Hurst (Counsel for Idaho)
Appellate counsel representing the State of Idaho in the Little v. Hecox argument, defending Idaho's Fairness in Women's Sports Act and arguing for upholding the sex-based classification in sports.
Best podcasts with Hurst (Counsel for Idaho)
Ranked by the Snipd community
Jan 13, 2026 • 1h 52min
Little v. Hecox
Ms. Hartnett, advocate for Lindsay Hecox who argues Idaho’s ban ignores mitigated sex-based advantages. Mr. Mupan/Muthan, opposing counsel pressing limits on as-applied relief and Title IX interpretation. Mr. Hurst, Idaho appellate counsel defending sex-based sports classifications for fairness and safety. They debate whether categorical rules or individual exceptions should govern sports, how to define sex, and the scope of equal protection review.
