A left wing youtuber who has advocated for banning hate speech as found his criticism of Lauren Southern placed in "limited state" by youtube effectively censoring the content. in response another far left youtuber mirrored the video in an attempt to bypass the censorship.If these people feel no one has an obligation to host your content and that content that could cause harm should be removed why would they try to bypass censorship? if youtube says their video causes harm shouldn't they agree?Or is this actually about politics and not principle
Support the show (http://timcast.com/donate)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
