True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Alex Murdaugh grew up believing he was untouchable. Four generations of family power made sure of it.From 1920 to 2006, the Murdaughs controlled prosecution in five South Carolina counties. They decided who faced justice and who didn't. They built a dynasty on the belief that their family was different, protected, above the law.And then Alex murdered his wife and son.Part 1 of "The Name" examines the generational machinery behind the Murdaugh case. Not just what Alex did — but how the family system created someone capable of doing it.If you've ever felt trapped by what your family expected you to be, this episode will resonate. The Murdaughs are extreme. The dynamics are universal.Join Our Substack for AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter: https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughFamily #MurdaughTrial #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughDynasty #SouthCarolinaCrime #MurdaughCase #TrueCrime #NarcissisticFamilies #MurdaughDocumentary

Brad Bloodworth, chief prosecutor for Summit County, serves up closing arguments in the Kouri Richins trial.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

In high-stakes murder trials, the decision not to call your client to the stand is one of the most consequential a defense team can make. In the Kouri Richins trial, that decision has been made. The defense rested without putting Kouri Richins in front of the jury.What does that silence communicate — legally, strategically, and behaviorally?Defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to examine the strategic landscape at the close of evidence in one of true crime's most-watched cases. With no physical drug evidence, a immunity-protected star witness whose credibility was aggressively challenged, and a defendant who spent years publicly performing grief while allegedly orchestrating false testimony, the Kouri Richins trial raises questions that go beyond this one case.When circumstantial evidence is this dense, what does a defense team owe the jury? When an investigation has as many procedural gaps as this one, does that create reasonable doubt — or just noise? And when a defendant chooses silence, what fills that vacuum in a juror's mind?Closing arguments are next. The verdict window is open. This is where the case stands.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #DefenseRests #EricRichins #UtahMurderTrial #FentanylMurder #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #SummitCounty

Brad Bloodworth, chief prosecutor for Summit County, serves up closing arguments in the Kouri Richins trial.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

Former University of Kentucky cheerleader Laken Snelling has been indicted on first-degree manslaughter in the death of her newborn son, whose body was discovered by her roommates on August 27, 2025, wrapped in a towel inside a black trash bag in the closet of her off-campus Lexington apartment. The Kentucky Medical Examiner confirmed the infant was born alive. Cause of death: asphyxia by undetermined means. On March 12, 2026, Snelling was booked into the Fayette County Detention Center. She faces up to 31 years.Tony Brueski of Hidden Killers breaks down the case from the beginning — and the beginning matters. This is not a story that starts at 4 a.m. on August 27th. It starts months earlier, with a full-term pregnancy Snelling concealed from everyone around her while privately tracking it week by week on her phone. It includes a national cheerleading championship performance in April 2025, couples photo shoots in June that observers described as maternity photos, and a final TikTok post listing "be a mom" as a life goal — all while the evidence shows she had no intention of anyone finding out.When investigators executed search warrants on her phone and social media accounts, they found deleted labor photos, pregnancy searches, and documented evidence of a months-long concealment. Her own words to investigators placed her conscious and aware when her son moved and made a sound. The grand jury heard all four levels of criminal homicide. They landed on manslaughter.Hidden Killers covers the full timeline, the phone evidence, the affidavit details, and what the people who knew Snelling long before this say about who she really is.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LakenSnelling #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #LakenSnellingIndictment #KentuckyCheerleader #TrueCrime2026 #ManslaughterCharge #InfantDeath #FayetteCounty #LakenSnellingCase

Judge Richard Mrazik gives instructions to the jury in the Kouri Richins Trial. The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

The Kouri Richins murder trial produced no smoking gun — no murder weapon recovered, no confession, no eyewitness to the act itself. What it produced instead was 42 witnesses, three weeks of testimony, and a prosecution argument that circumstantial evidence stacked high enough becomes something else entirely.Richins, a Utah mother of three, is accused of poisoning her husband Eric with a lethal fentanyl overdose in March 2022. She has pleaded not guilty to aggravated murder, attempted murder, insurance fraud, and forgery. After the prosecution rested, her defense team called no witnesses. She did not testify. The case went to the jury on the strength of the state's case alone.Tony Brueski of Hidden Killers walks through what that case actually looked like — the financial motive prosecutors built around a prenuptial agreement and alleged millions in debt, the housekeeper's testimony about four separate fentanyl purchases made at Richins' request, the Valentine's Day sandwich poisoning prosecutors say was attempt number one, the deleted messages, the pre-arrest phone searches, the jail cell letter, and the question Richins allegedly asked her boyfriend about killing — all of it built into a portrait prosecutors called death by a thousand cuts.No single piece of it was a killshot. Whether all of it together crossed the line into proof beyond a reasonable doubt — that's the question this episode answers.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #CircumstantialEvidence #UtahMurder #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast

The Kouri Richins murder trial enters its final legal phase: closing arguments followed by jury deliberations in a case built entirely on circumstantial evidence. Former FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski for Part 2 of the listener Q&A, analyzing the legal and procedural dynamics now shaping how this verdict gets constructed.The prosecution's burden is precise: establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt without direct forensic evidence connecting Richins to the fentanyl in Eric's system. Dreeke examines how juries process purely circumstantial cases under that standard — and what the behavioral research shows about the reliability of those inferential conclusions.Jury instructions handed to jurors before closing arguments represent the legal framework for deliberation — and most trial observers underestimate their importance. Dreeke addresses how instructions function in the deliberation room: as architecture jurors are supposed to apply, but that competes with the emotional and narrative weight accumulated over three weeks of testimony.The forensic accountant's presentation represents a distinct evidentiary challenge: dense, document-heavy, legally durable — but emotionally flat compared to testimony about fentanyl procurement and obituaries on mirrors. Dreeke examines whether that category of evidence survives the emotional gravity of more visceral testimony once deliberations begin.Documented investigative gaps remain on the record: the cocktail mugs never forensically tested, no warrant executed for a key phone, an uninvestigated alternate fentanyl-source report. Under the reasonable doubt standard, those aren't rhetorical points — they're unresolved evidentiary questions. Dreeke addresses what weight they're likely to carry once jurors are behind closed doors.He also maps the realistic path to acquittal — and what behavioral indicators from outside the jury room would signal deliberations are moving in that direction.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #TrueCrimeToday #LegalAnalysis #JuryInstructions #CircumstantialEvidence #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #ClosingArguments #MurderTrial #TrueCrime

In a move carrying significant legal weight, Kouri Richins' defense team rested without calling a single witness — concluding three weeks of prosecution testimony in a first-degree murder case built entirely on circumstantial evidence. Former FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski for a listener Q&A examining the evidentiary landscape the jury is now tasked with assessing.From a procedural standpoint, the defense's silence forces jurors to evaluate the prosecution's case on its own terms. That case rests on interconnected pillars: an extensive financial picture — accounts reportedly in the red, failed real estate transactions, outstanding loans — uncontested opportunity evidence, and Carmen Lauber's testimony, which represents the closest thing this case has to a direct statement from Richins about her intentions.Lauber's testimony came with a serious legal complication. A detective allegedly told her she needed to provide "details that ensure Kouri gets convicted." That statement, if accurately reported, represents a significant problem for the prosecution's most important witness — and Dreeke examines how jurors are likely to weigh that disclosure against everything else Lauber put on the record.The defense also left documented evidentiary gaps in the record: cocktail mugs never forensically tested, no warrant executed for a key family member's phone, an uninvestigated report that Eric sought fentanyl from an alternate source. Under reasonable doubt standards, those aren't rhetorical flourishes — they're unresolved evidentiary questions. Dreeke addresses whether they're likely to carry weight in deliberations.The "Walk the Dog" letter — Richins' alleged jail correspondence coaching family members on what to tell investigators — anchors the prosecution's consciousness-of-guilt argument. Dreeke examines what that document does once it's inside a deliberation room.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichinsTrial #LegalAnalysis #EricRichins #CircumstantialEvidence #MurderTrial #UtahMurder #TrueCrime #JuryDeliberations

Nick Reiner pleaded not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder with special circumstances. The death penalty remains on the table. And his siblings are done. This Hidden Killers Week In Review breaks down the legal mechanics most headlines are missing—and examines what brought Jake and Romy Reiner to the point of walking away from their brother's defense.That not guilty plea wasn't a claim of innocence. It was a procedural placeholder. In California, pursuing an insanity defense requires entering a dual plea: not guilty AND not guilty by reason of insanity. The single plea keeps all options open while psychiatric evaluations continue.Door one: full insanity under the M'Naghten standard—a longshot given Nick was reportedly arguing with his father at a party hours before allegedly stabbing both parents to death. Door two: diminished actuality, using his documented schizoaffective disorder and a reported medication change to argue he couldn't form specific intent to premeditate. Door three: incompetence to stand trial, potentially pushing proceedings out months or years.Meanwhile, the family has fractured. Sources told TMZ: "Nick's defense is Nick's defense. They're not involved." The high-profile attorney Jake and Romy initially funded—Alan Jackson—withdrew in January. Nick now has a public defender. Reports indicate his siblings won't attend the trial. His only visitor in over two months has been his lawyer.After eighteen rehabs, a conservatorship, years of police visits—what does it cost to finally stop holding on? Tony Brueski examines what Peter Lanza, the Roof family, and Kerri Rawson can teach us about the moment when family members of killers finally step back.The question the legal system can't fully answer: what do we owe people who refuse to be helped, and what do we owe the people they destroy?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #TrueCrimeToday #InsanityDefense #NotGuiltyPlea #JakeReiner #RomyReiner #Parricide #CaliforniaMurder