MGTOW Sandman Quotes

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Jeff. There was no specific topic request so I'm going to cover a man I've wanted to discuss for quite some time. And that man is Rob Ford the mayor Toronto, Canada, the city I live in. Yesterday Rob Ford was rushed to the hospital with unbearable abdominal pain in his stomach. So in the hospital they found that he has a tumor in his chest and with the election only about a month away he might have to step down as the mayor and call it quits. The mayor of Toronto I believe is the ultimate disposable man and a good indication of how other men think as well. He's has been having chest pain for many months now and I'm pretty sure his wife knew about this. I don't know if she asked him to get treatment for the sake of herself, the city or their two children. But he waited to get his health problem checked out and this is very typical for men. We are stubborn because many of us want to do things for others because of the honor, satisfaction and fulfillment we get from it. Rob Ford's family has a net worth in the neighborhood of two hundred million dollars. And Rob Ford personally has a fifty million dollar net worth and yet he drives a domestic SUV and lives in a suburban three bedroom bungalow. He lives a very modest life and spends his days working as a civil servant. He doesn't buy himself lavish homes, clothes, cars and other things but I often wonder about his relationship with his wife. I respect the fact that he has literally gone his own way as a mayor. But I wonder if his wife is just watching him self destruct knowing full well that he could die from a heart attack at any moment. We'll know in a few days if he has aggressive cancer and if he does the prognosis would not be good at his age. He's only forty five years old. I also don't know very much about his wife as she's very private and she doesn't seem to look after their two kids. From everything I've read she gets her own parents to take care of the kids while she spends most of her time quietly at home. That's the story anyways. Maybe she's urging him to eat more food and get bigger and bigger knowing he'll die from a heart attack. I know for a fact there are women out there that try to fatten up men. Even one of my ex girlfriends tried to get me to put on thirty pounds. Maybe she's afraid that if he looked good he would end the marriage and chase after another woman? Maybe there's another reason. But they are high school sweethearts after all and if she's hypergamous she could just be waiting for him to die from smoking too much crack or having a heart attack. Then she would be left with fifty million dollars and the ability to live any which way she chooses. If he were to die in the next few years it would be interesting to see if she would move out of the small three bedroom home and purchase a mansion and surround herself with an expensive lifestyle?Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today I'm going discuss a topic that I've heard many men talk about in the past in the MGTOW community but haven't really looked into it. There are two ways that you can classify sperm jacking. The first one is when a woman steals the sperm right out of the condom and impregnates herself with it and the second one is when a woman conveniently forgets to take her birth control pill either consciously or subconsciously with the hopes of getting pregnant. Usually this type of behavior happens when women are past the wall of attractiveness and are looking to snag a man and have a baby before it's too late. I knew a woman that got pregnant by not taking her birth control pills but luckily for the guy she had a miscarriage. But she was willing to steal a man's freedom even though he already had four kids of his own. She didn't care. After hearing about this I knew that women become increasingly irrational as their ovaries are going to expire. I don't know if it's a hormonal thing or if it's something related to social pressure and conditioning. It probably has to do with a little of both. Regardless of the reported incidence of sperm-jacking going up I believe that modern women increasingly don't want babies and are content as long as they have a husband to provide for them. The typical profile of a Sperm-Jacker is usually a woman in her thirties and early fourties. And according to the Ask Men dot com's article called "Beware The Sperm-Jacker" this type of woman will usually target men that are younger and genetically superior. Then Askmen put out a second article about the five types of sperm-jackers. They say there's the Lesbian woman that just wants your sperm and is content using a turkey baster inserted into her goods. Then there's the running out of the time girl. This is the woman I described that I personally know that didn't use contraception. The only difference between the woman I know and the ones described by askmen is their version wants to trap a man into a family. For her a baby means access to male resources. Then you have the trapster. The woman that wants a husband forever. Personally I don't believe that this so called trapster exists unless this woman is really ugly and has few options. In that case if she jacks your sperm your kids will come out looking like rats. The fourth category is Miss Lonely. This is another category I don't really believe in. A lonely girl is an oxymoron. Women can get attention anywhere and at any time. These categories are definitely not screen by a Man Going his Own Way over at Askmen.com. The fifth category is called Miss Independent.Askmen.com - Beware The Sperm-Jackerhttp://ca.askmen.com/dating/love_tip_...Sperm-Jackers: The 5 Typeshttp://ca.askmen.com/dating/curtsmith...Zimbabwe 'Sperm Hunters' Acquitted Of Raping 17 Menhttp://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/...Terrence Popp - Redonkulas.comhttps://www.youtube.com/user/redonkul...BANKSY SPERM THIEF GOES TO TRIALhttp://animalnewyork.com/2012/banksy-...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A couple of days ago a user called iCareSoVeryDeeply left a comment on my youtube channel and this is what he had to say: "Hi Sandman, get an oculus rift, a massage chair, a shot of whiskey, and a Flesh Light. You'll get off so hard you won't care about robots, or women, or much of anything for about an hour. I speak from experience. I see a lot of sad underachievers in the masturbation department. If you're going to do it, do it right, and get that goofy high feeling you get from real sex, the kind that makes you feel great the next day." Well, that's what iCareSoVeryDeeply had to say and he got my attention. I've been thinking about what he said for the last few days. You see for me sex has always been about the feeling that I would get for a day to two days afterwards. When I've ejaculated with a woman and then feel so good in many cases that I don't need to be sexual for a day or two. My sexual appitite has been fully filled and I can go about my business. Pornography has only done this for a me a few times in my life so to think that there would be technology out there that would allow me to do that seriously got my attention. So if I'm to believe the tales of ICareSoVeryDeeply. Then I have to have four things covered on my list. Alcohol, check, an massage chair, well a good one will set me back a couple thousand dollars and a professional one will set me back ten thousand dollars. So I'll have to get all the other elements of the technology right before I move onto that one. And I can get a flesh light with three sleeves for about two hundred dollars. So I've been looking at that and think the Super Tight, Wonder Wave and the vortex sleeves seem to be the best. Then comes the most complicated part of this four step program the Oculus Rift itself and the technology associated with it. The problem with this technology is that it's still in it's infancywhen it comes to stimulating lifelike and real people in a virtual world. The closest thing I've seen to real is in two videos that I'm adding in the description below. These three videos are called Oculus Rift Video of Photo Realistic CG Women, Naked Virtual GIRLS EVERYWHERE! and HydraDeck Humans. The first one has a naked woman in heels over and over again and it's so incredibly photo realistic. You can fly around her in virtual space and see her complete body from all different angles. The third video called Hydradeck humans shows you how the 3D people are made. They aren't rendered from a 3D character. Instead they are photographed from all different angles in a large room that looks like a reverse holodeck. But instead of projecting images the reverse holodeck room looks like it has hundreds of cameras capturing a real person from many different angles. Technology like this combined with green screen is going to revolutionize the way that Hollywood films and pornography are going to be made. Oculus Rift Video of Photo Realistic CG Womenhttp://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d0e_13...Virtual GIRLS EVERYWHERE! Oculus Rifthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6Omz...HydraDeck Humanshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bytI...Oculus Rift DK1 - X360: live-action VR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JFc5...Oculus Rift just got its first title: Wicked Paradisehttp://www.dvice.com/2013-6-19/oculus...Tuscanyhttp://www.dailymotion.com/video/x16s...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Alan. And this is what Alan to say: "Hi Sandman, Please cover the recent GamerGate/Quinnspiracy controversy. I will understand if you don't cover it, so don't feel obligated to try and connect the event to MGTOW if the connection would be too far-fetched. I'd watch the video either way. Thanks!" Well that's what Alan wants me to do so I'll try and do it. This issue relates to men going their own way because video games have been one of the few escapes that men have had from the Gynocentric world. Men could go and play grand theft auto and take out their aggression on random 3D rendered characters in virtual worlds. I'm not going to lie, I enjoy driving cars around in Grand Theft Auto just to run over pedestrians and blow things up. This helps me get my testosterone filled aggression out so that I can go about my day. In recent years video games have actually started competing with pornography for male attention. Women must have sensed this so they started running into gaming culture to try and get some of that attention. And what really sucks is that women are going into virtual male fantasies and trying to sanitize them. They want to eliminate virtual violence against women. Real violent crime and rape statistics are declining in much of the western world so now feminists are going after virtual male violence against women. Feminist social justice are attacking gamers by entering the culture and trying to change it from within. And they are bringing up supposed misogyny in the gaming culture. But unlike Anita Sarkesian I don't have time to sit and play three to four hours a day worth of World of Warcraft. Don't worry I'm just joking. I know she's not really a real gamer and besides I'm reading that fifty four percent of gamers these days are now women. If gaming was a democracy women would be winning because they would be majority of voters. Many people say that democracy is like two wolves and a sheep voting to see who they'll have for dinner. I prefer to think of it as two women and one man voting about who is going to have the social, financial and political power in our society and who's going to become the utility. And since women make up the majority and have own group preference men are screwed if they play the game. Women gamers are also supposedly upset because they have been held back in the gaming business and industry. Last time I checked they have just as many opportunities to program and develop games. But instead of doing the hard work they seem to be either blaming men for not changing the culture to their liking or trying to sleep their way to the most influential positions in the gaming industry.Quinnspiracy Theory: The Five Guys Sagahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5-51...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Jagdesh, thank you for your support. Today I want to talk about a post I found on the Gizmodo website with regards to online dating. And I'm adding a link to that article in the description called Less-Attractive People Get The Most Online Dating Attention. This is something that I've suspected for a while now and it this article and video it links to confirms my suspicions. Say you're on a matchmaking site like OkCupid, Plenty of Fish, Tinder or Hot or Not. As you browse through the images of the women you notice the incredibly attractive women, they stick out to you but you say to yourself the odds are really slim that if I contact that girl she will get back to you. So you start looking at the average looking women and well, they just look fairly average. So there's nothing about them that sticks out so then you go down to the less attractive women. And as a man you start thinking to yourself, my sexual marketplace value is higher then this woman. She's at least two or three notches below me on the attractiveness scale so I'll contact her because she's probably dying for male attention. But if you're thinking that so are other guys. So what happens through online dating is that the weird looking and ugly looking people get a lot of the attention. And the normal and hot looking people get less attention. If you don't believe me check out the video from the link I provided and you'll see what I'm talking about. This is something I talked about in a recent video called women and technology and how less attractive women were getting more attention then they would have ever got in real life. But I didn't realize that since the majority of people date online now wouldn't it be ironic of the less attractive and ugly people were the ones getting all the action while the average looking people were just spending their Friday nights alone. It's like the world has been flipped on its head. The dynamics of the sexual marketplace are changing in strange ways that none of us could have predicted. So if you're a purple pill kind of guy or a level one MGTOW that still dates and has short term relationships you're better off meeting people in real life instead of online. Well at least if you believe what this video and article are saying. The video that's embedded in the article shares information about scientists that created online dating profiles to find out which ones got the most attention. In Japan this could explain why to some extent women are getting their teeth made crooked and fang like to look imperfect and to look like younger. I think that the name of the game going forward is going to be people attracted to people that look unusual. People that look different then everyone else. Almost like a one of a kind craft show dating game. The idea I guess would be to look 100% perfect but then have one or two small things on your body that look different then everyone else. What do you guys think? Science: Less-Attractive People Get The Most Online Dating Attentionhttp://www.gizmodo.com.au/2014/03/sci...Why are Japanese women paying hundreds of pounds to make perfectly straight teeth look crooked and fang-like?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/art...Women And Prescription Drugs: One In Four Takes Mental Health Medshttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Elliot. Thank you for your support. Elliot didn't have a specific question so I'm going to discuss something brought up briefly in yesterday's video. And that's the issue of palimony. Palimony is essentially alimony but without the marriage contract. It's usually paid out by a man to his common law spouse after they stop living together. Basically it's spousal support without the state sanctioned wedding ceremony. And it works against both gay and straight couples. Martina Navratilova was sued by her female partner Judy Nelson in 1991. And Even Bill Maher the crown prince of MGTOW talk show hosts was sued by an ex girlfriend in 2004 for palimony. Nancy "Coco" Johnson his ex tried to beat him in court but the case was dismissed. This just goes to show that cohabitation is dangerous for men going their own way. And it can be just as dangerous as signing a wedding contract. Usually palimony is spousal support paid by on party in a relationship to the other party that stayed home and put work into the household. More often then not in it is the woman that stays home and gives up her career to take care of children, although that practice has been changing in recent years. This whole idea of palimony started back in 1976 when Michelle Triola Marvin took her ex-boyfriend Lee Marvin to court. This was the first time in American history where unmarried people could sue one another for property division after a relationship came to an end. There's even a famous soundbite that goes as follows: "If a man wants to leave his toothbrush at my house, he better bloody well marry me," she said after the 1979 trial. The whole situation went to an appeals court and she never got her money but the legal precedent had been set for future palimony cases. Michelle Marvin was awarded about one hundred thousand dollars for rehabilitation by the lawyer. She wanted 1.8 million. Half the money her boyfriend made while he was working. The rehabilitation money was awarded to her so she could transition from being the wife of a motion picture star to becoming a separate independent person. She didn't even get the hundred grand and Michelle Triola Marvin She later went on to marry actor Dick Van Dyke. So that was the world's introduction to palimony and it took a high profile celebrity case to get the ball rolling and for other people to realize they too could fight for money from their common law spouses or even girlfriends or boyfriends. Having any long term relationship even if you just leave your toothbrush at your girlfriends house can get you into trouble if you are helping her out financially. The precedent has been set. Right now palimony means couples that have been co-habituating for a long period of time. Usually 2 years where I live because that's the length of time it takes for common law to kick in. Michelle Triola Marvin dies at 75; her legal fight with ex-lover Lee Marvin added 'palimony' to the languagehttp://www.latimes.com/local/obituari...Dumped? Now Claim Palimony!http://idiva.com/news-relationships/d...I left the love of my life because I thought I could do better. Now I'm childless and alone at 42 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/art...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Women are quite happy to depend on the government if the father doesn't meet her expectations. Men are quite happy too, as higher taxes are a lot better than complete financial annihilation through divorce. Governments love higher taxes. Many same sex couples are going to want children. As the decline in heterosexual “marital” relationships continues (and it will), more and more will opt for same sex relationships/domestic partnerships/cohabitation. Traditionalist views on relationships will gradually become extinct (like the dodo and dinosaur). Polygamist like relationships and/or the broad acceptance of polygamist domestic partnerships among heterosexuals, bisexuals, homosexuals and lesbians will become more popular as well. Female empowerment means that there are fewer men capable of providing for a family (hence the decline of marriage). Women want the highest paying, most prestigious jobs for themselves. As divorce is nearly a death sentence for bread winning males, men are opting out of marriage and family. Most every bread winning man now knows the devastating consequences that divorce can have on their lives. The result of divorce is often severe psychological, emotional, legal, physical and financial destruction. For these reasons, men will continue to opt out of marriage and family or resort to cohabitation as a lessor of the two evils. As women become the majority of breadwinners (and they will), they’ll feel the same way. Feminism taught women that marriage was slavery. Bread winning men now know that marriage is a death trap (took them long enough). Both sides are in many ways correct. Women were at one point in time abused in marriage and through divorce, left destitute. They're not going back to those times. For the past several decades, the shoe has been on the other foot and it's mostly men that have been destroyed through divorce. Men are opting out in ever growing numbers. The liberal/feminist model of heterosexual marriage has and will continue to fail. Most men aren't going to allow themselves to be ruled by women in relationships. Women think they want to have power over men in relationships, but have no respect for and are repulsed by the men that aren't at least their equal in terms of education, finances and social standing. Both sides under the liberal/feminist model are far more promiscuous, more likely to commit adultery and more likely to indulge in infidelity – even in the face of STDs. The playing field for the worst in human behavior is level under the feminist/liberal model.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

"Hi Sandman my question is I'm a Canadian who lives in Toronto for at least 5 years now, and I've noticed that since the Slut Walk phenomenon, that Toronto is very anti-male while women are free to pursue anything without opposition, including activities which may be criminal such as female teacher and student relations. Do you see an increase in predatory female teachers in the near future because men 18+ have gone their own way? Thank You." Well that's what he has to say. Anyways, first of all there are other places where you are more likely to find female sexual predators. Most female teachers aren't going to jeopardize their careers and retirement to sleep with a seventeen year old student when they can go out to a cougars night at Crocodile Rock or Blue Suede Sues here in Toronto and find a young guy in his early to mid twenties and rob the cradle that way. So no I don't think that we are going to see an increase in teachers going after their students because there are more MGTOWs. But then again this is Toronto after all the most popular city for MGTOW on the planet. I also have some amazing news about something I just saw on google trends today. Apparently the interest in MGTOW is now ten times more then it was just a week ago. Not ten percent higher, but ten times higher. I'm not sure if this is just some random spike in traffic or if it symbolizes the beginning of the a MGTOW super-spike and a situation where interest in MGTOW goes exponential. Before this spike MGTOW was already growing at an exponential hockey stick pattern growth rate. And I've also noticed that my traffic has increased about thirty percent in the last week or so. Not sure what's going on out there but when I look at the youtube comments section I'm seeing more new users and posters then at any point before. It's exciting to see that eleven to twelve thousand men are now coming through my youtube page each and every day. There are more daily viewers then subscribers and it keeps growing. Anyways, now on with the topic, Female Teacher Predators. With regards to personal stories I've heard about female teachers trying to take advantage of students I've heard one story in the last couple of years. I heard that from one of my clients that another one of my clients was making sexual comments and hitting on a guy dude that was sixteen. Nothing happened between them and apparently he was disgusted that a middle aged woman would be hitting on him. She sees herself as all that and a bag of chips. She was a music teacher and although I don't have any proof that she actually hit on this sixteen year old. But she would often make sexual comments to me all the time as well. I was disgusted and no longer work with her. Florida Epidemic: Teachers Sleeping with Studentshttp://content.time.com/time/nation/a...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Marcus Brown. He didn't have a specific topic he wanted to cover so I've decided to dedicate this topic to him. All the footage you are seeing from Busker-fest that happened here in Toronto a few weeks ago. Anyways, a couple of my friends and I got together and started talking about the idea that girls that have been riding the cock carousel for many years decide to stop at some point and avoid having sexual intercourse for a few year or more when they start looking for a man to settle down with. The goal is reduce some of the damage they've gotten by having too many men inside of them. And if a woman abstains from sex or inserting anything into her vagina for a few years she becomes vaginally tighter. So it's a way to deceive men about the number of guys she's slept with. Effectively she's trying to put back together her humpty dumpy hymen. In the body-shop world this is the equivalent to slapping on a fresh coat of paint onto a rusting car and inserting a new stereo system. But a few months later the rust will eat through the pain and the stereo will start to shake the car apart. That girl called Sailor Spoon I was telling everyone about didn't like the idea of male penetration. She thought that intercourse destroyed her value in the sexual marketplace. She told me that there was a guy she slept with a year before she met me that she regretted sleeping with. She never gave me the exact number of men she slept with but I brought this concept of the born again virgin with my friends and they thought I should definitely talk about it on my channel. I have heard several women in my own life that say that they are born again virgins. To me that means the guy they try to find and marry will never get to experience all the great things she did sexually with other guys before you. In today's world the number of men a woman sleeps with is a guarded number that only her friends know. If you ever want to the true number get her best friend drunk and ask her that question. There's a good chance she'll tell you. Or ask one of her female friends boyfriends to see if he knows. It's kind of ironic that the number of sexual partners has become one of women's most closely protected secrets. And many of the blogs, websites and articles I found on the internet claim that a woman becomes a born again virgin after not having sex for over a year.Selena Gomez Is Now A ‘Born-Again Virgin’ After Justin Bieber Betrayalhttp://hollywoodlife.com/2014/05/28/s...The Cult of the Born-Again Virgin: How Single Women Can Reclaim Their Sexual Powerhttp://www.amazon.com/The-Cult-Born-A...Women Have Surgery to 'Restore' Virginityhttp://abcnews.go.com/2020/WomensHeal...Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

And this is what Esteban has to say: "Hi Sandman, I've had many married friends in my time, and there's a pattern that's repeated itself over and over. Before they were married, my friends had lots of time to spend with their male friends. Afterward, not so much, and that's fine. Keeping a marriage working is a full-time job and it's unreasonable to expect the same kind of contact we had as single guys. What I find is that when I visit, I end up spending an inordinate amount of time with my friend's wife instead of him. She never works the kinds of hours he does, so she & I are together more than I am with him. Additionally, she has to be included in any activity we do together, and if I get any alone time with my friend it's after his wife has gone to bed--and that's maybe half an hour at the end of the day. Maybe I'm being selfish, but it seems strange that she & I can be without him, but he & I are not allowed to be without her. At first, it's a minor inconvenience. But after a while I find myself being treated like a second husband, including overt criticism if I haven't met her emotional needs. And this isn't a single couple; it's with nearly every married couple I've known over the last twenty years. What are your thoughts?" Well, that's what Esteban has to say. And comments are question about female nature are absolutely dead on. It's clear that women want to be included when guys hang out because in that way a woman can act like filter to make sure men aren't talking about her. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Women need men to adopt politically correct and woman friendly attitudes. Men have to behave well and be constantly put in their place. If you observe female behavior it's almost like they make many men feel like they are unable to manage their own emotions and require a woman to help navigate the emotional issues that men face. Women don't trust the way that men feel and think so they try to guide male action into a direction that is more suited towards their own needs. At the same time some women understand that if they cut their boyfriends and husbands off from their friendships entirely it makes them look like the bad ones. So they want their men to continue interacting with each other but only in ways that are socially acceptable. That's why women throw dinner parties so that everyone can socialize and be controlled and men can be herded around like a flock of sheep. Men that can think for themselves are a dying breed. We have advertising telling us what to buy. We have women telling us how to feel and we have the state making sure we do what we are supposed to at all times. Esteban you're just seeing the emotional prison your friends wife is trying to construct for you. Your friends wife is most likely interacting with you when your friend is not around for a number of different reasons. She might be assessing if you will be a negative influence on her man. She needs to determine if you are going to say or do anything that could potentially lead to him walking away in the future. She is acting the part of the psychologist.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy