Reasonable Faith Podcast

Joshua, a part-time Ph.D. student and father, shares his struggle balancing doctoral work and family life. Conversation covers overcoming intellectual self-doubt. Practical tips include detailed note-taking and filing, speed-reading to keep up, and a restorative half-hour post-lunch nap to fight exhaustion.

Paula Fredrickson, historian of early Christianity who rereads Paul through a Jewish lens. She questions common assumptions about resurrection appearances and whether Paul remained observant of Judaism. She links Reformation-era readings to modern views of Paul. The conversation also probes textual reliability, differing Gospel portraits of Jesus, and Christianity's cultural impact.

A deep question about how souls, personhood, and the Trinity interact when God becomes human. The conversation compares views that people are unipersonal souls versus a tripersonal divine soul. Classic and alternative accounts of the Logos assuming a human soul are explored. The speaker proposes the Logos itself as the soul of Christ and clarifies that only one divine person became incarnate.

Dr. William Lane Craig, philosopher and Christian apologist known for work in philosophy of religion, debates Sagan/Hitchens’ invisible dragon thought experiment. He distinguishes immaterial beings from incoherent claims. He discusses burden of proof, what counts as evidence beyond the senses, limits on dismissing claims, and contrasts contingent dragons with arguments for a necessary being.

A listener’s struggle over whether their beliefs fit theism or deism sparks a focused exploration. The difference between revealed religion and natural religion is contrasted and re-evaluated. A historical resource on the resurrection is recommended for further reading. The conversation closes with suggestions for continued study.

A thoughtful defense for a finite past and a tensed view of time. Reflections on learning from secular philosophers and the phrase all truth is God's truth. Personal counsel about assurance, perseverance, and seeking spiritual confirmation. Sensitive advice for a teen struggling with gender questions and notes on philosophical ideas like transworld depravity.

A caller wrestles with trusting God’s plan amid possible tragedies and disappointments. The speaker shares a personal story of unexpected failure and reframes divine will to include permitted hardships. Discussion covers how providence might use suffering for greater goods and how painful experiences can teach and shape moral character. Listeners are urged to reflect on lessons rather than seek speculative reasons.

A thoughtful take on Genesis 1–11 as quasi-mythical narratives and how that classification interacts with the Gospels. A look at the Gospels’ literary family, comparing them to Greco-Roman ancient biographies. Discussion of structural and internal features that make the Gospels historical narrative rather than myth.

They debate whether God was obligated to demand Jesus' death or could have saved people another way. They contrast theological views from Anselm, Aquinas and Grotius about necessity versus contingency. They examine whether moral influence or penal substitution better explains the cross. They critique a blogger's claim that divine goodness could be violated and its implications for assurance.

Michael Lepien, executive director who runs operations and outreach for Reasonable Faith, shares the ministry's growth and outreach strategy. He recounts joining the team and building social media and chapter networks. He highlights global chapter expansion, training programs, and free online resources. Short anecdotes and production shifts pepper the conversation.