Short Circuit

Introducing two IJ attorneys from Texas, Arif Panju and Christie Hebert, who discuss two Texan cases from the Fifth Circuit. Arif explains why some voting rights groups lacked standing to challenge changes to Texas' voting laws. Christie tells the story of "and" under the First Step Act and how two Fifth Circuit Texan judges strongly disagree.

Diana Simpson, IJ member, joins as a guest to discuss hot-off-the-press opinions on ballot access and voting rules for the 2022 election. They talk about cases in federal and state courts involving laws in Pennsylvania, Nebraska, Nevada, Alaska, Georgia, and the town of Mason, Tennessee. The podcast also announces the first appearance of Richard Nixon.

Live from New York City, the podcast features three former Second Circuit clerks discussing recent cases, including defamation against Trump, qualified immunity in a dog bite case, and the irrational classification of marijuana. They also reflect on their time working for the court.

Andrew Ward and Bob Belden discuss a case challenging Kentucky's Certificate of Need law. They highlight the difficulties faced by two Nepali entrepreneurs trying to open a home health agency. The discussion revolves around the weaknesses of the rational basis test and the need for federal court protection of economic liberty. They also explore a case involving foreclosure and the violation of property rights. The panel delves into the history of equity and law, analyzing its impact on property rights and contracts.

The podcast discusses the issue of pretextual stops by police and questions their legitimacy. It also examines a court case involving the Americans with Disabilities Act and the complexities of standing. The concept of 'cleaned up' in legal documents is explored as well.

"Short Circuit" brings two Yale Law School alumni, David Lat and Michael Yaeger, to discuss their experiences working on the Ninth and Third Circuits. Topics include a speech-and-licensing case involving the First Amendment, the differences between federal parole and compassionate release, a First Amendment violation case, and the significance of Younger versus Harris in federal courts. An entertaining conversation filled with legal insights.

Justin Pearson from IJ and Professor Andrew Hessick of UNC discuss Supreme Court cases ranging from property rights to anti-discrimination laws. They explore the complexities of the cases, predict potential outcomes, and highlight the importance of considering long-term impact. The podcast also delves into the regulation of speech, consequences of non-binding commentary, and potential outcomes of removing race from admissions.

The podcast discusses a case where prison officials failed to provide necessary medication to a detoxing inmate, resulting in his death. It explores the violation of the Eighth Amendment and the concept of qualified immunity. The podcast also delves into the challenge of suing about unpaid taxes and having your passport taken away. It raises questions about the right to international travel. Additionally, there is a discussion on COVID's impact on global travel and the use of the Gluxberg standard.

Montana Supreme Court cases on government immunity, racial balance on juries, and voting rights discussed at a symposium. Attorneys share experiences of attending a game and involvement in a voting rights case. Exploration of collective defense for cities, value of oral arguments, impact of implicit bias, and voting restrictions on young people. Discrepancy in fees for prison litigation and navigating complicated laws also discussed.

They discuss the limitations of suing the government for violations of rights, highlighting recent cases. The Tenth Circuit denies a prisoner's chance to sue a prison guard due to a recent Supreme Court decision. In contrast, the Michigan Supreme Court recognizes a remedy for violations of the state constitution. They explore the relationship between the FTCA and constitutional violations. They delve into constitutional harms caused by government actions, emphasizing free speech and the role of the judiciary.