True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Gloria Satterfield worked for the Murdaughs for twenty years. After she died, Alex promised to take care of her sons.He stole four million dollars from them instead.Part 3 of "The Name" explores the system of silence that enabled Alex Murdaugh for decades. The lawyer who helped structure the fake settlement. The insurance company that paid out without questions. The community that extended the benefit of the doubt.This isn't about conspiracy. It's about complicity. How systems protect the wrong people. How good people stay silent because speaking up costs too much.If you've ever been part of an institution that looked the other way — you'll recognize these patterns.That's what silence costs.Join Our Substack for AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter: https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #GloriaSatterfield #MurdaughFraud #MurdaughVictims #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughEnablers #TrueCrime #InstitutionalCorruption #MurdaughCase #SouthCarolina

Kouri Richins has been convicted of aggravated murder. The legal fight doesn't end with a verdict. Tony Brueski, defense attorney Bob Motta, and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke examine the appellate record built during this trial and what arguments have real traction.The video of investigators directing Carmen Lauber toward conviction — admitted at trial, seen by the jury, and now potentially central to a due process argument. The hearsay ruling that blocked testimony about Eric allegedly asking someone about obtaining fentanyl — and the complication that the defense walked away from it themselves. The denied spoliation instruction over the missing pill bottle. The Lauber informant instruction language. Bob Motta breaks down which arguments a higher court would take seriously and which ones sound stronger than they are. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #EricRichins #TrueCrime #CriminalAppeal #MurderTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #DueProcess #UtahMurder

Retired Maj. Gen. William Neil McCasland has been missing since February 27, 2026. The Bernalillo County Sheriff's Office is leading the investigation with FBI support. Authorities have confirmed no evidence of foul play while stating all possible scenarios remain active. After three weeks, more than 700 homes canvassed, and extensive search operations across Albuquerque's Sandia foothills, there is no confirmed sighting and no publicly identified direction of travel.The documented facts of McCasland's disappearance carry specific legal and procedural weight. A Silver Alert was issued under New Mexico statute, which requires demonstration of irreversible deterioration of intellectual faculties — a threshold his wife has publicly disputed. Authorities cited an unspecified medical issue as a basis for urgency. Missing from his residence: a .38-caliber revolver with leather holster, his wallet, and hiking boots. Remaining at the residence: his cell phone, prescription glasses, and wearable devices. He is believed to have left on foot.McCasland's career included command of the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base — a facility with documented involvement in sensitive aerospace and classified defense research programs — and the Phillips Research Site at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque. The FBI's involvement has not been explained beyond McCasland's background in classified programs. A 2016 WikiLeaks document places McCasland's name in email correspondence between Tom DeLonge and presidential campaign chairman John Podesta in the context of UAP-related discussions. McCasland never publicly confirmed or denied the connection.His disappearance occurred days after the Trump administration announced a directive to release government records on unidentified aerial phenomena. The procedural and investigative record of this case — what has been confirmed, what remains contested, and what law enforcement has declined to address publicly — is the focus of this episode.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#WilliamNeilMcCasland #MissingGeneral #RetiredAirForce #AlbuquerqueNM #UFOCoverUp #WrightPattersonAFB #TomDeLonge #UAP #FBIInvestigation #TrueCrimeToday

In the Kouri Richins murder trial, the defense has worked to portray Eric Richins as a financially controlling husband who left his wife feeling trapped and overlooked. Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty to all charges.But the documented financial record tells a different story — and this episode is a commentary and opinion breakdown of what that record actually contains.According to forensic accountant testimony at trial, Kouri's real estate business was approximately $7.5 million in debt at the time of Eric's death, generating far less revenue than its monthly obligations. According to prosecutors and charging documents, she secretly used Eric's power of attorney to take out a $250,000 loan against his premarital home, falsified his business financial documents to secure fraudulent loans, and allegedly took $45,000 from a close personal friend for a deal that never materialized — leaving that friend evicted.Eric Richins' documented response to discovering his wife's alleged financial conduct was not to tighten financial control. He consulted an estate attorney, cited "recently discovered and ongoing abuse and misuse of finances," and restructured his estate to protect his children — without telling Kouri.In this episode, the argument is that the "controlling husband" framing is not supported by the evidence — and that the pattern on the record reflects something else entirely. All commentary is opinion. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #TrueCrime #NarcissistPlaybook #FinancialFraud #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #UtahMurder #TrueCrimeCommentary

Kouri Richins has been convicted of aggravated murder. Her defense team called zero witnesses and rested without presenting an affirmative case — betting that the prosecution had failed to meet its burden. The jury disagreed.Tony Brueski, defense attorney Bob Motta, and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke examine what the defense accomplished during the prosecution's own case, why it wasn't enough to create reasonable doubt, and what the conviction tells us about the limits of a cross-examination-only strategy in a high-stakes murder trial. Bob Motta breaks down the key decisions — the coaching video, Detective O'Driscoll's no-fentanyl admission, the Carmen Lauber credibility attack, and the witness the defense chose to walk away from. Robin Dreeke examines how the jury processed what they saw.All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #EricRichins #TrueCrime #DefenseStrategy #ReasonableDoubt #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #UtahMurder

A jury has convicted Kouri Richins of aggravated murder in the death of her husband, Eric Richins. Tony Brueski, defense attorney Bob Motta, and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke examine what the prosecution built and why it worked.The dead man's warning. The insurance timeline a handwriting expert connected to the same period phone records show Kouri contacting her housekeeper about drugs. The financial motive case built around $4.5 million in debt, secret insurance policies, a forged signature, and an affair. Bob Motta breaks down how prosecutors structured a circumstantial case strong enough to convict, and Robin Dreeke examines how the behavioral picture the state built translated to twelve civilians in that jury box.The conviction answers one question definitively: circumstantial evidence, built carefully enough, is enough. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #EricRichins #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #FentanylMurder #ProsecutionCase #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #UtahMurder

Eric Richins told friends after Valentine's Day 2022 that he thought Kouri might be poisoning him. He'd been violently ill. According to testimony, the concern was genuine.A month later, he was dead.This is Part 2 of The Perfect Wife — examining what happens when victims see the truth and still can't escape.Bobby Curley saw it too. On September 22, 1991, he grabbed a nurse's arm in a hospital bed. Barely able to sit up. But his grip was tight."Please help me. My wife is trying to kill me. She is not as she seems."His heart stopped the next morning.Joann had been putting thallium in his iced tea for almost a year. Every morning she made his thermos. Every morning he drank it. While his organs failed. While his hair fell out. While doctors ran tests that showed nothing.Bobby figured it out. He told a medical professional. In a hospital with phones and security and all the resources that should have saved him.He died anyway.Two days earlier, Joann won $1.7 million in a lawsuit settlement. She needed him dead before he could touch it.Knowing isn't enough. Not when the killer is the person who makes your food.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #JoannCurley #BobbyCurley #ThalliumPoison #TrueCrimeToday #VictimWhoKnew #PerfectWife #WifePoisoner #TrueCrime2026 #DeathbedWarning

Three active criminal cases. A murder trial going to the jury. A kidnapping investigation at day forty-one. A manslaughter indictment built on phone evidence and a precise legal threshold. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke join True Crime Today for a multi-part panel covering all three with the legal and investigative precision each deserves.The Kouri Richins segment addresses the trial's legal pressure points before deliberations begin. No murder weapon. No recovered fentanyl. A star witness under immunity whose alleged drug supplier now says he never sold fentanyl. And a detective recording that played for the jury in which investigators told that witness she needed to produce details that would "ensure Kouri gets convicted of murder." Coffindaffer breaks down the legal implications of that recording, whether the prosecution's remaining evidentiary case is strong enough to survive it, and what closing arguments must accomplish. Dreeke addresses the behavioral layer — the silence, the texts, and what the absence of testimony communicates regardless of jury instruction.The Nancy Guthrie segment addresses a 41-day kidnapping investigation that has pivoted to digital forensics with no arrest and a public safety warning from the sheriff. Coffindaffer examines the legal and procedural dimensions of what Nanos said on national television — what the motive theory hedge means, what the public safety warning implies legally, and how the internet disruption investigative thread is built for eventual evidentiary use. Dreeke addresses the behavioral profile of premeditation and what the sustained silence around the alleged perpetrator communicates.The Laken Snelling segment addresses a first-degree manslaughter indictment carrying up to 31 years, where the charge rests on a specific finding of conscious disregard. Coffindaffer maps the legal case — the phone evidence, the "guessed" language at the hospital, the born-alive determination — and what the prosecution must establish at trial to hold the charge. Dreeke addresses the behavioral underpinning and the jury challenge it creates.Three cases, examined with the legal clarity they require.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #LakenSnelling #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #CriminalLaw #TrueCrime #FBIAnalysis #TrueCrimePodcast

He was the most charming man in the room. Everyone loved Alex Murdaugh.That was the mask. Underneath was a man stealing millions, feeding an opioid addiction, living a double life that required constant crimes to maintain.Part 2 of "The Name" explores covert narcissism — the kind that hides behind charm. The kind that makes you feel special while managing you completely. The kind that makes you question your own perception.Maggie was starting to see it. Consulting divorce attorneys. Asking about the finances.And then the boat crash happened. Mallory Beach died. The lawsuits started.The double life was about to be exposed. And narcissists don't self-correct when they're cornered. They escalate.Join Our Substack for AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter: https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughDoubleLife #CovertNarcissist #MaggieAndPaul #MurdaughTrial #TrueCrimeToday #MalloryBeach #MurdaughFraud #TrueCrime #NarcissistHusband

The Laken Snelling case is built on a specific legal threshold — first-degree manslaughter, conscious disregard — and the question of whether the evidence as it currently exists can sustain that charge through trial. That is the central legal question this episode addresses.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins True Crime Today alongside Robin Dreeke for a precise legal and procedural analysis of the Snelling case — the indictment, the evidence record, and the prosecution's path forward.The grand jury heard all four levels of criminal homicide. They landed on manslaughter. That choice — conscious disregard over negligence — is a meaningful legal finding, and Coffindaffer examines what the prosecution had to show the grand jury to get there, and what they will need to demonstrate at trial to hold it. She works through each major piece of evidence: the phone documentation, the deleted labor photos, the pregnancy tracking, the months of documented concealment, and how each element translates into legal weight under the conscious disregard standard.The single word "guessed" — used by Snelling when hospital staff asked whether her son was alive — is analyzed in specific legal terms. Coffindaffer addresses how hedged language of that nature is used when the medical examiner has already placed "born alive" in the record, and what it means for the prosecution's intent narrative.The roommate element is examined procedurally: whether their 4 a.m. acceptance of "I fainted" and return to bed constitutes something investigators had to formally account for, and whether it surfaces at trial.Dreeke adds the behavioral framework that the prosecution will need to explain to a jury — particularly around why the documented concealment pattern reflects calculated awareness rather than psychological crisis, and why that distinction matters under the law.Up to 31 years. The charge is serious. The evidence is substantial. The legal path is specific. This is the breakdown that case deserves.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LakenSnelling #TrueCrimeToday #NeonaticideKentucky #FirstDegreeManslaughter #LexingtonKentucky #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #CriminalLaw #KentuckyTrueCrime