
Microsoft Research Podcast AI Testing and Evaluation: Learnings from genome editing
Jun 30, 2025
Alta Charo, emerita professor of law and bioethics, shares her expertise in biotechnology policy, focusing on the regulatory landscape of genome editing. She discusses the importance of differentiating hazards from risks in biotechnological advances. Daniel Kluttz from Microsoft dives into how lessons from genome editing can shape AI governance. The conversation emphasizes the need for ethical frameworks and international coordination in both fields, ensuring a responsible balance between innovation and oversight.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Regulating Applications, Not Tech
- Genome editing regulation targets its applications, not the technology itself.
- Multiple US agencies oversee different aspects based on use, like FDA for humans and EPA for environment.
Governing Biotech Faces Gaps
- Many regulations were not designed for modern biotech, causing jurisdiction ambiguity.
- International coordination is vital due to cross-border impact of biotech applications.
Balancing Innovation and Safety
- US biotech regulation balances pre-market approval for risky, novel products and post-market control for familiar ones.
- Regulation intensity depends on novelty and risk level of the genome-edited product.
