
The Cartesian Cafe Justin Clarke-Doane | Mathematics, Reality, and Morality
48 snips
Dec 6, 2024 Justin Clarke-Doane, Columbia philosophy professor and author of Morality and Mathematics, explores parallels between mathematical and moral realism. He discusses whether math realism forces moral realism, compares anti-realist options, and examines justification, indispensability to science, and evolutionary reliability. Short, sharp conversations about foundations, pluralism, and how values guide action.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Most Civilizations Didn't Axiomatize Geometry
- Historical math practice rarely relied on axiomatization; Greek axiomatization was atypical and modern foundational concerns rose only in the 19th century.
- Clarke-Doane notes many civilizations did advanced mathematics without Euclidean-style formal proof, so axioms are historically contingent.
Field Tried to Expunge Mathematical Entities
- Hartry Field and Quine attempted a fictionalist program to remove mathematical entities, treating math as representational machinery replaceable within naturalism.
- Field pursued a research program to reformulate science without Plato's beard, but Quine later reluctantly accepted Platonism as unavoidable.
Moral Realism Mirrors Math Realism
- Moral realism parallels mathematical realism: it claims independent moral facts (rightness, wrongness) exist that we can discover, not invent.
- Normative topics (ethics, epistemology, logic) share the same structure: categorical facts versus context-sensitive or hypothetical norms.




