True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Pima County Supervisor Matt Heinz — a fellow Democrat — used three words to describe Sheriff Chris Nanos's 42-year career in Pima County: fruit of a poison tree. The argument is straightforward and damning. If Nanos omitted a forced resignation and eight suspensions from his 1984 Pima County job application — and the records now suggest he did — then the career built on that application was compromised from the start. Everything above it is tainted.His deputies agree. Two hundred and forty-one voted no confidence. Zero voted to continue. The Pima County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to invoke a state statute requiring Nanos to submit sworn statements or face removal. And a December deposition — in which Nanos was asked under oath whether he'd ever been suspended and said no — is now at the center of a public question about whether his answer was truthful.Nanos says he interpreted the question as applying only to his Pima County career. His El Paso file — obtained by the Arizona Republic — shows eight suspensions totaling thirty-seven days, a suspect who ended up in the intensive care unit, a grand jury, and a resignation submitted in lieu of termination.He's said he'll comply with the board's order. Whether that compliance is enough to keep him in office — or whether it simply closes the door on the only removal mechanism currently available — is what county attorneys are working to determine right now.Nancy Guthrie is still missing. The full picture, laid out plainly, is here.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#SheriffNanos #NancyGuthrie #PimaCounty #NoConfidenceVote #NanosRecall #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrime #LawEnforcementAccountability #TucsonMissingPerson #HiddenKillers

A California civil jury has delivered the largest judgment Bill Cosby has ever faced. Here's how a case from 1972 made it to a Santa Monica courtroom in 2026 — and what the verdict actually means legally.On March 23, 2026, jurors found Cosby liable for the sexual battery and assault of an intoxicated person under California civil law, awarding plaintiff Donna Motsinger $17.5 million in past non-economic damages, $1.75 million in future damages, and — following a separate punitive phase the same afternoon — $40 million in punitive damages, for a total of $59.25 million. The punitive award required the jury to find that Cosby acted with malice, oppression, or fraud, a legal threshold they met after deliberating on pattern evidence and Cosby's own prior deposition testimony.The case was filed in 2023 under California's lookback window legislation, signed by Governor Newsom in 2022, which temporarily suspended the civil statute of limitations for older sexual assault claims. Without that law, Motsinger's suit would have been time-barred decades ago. Motsinger had previously appeared as an anonymous witness — Jane Doe Number 8 — in the 2005 Constand civil case, which resolved in a private settlement before reaching trial.At the Motsinger trial, the court admitted testimony from Andrea Constand, Victoria Valentino, and Janice Baker Kinney under California's common plan or design evidentiary standard, allowing the jury to consider a documented pattern of alleged conduct. Closing arguments included excerpts from a Cosby deposition in which he acknowledged prescribing himself Quaaludes with the stated purpose of giving them to women and admitted he did not evaluate whether those women could give meaningful consent.Cosby's legal team has announced an appeal. Whether Motsinger will collect on the judgment depends on Cosby's actual assets and the outcome of that appellate process — both of which remain contested.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BillCosby #DonnaMotsinger #CivilVerdict #TrueCrimeToday #CaliforniaLaw #PunitiveDamages #StatuteOfLimitations #SexualAssaultLaw #TrueCrime #CosbyCivilCase

The legal and investigative dimensions of the Nancy Guthrie disappearance have grown increasingly intertwined, and True Crime Today examines what the current conditions mean for the active case.From an investigative standpoint: Nancy Guthrie, 84, the mother of NBC News anchor Savannah Guthrie, has been missing from her Catalina Foothills, Arizona home since early February. The FBI and Pima County Sheriff's Department are co-leading the investigation. DNA recovered from the crime scene and from gloves found in the vicinity has produced no matches in CODIS, the FBI-managed national genetic database. Investigators have been requesting footage specifically from January 11, several weeks prior to the abduction, suggesting evidence of possible pre-operational activity. No suspect has been publicly identified or charged.From an institutional standpoint: The lead law enforcement official, Sheriff Chris Nanos, is simultaneously subject to a unanimous no-confidence vote from his deputies union of more than 300 officers, a Board of Supervisors order requiring sworn departmental reporting — with the draft language set for review at a board meeting on April 7 — and an active recall effort requiring 122,000-plus signatures by July 10. These developments stem from the emergence of undisclosed disciplinary records from Nanos' El Paso PD tenure, records that directly contradict sworn testimony he provided.The question of whether command-level institutional disruption affects the quality of active investigative work, and what conditions would be required to advance this case toward resolution, is addressed directly by retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke in this episode.The investigation continues. No arrest has been made.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #ChrisNanos #PimaCounty #TrueCrimeLaw #FBI #MissingPersons #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #Investigation #SavannahGuthrie

The legal picture surrounding Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has sharpened considerably, and the implications for the Nancy Guthrie investigation are significant.Under sworn testimony, Nanos stated he had never been suspended during his law enforcement career. Documented records from his tenure with the El Paso Police Department indicate otherwise, revealing a history of suspensions and conduct issues. When the discrepancy emerged publicly, Nanos' office clarified that his sworn statement pertained specifically to his Pima County career.The distinction matters legally. And it did not go unnoticed.The union representing more than 300 Pima County Sheriff's deputies voted unanimously no confidence and called for Nanos to resign immediately. The Board of Supervisors has directed its legal counsel to draft language requiring Nanos to provide reports under oath regarding his department — language set for review at a board meeting on April 7. Pima County Supervisor Matt Heinz stated publicly that Nanos' 42-year Pima County career "seems to be based on fraud."Nanos, who has three years remaining in his term after winning election by 481 votes, stated within hours of the compliance directive that he would comply. Legal observers have noted that compliance under these specific circumstances effectively forecloses the procedural pathway to removal.A recall effort is underway, requiring more than 122,000 signatures by July 10 to place the matter before voters in 2027. No arrest has been made in the Nancy Guthrie case. No suspect has been publicly identified.Retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke provides professional assessment of what the documented behavioral record of Nanos' conduct reveals — grounded in publicly available facts, not opinion.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#ChrisNanos #NancyGuthrie #PimaCounty #TrueCrimeLaw #SheriffNanos #NoConfidenceVote #Recall #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MissingPersons

The characteristics assembled around Bryan Kohberger after his arrest — socially awkward, intensely focused, isolated, preoccupied with dark subject matter — describe an enormous population of people who have never harmed anyone and never will. And nobody is talking about what it costs those people when a profile like this gets built.True Crime Today presents Part Four of The Shape of Him from Hidden Killers host Tony Brueski — the most uncommon episode in the series, and possibly the most necessary. It examines what it actually feels like to live inside a behavioral description that was assembled around someone else's alleged act. The experience of knowing you are being monitored without being able to address it directly. The impossible trap of a concern you cannot disprove because it was never based on anything you did. The exhaustion of it.This episode makes the case clearly: fitting a profile is not evidence. The behavioral overlap between people who match this description and people who actually pose risk is enormous. The false positive rate is not a small problem — it is the structural reality of behavioral profiling. And the cost of treating it otherwise falls on real people who carry it quietly with no acknowledgment.It also speaks directly to the true crime audience about their own relationship to this content — and what that relationship actually reflects. Part four of five. New episodes weekly.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #TrueCrimePsychology #IdahoMurders #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ProfileBurden #TheShapeOfHim #WomenAndTrueCrime #MoscowIdaho #CriminalPsychology

Two Duggar brothers are facing criminal charges. One is in federal prison. Their father has faced no legal consequences. The organization that produced this family is still running. And a 14-year-old girl is in the middle of an active criminal investigation involving one of the most recognized families in reality television history.In this complete three-part series from Hidden Killers and True Crime Today, hosts Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke sit down with psychotherapist Shavaun Scott to examine every dimension of the Duggar story that the crime reports don't cover. Scott is a thirty-year licensed clinician specializing in trauma recovery, forensic psychology, and the psychology of violent behavior — and a survivor of fundamentalist religious upbringing herself.Part 1 covers the system. IBLP's doctrine, control mechanisms, and what they were designed to produce — examined by someone who lived inside a system like it and has spent thirty years helping people recover from them.Part 2 covers the men. Josh, Joseph, and Jim Bob Duggar through a forensic clinical lens. What do their patterns reveal? What does the research say about offenders who receive faith-based handling instead of clinical treatment? What keeps the women in their lives inside a world that has produced these outcomes?Part 3 covers the survivors. What recovery actually takes. What the people most affected by this week's events need right now. And what hundreds of thousands of former IBLP members — who have been saying this for years — need from this moment.Three parts. The full picture.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DuggarFamily #IBLP #ShavaunScott #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #ReligiousAbuse #DuggarFamilySecrets #ForensicPsychology #TraumaRecovery

When Kirsten Bridegan opened her door on the night of February 16th, 2022 and found Bexley without her father, she faced two things simultaneously: the worst moment of her life, and the accurate knowledge that the case would go as far as she pushed it.She chose to push.Part 4 of One Mile From Home is about what that choice cost her, and what it reveals about the systems surrounding this case. Tony Brueski examines institutional betrayal — the research-documented finding that a system's failure to respond to documented warning signs before a tragedy inflicts its own category of damage, separate from the loss itself. Jared Bridegan had filed concerns. Had documented things. Had tried to use every available channel. The system received those communications and produced no different outcome.Kirsten came into the aftermath of those systemic failures and became, of necessity, her own loudest advocate. This episode examines the psychological cost of that — the specific burden of having to be strategic and publicly composed while privately devastated. The moral complexity of advocating against people who were also parents of Jared's other children. And the quiet, damning observation that the system required her to fight it in order to function.Built for true crime audiences who want to understand not just what happened, but what it cost the people who survived it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KirstenBridegan #JaredBridegan #OneMileFromHome #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #InstitutionalBetrayal #TrueCrimePsychology #JusticeForJared #ShannaGardner #MurderForHire

Jill Duggar was one of Josh Duggar's victims. She said on national television as a young adult that her parents handled it correctly. She is now publicly condemning abuse and supporting victims. What happened between those two moments — and what it took to get there — is a story that matters far beyond the Duggar family.In Part 3 of this three-part series from Hidden Killers and True Crime Today, hosts Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke sit down with psychotherapist Shavaun Scott to discuss what recovery from a closed fundamentalist system actually takes. Scott is a thirty-year licensed clinician who specializes in trauma recovery and left a fundamentalist religious system herself.This conversation addresses the specific people who need the most right now: the 14-year-old girl at the center of the Joseph Duggar case who carried what allegedly happened to her for nearly five years, the four young children of Joseph and Kendra Duggar whose world just collapsed around them, and the hundreds of thousands of former IBLP members watching this story become national news — people who have been saying this for years and are now waiting to see if anyone is actually listening.This is Part 3 of 3.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JillDuggar #DuggarFamily #IBLP #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #TraumaRecovery #ReligiousAbuse #DuggarFamilySecrets #19KidsAndCounting

Judge Jeffrey Karp renders his verdict in the Kelsey Fitzsimmons trial.The Kelsey Fitzsimmons trial is underway in Essex Superior Court in Massachusetts. Fitzsimmons, a North Andover police officer, is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon after allegedly pointing her service weapon at fellow officer Patrick Noonan during a restraining order service at her home in June 2025. Prosecutors say she raised the gun at Noonan and pulled the trigger — the gun did not fire because there was no round in the chamber. The defense maintains Fitzsimmons was in the grip of a postpartum mental health crisis and the gun was turned on herself, not on Noonan. She has waived her right to a jury, leaving her fate entirely in the hands of Judge Jeffrey Karp.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens — key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KelseyFitzsimmons #KelseyFitzsimmonsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #NorthAndoverPolice #MassachusettsCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

Five years ago, Maya Millete disappeared from her Chula Vista home the same afternoon she called a divorce attorney. Her husband Larry sent his last email to a spell caster two minutes before she drove up. A neighbor's camera caught loud banging sounds from the house that night. She was never seen or heard from again.The case investigators built against Larry Millete is one of the most documented pictures of escalating coercive control in recent memory — and some of the details are genuinely hard to believe until you see the evidence. Over $1,100 paid to spell casters requesting Maya be bound to him forever, then injured, then made dependent, then given cancer. Subliminal audio devices placed throughout the family home. Google searches for Rohypnol and drugs used to incapacitate adults. An alleged blood shrine built to the marriage. A friend who told investigators he had choked Maya unconscious. A police officer who testified he punched through drywall to reach her when she locked herself in a bathroom in fear.The morning after Maya disappeared, Larry drove the family Lexus for over eleven hours with his phone off, asked a neighbor to clean the car, and still — five years later — has never provided a consistent account of where he went.The trial has been delayed again. The latest postponement came January 28th, 2026, two weeks before a start date attorneys described as final. Maya's sister stood in court and told the judge their parents are living day to day, waking up every morning waiting for justice. The judge granted the delay anyway. Trial is now set for May 11th, 2026.Larry Millete has pleaded not guilty. Tony Brueski covers both sides of this case fully and fairly — the prosecution's evidence, the defense's theory, and what five years of courtroom delays looks like when you're the family left waiting.Maya Millete said if anything happens to me, it was Larry. She said it to three people. A jury will decide if she was right.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LarryMillete #MayaMillete #TrueCrimeToday #MurderTrial2026 #MissingMom #ChulaVistaMurder #NoBodyMurder #TrueCrime #CoerciveControl #HiddenKillers