
unSILOed with Greg LaBlanc 638. Why Nothing Works: How Progressivism’s Split Led to Today's Governance Gridlock with Marc J. Dunkelman
Apr 7, 2026
Marc J. Dunkelman, historian and fellow at Brown and the Searchlight Institute, studies American progressivism and community. He traces the split between decentralizing Jeffersonian impulses and centralizing Hamiltonian expertise. He explains how expanded rights and checks slowed decisive action, how eroding 'middle‑ring' ties fuel local conflict, and considers ways to restore measured discretion and civic repair.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Why Good Projects Stall Compared To Moses Era
- Marc J. Dunkelman noticed a historical reversal: mid-20th-century leaders like Robert Moses could push through bad projects, while today even widely supported projects like a new Penn Station stall.
- That contrast motivated Dunkelman to trace how rights expansions, litigation, and procedural checks shifted power away from discretionary technocrats and created modern gridlock.
From Moses To Stop Sign Frustration
- Dunkelman recalls reading The Power Broker and later working in politics, noticing the stark contrast between Moses's unilateral power and today's labyrinthine processes for simple fixes like a stop sign.
- He describes a congressman's office hitting federal guidelines that blocked installing a local stop sign, illustrating modern procedural friction.
Progressivism Split Between Bigness And Expertise
- Progressivism split into Jeffersonian anti‑bigness (Brandeis) and Hamiltonian centralized expertise (Roosevelt/Hamilton) despite shared progressive ends.
- Hamiltonians built big bureaucracies and authorities (e.g., Port Authority, TVA) to manage new national-scale problems rather than restore 19th-century smallness.










