The Editors

They debate the possibility and strategy of American ground troops in Iran and whether seizing key geography could choke Iran’s leverage. They unpack a court ruling that could impose tort liability on social platforms and the wider First Amendment implications. Lively detours cover addictive design of platforms, cultural snobbery about blue-collar life, and quirky baseball and personal anecdotes.

They dig into the war with Iran, debating timing, tactics, and wider geopolitical costs. They unpack the DHS shutdown and the resulting airport and TSA chaos. They critique a controversial leftist trip to Havana and reflect on Cuba’s economic decay and historical interventions.

A wide-ranging discussion of energy shocks from Iran-related disruptions and how they ripple through oil, natural gas, fertilizer and agricultural markets. Debate over naval support in the Strait of Hormuz and whether airpower or ground forces could change the strategic balance. A segment on newly reported allegations about Cesar Chávez and the politics of renaming and historical reckoning. Plus quick cultural picks and light personal stories.

A sharp roundup on recent targeted killings in Iran and the ripple effects for shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. A heated debate about whether current strikes are degrading Iran’s military and what it would take to secure maritime routes. Discussion of intra-right fractures over the war and how MAGA politics shape foreign-policy expectations. A critique of Paul Ehrlich’s bleak legacy.

A vigorous debate about the war with Iran, including strategy, costs, and whether current actions are working. A deep dive into how media narratives and politics shape public perception. Discussion of insurance, Gulf-state reactions, and uncertain endgames. A separate thread on lone-wolf attacks, radicalization, and prosecutions. Lighter segments include favorite bodies of water and reading and TV picks.

They analyze shifting strategic stakes in the Gulf, including Strait of Hormuz disruptions and economic fallout for energy and fertilizers. They debate the prospects of U.S. military options in Iran and whether the conflict is escalating or winding down. They critique media framing around a foiled NYC bombing and unpack the politics of press coverage. They also discuss the federal confrontation with an AI company and risks tied to autonomous weapons.

A sharp rundown of the first week of conflict with Iran, focusing on missile and drone exchanges and U.S. military responses. A debate over differing U.S. and Israeli war aims and the politics of labeling the fight. Coverage of Kristi Noem’s abrupt DHS exit and the clash between outsiders and career technocrats. A look at surprising Texas primary results and the wider implications for party divides.

A tight, Iran-focused conversation about the recent air operation and its military performance. Debates over strategic aims, communication failures, and the role of Congress feature heavily. Panelists weigh timelines, operational risks, and whether battlefield success will translate into political gain.

Today on The Editors, Rich, Noah, Phil, and Audrey discuss Trump’s State of the Union address, the ramp-up around Iran, and the roiling debate over the U.S. Olympic Men’s team success. Editors’ Picks: Rich: Charlie's piece "Our Men’s Hockey Team’s Historic Win Was Just Too Much for Sports Writers to Bear" Noah: MBD's piece "Three Cheers for Jack" Phil: Dan's piece "If the ‘Talking Filibuster’ Means Anything, It Would Irrevocably Change the Senate for the Worse" Audrey: Andy's piece "Why Not Unseal FBI Director Patel’s Grand Jury Testimony About Mar-a-Lago Documents?" Light Items: Rich: Spring training Noah: The Decameron  Phil: New food processor Audrey: Dry February Sponsors:VaerFastGrowingTrees This podcast was edited and produced by Sarah Colleen Schutte. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

They unpack the Supreme Court ruling that curbed presidential tariff authority and debate its legal reasoning. They weigh political fallout and whether Congress will reclaim trade powers. They examine Trump's maneuvering on tariffs and the economic politics behind them. They also discuss U.S. pressure on Iran, strikes versus diplomacy, and constitutional questions about war powers.