
In Bed With The Right Episode 134: Natural Law
May 5, 2026
A wide‑ranging tour of the natural law tradition, from Aristotle and Aquinas to Locke, Hobbes, and modern revivals. They trace how appeals to nature have justified gender roles, shaped jurisprudence, and been repurposed by both progressives and conservatives. The conversation flags risks of biological determinism, explores moral intuition versus reason, and shows why natural law remains politically potent.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Moral Feelings Can Motivate Natural Law Judgments
- 'Sensation' or visceral feeling plays a role in natural law reasoning but is unreliable.
- Daub uses Shepard Smith's Abu Ghraib reaction to show how moral sensation can assert normative claims ('We don't fucking torture').
Repugnance Is A Poor Moral Guide According To Nussbaum
- 'Wisdom of repugnance' argues visceral disgust signals moral truth, but critics like Martha Nussbaum say disgust encodes hierarchies and restricts liberty.
- The debate surfaced around cloning and gay marriage in bioethics.
Natural Law Can Be Anti-Authoritarian As Well As Traditionalist
- Natural law underpins both conservative tradition and modern critiques of authority: it can check sovereign power by appealing to preexisting moral standards.
- Roger Scruton frames natural law as modern because it contests royal or ecclesiastical fiat.







