Steve Vladeck

Joining the conversation are Steve Vladeck, a law professor renowned for his expertise on military justice and national security, and Julia Gegenheimer, a former DOJ prosecutor now at Georgetown Law. They delve into the complexities of the Insurrection Act, discussing its historical context and why Trump's potential invocation could overstep legal boundaries. Julia raises alarms about the Justice Department’s lack of accountability in cases like Renee Good’s killing, emphasizing the troubling implications of a politicized DOJ and excessive force in policing.

Steve Vladeck, Georgetown law professor and Supreme Court expert, discusses how congressional abdication and strategic litigation let courts reshape economic rules. He outlines how docket control, interest groups, and institutional incentives shifted power. Short, sharp takes on who benefits, what Congress could do, and why rule-of-law erosion threatens markets.

Elliot Williams, journalist and former DOJ official who wrote Five Bullets, and Steve Vladeck, legal scholar and commentator, dig into SCOTUS developments. They discuss lower-court noncompliance, ethics and stock-rule tweaks, upcoming asylum and Second Amendment arguments, and the Bernie Goetz subway shooting’s place in 1980s New York and modern gun politics.

Steve Vladeck, a Georgetown University law professor and expert in national security law, dives into President Trump's controversial claims about deploying the National Guard in cities like Chicago. He highlights the legal hurdles for federalizing the Guard in states compared to D.C., where the President holds direct command. While addressing public skepticism and constitutional constraints, Vladeck underscores the delicate balance between community safety and civil liberties, shedding light on the military's role in domestic affairs.

Jamelle Bouie, an opinion columnist at The New York Times, Sherrilyn Ifill, a civil rights lawyer and founding director at Howard University, and Steve Vladeck, a Georgetown Law professor, join the discussion. They dive deep into the Supreme Court's recent term, unpacking the major rulings on reproductive rights and LGBTQ issues. The panel critiques the shadow docket's implications, explores the evolving judicial integrity, and highlights the importance of historical context in court decisions. Their insights reflect broader trends affecting marginalized voices and judicial activism.

In a compelling discussion, Steve Vladeck, a Georgetown Law professor and Substack author, Mike Sacks, a former legal journalist and congressional candidate, and Bec Ingber, a legal scholar and ex-counselor on international law, delve into pressing legal issues. They tackle the implications of military intervention and the War Powers Resolution, dissect recent Supreme Court decisions, and highlight Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's vision for the court's future. Their insights on corporate influence and the erosion of judicial integrity shed light on today's legal landscape.

Steve Vladeck, a law professor and author of The Shadow Docket, teams up with Sarah Isgur, SCOTUSblog editor and legal analyst, to dissect the latest Supreme Court term. They dive into the implications of justices' decisions on executive power and judicial transparency. The pair also highlights recent rulings impacting immigration and birthright citizenship while speculating on the court's future direction. Their insights reveal the powerful dynamics at play within the Court and the ongoing challenges to judicial legitimacy.

Steve Vladeck, a law professor and Supreme Court expert, joins to dissect legal absurdities surrounding a hoagie-tossing acquittal and the dubious Comey indictment. They explore how jury instructions shaped the sandwich verdict and why the Comey case seems doomed to fail. Transitioning to Trump's tariffs, Vladeck explains critical Supreme Court arguments and the implications of delegation power. He reveals justices' skepticism over the administration's claims and predicts a decision that could reshape tariff laws, hinting at significant consequences for U.S. businesses.

LaMonica McIver, a member of Congress from New Jersey's 10th District, discusses her controversial oversight visit to an ICE facility and the absurd criminal charges she faces. Legal analyst Steve Vladeck breaks down the complex dynamics of emergency orders, especially regarding SNAP funding disputes, explaining Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's urgent administrative stay. The conversation highlights the intersection of politics, accountability, and judicial processes, all while keeping a light-hearted tone with audience engagement and trivia.

Steve Vladeck, a law professor and CNN Supreme Court analyst, teams up with Gary Schmitt, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, to dissect President Trump's executive orders since January 2025. They delve into legal challenges surrounding appropriated funds and the tension between Congressional authority and executive power. The duo discusses controversial orders affecting gender definitions and military policy, as well as the implications of a new advisory board at USAID. Their insights reveal the ongoing constitutional battles shaping American governance.