Ruth Marcus

Ruth Marcus, a legal analyst for The New Yorker, and Jeannie Suk Gersen, a Harvard constitutional law professor, dive into the legal chaos during the Trump era. They tackle controversial topics like birthright citizenship and ICE practices, debating the implications of recent rulings. Listeners’ questions reveal the unprecedented nature of these legal challenges, prompting a discussion about the evolving relationship between the courts and the executive branch. They emphasize the importance of understanding these dynamics in today’s political climate.

Ruth Marcus, a former Washington Post columnist and author, joins Yale Law School's James Forman, an expert on mass incarceration, alongside Stephen Cook from the Council on Foreign Relations. They dive into the implications of Trump's recent bombings in Iran and a pivotal New York Democratic primary win for Zohran Mamdani. The trio discusses a whistleblower's shocking revelations about Trump’s judicial nominees and the ongoing ethical dilemmas within the Justice Department, highlighting the urgent need for accountability in politics.

Ruth Marcus, a contributing writer at The New Yorker specializing in law, joins to dissect Trump’s 'revenge tour' and the indictment of James Comey. They explore how Trump's retaliatory strategies challenge legal norms and might endanger public officials and their families. Marcus reveals the indictment's weak legal foundation and discusses why Comey was targeted first. The conversation dives into the implications of Trump's tactics on the Justice Department and questions whether the cycle of political retribution can be broken.

Ruth Marcus, a columnist for The New Yorker and author of *Supreme Ambition*, dives deep into the turbulent relationship between Trump and the judiciary. She discusses how Trump's legal strategies seem to be backfiring in lower courts while the Supreme Court exhibits surprising deference to presidential power. Marcus highlights crucial immigration cases and the implications of recent rulings, questioning the Court's checks on Trump. With a conservative majority, she explores what this may mean for the balance of power moving forward.

Ruth Marcus, a columnist for The New Yorker and author of "Supreme Ambition," discusses her critical experience at the Washington Post and her insights on Trump’s legal strategies. She analyzes how Trump's expansive view of presidential power faces rebukes in lower courts but gains unexpected support from the Supreme Court. Marcus questions whether the conservative majority will ultimately check Trump's authority or yield to it, highlighting the implications for constitutional rights and judicial integrity.

Ruth Marcus, a contributing writer at The New Yorker, delves into the controversial tenure of U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. She discusses Bondi's close alignment with Trump and her significant influence on the Justice Department, raising concerns about its integrity. The podcast highlights Bondi's mismanagement of the Jeffrey Epstein case and the backlash it generated. Marcus also examines the broader implications of Bondi's political maneuvers and the lasting impact on the department amidst a culture of fear and turmoil.

Ruth Marcus, a legal issues writer for The New Yorker, and Jeannie Suk Gersen, a Harvard law professor, dive deep into the legal controversies surrounding Trump. They tackle birthright citizenship, examining the Supreme Court's recent rulings and the potential erosion of voting rights. The duo debates the legality of ICE practices and the challenges naturalized citizens face. With contrasting views on judicial authority, they explore how politics clash with the rule of law in these unprecedented times and invite listeners to ponder future legal complexities.

Ruth Marcus, longtime Washington Post columnist now at The New Yorker, offers an insider take on the Post's drastic newsroom cuts and what they mean for national journalism. Short takes cover owner-driven opinion shifts, massive layoffs and lost newsroom apprenticeship, AI's complex effects on reporting, and how a shrunken Post changes the public square.

Ruth Marcus, a contributor to The New Yorker and author of Supreme Ambition, analyzes significant recent Supreme Court decisions. She highlights Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissenting perspective, especially on birthright citizenship, and the ideological divides within the court. The discussion covers the implications of executive power and judicial checks, raising concerns about the legitimacy of the court amid political pressures. They also debate potential judicial reforms and explore the evolving nature of constitutional interpretation in this charged environment.

Ruth Marcus, a contributor to The New Yorker and author of 'Supreme Ambition,' joins Yale professor James Forman, known for 'Locking Up Our Own,' and Steven Cook from the Council on Foreign Relations. They dive into Trump’s controversial bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities, exploring its complex geopolitical implications. The discussion shifts to Zohran Mamdani’s surprising victory in New York’s Democratic primary, highlighting grassroots strategies and voter demands for authenticity. They also touch on ethical concerns in judicial practices, bringing light to significant legal challenges.