Mupan / Mr. Muthan (Opposing Counsel)
Lead counsel for respondents challenging Idaho's law, arguing that as-applied equal protection review should allow exceptions for transgender women who have mitigated sex-based advantages.
Best podcasts with Mupan / Mr. Muthan (Opposing Counsel)
Ranked by the Snipd community
Jan 13, 2026 • 1h 52min
Little v. Hecox
Ms. Hartnett, advocate for Lindsay Hecox who argues Idaho’s ban ignores mitigated sex-based advantages. Mr. Mupan/Muthan, opposing counsel pressing limits on as-applied relief and Title IX interpretation. Mr. Hurst, Idaho appellate counsel defending sex-based sports classifications for fairness and safety. They debate whether categorical rules or individual exceptions should govern sports, how to define sex, and the scope of equal protection review.
