True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Everyone loves them. Your friends think they're charming. Your family thinks you're lucky. You know what they're really like at home. And you wonder if you're the crazy one.This is Parts 3 and 4 of "Surviving the Fog"—examining financial coercive control and the psychology of the mask through the Kouri Richins case. We're not diagnosing anyone. We're exploring documented patterns that explain how intelligent people end up trapped.Prosecutors allege Kouri was $4.5 million in debt when Eric died. Over 200 overdraft transactions totaling $300,000. A $3.2 million mansion closing the day of his death. Financial abuse creates chains so complete that leaving becomes impossible—not because you're afraid, but because you literally cannot afford to go.The chaos strategy keeps you reactive. The "we" weapon makes every decision feel shared while one person controls. The flip turns your questions into accusations. The trap follows you: destroyed credit, joint debt, sabotaged employment. Financial desperation is a documented lethality indicator—when the house of cards collapses, danger spikes.Then there's the mask. After Eric died, Kouri wrote a children's book about grief. Featured her sons. Did media appearances as the grieving widow helping families heal. All while under investigation for allegedly murdering her husband.Public image management means every interaction is curated, building character witnesses before they're needed. "They would never"—the narrative gets set before you speak. Flying monkeys reinforce their reality while your support network erodes. Two people exist: warm and generous in public, cold and critical at home.The pressure paradox: the mask doesn't crack under scrutiny. It becomes more elaborate. The worse the truth, the better the performance has to be.The public saint and private monster are the same person. Trust what you see at home.Kouri Richins is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #SurvivingTheFog #FinancialAbuse #TheMask #NarcissisticAbuse #EricRichins #FlyingMonkeys #CoerciveControl #PublicPersona #KouriRichinsTrial

This is our Week in Review of the Kouri Richins murder trial—and one fact may matter more than everything else the jury has heard.Four years after Eric Richins died with fentanyl in his system, the state's own former Chief Medical Examiner still lists his manner of death as "undetermined." Not homicide. The prosecution is asking a jury to convict Kouri Richins of murder when their own medical expert won't call it one.The problems don't stop there. Carmen Lauber, the housekeeper who testified she bought fentanyl for Kouri four times, was using methamphetamine during the relevant period. She received immunity from three jurisdictions before taking the stand. Her supplier Robert Crozier originally told detectives he sold fentanyl—then testified under oath that he only sold oxycodone because "everybody was scared of fentanyl." When your two key witnesses can't agree on what the drugs were, the case has a credibility crisis.Former FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke assesses what's actually happening in that courtroom. After 21 years with the Bureau, including running the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Dreeke separates truth from performance. He reads Lauber's testimony, Crozier's contradiction, and Kouri's composure through five days of prosecution evidence.Defense attorney Bob Motta identifies what the prosecution still hasn't proven: what drugs Carmen actually obtained, how fentanyl got into Eric, and whether Kouri administered it. He analyzes the nine-minute phone call to the medical examiner's office—consciousness of guilt or a widow seeking answers? And he flags the Seroquel in Eric's system that neither side is emphasizing.The state has established fentanyl in Eric's system, Kouri's financial problems, and her boyfriend. But establishing motive isn't the same as proving murder.Kouri Richins is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichinsUpdate #RichinsTrialNews #EricRichins #MedicalExaminerTestimony #CarmenLauber #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #FentanylMurder #UtahMurderCase #TrueCrimeToday

The man who took Nancy Guthrie has been called sloppy, amateurish, incompetent by every talking head on cable news. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke disagrees. After 21 years with the Bureau—including leading the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program—his assessment is clear: what we're seeing on that doorbell footage isn't unusual. It's baseline.The Walmart backpack. The awkward holster placement. The improvised camera cover fashioned from potted plant foliage. Dreeke explains this is what actual criminal operations look like. The movies trained us to expect meticulous planning and elegant execution. Real offenders show up with cheap equipment and figure it out as they go. The cases that get solved typically involve exactly this preparation level. We just don't broadcast those nationally.The uncomfortable question: this suspect's operation was messy and it's still working. Four weeks—no identification, no arrest, no vehicle. Sloppy-but-successful tells us something different than sloppy-and-caught. Dreeke examines whether this is someone who lacks capacity or someone driven by desperation or compulsion. The willingness to proceed despite being recorded, problem-solving on camera in real time—that might not be stupidity.Drawing on his counterintelligence background, Dreeke explains what a genuinely sophisticated version of this operation would have looked like—and how wide the gap is between trained tradecraft and what appears on the Guthrie footage.Meanwhile, calls for Sheriff Chris Nanos's removal grow louder daily. But what would it take? A recall requires roughly 121,825 signatures in 120 days—near impossible. Impeachment doesn't apply to county officers in Arizona. Two AG investigations have gone silent. Nanos won by 481 votes. His deputies voted no confidence. His supervisors twice requested outside investigations. Arizona's constitution protects him until 2028.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieSuspect #RobinDreeke #FBIProfile #SheriffNanos #FindNancyGuthrie #TucsonKidnapping #PimaCountySheriff #SavannahGuthrieMom #NancyGuthrieCase

The digital evidence presented in the Kouri Richins trial doesn't need a plea deal or immunity agreement. It speaks on its own.Forensic analyst Chris Kotrodimos testified about data extracted from seven phones in this case. What he showed the jury was damning. Deleted meme thumbnails recovered from Kouri's phone—accessed moments after first responders left the home where Eric Richins lay dead—included one captioned "I'm really rich" and another showing a woman crying into cash.Between January and mid-March 2022, hundreds of messages, web searches, and call logs were scrubbed from Kouri's white iPhone. Eric's phone showed no mass deletions during the same period.The timeline around Eric's death raised immediate questions. Kouri's phone was unlocked multiple times at 3:06 a.m. the night he died. She didn't call 911 until 3:21. What happened in those fifteen minutes?Google searches recovered from Kouri's replacement phone included how to wipe an iPhone remotely, whether police can force lie detector tests, luxury prison information, and life insurance payout timelines. Cell tower data showed phones belonging to the alleged drug supplier and middleman meeting at the same Draper gas station on the three exact dates prosecutors say fentanyl was purchased—and nowhere else.Valentine's Day data presented a split screen: Kouri texting her alleged boyfriend "I love you" while Eric texted her saying he was sick. That's the day prosecutors allege she attempted to poison him with fentanyl. Former Chief Medical Examiner Erik Christensen testified Eric was given fentanyl by someone else.The psychological question underlying this case—how did Eric miss the signs?—has answers in documented research on coercive control and love bombing. Smart people don't see it coming because they're targeted precisely for their trust.Kouri Richins is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichinsUpdate #RichinsTrialEvidence #PhoneForensics #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #DeletedTexts #LoveBombing #CoerciveControl #SummitCountyTrial #TrueCrimeToday

Every investigative pathway in the Nancy Guthrie case has dead-ended at once. Four weeks after Savannah Guthrie's 84-year-old mother was kidnapped from her Tucson home, there's no suspect in custody, no confirmed identification of the man on camera, and critical evidence has yielded no actionable leads.The DNA should have been a breakthrough. Gloves recovered two miles from the scene contained genetic material from an unknown male. But it didn't match anyone in CODIS. Genetic genealogy—the technique that solved the Golden State Killer case—could eventually provide answers, but the process takes months. Whether investigators are even pursuing that route remains unclear.Nancy's pacemaker offered another potential lead. The device emits a Bluetooth signal detectable from over two hundred yards away. Search teams flew helicopters specifically scanning for that signal across the Tucson area. They found nothing. The silence suggests troubling possibilities: Nancy could be somewhere the signal can't penetrate, the pacemaker may have stopped functioning, or worse.The suspect's face has been everywhere. Every major network has broadcast the doorbell footage. Fifty thousand tips have flooded in. Yet somehow, not one person has successfully identified him. No coworker. No neighbor. No one who has ever crossed paths with this man has come forward with information that led anywhere.Robin Dreeke, a 21-year FBI veteran who served as Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, addresses the dysfunction narrative. The crime scene released early. Blood photographed by reporters before federal agents secured the property. Evidence routed to a private lab. Contradictory public statements. Dreeke's assessment: this friction is normal. Multi-agency investigations always have this tension. The difference is that America is watching this one.Resources have drawn down. The home was returned to Nancy's family. What does that actually mean for the case?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrieNews #NancyGuthrieMissing #TucsonMissingPerson #GuthrieCaseUpdate #SavannahGuthrieMother #FBIInvestigation #MissingPersonsCase #NancyGuthrieDNA #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday

The Kouri Richins murder trial reached a critical moment as prosecutors called their star witness. Carmen Lauber, the former housekeeper who allegedly purchased the fentanyl that killed Eric Richins, testified under immunity agreements and described a months-long drug procurement operation.Lauber told jurors she bought drugs for Kouri four times in early 2022. The requests allegedly escalated from pain pills to fentanyl. According to her testimony, when she informed Kouri the drugs were fentanyl—not standard painkillers—Kouri told her to get them anyway. Transactions allegedly happened through cash drops at properties Kouri was renovating and pills left in a firepit.Three days after Eric died, Lauber says Kouri contacted her asking about the drug connection again. Payment arrived as a check marked for construction cleaning. When Lauber later asked about the pills, Kouri allegedly claimed Eric died from a brain aneurysm.Prosecutor Brad Bloodworth promised the jury the evidence would prove Kouri murdered Eric "for his money and to get a fresh start at life." The prosecution's case includes a forensic toxicologist's confirmation that Eric had five times the lethal dose of illicit fentanyl in his system, a fraudulent life insurance policy obtained weeks before his death, a Caribbean vacation pre-booked with Kouri's boyfriend for the month after Eric would be dead, and internet searches for "what is a lethal dose of fentanyl."Defense attorney Wendy Lewis challenged Lauber's testimony aggressively. Lauber confirmed she was using methamphetamine regularly during the alleged drug purchases. She initially described the drug requests as oxycodone, not fentanyl. The defense also played a recording where an investigator encouraged Lauber to provide testimony ensuring conviction.Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty to all charges and is presumed innocent until proven otherwise.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichinsUpdate #RichinsTrial2025 #CarmenLauberTestimony #EricRichins #FentanylMurderTrial #UtahCrime #ParkCityTrial #TrueCrimeNews #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeToday

Four weeks after Nancy Guthrie was kidnapped from her Tucson residence, the investigation has stalled—and insiders say they know why. Multiple sources within the Pima County Sheriff's Department allege that Sheriff Chris Nanos is refusing to let the FBI take the lead, despite federal agents reportedly wanting to step in.The allegations don't come from outside critics. They come from Nanos's own current and former staff. Richard Kastigar spent 46 years with the department and served as Nanos's second-in-command before retiring. He now accuses the sheriff of harboring "great disdain" for the FBI stemming from a 2015 federal investigation that allegedly left Nanos angry for years.Sgt. Aaron Cross, who represents Pima County deputies as their union president, told media that belief inside the agency is widespread: this has become "an ego case" for the sheriff.Nanos rejects the characterization. He says FBI relations are strong and that sending DNA evidence to a private lab instead of Quantico was about maintaining consistency. But the optics are troubling. Nancy Guthrie—mother of TODAY show anchor Savannah Guthrie—remains missing with no suspects publicly identified and no arrests made. DNA processing alone could take months.Adding context: in 2024, Nanos placed his election opponent on administrative leave just weeks before the vote. A federal lawsuit alleging retaliation followed. And Nanos's own words have raised eyebrows: "I'm not used to everyone hanging onto my every word and then holding me accountable for what I say."The people who worked closest to this sheriff are the ones asking why the FBI isn't running this case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrieNews #FBIInvestigation #SheriffNanos #PimaCountyArizona #TucsonMissing #SavannahGuthrieMother #TrueCrimeToday #MissingPersonCase #CrimePodcast #ArizonaNews

Thirteen years of dead ends in the Gilgo Beach case. Every suspect cleared. Then a pizza box changed everything.Today we break down exactly how LISK—the Long Island Serial Killer—was arrested. The Suffolk County task force, the Chevrolet Avalanche tip, the cell tower evidence, the DNA breakthrough, and the pizza crust that allegedly tied it all together.The investigation stalled for years after bodies were discovered along Ocean Parkway in 2010 and 2011. Then a new task force formed in February 2022. Six weeks in, an investigator noticed an old witness statement about an "ogre-like man" driving a Chevrolet Avalanche.A database search returned one name: Rex Heuermann.Cell phone records allegedly connected the alleged Gilgo Beach Killer to burner phones in every instance. But investigators needed physical evidence.Enter whole genome sequencing. This cutting-edge technology can extract DNA from degraded samples traditional testing couldn't use. A California lab applied it to hairs found on the Gilgo Beach victims. According to prosecutors, hairs on six of seven victims linked to LISK or his immediate family.But they still needed his DNA directly.May 2023. Heuermann discards a pizza box outside his Manhattan office. Investigators retrieve it. DNA from the crust matches a male hair found on Gilgo Four victim Megan Waterman. A profile found in only 0.04% of the population.July 13, 2023. The alleged Long Island Serial Killer arrested. Twelve-day search of his Massapequa Park home. Fifty-eight hard drives. Over two hundred firearms. The planning document that prosecutors say supports the Gilgo Beach case.The defense has challenged the DNA technology as "magic." Judge Mazzei rejected those challenges. The LISK trial happens September 2026.Seven women. Thirteen years. Finally, a trial.Part 5 of 5.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #LISK #GilgoBeachKiller #TrueCrimeToday #LongIslandSerialKiller #GilgoBeachMurders #DNABreakthrough #PizzaBox #OceanParkway #SuffolkCounty

Former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis covers three major legal developments in one extended interview.The Kouri Richins trial just heard devastating financial testimony. A forensic accountant told jurors she was $1.6 million in debt the day after Eric Richins died. Her business was "imploding." Checks bounced constantly. The prosecution wants the jury to see financial desperation as murder motive. Eric Faddis explains how that legal argument works, why Kouri's belief about life insurance matters even though Eric had already changed his beneficiaries, and whether 26 fraud charges help or hurt.In the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation, there's no arrest and no suspect—but innocent people have already been named, detained, and harassed. A man questioned for hours was released with his attorney saying he has "no link whatsoever" to the case. A teacher is being targeted at his home by amateur sleuths. Eric Faddis explains what legal recourse exists when you've been dragged into a high-profile case you weren't part of.The Cascio family—who defended Michael Jackson publicly for 25 years, testified at his 2005 trial, and wrote a memoir calling him innocent—are now suing, alleging he drugged, raped, and trafficked them since childhood. The estate calls it extortion. A hearing this week determines whether the case goes public or gets sealed in arbitration. Eric Faddis examines the credibility nightmare, the settlement they already collected, and what federal trafficking law requires.Three cases. Three legal battlegrounds. One conversation covering all of it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #MichaelJackson #CascioFamily #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeToday #MurderMotive #Defamation #Trafficking #TrueCrime

Leaving is the most dangerous time.For victims of coercive control, the moment you start pulling away is the moment risk escalates. The relationship was never about love. It was about control.This is Part 5 of "Surviving the Fog"—examining escalation and lethality through the Kouri Richins case. We're not diagnosing anyone. We're exploring documented patterns.Prosecutors allege Eric was asking questions. Wanted to change his will.Valentine's Day 2022: Eric allegedly gets sick after eating a sandwich prosecutors say Kouri bought. He recovers.Two weeks later, five times the lethal dose of fentanyl.If the prosecution's timeline is accurate, Eric may have been in the danger zone—the highest-risk period identified in domestic violence research.Lethality indicators include: escalating threats, weapons access, stalking, prior strangulation, extreme possessiveness, separation intent, financial desperation.Narcissistic collapse produces desperation and rage—not acceptance. When control is threatened, some escalate to the unthinkable."If I can't have you, no one can" is ownership, not love.The danger zone is real. But so is survival. Leave strategically. Make a plan. Tell someone. Don't announce your departure.The life you build afterward is permanent.Kouri Richins is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #TrueCrimeToday #DangerZone #SurvivingTheFog #LethalityIndicators #DomesticViolence #EricRichins #LeavingAbuse #CoerciveControl #SafetyPlanning