Andre Balazs Properties (represented by counsel Mr. Geiser)
Respondent in Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties; in this oral argument its counsel (Mr. Geiser) defended the position that a district court that stayed a case pending arbitration retains jurisdiction to decide post-arbitration FAA Section 9 and 10 applications under ordinary supplemental or original-jurisdiction principles.
Best podcasts with Andre Balazs Properties (represented by counsel Mr. Geiser)
Ranked by the Snipd community
Mar 30, 2026 • 55min
[25-83] Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties
Andre Balazs Properties (counsel Mr. Geiser), a property defendant defending federal court retention of jurisdiction after a Section 3 stay. Adrian Jules (counsel Mr. Unikowski), an employee challenging federal courts’ power to confirm or vacate arbitration awards without independent jurisdiction. They debate Badgerow and Kokkonen, Section 3 stays vs dismissal, supplemental and original jurisdiction, and practical enforcement and forum-shopping concerns.
