I think it was that severe. It might be green card, but, but I mean,Simone Collins: he's trying to say like, we welcome outsiders who are willing to contribute to United States.And I think that's the [01:43:00] big issue. And that's that is kind of the issue with immigration across the world. Is that There, there is a need in many, many, many nations for these people who are willing to immigrate and contribute and build, and there's a lot of damage being incurred by countries who have very generous social services that then subsequently support people who are not willing to contribute.And that's a, that's a big struggle.Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah, no, you're, you're absolutely right and I it, it's just sad that it's reached this stage that the, the enemy of, of pluralism, the enemy of freedom, the enemy of, Of fair democratic processes because there is nothing you can say, but it's not pro fair democratic processes.If it's using money to support one party and attack another party, public money.Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah. Well,Malcolm Collins: it is the urban monoculture. It is the left and all you guys can do is vote.Simone Collins: Yeah. Wherever you are in the world, vote, [01:44:00] vote. Well, both vote politically, and also with your pocket book, you know, support organizations, products, services and politicians.AnyoneMalcolm Collins: who watches this in the Trump administration let us know. We want to work. We want to help dismantle this thing. You don't need to pay us. I just want a future for my children that isn't the fascist dictatorship that the Democrats are currently working towards. Just appointing camel. I, I love that.Just like, we we don't, you know, we don't do primaries anymore. That's for the oligarchs to decide.Simone Collins: I willMalcolm Collins: anyway. Love you soSimone Collins: much. I love you. And I, I also wish all the best to the real Chris Morton.Whatever,Malcolm Collins: whatever his name is. I don't know. Wherever you are, dude. Overly doxxed.Simone Collins: Yeah. And we, we, we didn't put your fake passport on the internet. Attempting to hurt you in any way. Anyway, we, we. Have very good reason to believe thatMalcolm Collins: there is this connection here. And it's like the best way to do it.[01:45:00] You know, if, if you actually were just breaking the law, youSimone Collins: wouldn't have done that if you were actually just breaking the law. Because you're not, you're, you're a smart person and we know thatMalcolm Collins: you went to Cambridge, you wouldn't take that risk. I don't believe that we did. That would take that risk.And I will say, you know, it's very important that the people we have named in this episode that you don't. You know, find their addresses, find their personal information or anything like that. You know, that's really a bad thing to do. That's what it's a bad. It's a bad useSimone Collins: of already strapped resources.Like, when we had CPS come to our house, all I felt was just mortified that. This could be helping someone else. Like they could be helping children who really needed help. And they were sitting there, you know, they had to go through our entire house, go through our fridge, go through everything else, you know, like, and they knew it was fine, but they had to come out because they were, we, you know, people reported us so much.So yeah, don't, don't play those games. You're, you're not just [01:46:00] hurting the people involved. You're hurting the local government. You're, you're draining resources and goodness knows we don't need any more of that in this world. So. Thank you. And when am I making you for dinner tonight?Malcolm Collins: Do we, we still have some meat left over from yesterday, right?Simone Collins: No, I don't think there's, but I can make you more with less penang sauce this time. So I know itMalcolm Collins: was very good. And I absolutely love your pie.Simone Collins: And did you want that with cornmeal muffins?Malcolm Collins: Yeah, cornmeal muffins would go great with that.Simone Collins: Okay.Malcolm Collins: Cornmeal muffins, so people know this is slow cooked beef with penang sauce, slow cooked until it's like a mush, right?And then penang sauce, so it's like a forever soup meat with a lot of vegetables in it. And then we're going to put that on cornmeal muffins. And then for dessert, describe the cake you made because it's so good.Simone Collins: Ooh, we can put the recipe in perplexity for a pumpkin cake because we had bought a bunch of decorative pumpkins and I just cut them open with the kids and we madeMalcolm Collins: Nothing for free at a local [01:47:00] fair.Simone Collins: Yeah, we got them for free to local fair. So that's perfect freebie pumpkins to make that we have no we we harvest our food from local events and Yeah, just ask perplexity to make recipes for what's in the house. And so we made this with a buttercream frosting because we didn't have cream cheese in the house.We have lots of butter and it is, they are amazing. So this is for our daughter's birthday. So one of the, and youMalcolm Collins: made the frosting from scratch too. Yeah. Yeah. AndSimone Collins: I will share the recipe for both. For the pumpkin cake and the buttercream pumpkin frosting, highly recommend. They're really good. And I worked at a cupcake shop for like a year.I've, I've had a lot of cupcakes and a lot of cake, a lot of cake, and it's really good. So AI makesMalcolm Collins: great recipes. Yeah. Oh, by the way, final thought before we head out, and I was just thinking like he's met these people, you know, like to say that they went to the far right because they lost all hope or something like that, or like we're alcoholics [01:48:00] or like didn't have a family.Like he knows us. He knows that we chose to give up careers. Venture capital and private equity, good careers. You have a graduate degree from Cambridge. I have a graduate degree from Stanford to pursue this because we believe it's what's right. You can look at somebody like Elon, what he's given up to pursue this.You can look at something like he lives a fun life. I mean, maybe it's fun. He worked for like black, right? He worked for some big organization like that. He left to go do this. A lot of us are actually Really high skilled professionals who very clearly left that life and the privileges that came with it to try to make the world a better place.You don't see this on the left.Simone Collins: Yeah. Anyway, yeah. Bye. Love you.Speaker 19: Wait, what are you wishing about? A whoopee cushion. Okay. I'm gonna blow it. Go ahead.[01:49:00]Speaker 22: Why is This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe