Joe Schmid

A PhD student in philosophy at Princeton University, Joe Schmid, explores arguments for atheism, discussing topics like non-resistance in non-belief, the role of geography in Christianity, religious diversity, and the atheist argument from the scale of the universe. They delve into the nature of God's omnipotence, the connection between God and goodness, and the comparison of good and evil God hypotheses. The podcast also examines material causation, the improvability argument against God's existence, and philosophical arguments for atheism.

Joe Schmid, an agnostic philosopher and Princeton doctoral researcher, and Dan Paterson, founder of Questioning Christianity and Christian apologist, debate divine hiddenness. They tackle Schellenberg’s argument, evidential versus deductive approaches, religious demographics, silence in suffering, moral‑growth defenses, inclusivism, and why God might delay revelation. Quick, lively, and provocative dialogue.

Joe Schmid, co-author of "Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs," dives deep into the philosophical nuances of existential inertia and its implications for the existence of God. He explores the historical roots of the concept, discussing how persistence and metaphysical perspectives shape our understanding of divine intervention. The conversation also covers Neoplatonic arguments for a non-composite first cause and critiques various proofs for God's existence. With engaging banter, they simplify complex ideas, making philosophy accessible and thought-provoking.

Gavin Ortlund, President of Truth Unites and theologian, teams up with Joe Schmid, a Princeton PhD student and philosopher. They delve deep into the ontological argument, revealing its historical journey from Anselm to modern thinkers. The dialogue examines the tension between existence and conceptual greatness using whimsical superheroes as a backdrop. They also tackle the complexities of divine attributes like justice and mercy, questioning whether God's essence can be reasoned. The conversation is rich with insights for both believers and skeptics.

In this enlightening discussion, philosopher Joe Schmid tackles the differences between academic and public philosophy. He argues that anyone engaged in philosophical thought can be considered a philosopher, challenging traditional notions of authority. Schmid highlights the appeal of continental philosophy for its relatability, compared to the technical barriers of analytic philosophy. He advocates for a synthesis of both approaches to make philosophical ideas more accessible, touching on contemporary issues like the simulation hypothesis and NFTs.