David E. Sanger

David E. Sanger, New York Times national security correspondent, and Mark Mazzetti, New York Times investigative reporter on intelligence, discuss the U.S.-Israeli strikes that killed Iran’s supreme leader. They explore whether this marks open war, how the crisis escalated, Iran’s immediate and longer-term responses, and regional and global fallout.

David E. Sanger, The New York Times’ White House and international security correspondent, delves into the ramifications of the U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. He examines whether this bold action truly dismantled Iran's nuclear capabilities or merely ignited further conflict. Sanger discusses the advanced military technology used, Iran's restrained response, and the potential fallout for U.S.-Iran relations. The conversation also covers the political implications of such military actions and historical decisions Iran might consider moving forward.

David E. Sanger, a White House and national security correspondent for The New York Times, dives into the alarming breach of the U.S. telephone network by Chinese hackers. He reveals how outdated infrastructure was exploited, leading to serious national security concerns. Sanger discusses China's evolving cyber capabilities under Xi Jinping, marking a shift in power dynamics. The conversation also touches on the urgency of encrypted communications and the wider implications of these incidents for global cybersecurity strategies.

David E. Sanger, a seasoned White House correspondent for The New York Times, joins President Trump for a revealing conversation. They explore Trump's perspective on the U.S. role in Venezuela, where he expresses a strong view on American intervention. The discussion touches on international law, with Trump asserting his authority over it. Sanger notes Trump's evolving stance on immigration, revealing unexpected support for reform. Additionally, Trump claims artificial intelligence will boost job creation, painting an optimistic picture of the economy.

David E. Sanger, White House and national security correspondent for The New York Times, walks through the U.S. military buildup near Iran. He covers what the U.S. wants from Tehran. He maps potential targets and the risks of escalation. He explores Israel's role and whether military pressure is a bargaining chip.

In this fascinating discussion, Kim Barker, a New York Times reporter on the Ukraine war, shares the intense Ukrainian backlash against a controversial peace plan perceived as pro-Russian. She highlights the deep sense of capitulation felt by Ukrainians and connects it to ongoing corruption scandals affecting President Zelensky's leadership. David E. Sanger analyzes the plan's Kremlin-like origins and the internal U.S. divisions that influenced its creation. Together, they explore the diplomatic complexities and the urgent need for a viable solution amid a turbulent backdrop.

Helene Cooper, a Pentagon correspondent for The New York Times, and David E. Sanger, the White House and National Security Correspondent, delve into Israel's recent military actions against Iran and their implications for regional stability. They discuss the provocations surrounding a planned U.S. military parade, a controversial decision influenced by political motives. The duo also explores the fraught history of U.S.-Israel relations, the intersection of military displays with democracy, and the diverse sentiments within the military regarding these events.

David E. Sanger, a White House correspondent for The New York Times, dives into Trump's bold new national security strategy, which shifts focus from promoting democracy to prioritizing wealth. He critiques the harsh stance on Europe, noting its portrayal as a declining partner and the strategy's surprising omissions regarding North Korea and Iran. Sanger discusses the pivot back to the Americas, including military actions in the Caribbean and efforts to curb Chinese influence. This deep analysis raises questions about the future of U.S. foreign policy and its impact on global alliances.

David E. Sanger, a White House and national security correspondent for The New York Times, guides listeners through the State of the Union. He recounts the room’s atmosphere, the speech’s three-part structure, heated partisan moments over immigration, and how foreign policy and economic claims were presented. He also weighs whether the address rose to the nation’s pressing challenges.

David E. Sanger, the White House and national security correspondent for The New York Times, delves into the high-stakes meeting between President Trump and Vladimir Putin. He highlights the strategic advantages for Putin, regardless of the outcome. The discussion covers the absence of Ukrainian representatives, raising skepticism about concessions made during negotiations. Sanger addresses the implications for NATO and the need for continued Western support in light of ongoing geopolitical tensions surrounding the war in Ukraine.