BackTable Urology

Is the era of cisplatin over, or are we simply becoming more precise about who benefits from it? As perioperative strategies in bladder cancer continue to evolve, emerging tools like circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are playing a bigger role in how clinicians assess recurrence risk and tailor treatment. In this episode of BackTable Tumor Board, host Alan Tan, medical oncologist at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, is joined by bladder cancer experts Dr. Amanda Nizam and Dr. Brad McGregor to discuss recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of urothelial carcinoma. --- SYNPOSIS The doctors examine the evolving management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), including the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, the integration of immunotherapy, and the recent approval of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. The discussion explores the rapidly changing perioperative landscape, the prognostic utility of ctDNA, and how biomarkers such as HER2 and FGFR are influencing treatment selection across disease states. They also address bladder preservation strategies, management of treatment-related toxicities, and the importance of multidisciplinary coordination. The episode concludes with a forward-looking discussion on emerging therapies and the potential to improve cure rates in bladder cancer. --- TIMESTAMPS 00:00 - Introduction01:44 - Overview of Bladder Cancer Treatment04:54 - Patient Staging and Treatment Goals10:12 - Bladder Preservation vs. Radical Cystectomy16:39 - Emerging Trials and Future Directions22:40 - ctDNA and Precision Medicine33:50 - Metastatic Disease and Biomarker Strategies42:16 - Managing Neuropathy in Metastatic Treatment48:44 - HER2 and FGFR in Bladder Cancer54:15 - Future Directions in Bladder Cancer Treatment --- RESOURCES EV-302/303 Trialhttps://newsroom.astellas.com/2023-12-15-PADCEV-R-enfortumab-vedotin-ejfv-with-KEYTRUDA-R-pembrolizumab-Approved-by-FDA-as-the-First-and-Only-ADC-Plus-PD-1-to-Treat-Advanced-Bladder-Cancer NIAGARA Regimenhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2408154 KEYNOTE-905 Studyhttps://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(25)04894-X/fulltext

In reconstructive urology, preventing infection often means prolonged antibiotic exposure, raising important questions about stewardship and long-term harm. In this episode of BackTable Urology, Joshua Sterling of Yale University joins host George Koch to examine how antibiotic stewardship and emerging insights into the urinary microbiome are reshaping infection management in reconstructive practice. --- SYNPOSIS The discussion centers on real-world clinical challenges, particularly in high-risk populations such as patients with neurogenic bladder, chronic catheterization, or prior reconstruction - groups in whom antibiotics are frequently used prophylactically or indefinitely. Drs. Sterling and Koch explore how well-intentioned prescribing patterns can contribute to resistance, dysbiosis, and recurrent infection, while often failing to address the underlying drivers of disease. Rather than framing infection control solely around eradication, the conversation considers a shift toward modulation of the urinary microbiome, drawing on lessons from gastroenterology, infectious disease, and transplant medicine. The episode concludes by outlining how a more nuanced, multidisciplinary approach may better serve reconstructive urology patients in the long term. --- TIMESTAMPS 00:00 - Introduction02:22 - Antibiotic Stewardship in Urology06:34 - Current Landscape of Antibiotic Use13:44 - Protocols and Practices in Reconstruction18:24 - Antibiotic Overuse and Misuse21:02 - Shifting the Microbiome25:12 - Chlorhexidine Irrigations32:38 - Future Directions38:27 - Implementing Antibiotic Protocols40:48 - Conclusions --- RESOURCES STOP-IT Trialhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1411162

Vaginal rejuvenation is often misunderstood, misrepresented, and overdue for honest conversations in medicine. In this crossover episode between BackTable Urology and BackTable OBGYN, Dr. Nirit Rosenblum, a urology and OBGYN professor at NYU Langone Medical Center, is joined by Dr. Karyn Eilber, Chair of the Cedars-Sinai Medical Group Department of Surgery, and Dr. Ariana Smith, Chief of Urology at Pennsylvania Hospital. Together, they bring a multidisciplinary lens to one of the most misunderstood areas of women’s health. --- This podcast was developed in collaboration with: Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) https://sufuorg.com/home.aspx --- SYNPOSIS The discussion revolves around the broad definition of vaginal rejuvenation, distinguishing between medical and cosmetic interventions. They address common misconceptions, the roles of different health professionals, and emphasize the importance of pelvic floor physical therapy and the appropriate use of systemic and vaginal estrogen therapy. The conversation also highlights critical gaps in research surrounding laser and radiofrequency interventions, underscoring the need for stronger evidence, clearer patient education, and continued advocacy around menopause care and sexual function. --- TIMESTAMPS 00:00 - Introduction02:07 - Defining Vaginal Rejuvenation04:31 - Common Procedures and Misconceptions10:00 - Insurance and Coverage of Procedures12:00 - Laser and Radiofrequency Therapies18:06 - Vaginal Estrogen and Lift of Black Box Warning19:55 - The Role of Systemic Hormone Therapy26:52 - Vaginal Rejuvenation Misconceptions32:17 - Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy and Timing of Procedures34:20 - Regional Variations in Therapeutic Availability38:36 - Gender Inequity in Healthcare40:12 - Final Thoughts --- RESOURCES Joint Report on Terminology for Cosmetic Gynecologyhttps://journals.lww.com/fpmrs/abstract/2022/06000/joint_report_on_terminology_for_cosmetic.2.aspx

Gender affirming surgery is becoming a more visible part of urologic practice, raising practical questions about surgical training, case volume, and multidisciplinary support. In this episode of BackTable Urology, Dr. Eric Walton of The Ohio State University joins Dr. George Koch to examine how gender affirming surgery is being integrated into contemporary urology. Dr. Walton discusses his path into reconstructive urology, structural barriers that limit patient access, and why expanding surgical training pathways is central to closing gaps in care. --- SYNPOSIS The conversation explores fellowship models, academic versus private practice settings, and the role of multidisciplinary teams in supporting surgical programs. Practical considerations around patient screening, care coordination, and insurance are addressed, reframing gender affirming surgery as a core component of modern urologic care rather than a subspecialty outlier. --- TIMESTAMPS 00:00 - Introduction00:52 - Journey to Gender Affirming Surgery03:29 - Specialized Training in Gender Surgery09:34 - Building a Gender Surgery Program27:54 - Providing Competent and Affirming Care32:54 - Future of Gender Affirming Surgery in Urology39:58 - Final Thoughts and Advice --- RESOURCES World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) Standards of Care:https://wpath.org/publications/soc8/

What determines success in the early years of urology practice? In this BackTable Urology episode, produced in collaboration with the Society of Women in Urology (SWIU), this episode of the BackTable Urology Podcast brings on Dr. Raveen Syan, Dr. Helen Hougen, and host Dr. Michelle Van Kuiken to discuss the transition to early career practice in urology. --- SYNPOSIS Together, the doctors explore the realities that new attendings face, from building efficient clinical systems to managing complications and building support networks. Drawing from personal experience, the guests offer practical guidance on mentorship, recognizing when a role or environment may no longer be the right fit, and building a sustainable, fulfilling professional life. --- TIMESTAMPS 00:00 - Introduction02:54 - Early Challenges06:13 - Finding Support and Building Systems11:49 - Balancing Work and Personal Life15:52 - The Importance of Saying Yes Early On18:16 - Mentorship and Finding Allies22:29 - Decision Making and Cognitive Biases24:36 - Managing Complications27:31 - Prioritizing Clinical Goals38:45 - Knowing When to Leave42:09 - Final Reflections --- RESOURCES Annie Dukehttps://www.annieduke.com/ Aristotle’s 10 Rules for a Good Lifehttps://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/08/aristotle-10-rules-happy-life/674905/ Personal Productivity: How to work effectively and calmly in the midst of chaoshttps://www.cvdtraining.pitt.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Johnson2009_Essays.pdf Understanding Academic Medical Centers: Simone’s Maximshttps://aacrjournals.org/clincancerres/article/5/9/2281/287826/Understanding-Academic-Medical-Centers-Simone-s

Dr. Daniel Barocas, urologic oncologist and guideline contributor at Vanderbilt, walks through the 2025 microhematuria guideline changes. He explains revised risk groups and which patients may avoid immediate workup. He discusses imaging tradeoffs and expanding use of urinary biomarkers for intermediate-risk evaluations. The conversation highlights practical impacts on patient evaluation and shared decision-making.

How are local and international teams working together to offer reconstructive urology in resource-constrained settings? This week on BackTable Urology, Dr. Jane Kurtzman (University of Utah) joins Dr. George Koch (Ohio State University) to discuss the realities, challenges, and opportunities of international surgical work. --- SYNPOSIS They break down how global urology programs differ in structure, why cultural understanding is foundational, and what sustainable models look like in practice. The conversation highlights unmet reconstructive needs in low- and middle-income countries, evolving models for subspecialty development, and the growing role of long-term partnerships in shaping the future of global urology. --- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 - Introduction4:46 - Understanding Healthcare Systems Abroad8:12 - Need for Global Urology13:39 - Role of Reconstructive Urology Abroad21:57 - Current Programs27:20 - GU Impacts39:35 - Building Capacity through Training49:00 - Past Successes58:38 - Future Directions1:14:12 - Getting Involved --- RESOURCES GU Impactshttps://medicine.utah.edu/surgery/urology/gu-impacts IVUMedhttps://www.ivumed.org/ Urology Care Foundationhttps://www.urologyhealth.org/humanitarianism

Can genomic classifiers close the gap between what we see and what a tumor will do? In this episode of BackTable Urology, Dr. Carissa Chu (UCSF) joins Dr. Ruchika Talwar (Vanderbilt) to explore how genomic classifiers are reshaping the way clinicians diagnose and manage bladder cancer. --- This podcast is supported by: Veracytehttps://www.veracyte.com/decipher-bladder --- SYNPOSIS They discuss the limitations of traditional staging systems and how molecular subtyping is providing deeper insight into tumor biology, treatment response, and prognosis. Dr. Chu highlights where these classifiers can be integrated into real-world clinical decision-making today, where the evidence is still emerging, and which ongoing trials may define the next era of precision medicine in urologic oncology. --- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 - Introduction3:01 - Overview of Genomic Classifiers9:34 - Risk Stratification15:22 - Current Evidence for Genomic Classifiers22:07 - Clinical Implications of Biomarkers27:23 - Ordering Genomic Classifiers33:46 - Future Directions37:57 - Final Takeaways --- RESOURCES Alignment of molecular subtypes across multiple bladder cancer subtyping classifiershttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38480079/ GUSTO Trialhttps://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR128103

If you’re navigating pregnancy, postpartum, or return-to-work stress, you are not alone. In this BackTable Urology × SWIU collaboration, Dr. Danielle Velez (Rutgers Health) joins host Dr. Helen Bernie (Indiana University Health) for a candid conversation on navigating parental leave, lactation, and the emotional turbulence of stepping back into clinical practice. Together, they unpack boundary-setting, finding a support system, protecting partnership time, and giving yourself grace through each stage of early parenthood. --- SYNPOSIS The discussion highlights the power of mentorship, community, and transparency, especially for physicians balancing patient care and family life. From combo-feeding and night nannies to sleep deprivation, identity shifts, and the six-month reevaluation rule, both guests share wisdom they hope future trainees and new parents won't have to learn alone. This episode is a reminder that things get easier with time, that asking for help is strength, not weakness, and that paying it forward makes the path smoother for the next generation. --- TIMESTAMPS 00:00 - Introduction03:07 - Support Systems, Mentorship and Maternity Leave09:03 - Navigating Lactation and Pumping19:21 - Lactation Resources25:58 - Finding Your Village and Outsourcing Tasks34:31 - Balancing Parenthood and Career42:26 - Sleep Deprivation and Protecting Your Schedule55:14 - Maintaining Spousal Relationships59:20 - Rebuilding Your Practice Post-Maternity Leave01:03:56 - Final Thoughts and Advice for New Parents --- RESOURCES Dr. MILK (Mothers Interested in Lactation Knowledge) Support Grouphttps://www.drmilk.org/

When it comes to GU cancers, fear and uncertainty often shape a patient’s treatment decisions well before the clinical data does. Dr. Hung-Jui (Ray) Tan of UNC Health sits down with host Dr. Ruchika Talwar to unpack why decision-making around small renal masses, low-risk prostate cancer, and other GU conditions can be so challenging. Dr. Tan explains the concept of decisional conflict, a patient’s internal uncertainty about the “right” course of action, and how it predicts downstream satisfaction and health outcomes. --- SYNPOSIS Dr. Tan shares practical, evidence-based strategies for improving decision-making conversations, from clearer framing to simple visual aids that reduce anxiety. They discuss how patients often perceive much greater risk of metastasis than what data shows, and why “turning down the temperature” is essential before discussing options. They also touch on evolving tools, including AI, that may improve how clinicians communicate risk and support patients through uncertainty. --- TIMESTAMPS 00:00 - Introduction01:02 - Journey to Decision Science05:59 - Research on Decision Making14:41 - Shared Decision Making in Practice22:39 - Resources for Shared Decision Making39:54 - Improving Decision-Making Conversations --- RESOURCES Decisional conflict among patients newly diagnosed with clinical T1 renal masses: a prospective studyhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11233232/ Decisional Quality in Patients With Small Renal Masseshttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29574123/ Impact of renal mass biopsy on decision-making experience for clinical T1 renal masseshttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41151063/ MUSIC Patient and Provider Resources for Shared Decision Makinghttps://musicurology.com/programs/kidney/ P3P - Prostate Cancer Shared Decision Making Resourcehttps://www.p3p4me.org/users/login Best Case/Worst Case Treatment Decision Toolhttps://patientpreferences.org/best-case-worst-case/ Better Conversations Treatment Decision Toolhttps://patientpreferences.org/better-conversations/