Kash Patel’s Strategic, Frivolous Lawsuit Against The Atlantic
31 snips
May 7, 2026 Fabio Bertoni, The New Yorker’s general counsel and legal writer, breaks down Kash Patel’s $250M suit against The Atlantic. He walks through defamation law, the actual malice standard, and the risks of anonymous sources. He also discusses how such lawsuits could chill reporting and fit into a broader pattern of legal attacks on the press.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Actual Malice Creates A High Bar For Officials
- Defamation suits by public officials face a very high legal bar called actual malice.
- Fabio Bertoni explains plaintiffs must show the publisher knew the story was false or recklessly disregarded the truth, making such suits rare to win.
Patel Sued After Atlantic's Anonymous Drinking Allegations
- The Atlantic published dozens of anonymous accounts alleging Kash Patel drank on the job, prompting Patel to sue for $250 million.
- Patel denied the allegations, threatened litigation before publication, and filed suit the following Monday.
How Courts Evaluate Source Reliability
- Courts assess source quality, number, and verification when judging actual malice.
- Bertoni says reporters check whether sources had a reason to know, prompt-outcry witnesses, and documentary proof to avoid reckless-disregard findings.

