True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

The Nancy Guthrie abduction sits inside one of the most legally and institutionally complicated investigative contexts in recent memory.Nancy Guthrie — 84 years old, medically vulnerable, abducted from her Tucson home — has had ransom notes arrive demanding cryptocurrency payment, two deadlines pass, and more than 18,000 tips submitted to investigators. No suspect has been named publicly. No arrest has been made.The investigation is being run by a department with a documented institutional crisis. Dr. Richard Carmona — a former U.S. Surgeon General and former Pima County sheriff — went on record stating that current Sheriff Chris Nanos "corrupted" the crime scene, calling it an irreversible error. "Once it has been corrupted, that's the end of it," Carmona said. "You cannot reconstitute a crime scene." The Pima County Sheriff's deputies' union passed a unanimous no-confidence vote. The Board of Supervisors invoked a rare territorial-era law requiring the sheriff to submit reports under oath after discovering discrepancies in his record. A recall effort is now underway. And a department deputy, unrelated to this case, was arrested on a kidnapping charge — a development that raises systemic questions about this department regardless of its separation from Nancy's case.Today on True Crime Today, retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke joins me to work through listener questions on the legal and procedural picture. What does a publicly stated corrupted scene mean for any future prosecution's evidentiary foundation? What does 18,000 tips with no arrest signal about how that investigative resource is being managed? And if this case eventually produces a suspect, what does the institutional record of this department mean for charges that follow?The surveillance footage shows a masked man outside Nancy's front door the night she disappeared — improvised, not highly prepared. What that tells us about who investigators should be looking for, and what kind of evidentiary case prosecutors would need to build given what's already been compromised, is the procedural question that matters most right now.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #PimaCounty #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #MissingPerson #SheriffNanos #HiddenKillers #ColdCase #TucsonMissing #CriminalJustice

Rex Heuermann is reportedly expected to plead guilty in the Gilgo Beach serial killing case at a court appearance on April 8. The deal is still being finalized. It has not been entered. But if it holds, it would represent a legal resolution for seven victims' families while leaving four other families — whose loved ones are connected to this investigation — with no charges and no trial.That gap is worth examining carefully. An expected guilty plea, if accepted, resolves what it resolves. A plea structure does not automatically produce charges that weren't included. And without a trial, there is no public testimony, no cross-examination, and no courtroom record of the kind that full proceedings would have created.Today on True Crime Today, retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke joins me to go through listener questions on the legal and investigative dimensions of this case. We're examining what the expected plea structure means for the uncharged cases, what the evidentiary record — including the alleged computer files with checklists for the killings and the DNA evidence tied to family members — tells us about how this investigation was built, and what the legal outcome does and does not accomplish for the people most directly affected.We're also addressing a question many listeners have raised: when a defendant reportedly controls the terms of resolution through a plea — choosing when and how it ends, without a trial — is that outcome justice? It's not a simple question. And it doesn't have a simple answer.The legal record on this case is worth understanding carefully. That's what we're doing today.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #GilgoFour #LongIslandSerialKiller #PleaDeal #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #ColdCase

Kouri Richins was convicted of murdering her husband in one of the most unusual cases in recent true crime history — a Utah mother who poisoned Eric Richins with fentanyl, then wrote a children's book about his death and appeared on television to promote it. According to investigators, that promotion is part of what put the case back under the microscope. The jury convicted her on all counts in three hours.But the story that doesn't end with a verdict belongs to the three boys she left behind. They were 9, 7, and 5 when their father died. They are preteens now, living with Eric's family, carrying the weight of two losses — one parent taken by what a jury determined was murder, one taken by a prison sentence that will likely define the rest of their childhoods.True Crime Today examines what research and history tell us about children in this exact position. We look at betrayal trauma — the psychological damage specific to children whose protector was also their threat — and we compare what happened to the young children left behind in two cases that rhyme with this one: Susan Wright's kids, who were absorbed into their father's family after her 2003 conviction and have never spoken publicly, and Betty Broderick's sons, who grew up divided on whether their mother should ever leave prison.What separates Kouri Richins from every comparison is the book. She wrote it. She promoted it. She used her sons' grief as the vehicle. And according to trial testimony, it may be part of what put her in prison.Those boys will search their own story forever. There is no children's book for what comes next.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #GriefBookMurder #FentanylPoisoning #BetrayalTrauma #UtahMurder #TrueCrimePodcast #ChildrenOfConvictedKillers

Three major cases examined in full with Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer.In the Nancy Guthrie disappearance, Savannah Guthrie's first public interview confirmed that the suspect made two separate visits to the residence prior to the disappearance, and that investigators are actively pursuing the theory that the individual on doorbell camera footage was functioning as a lookout with at least one additional person already inside the home. FBI neighborhood canvassing has shifted to targeted questioning about specific categories of individuals — reflecting a working theory. Coffindaffer provides procedural context on the surveillance profile, the evidentiary implications of the family's public ransom responses, and the significance of the continued absence of confirmed proof of life.On the Nanos matter: the Pima County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to invoke state law compelling Nanos to provide sworn reports, with non-compliance constituting grounds for removal. This follows a 241-0 no-confidence vote from the deputies' union, citing records reported by the Arizona Republic and AZPM documenting approximately 26 disciplinary allegations from Nanos' El Paso tenure that deputies say were concealed from Pima County for over 40 years. Reporting also indicates that sworn testimony Nanos provided in a December 2025 deposition regarding his suspension history may be inconsistent with that documented record. Coffindaffer addresses the legal implications of that testimony and the operational consequences for the Guthrie investigation.On the Duggar matter: Joseph Duggar, 31, arrested March 18 in Arkansas on Florida charges of lewd and lascivious behavior on a child under 12, has waived extradition. His wife Kendra Duggar was arrested on four counts each of endangering the welfare of a minor and false imprisonment in Arkansas. The multi-jurisdictional nature of the allegations, the evidentiary significance of the recorded admissions, and the question of whether the pattern across two brothers in the same household opens any avenue for federal examination are all addressed directly.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #JosephDuggar #SheriffNanos #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #FBIInvestigation #MissingPerson #DuggarFamily #BringNancyHome

The Duggar family spent a decade on national television as the wholesome face of fundamentalist Christianity. What viewers didn't see was the organization behind the image — and the man who built it.Bill Gothard founded the Institute in Basic Life Principles in 1961. By the 1970s and 80s, he was filling convention centers with ten thousand people per event. He had endorsements from sitting governors, board members who were U.S. senators, and millions of families who restructured their entire lives around his teachings. He held no ordination, no theological degree, and no credentials of any kind.Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar attended their first IBLP seminar in 1985 and called it life-changing. Their family would spend the next three decades as the organization's most visible advertisement.In Part 1 of this five-part series from Hidden Killers and True Crime Today, host Tony Brueski examines IBLP's doctrine of total male authority, the ATI homeschooling curriculum that isolated children from outside institutions, and the theological framework that made reporting abuse virtually impossible from within.More than thirty women have accused Gothard of sexual harassment and abuse. Gothard has denied all of these allegations. A civil lawsuit filed in 2016 was dismissed in 2018 on statute of limitations grounds. No criminal charges have ever been filed.Gothard is 91. He is still operating online. The organization he built is still intact in thousands of homes that never made the news.Before the molestation. Before the trial. Before the arrest that happened this week. This is the machine — and this is how it worked.This is Part 1 of 5.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BillGothard #IBLP #DuggarFamily #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #CultExposed #HiddenKillers #ReligiousAbuse #ATI #DuggarFamilySecrets

Former reality television personality Joseph Duggar, 31, was arrested March 18 in Tontitown, Arkansas, on charges of lewd and lascivious behavior involving a child under 12, according to an arrest affidavit filed by the Bay County Sheriff's Office in Panama City, Florida. Duggar subsequently waived extradition and is awaiting transfer to Bay County to face those charges.According to the affidavit, Tontitown investigators made contact with Bay County authorities after interviewing a 14-year-old girl who disclosed that Duggar had allegedly committed acts of abuse against her on multiple occasions during a family vacation to Panama City Beach when she was approximately 9 years old. The alleged victim's father confronted Duggar directly, and Duggar reportedly admitted to the conduct. Tontitown detectives then arranged for the father to contact Duggar again while a detective monitored the call — and Duggar allegedly made admissions a second time.Separately, Kendra Duggar, 27, was arrested in Arkansas on four counts of second-degree endangering the welfare of a minor and four counts of second-degree false imprisonment — charges that correspond in number to the children in the household. Both Joseph and Kendra Duggar have been assigned court dates of April 29 in Elm Springs District Court for the Arkansas charges.These charges arrive nearly five years after Joseph's older brother Josh Duggar was convicted on federal charges related to child sexual abuse material and sentenced to approximately 12 and a half years in federal prison.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer provides legal and procedural analysis of the multi-jurisdictional case structure, the evidentiary significance of the recorded admissions, the Arkansas charges against Kendra, and whether the multi-state, multi-victim scope opens any realistic pathway to broader federal examination.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #KendraDuggar #DuggarFamily #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #19KidsAndCounting #JoshDuggar #ChildAbuse #JusticeForVictims

He said not guilty for nearly three years. Seven women. Seven charges. Not guilty, every single time. Now, according to multiple sources confirmed by the Associated Press, NBC, CNN, and Fox News, Rex Heuermann — the Long Island architect at the center of the Gilgo Beach murders — is expected to change that plea on April 8. Life without parole. No trial. The families have been notified.I want to take you inside the evidence that made this moment inevitable — and into the details that most coverage is skipping over.The defense filed a 178-page legal challenge in January and was publicly saying as recently as early March that they were planning for trial, not a plea. Weeks later, the phone calls went out to the families. Something broke. And when you look at what prosecutors had built, it's not hard to understand why.A pizza crust DNA match pulled from a Manhattan trash can. A murder manual recovered from his basement — written in all capitals, sections titled "Body Prep" and "Post Event," created in 2000 and updated for years before he tried to delete it. More than 350 electronic devices seized from his home. Burner phones registered under "Andrew Roberts" and "Thomas Hawk" used to contact at least 60 sex workers more than 500 times. And from that same Gmail account used to reach those women: more than 100 searches about the Gilgo Beach investigation — including, per court documents, "Why hasn't the Long Island serial killer been caught."His daughter says she believes he most likely did it. His ex-wife called him her hero in a documentary. DNA from both of them was found on five of the seven victims — transferred through household objects, without their knowledge, without their consent. Every defense motion denied. Every off-ramp closed.What a guilty plea gives the families of seven women who waited decades for this moment — and what it still leaves open — that's what this episode ends on.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #TrueCrimeToday #LongIslandSerialKiller #TrueCrime #GuiltyPlea #SerialKiller #GilgoFour #ColdCase #LISKcase

Patrick Clancy came home with dinner on January 24th, 2023. His wife was injured in the backyard. His three children were in the basement. Cora was five. Dawson was three. Callan was eight months old. Within 72 hours, all three were gone.Lindsay Clancy — a devoted mother and labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General Hospital — allegedly strangled all three children with exercise bands before attempting to take her own life by jumping from a second-story window. She survived. She is now paralyzed from the chest down, held at Tewksbury State Hospital, awaiting a trial currently scheduled for July 2026.She has pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors allege premeditation — that she calculated Patrick's absence, sent him on a deliberate errand, and created the window intentionally. Her defense maintains she was in active psychosis at the time, hearing a commanding voice she could not resist, the result of a serious illness the medical system allegedly failed to diagnose or treat.In the days after the deaths, Patrick released a public statement of forgiveness that divided the country. The debate it sparked has never stopped.Part 1 of our five-part deep-dive into the Lindsay Clancy case, presented in partnership with Hidden Killers, establishes the foundation: who was lost, who Lindsay was, and what it looks like when two opposing accounts of the same devastating night collide for the first time.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMassachusetts #PatrickClancy #MurderCase #MaternalMentalHealth #TrueCrimePodcast #CriminalJustice

The legal pressure surrounding Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos reached a significant threshold this week, with direct implications for the ongoing investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie. The Pima County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to invoke state law compelling Nanos to provide sworn reports regarding his department — with non-compliance creating a legal pathway to his removal from office.The action follows a 241-0 no-confidence vote by the Pima County Deputies Organization, citing records from Nanos' tenure with the El Paso Police Department. According to reporting by the Arizona Republic and AZPM, those documents describe approximately 26 disciplinary allegations over six years — including excessive force, discharge of a firearm, insubordination, illegal gambling, and threatening behavior — before Nanos resigned in 1982 in lieu of termination. His deputies contend those records were never disclosed to Pima County.Of particular legal significance: reporting by the Arizona Republic and AZPM indicated that in a December 2025 deposition, Nanos was asked under oath whether he had ever been suspended and reportedly testified that he had not — a statement that appears inconsistent with the documented record. Pima County Supervisor Matt Heinz has described Nanos' 42-year career as potentially "based on fraud."Against this backdrop, questions persist about critical investigative decisions in the Guthrie case: the early release of the crime scene, the routing of DNA evidence to a private Florida lab rather than through federal channels, and reported early friction with FBI evidence access. Federal prosecutors have publicly affirmed their continued involvement regardless of what occurs at the sheriff's office level.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer provides legal and procedural analysis on the sworn testimony questions, the investigative implications of the Nanos crisis, and what a potential leadership transition means for the integrity of this case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #FBIInvestigation #SwornTestimony #MissingPerson #BringNancyHome

The investigative picture in the Nancy Guthrie disappearance grew significantly more complex this week following Savannah Guthrie's first public interview since her mother was reported missing from her Tucson-area home. Key details confirmed: the suspect made two separate visits to the residence prior to the night of the alleged abduction. Investigators are actively pursuing the theory that the armed individual visible on doorbell camera footage was functioning as a lookout — and that at least one additional person may have been present inside the home at the time.Nancy Guthrie, 84, was living with significant physical limitations and could not have been moved without assistance. She was taken without shoes or medication. The logistics of the alleged abduction point to a coordinated operation built on prior surveillance of the victim — her address, her living situation, her physical condition.FBI canvassing activity has moved from broad neighborhood sweeps to targeted questioning about specific categories of people: former residents who recently relocated, and construction workers active at a nearby property. That level of focus in a canvassing operation reflects a working theory, not a search for leads.Savannah also addressed the family's public responses to potential ransom communications — including video statements directed at possible abductors — and stated her belief that certain ransom notes may be legitimate while others likely are not. The investigative and legal implications of a family publicly engaging with potential ransom demands, including the effect on negotiation posture and evidentiary value, are examined directly in this episode.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer provides procedural analysis on the surveillance profile, the ransom communication dynamics, and the significance of the continued absence of any confirmed proof of life.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #MissingPerson #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #PimaCounty #FBIInvestigation #KidnappingInvestigation #BringNancyHome