Very Bad Wizards

Episode 63: Stalemates and Closets (with Sam Harris)

Feb 28, 2015
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ANECDOTE

Sam On Persistent Online Misrepresentation

  • Sam Harris recounts enduring repeated misrepresentations of his views online, which harmed his reputation despite clarifications.
  • He names examples like false claims about supporting nuclear strikes and torture circulated by journalists.
INSIGHT

Why Moral Responsibility Debates Stall

  • The 'stalemate' over moral responsibility arises because rival, irreducible intuitions about blame can persist even after reasoned exchange.
  • Progress requires showing some intuitions are indefensible or revealing how competing intuitions can be triangulated.
ADVICE

Name Your Moral Reasoning Style

  • When debating moral responsibility, explicitly state whether you're using consequentialist reasoning or reactive-attitude justifications.
  • Clarify the role of consequences in your account to avoid talking past opponents.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app