Hartnett (Counsel for Respondent Hecox)
Advocate for the individual plaintiff (Lindsay Hecox), arguing that Idaho's categorical exclusion fails heightened equal protection scrutiny as applied to transgender women who have mitigated sex-based advantages.
Best podcasts with Hartnett (Counsel for Respondent Hecox)
Ranked by the Snipd community
Jan 13, 2026 • 1h 52min
Little v. Hecox
Ms. Hartnett, advocate for Lindsay Hecox who argues Idaho’s ban ignores mitigated sex-based advantages. Mr. Mupan/Muthan, opposing counsel pressing limits on as-applied relief and Title IX interpretation. Mr. Hurst, Idaho appellate counsel defending sex-based sports classifications for fairness and safety. They debate whether categorical rules or individual exceptions should govern sports, how to define sex, and the scope of equal protection review.
