General Sauer

In this discussion, General Sauer, representing President Trump, dives into the 14th Amendment's original meaning and challenges around judicial power with universal injunctions. Mr. Feigenbaum, advocating for CASA Inc., contrasts states' injuries with the breadth of typical injunctions. Lastly, Ms. Corcoran emphasizes the significance of universal injunctions in defending against executive actions. Together, they navigate complex legal terrains regarding citizenship rights, historical precedents, and the evolving role of district courts in addressing these crucial constitutional debates.

Ms. Wong, respondent counsel defending broad birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment. General Sauer, senior government advocate arguing for a narrower, domicile-based reading. They spar over whether citizenship hinges on territorial birth or parental allegiance, the role of Wong Kim Ark, historical sources about temporary sojourners, and how statutes should align with constitutional meaning.

General Sauer, a senior government appellate advocate, discusses the complexities of presidential removal authority concerning Governor Cook's mortgage misrepresentations. Mr. Clement, representing Cook, argues for the independence of the Federal Reserve, highlighting the importance of procedural limits on removal. They delve into whether inadvertent errors constitute 'cause' for removal, the standards of judicial review, and the implications of their arguments on the separation of powers, all while the justices challenge and probe the nuances of the case.